Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[b] Are you up to it?

33 views
Skip to first unread message

Ceredwyn Bensley

unread,
Apr 22, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/22/96
to
Could *you* be a member of the Four?

Do you have what it takes?

Take the following quiz, mercilessly stolen from another author on
the group...
Score one point for each answer :D

[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?
[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?
[3] Are you now or have you every been, committed into an
institution for the so called (H@h!) insane? (gain two points)
[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?
[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?
[6] Loose a point if you felt remorse.
[7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?
[8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?
[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?
[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)
[11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?
[12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
with your knives...
[13] Do you like Art?
[14] Do you like biological Art?
[15] Loose a point if any of your materials ever ran away.
[16] Loose a point if you ever believe one blow is enough.
[17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?
[18] Do you think the Fuddites are not taking strong enough measures?
[19] Do you love your Family?
[20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
sure if your sister is not also your uncle?
[21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
covers my face...killkillkill!
[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...
[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
I had realised he was a symp at heart.
[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?
[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
either serve the Four or be SPAM?

Scoring...
0-5 : Symp. We w1ll get y0u.
5-10 : A mere b0rderl1ne p$ych0t1c. Keep try1ng @nd perh@p$ 0ne d@y
y0u w1ll gr@du@te 1nt0 the $ch00l 0f l1fe @nd re@l1$e th@t
where y0ur true g0@l l1e$.
11-15: Better @nd better. Y0u w0uld m@ke @n excellent member 0f the
F0ur @nd we re$pect y0u f0r 1t. Keep up the g00d w0rk @nd
remember, the 0nly g00d dev1lbunny 1$ @n ev1$cer@ted
dev1lbunny.
16-20: Y0u kn0w the truth, even 1f th0$e p@wn$ d0n't! The F0ur 1$
the 0nly truth @nd the 0nly truth 1$ 1n the F0ur. K1ll the
r@bb1t, h0ld f@$t t0 Fr1th @nd Lun@, @nd pr@y th@t the j0y
y0u kn0w 1n the1r de@th$ w1ll be en0ugh t0 $t@ve 0ff the h@nd$
...the h@nd$ th@t c0me @t n1ght f0r y0u...1n the r@1n...mm..
mmh@h@@h@...hHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
21-25: <cr@zedg1ggle> Ye$$..$$$. Y0u under$t@nd. Y0u w1ll r1$e f@r
1n the r@nk$. Wh0 kn0w$? There @re be @cc1dent$ even
@m0ng$t the F0ur. Y0u m@y be the next Pe$t1l@nce...
25+ : <$hr1llg1ggl1ng> L0rd L1fe! We w@1t f()R thee 1n the
@pp01nted pl@ce!


^ ^ The Sibyl
\\// Join today! You'll love our health insurance!
{--}
[] +==+----oo-oo--+ Web Page :http://www-mugc.cc.monash.edu.au/~clben1
[]===|==| | | | ||)----------- De$tr()y the Ev!l! Get the F@Q fr0m:
[] +==+-----------+ http://www.xmission.com/~snowhare *n0w*!


Bubba

unread,
Apr 22, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/22/96
to
Bubba was intrigued. He had often wondered about
the Four and their little project. Here was a chance
to find out how he might fit in to the picture.


> Score one point for each answer :D
>
> [1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?

()h ye$. @b$0lute1y n()th1ng t0 !t. (Subtotal: +1)

> [2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?

I think so. It's difficult to be a traditionalist
Fuddite without going off the beaten ethical path. Half credit(+1.5)

> [3] Are you now or have you every been, committed into an
> institution for the so called (H@h!) insane? (gain two points)

Well, I did take a university degree. And I was subjected to stuffed
animal therapy and Snapple treatments, but survived.
That counts for a point. (+2.5)

> [4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?

Yes. (+3.5)

> [5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?

No. (+3.5)

> [6] Loose a point if you felt remorse.

I wouldn't have. (+3.5)

> [7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?

Yes. They even put me to sleep. (+4.5)

> [8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?

Yes. Absolutely obsessional. (+5.5)

> [9] Does ky00tness make you ill?

Yes. (+6.5)

> [10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)

It makes me want to kill, although I haven't always
been able to act on the impulse. Two points, I think. (+8.5)

> [11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?

Yes, and at its backside, too. Especially if danger takes the
form of LonGears. (+9.5)

> [12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
> with your knives...

Rarely. (+9.5)

> [13] Do you like Art?

Yes. I think he's really cool. (+10.5)

> [14] Do you like biological Art?

Oui. L'art biologique me plait beaucoup. (+11.5)

> [15] Loose a point if any of your materials ever ran away.

Damn! (+10.5)

> [16] Loose a point if you ever believe one blow is enough.

Never. (+10.5)

> [17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?

Ye$ @nd ! w@nt t() m@ke @ B@rney $nuff film. (+11.5)

> [18] Do you think the Fuddites are not taking strong enough measures?

No. We're doing what we can. (+11.5)

> [19] Do you love your Family?

Yes. (+12.5)

> [20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
> sure if your sister is not also your uncle?

No (+12.5)

> [21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
> covers my face...killkillkill!

Bad grammar is so off-putting. (+12.5)

> [22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...

Huh? (+12.5)

> [23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
> I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
> I had realised he was a symp at heart.

I wholly share the sentiment. (+13.5)

> [24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?

Yes, and I mock them and their foolish pretense to objectivity. (+14.5)

> [25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
> either serve the Four or be SPAM?

Well, I laugh at them and wish they could help us. Half credit. (+15)

A total of 15. Bubba looked at the scoring chart ...


> 11-15: Better @nd better. Y0u w0uld m@ke @n excellent member 0f the
> F0ur @nd we re$pect y0u f0r 1t. Keep up the g00d w0rk @nd
> remember, the 0nly g00d dev1lbunny 1$ @n ev1$cer@ted
> dev1lbunny.

WEll, !t 1$ g00d t() kn()w th@t there @re c@reer ()ption$ ava!lable.

Bubba, the Fuddite with Truck
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nebula purpura, tota in cerebro meo. | Newbies! Don't be confused like Jimi.
Nuper, res non eaedem videntur. | Get the alt. devilbunnies FAQ from
Ago ridicule, sed cur non scio. | http://www.xmission.com/~snowhare
Da me veniam, dum caelum osculo. |
-Jacobulus Hendrix |

Axe-Wielding Fuddite

unread,
Apr 23, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/23/96
to
In alt.devilbunnies, clb...@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au (Ceredwyn Bensley) wrote:

<Could *you* be a member of the Four?
<Do you have what it takes?

More importantly, are you missing the right things?

<Take the following quiz, mercilessly stolen from another author on
<the group...

<Score one point for each answer :D

<[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?

Yes. I've even \/\/r1tten s{}ftw@re t{} \/vr1te 1t! @lm{}$t w{}rk1ng!! J\/$t
@ fevv b\/g$!

<[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?

I prefer to think of them as 'rarified.'

<[3] Are you now or have you every been, committed into an
< institution for the so called (H@h!) insane? (gain two points)

No, but I once worked for the goverment. I think that counts.

<[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?

Yes. Repeatedly.

<[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?

Forgive me, but what is your security clearance?

<[6] Lose a point if you felt remorse.

What's that?

<[7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?

NO, but only because I start them, so I think that counts.

<[8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?

Yes.

<[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?

I'm inured to ky00tness. It doesn't affect me. Half point.

<[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)

Er, sorry, no.

<[11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?

Yes. But it's not a *nice* laugh.

<[12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
< with your knives...

Axes, not knives. Er. No. Not to speak of.

<[13] Do you like Art?

Yes!

<[14] Do you like biological Art?

Well, the Female Form...

<[15] Lose a point if any of your materials ever ran away.

Yes, well, but I caught her again. Doesn't count.

<[16] Lose a point if you ever believe one blow is enough.

Hit repeatedly. Hit often.

<[17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?

Yes. Normal rabbit is quite tasty.

<[18] Do you think the Fuddites are not taking strong enough measures?

Oh, yes.

<[19] Do you love your Family?

What's left of it. Yes.

<[20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
< sure if your sister is not also your uncle?

No.

<[21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
< covers my face...killkillkill!

Um...

<[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...

Er...

<[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
< I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
< I had realised he was a symp at heart.

Ah... I can at least *sympathise* with the general sentiment. "Kill da Wabbit!"

<[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?

Oh yes. Neutrals and their Froze-Toes... *We* know.

<[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
< either serve the Four or be SPAM?

No. I feel for the newbies. It is no easy thing to be clueless.

<16-20: Y0u kn0w the truth, even 1f th0$e p@wn$ d0n't! The F0ur 1$
< the 0nly truth @nd the 0nly truth 1$ 1n the F0ur. K1ll the
< r@bb1t, h0ld f@$t t0 Fr1th @nd Lun@, @nd pr@y th@t the j0y
< y0u kn0w 1n the1r de@th$ w1ll be en0ugh t0 $t@ve 0ff the h@nd$
< ...the h@nd$ th@t c0me @t n1ght f0r y0u...1n the r@1n...mm..
< mmh@h@@h@...hHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Those hands are generally Heather's, and I hardly ever stave them
off.

--
She has a *delightful* way of putting things. Er, Sibyl, that is.
Well, Heather too...

The Comedy Team from Hell

unread,
Apr 25, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/25/96
to
*PeSTiLEnCE*wRoTE*...

>Could *you* be a member of the Four?
>
>Do you have what it takes?
>
>Take the following quiz, mercilessly stolen from another author on
>the group...
>Score one point for each answer :D
>
>[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?
*Oh*YeS*,*MOsT*deFInITe1Y*.

>[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?
:)

>[3] Are you now or have you every been, committed into an
> institution for the so called (H@h!) insane? (gain two points)
*tW1Ce*. (4 p*ints?)

>[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?
*fUN*.

>[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?
*nOT*yEt*.
>[6] Loose a point if you felt remorse.

>[7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?
<snore>

>[8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?
<drool> *k!LL*tHeM*AlL*!

>[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?
<twitch><twitch> ...<TWITCH>

>[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)
]> +3.

>[11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?
:)

>[12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
> with your knives...
%}

>[13] Do you like Art?
%) %)

>[14] Do you like biological Art?
*0H*,*YeS*
>[15] Loose a point if any of your materials ever ran away.
<snort> *aMAtEUr$*.
>[16] Loose a point if you ever believe one blow is enough.
*fOr*WhAT*? *AppETiZErS*? *Or*A*BaZooKA*? *NaaaAaH*.

>[17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?
*No*.*ThE*sAcHHaRInE*,*y()U*kNOw*.*mAKEs*Me*IlL*

>[18] Do you think the Fuddites are not taking strong enough measures?
*jOHn*w1lL*LeARn*...*iN*TiME*. *i*HaVE*greAt*HopEs*f()r*HIm*.

>[19] Do you love your Family?
*mY*()tHEr*PerSoNALiTy*IS*TrOUbLEsoME*. *bUT*i*L()0oo0vE*mY*MurDOcH*.
*YeSS$sS*.

>[20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
> sure if your sister is not also your uncle?
*WhAT*aBOuT*a*Kn1FE*wH0*1S*mY*fAThER* *AnD*a*S()n*LiViNG*iN*MY*MiND*?

>[21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
> covers my face...killkillkill!
*stAy*oUT*Of*MY*DrEAM$*! <holdhead> *myheadISmYreFuGeIliVewIthiNmYheAD
STaYOUTOFMYHEADSTAYOUTOUTOUTOUTOUTOUT!!!!!*
>[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...
<sharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpen>
<inspect>
<squint>
<sharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpen...

>[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
> I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
> I had realised he was a symp at heart.
<nod> *sUCh*A*pITy*. <brightly> ...*bUT*aMUSinG*!!

>[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?
<soursmile>

>[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
> either serve the Four or be SPAM?
%) %) %)

<tallytallytallytally....

25!!!

<nodnodnod>

>Scoring...


>21-25: <cr@zedg1ggle> Ye$$..$$$. Y0u under$t@nd. Y0u w1ll r1$e f@r
> 1n the r@nk$. Wh0 kn0w$? There @re be @cc1dent$ even
> @m0ng$t the F0ur. Y0u m@y be the next Pe$t1l@nce...


<DING!>

*cAN*1*bE*aN*ArCHeTYpE*TOO*?!!

*pleAsE*plEASe*pLeaSE*? PLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASE????!!!!

Erik
<giggle>

LonGears

unread,
Apr 26, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/26/96
to

In article <10be5.fudd...@fuddites.net>, sm...@tiac.net (Axe-Wielding
Fuddite)
takes the Test of the Four:

[nibble]


> <[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?
>
> I prefer to think of them as 'rarified.'

Spirit knows they're not "well-done."


> <[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
> < either serve the Four or be SPAM?
>
> No. I feel for the newbies.

There are laws against that, McGregor.


> It is no easy thing to be clueless.

<bite tongue>

-- General LonGears

LonGears

unread,
Apr 26, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/26/96
to

In article <317BF8...@unity.ncsu.edu>, Bubba <dmj...@unity.ncsu.edu> takes
the Test of the Four:


[nibble]


> > [7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?
>

> Yes. They even put me to sleep. (+4.5)

In that case, let's have one.

-- General LonGears

It would put him out of our misery!

Remus Shepherd

unread,
Apr 26, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/26/96
to

The Sibyl wrote:
> Could *you* be a member of the Four?
> Do you have what it takes?

Why do they bother to recruit? All they need to do is throw a net around
a few institutions for the psychotically dangerous, and they'll have plenty
of shock troops...

> [1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?

N()p3. (+1)

> [2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?

Compared to whom? Um. Okay. (+2)

> [3] Are you now or have you every been, committed into an
> institution for the so called (H@h!) insane? (gain two points)

<blink>

(+4)

> [4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?

<sigh> Yes. (+5)



> [5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?

Well...does Lady DB count? ;) (+6)

(Sorry my dear...you do realize that I'm only taking this test
for humor value. <:) )

> [6] Loose a point if you felt remorse.

Not at all. :) (+6)

> [7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?

Yes, actually. (+7)

> [8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?

Um...what do you mean by fanatical? It's not something I could walk
away from, and it consumes most of my free time...not to mention that
that's what I do for a living...hmmn. (+8)

> [9] Does ky00tness make you ill?

Definite, and very extreme, mental effects. :( (+9)

> [10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)

You could rephrase this to 'are you a psycho', you know. (+9)

> [11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?

<smile> It's a trademark. (+10)

> [12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
> with your knives...

Another 'psycho' question... (+10)

> [13] Do you like Art?

Yes. (+11)

> [14] Do you like biological Art?

Do genetic experiments count? (+12)

> [15] Loose a point if any of your materials ever ran away.

Nope...that's what cages and petri dishes are for... :) (+13)

> [16] Loose a point if you ever believe one blow is enough.

<blink> Now *this* question can be read several different ways. :/
I think I'll just ignore it, to be safe.

> [17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?

I've had some very good dinner conversations with fluffy rabbits. (+13)

> [18] Do you think the Fuddites are not taking strong enough measures?

They could be much more effective. (+14)



> [19] Do you love your Family?

Yes, of course. (+15)

> [20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
> sure if your sister is not also your uncle?

Only Sibyl would ask this. :/ (+15)

> [21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
> covers my face...killkillkill!

> [22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...


> [23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
> I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
> I had realised he was a symp at heart.

...I'm not sure I understand the questions. I'm not sure I want to.



> [24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?

Um...only in private. <:) I was there once, you see, and well...
it's kinda funny, realizing what an idiot I was... <:) (+16)

> [25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
> either serve the Four or be SPAM?

Give me a break. (+16)

Hmmn.

> 16-20: Y0u kn0w the truth, even 1f th0$e p@wn$ d0n't! The F0ur 1$
> the 0nly truth @nd the 0nly truth 1$ 1n the F0ur. K1ll the
> r@bb1t, h0ld f@$t t0 Fr1th @nd Lun@, @nd pr@y th@t the j0y
> y0u kn0w 1n the1r de@th$ w1ll be en0ugh t0 $t@ve 0ff the h@nd$
> ...the h@nd$ th@t c0me @t n1ght f0r y0u...1n the r@1n...mm..
> mmh@h@@h@...hHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

This is not a very good questionnaire. :/ More importantly, this
is *not* a very good result.

...
Remus Shepherd (re...@netcom.com)
( I must have misunderstood some of the questions... :( )

Teral Acorn

unread,
Apr 26, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/26/96
to

clb...@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au (Ceredwyn Bensley) writes:

>Could *you* be a member of the Four?

>[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?

Yes! [bounce] I can even *understand* it! [flick]

>[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?

Unfortunately, yes. }:(

>[3] Are you now or have you every been, committed into an
> institution for the so called (H@h!) insane? (gain two points)

Nope. [flick]

>[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?

Like, duh.

>[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?

Maaaaaaybe.

>[6] Loose a point if you felt remorse.

Why would you feel remorse? [chitter] I hope no one would be crazy enough to
use an Omega weapon without being sure they were doing the right thing!!!!

>[7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?

[yaaaawn]

>[8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?

I'm not devoted to the war, I'm devoted to destroying the bunnies. [flick!]

>[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?

Nope. [flick] I'm immune. [flickflickflick]

>[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)

It doesn't *make* me do anything. [ruffle]

In fact, it has no effect on me whatsoever. [chitter]

>[11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?

Of course! It's selfish to laugh at others' misfortune and not at your own.

>[12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
> with your knives...

Do lasers count? [evilgrin]

>[13] Do you like Art?

Nah, never saw the point. [flick]

>[14] Do you like biological Art?

Bio-whatsis? Never heard of it. But I'm sure it would be as stupid as
non-biological art. [flick]

>[15] Loose a point if any of your materials ever ran away.

Er... I don't think this one applies.

>[16] Loose a point if you ever believe one blow is enough.

Strike first, strike fast, strike hard, then run like hell. [flick]

>[17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?

We're, like, herbivores. Mostly. [flick]

>[18] Do you think the Fuddites are not taking strong enough measures?

They need to be recruiting more aggressively!!! [chitter] If the war stays
secret, the bunnies might win!

>[19] Do you love your Family?

Family? Rodentia? Can't stand 'em.

Or... wait... rodents was the order, and scuiridae the family...

I like squirrels. [flick]

>[20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
> sure if your sister is not also your uncle?

Most of my family relationships involve nonsentient rodents, who rarely keep
records. }:) So, yes.

>[21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
> covers my face...killkillkill!

Er... you left out the question... [chitter]

>[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...

[blink][blink]

>[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
> I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
> I had realised he was a symp at heart.

Kill! [chatter!] Symps should all die! I hate traitors. [flick]

>[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?

No, I tend to sneer patronizingly at them. Does that count? }:)

>[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
> either serve the Four or be SPAM?

YM 'squirrels'. HTH. Otherwise, yes. [flick]

Hmm... the lucky number is... 13. [chitter]

>11-15: Better @nd better. Y0u w0uld m@ke @n excellent member 0f the
> F0ur @nd we re$pect y0u f0r 1t. Keep up the g00d w0rk @nd
> remember, the 0nly g00d dev1lbunny 1$ @n ev1$cer@ted
> dev1lbunny.

With the proper genetic modification, this could be changed. [flick]

===--------
Teral Acorn

Rev. Omnicynic

unread,
Apr 26, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/26/96
to

[Bubba's testing]


>> [2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?

>I think so. It's difficult to be a traditionalist


>Fuddite without going off the beaten ethical path. Half credit(+1.5)

What are these "ethics" things the bunny speaks of?


>> [7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?

>Yes. They even put me to sleep. (+4.5)

Much agreement. Why kill an impressionable young mind?


>> [12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
>> with your knives...

>Rarely. (+9.5)

It's a great hobby, Bubba. Wonderful timekiller.


>> [17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?

>Ye$ @nd ! w@nt t() m@ke @ B@rney $nuff film. (+11.5)

That can be arranged, ya know. What kind of money are ya talking about?


>> [22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...

>Huh? (+12.5)

In (mostly) proper grammar, Bubba: "Have to get a better edge," repeated.

>WEll, !t 1$ g00d t() kn()w th@t there @re c@reer ()ption$ ava!lable.

Yea, but ya gotta look at the dental plan as well. I assume that being part of
the Four you'd use your teeth more than normal, for instance.

R.O

The Colective

unread,
Apr 29, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/29/96
to

Teral Acorn wrote:

>
> >[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?
>
> Nope. [flick] I'm immune. [flickflickflick]
>
> >[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)
>
> It doesn't *make* me do anything. [ruffle]
>
> In fact, it has no effect on me whatsoever. [chitter]

That's only 'cause you're sooo ky00t mr acorn <grynfluff>

<bouncebounce> Have a hug Q.T.

-------------------------------------------
Cuddlebunni - "i love you, you love me...."

Sgt. LeatherPaw

unread,
Apr 29, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/29/96
to

Remus Shepherd (Physicist without Fear...except of Wynn) writes:

>> [20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
>> sure if your sister is not also your uncle?

> Only Sibyl would ask this. :/ (+15)

Or Bubba.

=======================
Sgt. LeatherPaw
In Britain, Bubba would be considered
royalty, being as inbred as he is...
(no offense, Lucky)


Ceredwyn Bensley

unread,
Apr 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/30/96
to

the...@mocking.delusions.of.sanity.net (The Comedy Team from Hell) writes:

The Indomitable Eric, favourite of the Four for a lonnnng time
scores well :D

>*PeSTiLEnCE*wRoTE*...

"!$n't he $uch @ gentlem@n?"

>>[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?

>*Oh*YeS*,*MOsT*deFInITe1Y*.

"Th@t$ $()rt 0f under$t@nd@ble."

>>[8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?

><drool> *k!LL*tHeM*AlL*!

<grin>

>>[14] Do you like biological Art?

>*0H*,*YeS*

"Che$h1re, ! @m beg1nn1ng t0 feel we $h()uld v1$1t Er!k m()re 0ften."

>>[19] Do you love your Family?

>*mY*()tHEr*PerSoNALiTy*IS*TrOUbLEsoME*. *bUT*i*L()0oo0vE*mY*MurDOcH*.
>*YeSS$sS*.

<understandingnod> "My 0ther per$0n@l1ty 1$ @l$0 d1ff1cult."

>>[20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
>> sure if your sister is not also your uncle?

>*WhAT*aBOuT*a*Kn1FE*wH0*1S*mY*fAThER* *AnD*a*S()n*LiViNG*iN*MY*MiND*?

<blink>
<somewhatconcernedlook>
"But where d()e$ @ny0ne el$e ever l1ve? Except f0r the True Pe()ple
- you @re one, the 0ther$ l1ve 0nly 1n 0ur m1nds..."

>>[21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
>> covers my face...killkillkill!

>*stAy*oUT*Of*MY*DrEAM$*! <holdhead> *myheadISmYreFuGeIliVewIthiNmYheAD
>STaYOUTOFMYHEADSTAYOUTOUTOUTOUTOUTOUT!!!!!*

<boink!>

>>[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...
><sharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpen>
><inspect>
><squint>
><sharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpen...

<brightgrin>

>>[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
>> I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
>> I had realised he was a symp at heart.

><nod> *sUCh*A*pITy*. <brightly> ...*bUT*aMUSinG*!!

<nodnodnod>
<pause>
<eagerreminisce>
<nodnodnod>

><tallytallytallytally....
>25!!!
><nodnodnod>
>>Scoring...
>>21-25: <cr@zedg1ggle> Ye$$..$$$. Y0u under$t@nd. Y0u w1ll r1$e f@r
>> 1n the r@nk$. Wh0 kn0w$? There @re be @cc1dent$ even
>> @m0ng$t the F0ur. Y0u m@y be the next Pe$t1l@nce...
><DING!>
>*cAN*1*bE*aN*ArCHeTYpE*TOO*?!!
>*pleAsE*plEASe*pLeaSE*? PLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASE????!!!!
>Erik
><giggle>

"()f *c0ur$e y0u c@n, Er1k! We @lW@y$ $pe@k well 0f y0u! @nd
bec@u$e we h@ve $en$ed true dev0t10n t0 deuty, here 1$ y()ur 0ff1c!@l
F()ur We@p0n ()f M@$$ De$truct!0n (tm).""

^ ^ The Sibyl
\\// If I wasn't in love with Cheshire,
{--} Erik/c would be in trouble :S

Kkatman (Furry Rep.)

unread,
Apr 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/30/96
to

Erik and Sibyl!

> >*PeSTiLEnCE*wRoTE*...
>
> "!$n't he $uch @ gentlem@n?"

<nod>



> >>[14] Do you like biological Art?
> >*0H*,*YeS*
>
> "Che$h1re, ! @m beg1nn1ng t0 feel we $h()uld v1$1t Er!k m()re 0ften."

<consider> <nod again> "Yes. I agree completely!"

> >*cAN*1*bE*aN*ArCHeTYpE*TOO*?!!
> >*pleAsE*plEASe*pLeaSE*? PLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASEPLEASE????!!!!
> >Erik
> ><giggle>
>
> "()f *c0ur$e y0u c@n, Er1k! We @lW@y$ $pe@k well 0f y0u! @nd
> bec@u$e we h@ve $en$ed true dev0t10n t0 deuty, here 1$ y()ur 0ff1c!@l
> F()ur We@p0n ()f M@$$ De$truct!0n (tm).""


"Welcome to the Four!" <GRIN!>

"oh, um, point it the other way. Ya, and the red button there..."

<duck!>
<brightlyilluminatedsmile>



> ^ ^ The Sibyl
> \\// If I wasn't in love with Cheshire,
> {--} Erik/c would be in trouble :S

"ummmmm..."

<worriedlook>

"About visiting more often... um..."


the cheshire

(o (o --Kkatman: Furry Rep.

( ( ( (
( ( ( (
( ( ( (
( ( ( (

TinyBunny

unread,
Apr 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/30/96
to

In article <clben1.830153529@giaec>, clb...@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au
says...

>
>Could *you* be a member of the Four?
>
>Do you have what it takes?
>
>Take the following quiz, mercilessly stolen from another author on
>the group...
>Score one point for each answer :D

ooOh!! a quiZ!!!!


>[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?

yEs!!~! sHe wRites beTter thAn me though,,. [1]


>[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?

ye$S, i likE to cuDdle toS/,. do yoU likE to cuddel toes t00? [1]


>[3] Are you now or have you every been, committed into an
> institution for the so called (H@h!) insane? (gain two points)

n0ooo.... [doubtful look] [1]


>[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?

yeS, itS when som#body doesn plAy faiR..,` [1]


>[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?

n0.../ [1]


>[6] Loose a point if you felt remorse.

uh-oh,./ [0]


>[7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?

yeS, thEy shouLdnt kill and Et kits,. anD thAts it!!.< [0]


>[8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?

wAr, whAt war?>.. [0]


>[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?

iT makEs me HapplY and i wanT to hug somEb0dy [wildspinaround...]
doEs thAt cou7nT??< [0]


>[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)

n0., should it?>m,/ [0]


>[11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?

doeS danGewr haVe a Face?. [puzzled look] [0]


>[12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
> with your knives...

unCle Cheshire wont let me plAy wiTh knovEs./< it miGht ruIn the
exPerimEnt [0]


>[13] Do you like Art?

i likE eVerybodY?>. even yoU sibyl [warm hug] [0]


>[14] Do you like biological Art?

l,;m. i stIll like tHem;' even iF thEy are mechanica!;' [0]


>[15] Loose a point if any of your materials ever ran away.

i lEt thEm go./, [sad cry...] i coulDnt leT thEm sTay sTuck in The cage
weitHout thEir family/., anD i did iT lotS and lotS of timEs/., [-1]


>[16] Loose a point if you ever believe one blow is enough.

um,, if you tickle thEm onCe, thEn you cAn ticle oTher peoplE too./
[-2]


>[17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
y0u mneAn you want to haVe me ovEr f0r dinnEr?,/ [joy!]
Sibyl lik3s me!!!,;''; [-2]


>[18] Do you think the Fuddites are not taking strong enough measures?

ye$,. moSt fuDd doEsnT seem t0 liKe me/>., hoW can I be their Freind if
thhey keep on tRying to et me... [-2]


>[19] Do you love your Family?

yEss, bu7 thEy areNt talking t0 me righT now/. [sad sniffle] [-1]


>[20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
> sure if your sister is not also your uncle?

i dont Have a sisTer/,.,./ [-1]


>[21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
> covers my face...killkillkill!

hee! hee! thAts whAt all fErotti sAy about me./ bu7 thEy won7 catch and
eaT me!!./ [-1]

>[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...

pooR siByl,./ is youR kEybouArd stuCk?. [-1]


>[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
> I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
> I had realised he was a symp at heart.

no!!1 you muStnt kiLl Him.,./ you can onLy kiLl a buCk onC3, bu7 you can
plAy with him manY, mAny timEs./, [-1]


>[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?

if I hurT thEir fEelings,./m, I wonT be aBle to makE freinds with thEm,
fRienD arE usEfull./, thEy can do so many thingS, and help you do whAt
you want./ (where wouLd YOU be wiThout the FOUR?,./) [-1]


>[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
> either serve the Four or be SPAM?

poor NewbiE,;,. so trusTworthy, so honEst,. they cnAn be manipulAted so
eAsi;ly./ I feel reely soRry foR thEm.,. [-1]

Total = -1


>Scoring...
>0-5 : Symp. We w1ll get y0u.
>5-10 : A mere b0rderl1ne p$ych0t1c. Keep try1ng @nd perh@p$ 0ne d@y
> y0u w1ll gr@du@te 1nt0 the $ch00l 0f l1fe @nd re@l1$e th@t
> where y0ur true g0@l l1e$.
>11-15: Better @nd better. Y0u w0uld m@ke @n excellent member 0f the
> F0ur @nd we re$pect y0u f0r 1t. Keep up the g00d w0rk @nd
> remember, the 0nly g00d dev1lbunny 1$ @n ev1$cer@ted
> dev1lbunny.
>16-20: Y0u kn0w the truth, even 1f th0$e p@wn$ d0n't! The F0ur 1$
> the 0nly truth @nd the 0nly truth 1$ 1n the F0ur. K1ll the
> r@bb1t, h0ld f@$t t0 Fr1th @nd Lun@, @nd pr@y th@t the j0y
> y0u kn0w 1n the1r de@th$ w1ll be en0ugh t0 $t@ve 0ff the h@nd$
> ...the h@nd$ th@t c0me @t n1ght f0r y0u...1n the r@1n...mm..
> mmh@h@@h@...hHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>21-25: <cr@zedg1ggle> Ye$$..$$$. Y0u under$t@nd. Y0u w1ll r1$e f@r
> 1n the r@nk$. Wh0 kn0w$? There @re be @cc1dent$ even
> @m0ng$t the F0ur. Y0u m@y be the next Pe$t1l@nce...
>25+ : <$hr1llg1ggl1ng> L0rd L1fe! We w@1t f()R thee 1n the
> @pp01nted pl@ce!
>
Hey!.m whEres my cAtegory? [indignant fluff]
--
TinyBunny

(0ne dAy 1 will be ky007 en0ugh 7o cAuse suffer1ng And m1sery even Among
7he dev1lbunn1es!!! 7hen w1ll you reAl1se 7he 7rue meaning of PA1N!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...choke...cough...cough...need to practise more...)


Dr Kralk

unread,
Apr 30, 1996, 3:00:00 AM4/30/96
to

TinyBunny writes in response to the Sibyl Aptitude Test (SAT):
: >[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but

: > I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
: > I had realised he was a symp at heart.
:
: no!!1 you muStnt kiLl Him.,./ you can onLy kiLl a buCk onC3, bu7 you can
: plAy with him manY, mAny timEs./, [-1]

[wideleergrinlipSMACK] My dear TinyBunny, that has always been my
motto. And it is *always* "Playtime" with me. >|)

Anybun up for a renewal of "The Romper Room"? [unsuccessfulinnocentfluff]
I assure you all I am a very Good Bee. Have a little...honey. >|D~


Dr. Lawrence Kralk
Lord Death, Mad Scientist, Bon Vivant.
"The Four is your friend. Trust the Four."


Christopher Hemme

unread,
May 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/1/96
to

Ceredwyn Bensley (clb...@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au) wrote:
->Could *you* be a member of the Four?

->Do you have what it takes?

->Take the following quiz, mercilessly stolen from another author on
->the group...
->Score one point for each answer :D

->[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?

[0] What?

->[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?

[1] Not unusual, just exaggerated :)

->[3] Are you now or have you every been, committed into an
-> institution for the so called (H@h!) insane? (gain two points)

[1] They sent me back to SFU... does that count?

->[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?

[1] Um... um...

->[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?

[1] I didn't do it!

->[6] Loose a point if you felt remorse.

[1] I'm sorry I got caught...

->[7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?

[0] Sorry...

->[8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?

[0]Not anymore...

->[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?

[1] <sigh> Sometimes...

->[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)

[3] Let's find out... hey Lucky!

->[11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?

[1] I guess you could call it laughing...

->[12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
-> with your knives...

[0] Not knives...

->[13] Do you like Art?

[0] He needs a new haircut.

->[14] Do you like biological Art?

[1] Oooooooooh yeah... heh heh heh

->[15] Loose a point if any of your materials ever ran away.

[-1] Just one point, right?

->[16] Loose a point if you ever believe one blow is enough.

[0] Yeah right...

->[17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?

[1] Yeah... <dreamysigh>

->[18] Do you think the Fuddites are not taking strong enough measures?

[1] I recommend Depends.

->[19] Do you love your Family?

[1] Very much so!

->[20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
-> sure if your sister is not also your uncle?

[1] Well, Patch always was a bit secretive...

->[21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
-> covers my face...killkillkill!

[1] Suwing! battabattabattabatta Suwing!

->[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...

[0] Ok, you've lost me...

->[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
-> I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
-> I had realised he was a symp at heart.

[0] I'm not touching that one...

->[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?

[1] Everytime Will makes a Bunhattin.

->[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
-> either serve the Four or be SPAM?

[1] Hey, I *invented* the Newbie Clause >:)

->16-20: Y0u kn0w the truth, even 1f th0$e p@wn$ d0n't! The F0ur 1$
-> the 0nly truth @nd the 0nly truth 1$ 1n the F0ur. K1ll the
-> r@bb1t, h0ld f@$t t0 Fr1th @nd Lun@, @nd pr@y th@t the j0y
-> y0u kn0w 1n the1r de@th$ w1ll be en0ugh t0 $t@ve 0ff the h@nd$
-> ...the h@nd$ th@t c0me @t n1ght f0r y0u...1n the r@1n...mm..
-> mmh@h@@h@...hHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

17... is that enough for Lord Libido? heh heh heh

==
Lenny, Lord Mentat

Ceredwyn Bensley

unread,
May 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/1/96
to

"Kkatman (Furry Rep.)" <rich...@uidaho.edu> writes:
>Erik and Sibyl!

>> "Che$h1re, ! @m beg1nn1ng t0 feel we $h()uld v1$1t Er!k m()re 0ften."
> <consider> <nod again> "Yes. I agree completely!"

<seriousnod> "He $h()uld be better @rmed."

>> "()f *c0ur$e y0u c@n, Er1k! We @lW@y$ $pe@k well 0f y0u! @nd
>> bec@u$e we h@ve $en$ed true dev0t10n t0 deuty, here 1$ y()ur 0ff1c!@l
>> F()ur We@p0n ()f M@$$ De$truct!0n (tm).""
> "Welcome to the Four!" <GRIN!>
> "oh, um, point it the other way. Ya, and the red button there..."

<putsondarkglasses>

> <duck!>
> <brightlyilluminatedsmile>

<brightlyilluminatedgrin>

>> ^ ^ The Sibyl
>> \\// If I wasn't in love with Cheshire,
>> {--} Erik/c would be in trouble :S
> "ummmmm..."

<look>

> <worriedlook>

<reassuringlook>
<patpawsharpclaws>

> "About visiting more often... um..."

<shakeshead> "Er1k !$ 1n tr()uble @nyw@y, ! feel."
<slowsmile> "D0 n()t fe@r, L0rd F@m1ne. Even w1th h1$ c0n$1der@ble
pr0gre$$10n 1n 1nch0herency, there 1$ n0 ()ne...*n0* ()ne...wh0 c@n
dec@p1t@te w1th qu1te y0ur fl@1r @nd del1c@cy."
<mistyeyedlook> "The p0etry 1$ bre@tht@k1ng."
<entrancedsigh>

^ ^ The Sibyl
\\// I may be insane but I can tell excellency in
{--} composition when I see it.

Teral Acorn

unread,
May 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/1/96
to

Cuddlebunni wrote:

> Teral Acorn wrote:
>> >[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)
>> It doesn't *make* me do anything. [ruffle]
>> In fact, it has no effect on me whatsoever. [chitter]
>That's only 'cause you're sooo ky00t mr acorn <grynfluff>

Cute. [glare] The word is 'cute'. [ruffle][uncutegrimace]

><bouncebounce> Have a hug Q.T.

It's sad to see the bunnies succumb to their own mind control...

[giggleflick] Who am I kidding? It's *wonderful*! }:D

====-------
Teral Acorn

The Comedy Team from Hell

unread,
May 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/1/96
to

At 11:41 PM 4/29/96, Ceredwyn Bensley wrote:
>the...@mocking.delusions.of.sanity.net (The Comedy Team from Hell) writes:

>The Indomitable Eric, favourite of the Four for a lonnnng time
>scores well :D

ANd*i*DiDN'T*evEn*h@Ve*To*StUDy*!

>>*PeSTiLEnCE*wRoTE*...
>"!$n't he $uch @ gentlem@n?"

<bow>

>>>[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?

>>*Oh*YeS*,*MOsT*deFInITe1Y*.
>"Th@t$ $()rt 0f under$t@nd@ble."

*caLLiGrApHY*Is*SuCH*a*LoST*aRt*TheSe*Day$...*

>"Che$h1re, ! @m beg1nn1ng t0 feel we $h()uld v1$1t Er!k m()re 0ften."

*pLEaSe*DO*. <smile> *i*GeT*So*LITtLe*COMpAnY*. <frown>

>>*mY*()tHEr*PerSoNALiTy*IS*TrOUbLEsoME*. *bUT*i*L()0oo0vE*mY*MurDOcH*.
>>*YeSS$sS*.
><understandingnod> "My 0ther per$0n@l1ty 1$ @l$0 d1ff1cult."

*bUt*... *oCCaSiOnaLLy*AMuSiNG*. *eRiC*,*thAt*Is*. *hIS*fLaIR*fOR*
*cHa()s*IS*WeLL*tuNeD*...

>>*WhAT*aBOuT*a*Kn1FE*wH0*1S*mY*fAThER* *AnD*a*S()n*LiViNG*iN*MY*MiND*?
><blink>
><somewhatconcernedlook>
>"But where d()e$ @ny0ne el$e ever l1ve? Except f0r the True Pe()ple
>- you @re one, the 0ther$ l1ve 0nly 1n 0ur m1nds..."

*@hhhHHhh.* *!*SeEeeeE*.

>>>[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...
>><sharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpen>
>><inspect>
>><squint>
>><sharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpen...
><brightgrin>

*oNE*mUSt*AlWaYS*LoOK*To*ThE*ProPEr*C@rE*oF*()Ne'S*fAMiLY*.

...*InCLUdINg*ReGUlAR*P()lIShinG*@nD*ShArpENInG*!!

>><DING!>
>>*cAN*1*bE*aN*ArCHeTYpE*TOO*?!!

>"()f *c0ur$e y0u c@n, Er1k! We @lW@y$ $pe@k well 0f y0u! @nd

<JOY>

*HeHeheHEhEhhhEEhHeH3HeeheheHEHhhEeH*.

"*Er1K*...*L()rD*MaDNeS$*."

*iT*hAS*SuCH*@*riNG*tO*It*,*n()*?

>bec@u$e we h@ve $en$ed true dev0t10n t0 deuty, here 1$ y()ur 0ff1c!@l
>F()ur We@p0n ()f M@$$ De$truct!0n (tm).""

<boink!> <----Really hard to do when you're human

.....*h()W*dOeS*It*WOrK*?

<fiddle>


> ^ ^ The Sibyl
> \\// If I wasn't in love with Cheshire,
> {--} Erik/c would be in trouble :S

<blink>

<fuddledlook>

*ErM*....

ERiK
(*SuDDeNLY*@t*A*L()sS*fOR*WoRDs*...)

The Comedy Team from Hell

unread,
May 1, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/1/96
to

*FaMInE*wR()tE*...
>Erik and Sibyl!

*YeAH*!

>> >*PeSTiLEnCE*wRoTE*...
>> "!$n't he $uch @ gentlem@n?"

> <nod>

<ears turn a little red>

<kick dirt>

>> >>[14] Do you like biological Art?

>> >*0H*,*YeS*


>> "Che$h1re, ! @m beg1nn1ng t0 feel we $h()uld v1$1t Er!k m()re 0ften."
>

> <consider> <nod again> "Yes. I agree completely!"

*D()*! *CoME*AnD*SeE*YoUR*PaINtING*,*cHEsHiRE*. *It'$*HaNGiNG*In*
*oUR*DiNInG*HaLl*,*aBoVE*ThE*kITcHEn*DooR*. <beam> *d0Es*WONDERS*
*FoR*The*appETiTe*...

>> bec@u$e we h@ve $en$ed true dev0t10n t0 deuty, here 1$ y()ur 0ff1c!@l
>> F()ur We@p0n ()f M@$$ De$truct!0n (tm).""

> "Welcome to the Four!" <GRIN!>

*()()00ooooooo.....*

> "oh, um, point it the other way.

<stick head down muzzle>

*H0W*DoEs*it*WoRK*?

>Ya, and the red button there..."

<look up at Cheshire, move head away from muzzle>

*HuH*?

<thumb hits red button>

> <duck!>

"*FFFFOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMM!*"

> <brightlyilluminatedsmile>

*C()()L*!

Er1K
(*haVE*A*New*ToyyyyYy*...)

Geoffrey Brent

unread,
May 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/2/96
to

<introducing William Gordon...>

The large auburn-coloured dog which has, up till now, restricted itself
to drooling on the Sibyl's paws in a doggy sort of way, looks down at
the quiz. After a moment's thought, it suddenly turns into a young man
with long auburn hair, gentle delicate features, and a pair of really
frighteningly innocent and endearing brown eyes. He pulls out a pen, and
begins writing.

>[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?

Yup. 1 point.

>[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?

Yes, but let's not go into that.

>[3] Are you now or have you every been, committed into an
> institution for the so called (H@h!) insane? (gain two points)

Yes, although not officially recognised as such.

>[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?

Yes. Do I get an extra point for sleeping with one ?

>[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?

To kill things ? Yes.

>[6] Loose a point if you felt remorse.

Nope.

>[7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?

Probably. Age should make no difference to the right to live.

>[8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?

Yes. Which war ?

>[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?

No. I AM cute, or so strange men keep telling me.

>[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)

Well, it _helps_ me kill... does that count ?

>[11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?

Yup.

>[12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
> with your knives...

Now and then...

>[13] Do you like Art?

You betcha.

>[14] Do you like biological Art?

H.R. Giger ? Sure !

>[15] Loose a point if any of your materials ever ran away.

Umm... no.

>[16] Loose a point if you ever believe one blow is enough.

It _can_ be enough, but what's the harm in making sure ?

>[17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I used to. Don't eat much these days.

>[18] Do you think the Fuddites are not taking strong enough measures?

We talking about Elmer and Lucy here ? If they had half a brain, they'd
use poison baits.

>[19] Do you love your Family?

Yup.

>[20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
> sure if your sister is not also your uncle?

You betcha... reincarnation is a confusing thing. And Cousin George
didn't make it any easier with his half-sister and all...

>[21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
> covers my face...killkillkill!

Unfortunately, yes.

>[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...

gottagetheavierbootsgottagetheavierbootsgottagetheavierboots...

>[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
> I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
> I had realised he was a symp at heart.

Don't think so... I got bright eyes and sometimes soft fur. Don't want
to be killed again.

>[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?

What neutrals ? Anyone not with me is against me.

>[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
> either serve the Four or be SPAM?

No... <worriedlook> I AM a newbie.

>Scoring...
>0-5 : Symp. We w1ll get y0u.
>5-10 : A mere b0rderl1ne p$ych0t1c. Keep try1ng @nd perh@p$ 0ne d@y
> y0u w1ll gr@du@te 1nt0 the $ch00l 0f l1fe @nd re@l1$e th@t
> where y0ur true g0@l l1e$.
>11-15: Better @nd better. Y0u w0uld m@ke @n excellent member 0f the
> F0ur @nd we re$pect y0u f0r 1t. Keep up the g00d w0rk @nd
> remember, the 0nly g00d dev1lbunny 1$ @n ev1$cer@ted
> dev1lbunny.
>16-20: Y0u kn0w the truth, even 1f th0$e p@wn$ d0n't! The F0ur 1$
> the 0nly truth @nd the 0nly truth 1$ 1n the F0ur. K1ll the
> r@bb1t, h0ld f@$t t0 Fr1th @nd Lun@, @nd pr@y th@t the j0y
> y0u kn0w 1n the1r de@th$ w1ll be en0ugh t0 $t@ve 0ff the h@nd$
> ...the h@nd$ th@t c0me @t n1ght f0r y0u...1n the r@1n...mm..
> mmh@h@@h@...hHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>21-25: <cr@zedg1ggle> Ye$$..$$$. Y0u under$t@nd. Y0u w1ll r1$e f@r
> 1n the r@nk$. Wh0 kn0w$? There @re be @cc1dent$ even
> @m0ng$t the F0ur. Y0u m@y be the next Pe$t1l@nce...
>25+ : <$hr1llg1ggl1ng> L0rd L1fe! We w@1t f()R thee 1n the
> @pp01nted pl@ce!

"Is 23 points a good score for a newcomer ?"

William looks at the Sibyl, brown eyes brimming with childish innocence.
One hand holds a book of poetry. The other plays with a very
sharp-looking Swiss Army knife with two knife-blades, a saw-blade, a
corkscres, a pair of scissors, two can-openers (one doubling as a
chisel), a small hook-shaped-thing, a thing with a really sharp point,
and a handy little metal ring to attach keys with. Occasionally he looks
down at it and watches the way the light shines off it. At these
moments, his innocent smile is magnified.

William Gordon
one of the quiet ones.
--
(gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au)

Ceredwyn Bensley

unread,
May 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/2/96
to

(So many people took this test I'm beginning to wonder if you all
want to defect :P)

yli...@flintheart.ead.auckland.ac.nz (TinyBunny) writes:
>In article <clben1.830153529@giaec>, clb...@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au
>says...

>>[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?
>yEs!!~! sHe wRites beTter thAn me though,,. [1]

<blink>
<blinkblink>

>>[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?
>ye$S, i likE to cuDdle toS/,. do yoU likE to cuddel toes t00? [1]

<disgustedlook> "N0t unu$u@l f0r @ Dev1lbunny."

>>[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?
>yeS, itS when som#body doesn plAy faiR..,` [1]

<obscenelyhappysmile>
"Ye$. Th@t'$ ex@ctly r1ght!"

>>[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)
>n0., should it?>m,/ [0]

"Ye$."

>>[11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?
>doeS danGewr haVe a Face?. [puzzled look] [0]

<headinpaws>

>>[12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
>> with your knives...
>unCle Cheshire wont let me plAy wiTh knovEs./< it miGht ruIn the
>exPerimEnt [0]

<somewhatsurprisedlook> "Re@lly? W()uld y0u l1ke me t0 t@lk t0 Uncle
Che$h1re f0r y()u? Were y0u @ b@d bunny? M@ybe y0u c@n d0 $0meth1ng
t0 m@ke 1t up."

>>[13] Do you like Art?
>i likE eVerybodY?>. even yoU sibyl [warm hug] [0]

<gag>

>>[17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>y0u mneAn you want to haVe me ovEr f0r dinnEr?,/ [joy!]
>Sibyl lik3s me!!!,;''; [-2]

<headinpawsagain>

>>[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...
>pooR siByl,./ is youR kEybouArd stuCk?. [-1]

<peculiarsmile> "N()t my keyb0@rd. My m1nd." <shrillgiggle>

>>[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
>> I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
>> I had realised he was a symp at heart.
>no!!1 you muStnt kiLl Him.,./ you can onLy kiLl a buCk onC3, bu7 you can
>plAy with him manY, mAny timEs./, [-1]

<blink>
<blinkblink>
<pause>
<tapstable>
<shrug>

>>[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?
>if I hurT thEir fEelings,./m, I wonT be aBle to makE freinds with thEm,
>fRienD arE usEfull./, thEy can do so many thingS, and help you do whAt
>you want./ (where wouLd YOU be wiThout the FOUR?,./) [-1]

"De@d."

>>[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
>> either serve the Four or be SPAM?
>poor NewbiE,;,. so trusTworthy, so honEst,. they cnAn be manipulAted so
>eAsi;ly./ I feel reely soRry foR thEm.,. [-1]

<blink>
"Y()u kn0w, Che$h1re, s0mewhere 1n th@t fluffy l1ttle m1nd 1$
p0tent!@l."

> Total = -1
>>Scoring...
>>0-5 : Symp. We w1ll get y0u.

>Hey!.m whEres my cAtegory? [indignant fluff]

"$ymp $qu@red. ! th1nk..."

>TinyBunny
>(0ne dAy 1 will be ky007 en0ugh 7o cAuse suffer1ng And m1sery even Among
>7he dev1lbunn1es!!! 7hen w1ll you reAl1se 7he 7rue meaning of PA1N!!!
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...choke...cough...cough...need to practise more...)

<blink>
"Y()u kn0w, my de@r fr1ends, ! th1nk we're mi$$1ng ()ut 0n $0meth1ng
here. @ l1ttle $elect1ve educ@t!()n...$0me tr@1n1ng..."
<patshead>
"Y()u're d()ing better th@n ! h@d th0ught, T1nyBunny."

^ ^ The Sibyl
\\//

{--}

Kkatman (Furry Rep.)

unread,
May 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/2/96
to


Sibyl wrote:
> (So many people took this test I'm beginning to wonder if you all
> want to defect :P)

They're all closet Fourers. :)



> (TinyBunny) writes:
> >no!!1 you muStnt kiLl Him.,./ you can onLy kiLl a buCk onC3, bu7 you can
> >plAy with him manY, mAny timEs./, [-1]
>
> <blink>
> <blinkblink>
> <pause>
> <tapstable>
> <shrug>

You must admit <wickedgrin> that he as a point!

> >poor NewbiE,;,. so trusTworthy, so honEst,. they cnAn be manipulAted so
> >eAsi;ly./ I feel reely soRry foR thEm.,. [-1]
>
> <blink>
> "Y()u kn0w, Che$h1re, s0mewhere 1n th@t fluffy l1ttle m1nd 1$
> p0tent!@l."

I told you so...



> >(0ne dAy 1 will be ky007 en0ugh 7o cAuse suffer1ng And m1sery even Among
> >7he dev1lbunn1es!!! 7hen w1ll you reAl1se 7he 7rue meaning of PA1N!!!
> >HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...choke...cough...cough...need to practise more...)
>
> <blink>
> "Y()u kn0w, my de@r fr1ends, ! th1nk we're mi$$1ng ()ut 0n $0meth1ng
> here. @ l1ttle $elect1ve educ@t!()n...$0me tr@1n1ng..."
> <patshead>
> "Y()u're d()ing better th@n ! h@d th0ught, T1nyBunny."

Now you begin to see.....

Kkatman (Furry Rep.)

unread,
May 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/2/96
to


On 30 Apr 1996, TinyBunny had trouble counting:


> Sibyl wrote:
> >[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?
> yEs!!~! sHe wRites beTter thAn me though,,. [1]
>
> >[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?
> ye$S, i likE to cuDdle toS/,. do yoU likE to cuddel toes t00? [1]


<brightbeam> "And he's so darling when he does. I've given him
my entire collection so he doesn't even need anyone around."


> >[3] Are you now or have you every been, committed into an
> > institution for the so called (H@h!) insane? (gain two points)
> n0ooo.... [doubtful look] [1]


<lookaroundatCapewarren> no... not quite close enough.


> >[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?
> yeS, itS when som#body doesn plAy faiR..,` [1]


EXACTLY! That's [2]!


> >[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?
> n0.../ [1]


<WednesdayAddamsvoice> "He's only a child!"

(Give him time!)

> >[6] Loose a point if you felt remorse.
> uh-oh,./ [0]


TinyBunny, that question refers to number 5. You can't loose a
point if you've never used an Omega Weapon.


> >[7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?
> yeS, thEy shouLdnt kill and Et kits,. anD thAts it!!.< [0]


Technically, that's [3]


> >[8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?
> wAr, whAt war?>.. [0]
>
> >[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?
> iT makEs me HapplY and i wanT to hug somEb0dy [wildspinaround...]
> doEs thAt cou7nT??< [0]


GACK!
Close enough. [4]

(Doesn't that sound ill to you?)


> >[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)
> n0., should it?>m,/ [0]


TinyBunny, ever hear of 'loving somebun to death'?

"I luv u, u luv me
Let's test out this SMG!"

[RTTTRTTTRTTTRTTTRTTTRTTRTTRTTRT]


> >[11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?
> doeS danGewr haVe a Face?. [puzzled look] [0]


Yes. But it's not nice to laugh at Sibyl.

<GRIN>


> >[12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
> > with your knives...
> unCle Cheshire wont let me plAy wiTh knovEs./< it miGht ruIn the
> exPerimEnt [0]


<franticlook> "I can explain!"


> >[13] Do you like Art?
> i likE eVerybodY?>. even yoU sibyl [warm hug] [0]


That's [5]. Plus and *extra* point for recognizing him! [6]
(Always reward the favorable critics! Its an artist's thing!)




> >[14] Do you like biological Art?
> l,;m. i stIll like tHem;' even iF thEy are mechanica!;' [0]


Seven [7]


> >[15] Loose a point if any of your materials ever ran away.
> i lEt thEm go./, [sad cry...] i coulDnt leT thEm sTay sTuck in The cage
> weitHout thEir family/., anD i did iT lotS and lotS of timEs/., [-1]


ARRUGH!!!!
TinyBunny, stoppit! Now listen, if you let them go, then they
won't bee here when we bring the rest of their families here. You don't
want them to miss their families do you?

Definitely [6]

> >[16] Loose a point if you ever believe one blow is enough.
> um,, if you tickle thEm onCe, thEn you cAn ticle oTher peoplE too./
> [-2]

<confusedlook>
I'm not sure I get it...
...but I think I like the general idea! So little time, and the
more the merrier! [7]


> >[17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> y0u mneAn you want to haVe me ovEr f0r dinnEr?,/ [joy!]
> Sibyl lik3s me!!!,;''; [-2]


I think I'll leave that answer alone.

> >[18] Do you think the Fuddites are not taking strong enough measures?
> ye$,. moSt fuDd doEsnT seem t0 liKe me/>., hoW can I be their Freind if
> thhey keep on tRying to et me... [-2]


<checkesnotes> I think that would fall under 'pursuing the wrong
enemy'. um... Fudds seem to be doing that a *lot* recently. Well, SURVEY
SEZ?

[BING]

OK One more point. [8]


> >[19] Do you love your Family?
> yEss, bu7 thEy areNt talking t0 me righT now/. [sad sniffle] [-1]

[9]... sigh.

<comforthug>

<GLAREaround> "What are all you looking at!?"


> >[20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
> > sure if your sister is not also your uncle?
> i dont Have a sisTer/,.,./ [-1]
>
> >[21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
> > covers my face...killkillkill!
> hee! hee! thAts whAt all fErotti sAy about me./ bu7 thEy won7 catch and
> eaT me!!./ [-1]

Good enough. [10]

> >[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...
> pooR siByl,./ is youR kEybouArd stuCk?. [-1]


<laugh!>


> >[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
> > I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
> > I had realised he was a symp at heart.
> no!!1 you muStnt kiLl Him.,./ you can onLy kiLl a buCk onC3, bu7 you can
> plAy with him manY, mAny timEs./, [-1]


<boink!>

"well, from the mouth of..."

<eyegleam!>

<scribblescribble> [11]


> >[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?
> if I hurT thEir fEelings,./m, I wonT be aBle to makE freinds with thEm,
> fRienD arE usEfull./, thEy can do so many thingS, and help you do whAt
> you want./ (where wouLd YOU be wiThout the FOUR?,./) [-1]


<strangelook>

He... has a point.
[12]


> >[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
> > either serve the Four or be SPAM?
> poor NewbiE,;,. so trusTworthy, so honEst,. they cnAn be manipulAted so
> eAsi;ly./ I feel reely soRry foR thEm.,. [-1]


I'm not sure if that's worth a point or not. But it shows
such potential.

Total: 12

> >11-15: Better @nd better. Y0u w0uld m@ke @n excellent member 0f the
> > F0ur @nd we re$pect y0u f0r 1t. Keep up the g00d w0rk @nd
> > remember, the 0nly g00d dev1lbunny 1$ @n ev1$cer@ted
> > dev1lbunny.

> TinyBunny
>
> (0ne dAy 1 will be ky007 en0ugh 7o cAuse suffer1ng And m1sery even Among
> 7he dev1lbunn1es!!! 7hen w1ll you reAl1se 7he 7rue meaning of PA1N!!!
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...choke...cough...cough...need to practise more...)


<stare around> "OK, so I fudged a little. Tell me that last
statement doesn't make up for everything!"

the cheshire
So I like TinyBunny. Purrverseness is a trademark of the Four! I'm
allowed!

Axe-Wielding Fuddite

unread,
May 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/2/96
to

In alt.devilbunnies, genlo...@delphi.com (LonGears) wrote:

<In article <10be5.fudd...@fuddites.net>, sm...@tiac.net (Axe-Wielding
<Fuddite)

<takes the Test of the Four:
<
<[nibble]

<> <[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?
<>

<> I prefer to think of them as 'rarified.'
<
<Spirit knows they're not "well-done."

This, from the king of char-broiled ethics.


<> <[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
<> < either serve the Four or be SPAM?
<>

<> No. I feel for the newbies.

<There are laws against that, McGregor.

Really? Have you heard the term "consulting adults"? I'll expose newbies
to the FAQs if I like, Longears.

Just because /you/ don't know how...

<> It is no easy thing to be clueless.
<
<<bite tongue>

Haven't you had enough things bitten off?

--
Biting off more than you can chew again, I see.

Remus Shepherd

unread,
May 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/2/96
to

Erik and Sibyl wrote:
> ANd*i*DiDN'T*evEn*h@Ve*To*StUDy*!

> >>*PeSTiLEnCE*wRoTE*...
> >"!$n't he $uch @ gentlem@n?"
> >>>[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?
> >>*Oh*YeS*,*MOsT*deFInITe1Y*.
> >"Th@t$ $()rt 0f under$t@nd@ble."
> *caLLiGrApHY*Is*SuCH*a*LoST*aRt*TheSe*Day$...*
> >"Che$h1re, ! @m beg1nn1ng t0 feel we $h()uld v1$1t Er!k m()re 0ften."
> *pLEaSe*DO*. <smile> *i*GeT*So*LITtLe*COMpAnY*. <frown>
> >>*mY*()tHEr*PerSoNALiTy*IS*TrOUbLEsoME*. *bUT*i*L()0oo0vE*mY*MurDOcH*.
> >>*YeSS$sS*.
> *bUt*... *oCCaSiOnaLLy*AMuSiNG*. *eRiC*,*thAt*Is*. *hIS*fLaIR*fOR*
> *cHa()s*IS*WeLL*tuNeD*...
> >>*WhAT*aBOuT*a*Kn1FE*wH0*1S*mY*fAThER* *AnD*a*S()n*LiViNG*iN*MY*MiND*?
> >>>[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...
> >><sharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpen>
> >><sharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpensharpen...
> *oNE*mUSt*AlWaYS*LoOK*To*ThE*ProPEr*C@rE*oF*()Ne'S*fAMiLY*.
> ...*InCLUdINg*ReGUlAR*P()lIShinG*@nD*ShArpENInG*!!

> >>*cAN*1*bE*aN*ArCHeTYpE*TOO*?!!
> >"()f *c0ur$e y0u c@n, Er1k! We @lW@y$ $pe@k well 0f y0u! @nd
> *HeHeheHEhEhhhEEhHeH3HeeheheHEHhhEeH*.
> "*Er1K*...*L()rD*MaDNeS$*."
> *iT*hAS*SuCH*@*riNG*tO*It*,*n()*?

> >bec@u$e we h@ve $en$ed true dev0t10n t0 deuty, here 1$ y()ur 0ff1c!@l
> >F()ur We@p0n ()f M@$$ De$truct!0n (tm).""
> .....*h()W*dOeS*It*WOrK*?

I can't decode this binary. Is this uuencoded, or some other kind of
encryption?

...
Remus Shepherd (re...@netcom.com)

Chris Fieldhouse

unread,
May 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/2/96
to

Leath...@LSW.org (Sgt. LeatherPaw) wrote:


>In Britain, Bubba would be considered
>royalty, being as inbred as he is...
>(no offense, Lucky)

Absolutely none taken, Sergeant.
Carry on...

Lucky


Chris Fieldhouse

unread,
May 2, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/2/96
to

kr...@bigtop.com (Dr Kralk) wrote:

> Anybun up for a renewal of "The Romper Room"? [unsuccessfulinnocentfluff]
>I assure you all I am a very Good Bee. Have a little...honey. >|D~

[grin] Bee? Hah!
Come into my parlour, said the spider to the fly.

Lucky

Spin that web, Larry!


The Colective

unread,
May 3, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/3/96
to

> >>[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?
> >ye$S, i likE to cuDdle toS/,. do yoU likE to cuddel toes t00? [1]
>
> <disgustedlook> "N0t unu$u@l f0r @ Dev1lbunny."

why just toes? cuddleing is so kewl. every one should cuddle everyone else.

> >>[13] Do you like Art?
> >i likE eVerybodY?>. even yoU sibyl [warm hug] [0]
>

> <gag>

way ta go tiny, sibyl needs warm hugs <bouncewiggle>, but don't forget
cuddles, they're importaint too, and sneak in a few snuggles for good
measure.

> <peculiarsmile> "N()t my keyb0@rd. My m1nd." <shrillgiggle>

Your telling fibs lady p.


> >TinyBunny
> >(0ne dAy 1 will be ky007 en0ugh 7o cAuse suffer1ng And m1sery even Among
> >7he dev1lbunn1es!!! 7hen w1ll you reAl1se 7he 7rue meaning of PA1N!!!
> >HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...choke...cough...cough...need to practise more...)
>

> <patshead>
> "Y()u're d()ing better th@n ! h@d th0ught, T1nyBunny."

<sadfluff> don't listen to her <sob>, be a nice kit and play nice.
There's enough pain and misery in the world with this pointless war, and
human's need to prey on their own kind.

<droopsears><dropshead> to see one so young manipulated and twisted is
soo sorowfull.

___________
Cuddlebunni

Ceredwyn Bensley

unread,
May 3, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/3/96
to

gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au (Geoffrey Brent) writes:
><introducing William Gordon...>

<gryn>

>The large auburn-coloured dog which has, up till now, restricted itself
>to drooling on the Sibyl's paws in a doggy sort of way, looks down at
>the quiz. After a moment's thought, it suddenly turns into a young man
>with long auburn hair, gentle delicate features, and a pair of really
>frighteningly innocent and endearing brown eyes. He pulls out a pen, and
>begins writing.

<looksovershoulder>
"! $h()uld w@rn y0u, the l@$t 0f y()ur $0rt here g0t...er..."
<looksatsmoulderingremainsofShadowPrince>
<blink>
"Well, we $0rt@ g0t bunn1e$ @nd hum@n$. )f c0ur$e,"
<lookCheshire'sway> "Th@t $h0uld 1n n0 w@y re$tr1ct @ny0ne be1ng..."
<pause>
<thinks>
"...cre@t1ve."

>>[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?
>Yup. 1 point.

(OOC : What, you got Malkavian Scrawl?>

>>[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?
>Yes. Do I get an extra point for sleeping with one ?

<looksatKralk>
<protectivestance>

>>[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?
>To kill things ? Yes.

<blink> "Th1$ c0uld be re@d 1n m@ny w@y$. G1ven number 4."

>>[8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?
>Yes. Which war ?

<looksatFourfriends> "$h()w$ pr0m1$e!"

>>[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?
>No. I AM cute, or so strange men keep telling me.

<guardedlook>

>>[21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
>> covers my face...killkillkill!
>Unfortunately, yes.

<patback> "!t h@ppen$ t0 the be$t ()f u$."

>>[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
>> either serve the Four or be SPAM?
>No... <worriedlook> I AM a newbie.

"T() qu0te one of the gre@te$t t@ct1c1@ns ()f 0ur t1me.
"'Bwahahahahahahahahaha!'"

>>Scoring...


>>21-25: <cr@zedg1ggle> Ye$$..$$$. Y0u under$t@nd. Y0u w1ll r1$e f@r
>> 1n the r@nk$. Wh0 kn0w$? There @re be @cc1dent$ even
>> @m0ng$t the F0ur. Y0u m@y be the next Pe$t1l@nce...
>>25+ : <$hr1llg1ggl1ng> L0rd L1fe! We w@1t f()R thee 1n the
>> @pp01nted pl@ce!
>"Is 23 points a good score for a newcomer ?"

"$1gn y0ur n@me, ple@$e."

>William looks at the Sibyl, brown eyes brimming with childish innocence.
>One hand holds a book of poetry. The other plays with a very
>sharp-looking Swiss Army knife with two knife-blades, a saw-blade, a
>corkscres, a pair of scissors, two can-openers (one doubling as a
>chisel), a small hook-shaped-thing, a thing with a really sharp point,
>and a handy little metal ring to attach keys with. Occasionally he looks
>down at it and watches the way the light shines off it. At these
>moments, his innocent smile is magnified.

<grin> "Re@d the F@Qs, de@r W1ll1@m. Welc0me t0 the f0ld."

> William Gordon
> one of the quiet ones.

^ ^ The Sibyl
\\// "We never suspected it. He was so quiet, you know?"

LonGears

unread,
May 3, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/3/96
to

In article <114e5.fudd...@fuddites.net>, sm...@tiac.net (Axe-Wielding
Fuddite) writes: > In alt.devilbunnies, genlo...@delphi.com (LonGears)
wrote: >

> <In article <10be5.fudd...@fuddites.net>, sm...@tiac.net (Axe-Wielding
> <Fuddite)
> <takes the Test of the Four:

[nibble]

> <> <[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
> <> < either serve the Four or be SPAM?
>

> <> No. I feel for the newbies.
>
> <There are laws against that, McGregor.
>
> Really? Have you heard the term "consulting adults"?

Yes. And you should do that more often.

Child.

-- General LonGears

None of you qualify as "consenting" or as "adults."
However, I *am* glad to see you're consulting someone
more mature. Glad I could help.

The Comedy Team from Hell

unread,
May 3, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/3/96
to

At 9:34 AM 5/2/96, Remus Shepherd wrote:

>Erik and Sibyl wrote:

[*sIByL'$*AnD*My*BeAUTiFUl*PENmANshiP*SLashEd*]


> I can't decode this binary. Is this uuencoded, or some other kind of
>encryption?

*iT'$*a*$EEeeeeeECrET*C()dE*! 8}
==
*Er1K*,*H()nORaRY*aRCHeTYpe*()f*M@dNEs$*

Rick Andersen

unread,
May 3, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/3/96
to

William Gordon wrote:
[...]
>William smiles and borrows the FAQs.

An excellent beginning. Read them. Learn them. Praise them.

>"So, what are the advantages to being on one side or the other ?"

A worthy question.

The bunnies, from the outset, will be attempting to corrupt, convert, or
kill you -- no matter which side you select.

* If they are successful in corruption, you'll be an unwitting dupe of
their evil schemes for world domination, and probably brain-damaged by the
high levels of Cuton radiation to which they tend to expose their human
minions.

* If they're successful in conversion, the hideous trauma of being
condemned to the twisted, diseased form of a small rabbit will pretty much
do the same thing to your mind as corruption, only quickly, and more
painfully -- and with less chance for reversing the monstrous process.

* If they're successful in killing you, well, you'll be dead. And your
corpse will probably be ground into mincemeat and distributed, laced with
psychoactive drugs, to an unwitting public under the trade name of "Spam."

The last is probably the least gruesome of the possible fates, but it's
still pretty terrible. Intelligence reports indicate that the more
sadistic of the bunnies prefer to begin the "Spamming" process while the
human is still alive. [shudder]

Next.

The Four will offer you a job involving torturing bunnies to death and
killing kits -- kits being the young of the lapine race, and almost the
only subset which a few among us hope may yet be turned from their
horrible fate.

Oh, yes, and the Four may also at some point involve you in the use of an
Omega Weapon -- an Omega Weapon, that is, being a device so dangerous
that it threatens the very existence of life on Earth, whether directly or
through escalatory retaliation.

The Four were brought to justice once for the use of an Omega Weapon. If
they employ one again, they will be hunted down again, and made to pay the
price for their actions. As will any who aid them.

Next.

The AoF -- that is, the Army of Fudd -- will give you such training as you
require in the use of an axe and of the other ways to fight the Evil that
Fluffs. We will provide you as many resources as we can spare; we do not
have the seemingly bottomless resources that the bunnies' corporate slaves
provide them, but what we have has yet sufficed to thwart their malice.

We will give you a chance to be a part of a battle as great and noble as
any ever yet fought by our race: the battle to save ourselves, and the
generations who follow us, and indeed all living things that now or in
the future shall dwell upon this planet, from the relentless iron grasp of
the devilbunny empire.

Join us.
- Andersen
--
Rick Andersen; Commander, Army of Fudd
An officer, still rarely a gentleman Quis custodiet ipsos Fuhadorum?
One devilbunny, one bullet -- substitutions as required.
Lurkers! Find the FAQ at http://www.netimages.com/archives/alt.devilbunnies

Geoffrey Brent

unread,
May 4, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/4/96
to

>><introducing William Gordon...>
><gryn>

[OOC: You spell 'i' with a 'y' ? A refugee from Whyte Wolf will be right
at home here !]

><looksovershoulder>
>"! $h()uld w@rn y0u, the l@$t 0f y()ur $0rt here g0t...er..."
><looksatsmoulderingremainsofShadowPrince>
><blink>
>"Well, we $0rt@ g0t bunn1e$ @nd hum@n$. )f c0ur$e,"
><lookCheshire'sway> "Th@t $h0uld 1n n0 w@y re$tr1ct @ny0ne be1ng..."
><pause>
><thinks>
>"...cre@t1ve."

"Creativity is my profession. Dietary requirements and skin conditions
do not make the man."

He frowns.

"Besides, I haven't seen anything here I'd feel comfortable about
feeding from."

>>>[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?
>>Yup. 1 point.

>(OOC : What, you got Malkavian Scrawl?>

(OOC: Some of my best friends are Malkavians. Tonight, I impersonate a
pooka.)

>>>[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?
>>Yes. Do I get an extra point for sleeping with one ?

><looksatKralk>
><protectivestance>

<looksatKralkandSibyloddly>

Not _him_.

>>>[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?
>>To kill things ? Yes.

><blink> "Th1$ c0uld be re@d 1n m@ny w@y$. G1ven number 4."

"That's what I thought. Do I get a point for each different way ?"

>>>[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?
>>No. I AM cute, or so strange men keep telling me.

><guardedlook>

<innocent look... fortunately, William has no fur in this form. Except
for long hair.>

>>>[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
>>> either serve the Four or be SPAM?
>>No... <worriedlook> I AM a newbie.

>"T() qu0te one of the gre@te$t t@ct1c1@ns ()f 0ur t1me.
>"'Bwahahahahahahahahaha!'"

<frowns... thinkthinkthinkthink...> "Enrico Fermi ?"

>>"Is 23 points a good score for a newcomer ?"

>"$1gn y0ur n@me, ple@$e."

William writes a large "X" on the paper. Below it, in neat small
letters, he adds "William Gordon, his mark."

><grin> "Re@d the F@Qs, de@r W1ll1@m. Welc0me t0 the f0ld."

William smiles and borrows the FAQs. "So, what are the advantages to


being on one side or the other ?"

He looks between the Four, the Buns, the Fuddites, and anyone else I've
forgotten, waiting for responses.

>> one of the quiet ones.

> ^ ^ The Sibyl
> \\// "We never suspected it. He was so quiet, you know?"

William Gordon
who never bothered the neighbours
--
(gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au)

'TinselTown' O'Donnel

unread,
May 4, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/4/96
to

TinyBunny wrote:
>In article <clben1.830153529@giaec>, clb...@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au
>says...
>>
(Alright, alright, so I missed it the first time around...I'm doing the
blasted survey now..)

>>Could *you* be a member of the Four?
>>
>>Do you have what it takes?
>>
>>Take the following quiz, mercilessly stolen from another author on
>>the group...
>>Score one point for each answer :D

>>[1] C@n y()u re@d the $1byl's wr1t1ng?

Y3$. But ! #@v3 tr()ub13 pr()n0unc!ng !t. (Or is that pr0n()unc!ng?) (1)



>>[2] Do you have an 'unusual' set of ethics?

Let's see...I'm a Fudd. Unusual right there. I've been accused of being a
symp. A little more unusual. I find joy in mangling song lyrics and
torturing rabbits with them. That part's completely normal. (2)

>>[3] Are you now or have you every been, committed into an
>> institution for the so called (H@h!) insane? (gain two points)

Well, I was put under psychiatric observation for a while...(3)

>>[4] Do you know what an Omega Weapon is?

Uhh...Yea. (4)

>>[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?

Nope. Gladly. (4)

>>[6] Loose a point if you felt remorse.

Didn't use it, so no change there. (4)



>>[7] Do kit-killing arguments make you yawn?

Yawn? No. Laugh? Sometimes. Amazing how silly some people can be. (4)

>>[8] Are you fanatical in your devotion to the war?

I don't really have a choice...(5)

>>[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?

<nodnodnodnod> (6)

>>[10] Does cuteness make you kill? (gain three points)

Not on it's own...(6)



>>[11] Do you laugh in the face of danger?

Does insulting danger's breath count? (7)

>>[12] Do you just sit and laugh anyway...all the time...as you play
>> with your knives...

Since I don't have any knives..(7)

>>[13] Do you like Art?

Yep. (8)

>>[14] Do you like biological Art?

I could interpret this a couple of ways, but...(9)

>>[15] Loose a point if any of your materials ever ran away.

I don't make that kind of art. I just look at it..(9)

>>[16] Loose a point if you ever believe one blow is enough.

All depends on the size of the weapon. But just to be safe, no. (10)

>>[17] Do you like fluffy widdle rabbits - for dinner?

Only when properly cooked. (11)

>>[18] Do you think the Fuddites are not taking strong enough measures?

Sometimes, a bit too strong. (11)

>>[19] Do you love your Family?

Very much so. That's why I won't let them know about the war. (12)

>>[20] Are the relationships in your Family so convoluted you're not
>> sure if your sister is not also your uncle?

<strangelook> I'm from LA, not Georgia. (12)

>>[21] Pretty...prettytoeat to sleep...drippszes down the walls and
>> covers my face...killkillkill!

<slowlybacksaway> Uhhh...could you put down the knife? (12)

>>[22] Gottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedgegottagettabettaedge...

<radiostatic> Mayday, mayday. I could use some backup, over! (12)

>>[23] He was so nice. His fur was so soft and his eyes so bright, but
>> I knew he had to die. It didn't matter that I loved him. You see,
>> I had realised he was a symp at heart.

<sidewaysglance> Is this some little 'hint'? (12)

>>[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?

No. My family are neutrals. And I hope it says that way. (12)

>>[25] Do you laugh maniacally at the newbies, knowing that they will
>> either serve the Four or be SPAM?

Often, yea. (13)

Oooo..lucky 13!

>11-15: Better @nd better. Y0u w0uld m@ke @n excellent member 0f the
> F0ur @nd we re$pect y0u f0r 1t. Keep up the g00d w0rk @nd
> remember, the 0nly g00d dev1lbunny 1$ @n ev1$cer@ted
> dev1lbunny.

One more question...should I be worried now?

--
Maybe I'll just hide over here behind this rock...
'TinselTown' O'Donnel
AoF Communications Officer, Pittsburgh Station
I do not speak for the AoF, Pittsburgh Station, or Fudds in general.

Axe-Wielding Fuddite

unread,
May 4, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/4/96
to

(Not quite IC. Not quite OOC. Deal as you will...)

In alt.devilbunnies, gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au (Geoffrey Brent) wrote:

<"Besides, I haven't seen anything here I'd feel comfortable about feeding
<from."

Well, ShortHare...


<>>>[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?

<>>No. I AM cute, or so strange men keep telling me.

Er, Kralk... ah, nevermind. Be nice to newbies, after all.


<><grin> "Re@d the F@Qs, de@r W1ll1@m. Welc0me t0 the f0ld."

<William smiles and borrows the FAQs. "So, what are the advantages to being on
<one side or the other ?" He looks between the Four, the Buns, the Fuddites,
<and anyone else I've forgotten, waiting for responses.

Well! The FAQs don't talk much about the *advantages*, so I'd better jump
right in here and set you a map.

If you choose to be a fluffer, you can engage in sick, unholy feasts involving
human toes, unbelievable sexual acts that we can't even discuss, involving
indiscrimate, horny fluffy partners, and you can write cheerfully about
utterly callous acts of murder and mayhem against children. On the downside,
robots have more free will than devilbunnies, your moral position will best be
described as "cramped", and you have to like things like Barney, Fluffy Muffy
Cuddle dolls, and Snapple, or at least be able to write about them with a
determined cheerfulness that does not belie the revulsion that is the mark of
all thinking beings in these matters. And, of course, you have to face Rick,
Eric and I in banter. You also better have a lasting fondness for words like
bounce, fluff, and wyggle. But spelling ability is completely optional.

OK. On the Fudd side, you get the pure joy of writing from unassailable moral
high ground, you get to be human (which might or might not be an area of
expertise for you already), you get to espouse political incorrectness, and
you get pop bunnies heads off, which I think we all agree is just the natural
order at work. And you are allowed to be something of an individual as regards
your thought life, as long as you don't go to any extremes. On the down side,
you better like the taste of vanilla, straight up, in the morning, the sound
of axes grinding, and the smell and feel of supersoakers of HU; and you may
have to face LonGears and ShortHare in banter, which is about as rough as it
gets. And Wynn will hit on you, at which point you should just abandon all
hope. It's not like you'll ever get a date with anyone furless, either. Just
give up on the reproductive strategy aspects entirely, is my advice.

Forget the Ferrotti. The grammar is hopeless and your sexual options make
the Fudds look like hot tickets.

Fuddites are merely a vocal subset of Fudds; we attract the more
Fuddamentalist sort and call for the outright extermination of fluffers. We're
a bit of an embarassment to the existing Fudd establishment and there are
costs to that. But you get to say *exactly* what you feel. And on the plus
side, your reproductive options open right up again - you should see some of
my fan mail. By the way, what are your thoughts on Language and Machinery?

There may be a niche for you among the Squirrels. I doubt it - you seem like a
bright sort - but if you like to write a lot and not ever actually affect the
course of the war except by accident, life under Teral may be for you.

Sympdom is one possible approach. Humans on the bun side, these folk get the
joy of losing toes *and* loving Barney in public, and frankly I think that
explains the vast number of writers *clamoring* to write for them.

The criteria for Fourierism is largely acceptance by the existing Fouriers,
and frankly I doubt you are screwy enough. If you felt the family life
typified by the Addams family (the original panels, maybe the first movie) is
homey and comfortable, give it a shot. But no one is going to *like* you for
it, except the Sybil and Kralk, and they might like you *entirely* too much. No
problem with Cheshire - he's totally barking but he doesn't swing that way. By
the way, how do you feel about Art?

Or you could give neutrality a crack. Then everyone hates you as a spineless
wimp, but you get to make scattershot comments about the frequency of bun-fudd
sexual liasons, which embarasses the fudds to no end and can be used as a
lever against the buns by the creative.

<>"We never suspected it. He was so quiet, you know?"

< William Gordon - who never bothered the neighbours

Well, that's over. Everyone's a bother in the war.


--
I support animal rights - the right of animals to be tasty, to frolic
in sour cream sauces with red peppers and garlic, and, at need, to
complement a decent glass of wine.
72.299W, 42.715N. Aim carefully, Fluffers.

The Comedy Team from Hell

unread,
May 4, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/4/96
to

Geoffrey Brent wrote:

> The Sibyl wrote:
> ><looksovershoulder>
> >"! $h()uld w@rn y0u, the l@$t 0f y()ur $0rt here g0t...er..."
> ><looksatsmoulderingremainsofShadowPrince>
> ><blink>
> >"Well, we $0rt@ g0t bunn1e$ @nd hum@n$. )f c0ur$e,"

*AnD*Re@llY*vERy*LittlE*ELsE*.

...*hUMaNS*AnD*RaBBiTS*ARE*EnOUgh*to*Make*ANyoNe*g()*a*LittLe*...
*maD*.

> "Creativity is my profession. Dietary requirements and skin conditions
> do not make the man."

*hEH*. :)

> "Besides, I haven't seen anything here I'd feel comfortable about
> feeding from."

*DeVILbuNNieS*Are*,*unfORtuNaTElY*,*inEd!bLe*.

*UnlEsS*You'Ve*Be&n*$1byLizEd*,*()F*CouRsE*.



> >>>[5] Have you ever *used* an Omega Weapon?
> >>To kill things ? Yes.

> ><blink> "Th1$ c0uld be re@d 1n m@ny w@y$. G1ven number 4."
>
> "That's what I thought. Do I get a point for each different way ?"

*Er*,*THaT*MiGhT*JuST*ThrOw*The*NumbERs*0Ff*A*liTtLE*Bit*.

> >"T() qu0te one of the gre@te$t t@ct1c1@ns ()f 0ur t1me.
> >"'Bwahahahahahahahahaha!'"

> <frowns... thinkthinkthinkthink...> "Enrico Fermi ?"

<BLINK>

<chuckle>

*HeH*HeeheHEeh*. <snicker> <giggle> *hEE*H3e*HeE*! <reread>
<SNURK> <snickergigglesnort> <snort> <snort> *MmmMmMPPhHH*...
*MUA-HA-H@-Ha-HA...

<ten minutes pass...>

<wipe tears from eyes>

<sniff>

*Hee*hEe*hEE*.

...*cLOsE*EnouGH*.

> ><grin> "Re@d the F@Qs, de@r W1ll1@m. Welc0me t0 the f0ld."
>
> William smiles and borrows the FAQs. "So, what are the advantages to
> being on one side or the other ?"

/The tall, albino figure's face, whose muscles have been rippling and
contorting as he speaks, goes through a change; the muscles relax, the red
eyes stop burning, the shoulders and back straighten from their strangely
twisted position. Without knowing how, you know that it is a different
person who now speaks to you from deep within the same throat. (Mainly
because it takes way too much effort for the author to write for any
length of time in the other format, and he just doesn't have the patience
right now)/

The advantages?

<pull out several crumpled promotional leaflets from his pocket, look at
them dubiously, stuff them back in pocket>

Since the other posts have basically covered just about everything but my
neck of the woods, I'll just point out the advantages of *my* neck of the
woods, otherwise known as WASP. <grin>

In joining WASP, you get to be allies with both the AoF, the Fuddites,
Sibyl and Company, and have connections to just about all the major crime
cartels in the Western Hemisphere. You get to learn to be a pilot from
the man who has singlehandedly been responsible for more nervous
breakdowns, resignations, and assasinations in the FAA than any
combination of other aircraft pilots. Fly classic World War II vintage
warbirds, faithfully refitted and modified for anti-bunny warfare!
Nothing beats the adrenaline rush of flying a classic aircraft at treetop
level through the Rocky Mountains, especially when being chased by law
enforcement officials!

Besides, women love pilots.

Learn the fine arts of welding and metalworking, and enjoy the
satisfaction of restoring a scrapped, dead skeleton of an aircraft to a
shining, fully operational instrument of devilbunny death. Play with
fully mobile, 150+ decibel sound systems, loaded with the Mormon
Tabernacle Choir, Nine Inch Nails, George Thoroughgood, Tom Waits, and
many other forms of Audio Bunny Anathema. Enjoy the pulsing throb of a
high-power firehose firing a concentrated jet of Holy Vanilla Extract from
the back of a low-flying DC-3, spreading short-lived terror into the
fluffy hearts of your equally short-lived enemies below.

Did I mention that chicks dig pilots?

Control the Friendly Skies! Thumb your nose at FAA regulations! Drop new
and interesting items out of aircraft! (At last accounting, 21"
television sets are the current favorite). Enjoy the company of the
Bandito Brigade, the best party-throwers in the Solar System, and the most
accurate depiction of Pure Entropy ever seen by sentient life on this
planet. (Besides the Four, of course.) And *free* *tequila*!

By the way, the ladies go *crazy* for pilots.



> He looks between the Four, the Buns, the Fuddites, and anyone else I've
> forgotten, waiting for responses.

Ah, they don't have as good a dental plan.

Eric
Co-founder of WASP, Aircraft Recruitment Specialist, and all-around froody guy.

Remus Shepherd

unread,
May 5, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/5/96
to

William Gordon wrote:
> William smiles and borrows the FAQs. "So, what are the advantages to
> being on one side or the other ?"
> He looks between the Four, the Buns, the Fuddites, and anyone else I've
> forgotten, waiting for responses.

Welcome, William! Let's see...we've skipped over the important criteria
for joining the war against the Evil that Fluffs (tm)...you know, being
barking mad, believing in talking killer rabbits (something I had trouble
with), all that lot. Going straight for choosing a side, eh?

Well, it's simple. You're human. That means that the bunnies either
hate you or, at worst, *love* you. :/ You can be their friend or you
can be their congealed lunchmeat. Only someone willing to throw away
their humanity, their morality, their shoes, and their mortal soul would
consider turning their back on their species and helping the devilbunnies.

So be careful, William...they know you know, now, and they're going to
try and come for you no matter what your final decision is. I'm sure
you'll make the right choice...just be careful, my friend, that they
don't try to make your choice for you. Take care, William! Beware anything
that fluffs or winks at you!

...
Remus Shepherd (re...@netcom.com)

The Colective

unread,
May 5, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/5/96
to

Dr Kralk wrote:

> Anybun up for a renewal of "The Romper Room"? [unsuccessfulinnocentfluff]
> I assure you all I am a very Good Bee. Have a little...honey. >|D~

d'ya have the magic mirror, huh?? and Ky00t little chairs an tables??

____________________________________________________________________
Cuddlebunni - "i always do what's right...i never do anything
wrong....i'm a romper room doobee, a doobee all day long buzz buzz!"

Sharree Thompson

unread,
May 5, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/5/96
to

On 3 May 1996, LonGears wrote:

> > Really? Have you heard the term "consulting adults"?
>

What's that???



> Yes. And you should do that more often.
> Child.
>

Are you talking about me behind my back, just because i'm only 9
months old and with a Body that will not quit (not to mention my tendancy
to wear black leather underclothes with chainmail blouses and skirts).

Stop being mean to mr Eric, he's nice. So are most of the Other
Fudds.


> -- General LonGears
>
> None of you qualify as "consenting" or as "adults."
> However, I *am* glad to see you're consulting someone
> more mature. Glad I could help.
>

You didn't seem to worried about that when you ordered Mommy
Raped, or has your standards been upped???


AlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierA
l l
i /\ | o Deadly and Darling i
e /__\ | __ .__ __. Charismic and charming e
r / \ | | |__| | | | | I'm totally disarming r
A / \ | | |__ | |__| A
l l
i I'm not another spandex hero i
e I'm the babe in leather and chain e
r r
AlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierAlierA


******************************************************************************
* To find out more about my creative
The Spyders * talents join us all in
* alt.devilbunnies
It seemed a perfect Marrage * Come watch Bill live up to his rep
As the Spyders stepped into the Carrage * Listen to Iago Rave
but when evening came around * Watch Will the Buntender banter
the groom was nowhere to be found. * Watch Dem continue to seduce Bill
* Watch me wonder if I'm insane
******************************************************************************
sha...@PEAK.ORG

Now where do I find the door back to the real world???


Ceredwyn Bensley

unread,
May 5, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/5/96
to

The Colective <rl...@st.nepean.uws.edu.au> writes:
>Dr Kralk wrote:
>> Anybun up for a renewal of "The Romper Room"? [unsuccessfulinnocentfluff]
>> I assure you all I am a very Good Bee. Have a little...honey. >|D~
>d'ya have the magic mirror, huh?? and Ky00t little chairs an tables??
>Cuddlebunni - "i always do what's right...i never do anything
>wrong....i'm a romper room doobee, a doobee all day long buzz buzz!"

<blink>
<blinkblink>
<looksatrestofgroup>
<'Im-not-touching-that-one'-hop>

^ ^ The Sibyl
\\// Define 'right' and 'wrong'.

Snug Fuzz

unread,
May 6, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/6/96
to

William Gordon wrote:

>"So, what are the advantages to being on one side or the other ?"

1) The bunnies will give you free SPAM and Snapple, and know lots
of cute girls they'll be happy to set up on a date with you.
You can also get free pets for all your friends!

What you provide: Sympathisers are asked to give no more then
they can. If you can provide information from your place of
employ, that is more then enough. Depending on your ambition,
however, there is plenty of room for advancement. Spelling and
grammar skills are optional.

2) The Fudds will give you an axe and teach you how to kill small
forest creatures with it, your thumbs, and your own body fluids!
They can also provide combat or legal assitance when your actions
bring down the wrath of the aforementioned forest creatures or
the SPCA.

What you provide: Your heart, body and soul. But don't worry!
Once you join the Fudds you will think it is all necessary.
People of moral righteousness always welcome!

3) Join the squirrels and be given a small, non-functioning laser.
(They won't trust you with a functioning one.)

What you provide: Nuts.


Snug
,--- Come by for a consultation and get a free tin of SPAM! Even if
| you decide not to get a conversion, you get to *keep* the SPAM!
`---------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out our homepage on the World Wide Warren: Online home of the
http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~dougmacd/alt.dbs/ alt.dbs Who's Who!

Axe-Wielding Fuddite

unread,
May 6, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/6/96
to

In alt.devilbunnies, sn...@caerbannog.drg.com (Snug Fuzz) wrote:

<William Gordon wrote:

<>"So, what are the advantages to being on one side or the other ?"

<1) The bunnies will give you free SPAM and Snapple, and know lots
< of cute girls they'll be happy to set up on a date with you.

Which is moderately awkward if you happen to be female yourself, but
that's sympdom for you.

< You can also get free pets for all your friends!

Out of deference to the under-age, I'm not taking this one.

< What you provide: Sympathisers are asked to give no more then
< they can.

...Ten's about the limit, usually.

<2) The Fudds will give you an axe and teach you how to kill small
< forest creatures with it, your thumbs, and your own body fluids!

Which small forest creatures would those be, Snug?

<
< What you provide: Your heart, body and soul. But don't worry!
< Once you join the Fudds you will think it is all necessary.
< People of moral righteousness always welcome!

Yayy! He means me! Yayy!

<3) Join the squirrels and be given a small, non-functioning laser.
< (They won't trust you with a functioning one.)

But! You get to go on covert missions and steal working ones! If you
win, you get to start a faction! If you lose, you get *vaporized* by
*teral himself*!

< What you provide: Nuts.

Er. Let's stick to heart and soul, OK?

--
I wonder when Snug last *saw* a small forest creature?

Chad Kirvan

unread,
May 6, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/6/96
to

TinselTown (who makes Wierd Al look well-adjusted) writes:

>>>[19] Do you love your Family?
>Very much so. That's why I won't let them know about the war. (12)

and...

>>>[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?
>No. My family are neutrals. And I hope it says that way. (12)

Tinny, I'm only getting technical here because I can, but neutrals are
people that know about the war and consciously do not use their
resources to benefit either side.

That means your answer to #24 is null and void and your entire test
results will be thrown out. You can come out from behind that rock now.

I remain...
Chad Kirvan
Pianist/Singer
--------------------
Neutrals basically include
me and Will (list subject to
change at any time)

Daphnie Mentat

unread,
May 6, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/6/96
to

sm...@tiac.net (Axe-Wielding Fuddite) writes:

>sn...@caerbannog.drg.com (Snug Fuzz) wrote:
>
><1) The bunnies will give you free SPAM and Snapple, and know lots
>< of cute girls they'll be happy to set up on a date with you.
>Which is moderately awkward if you happen to be female yourself, but
>that's sympdom for you.

[ruffle]

>< You can also get free pets for all your friends!
>Out of deference to the under-age, I'm not taking this one.

[gigglebouncefluffwink]

>I wonder when Snug last *saw* a small forest creature?

Well [giggle] It's been a while since I visited [winkblush]

-----
Daphnie Mentat


'TinselTown' O'Donnel

unread,
May 6, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/6/96
to

Eric wrote:
[snip]
>
>Eric
>Co-founder of WASP, Aircraft Recruitment Specialist, and all-around froody guy.

But, does he know where his towel is?

--
<wrapstowelaroundhishead> Now the Ravenous Bunbalter Beast of Daphnie
can't see me! <giggle>

Dr Kralk

unread,
May 6, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/6/96
to

Cuddlebunni typed:

: Dr Kralk wrote:
:
: > Anybun up for a renewal of "The Romper Room"? [unsuccessfulinnocentfluff]
: > I assure you all I am a very Good Bee. Have a little...honey. >|D~

: d'ya have the magic mirror, huh?? and Ky00t little chairs an tables??

[laviscioussmile] Indeed, I do have the Magic Mirror. Although it's
bolted to the ceiling above the bed at the moment. And just look at
these comfy padded chairs.

[evilsmirk] Ignore the leather straps and electrodes. They're
nothing. Really. >|)


Dr. Lawrence Kralk
Lord Death, Mad Scientist, Don Juan
"[cackle] Now, let's play a little game I call 'Tesla's Revenge'..."


Axe-Wielding Fuddite

unread,
May 6, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/6/96
to

In alt.devilbunnies, Ch...@neutral.parties.org (Chad Kirvan) wrote:

<Neutrals basically include
<me and Will (list subject to
<change at any time)

Nope. You both work in a place that serves Froze Toes(tm). Neutral,
my toenail.

--
We have witnesses, remember.

Christopher Hemme

unread,
May 7, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/7/96
to

'TinselTown' O'Donnel (chis...@buffnet.net) wrote:

->--
-><wrapstowelaroundhishead> Now the Ravenous Bunbalter Beast of Daphnie
->can't see me! <giggle>

And here we see demonstrated the latest Fudd combat technique...

==
Major Campion

The Colective

unread,
May 7, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/7/96
to

kuddly k wrote:

> [laviscioussmile] Indeed, I do have the Magic Mirror. Although it's
> bolted to the ceiling above the bed at the moment. And just look at
> these comfy padded chairs.

i've heard about bunns like yew. kinky <bouncebounce>



> [evilsmirk] Ignore the leather straps and electrodes. They're
> nothing. Really. >|)

oow, yew *are* kinky. sorry, i'm not *that* kind of buck ;)

___________
Cuddlebunni


Axe-Wielding Fuddite

unread,
May 7, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/7/96
to

Well, Daphnie! Don't you think he's getting lonely?

--
So what if the coordinates for Snug are a little off. If we can get Daphnie and
Snug in the same town, we can justify a bigger bomb. Hey, Teral!
Got a job for you!

Amy Gillespie

unread,
May 7, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/7/96
to

On 6 May 1996, Chad Kirvan wrote:
> TinselTown (who makes Wierd Al look well-adjusted) writes:
>
> >>>[19] Do you love your Family?
> >Very much so. That's why I won't let them know about the war. (12)
>
> and...
>
> >>>[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?
> >No. My family are neutrals. And I hope it says that way. (12)
>
> Tinny, I'm only getting technical here because I can, but neutrals are
> people that know about the war and consciously do not use their
> resources to benefit either side.

He's got a point, Tinsel.

>
> That means your answer to #24 is null and void and your entire test
> results will be thrown out. You can come out from behind that rock now.

*grin*
Lucky you, Tinsel.

> I remain...
> Chad Kirvan
> --------------------


> Neutrals basically include
> me and Will (list subject to
> change at any time)

What? Are you implying Will might join a side, Chad?
*grinwink*
*whisper: You better stay nuetral, else LeatherWorkings will be all over
your family, and frankly, I'm not /that/ good of a fighter.*

-Cpl. Amy Roth


'TinselTown' O'Donnel

unread,
May 7, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/7/96
to

Chad Kirvan wrote:
>TinselTown (who makes Wierd Al look well-adjusted) writes:
>
<blink>
Why...I don't belive it. I'm..flattered...<grin> Thanks!

>>>>[19] Do you love your Family?
>>Very much so. That's why I won't let them know about the war. (12)
>
>and...
>
>>>>[24] Do you laugh bitterly at the neutrals?
>>No. My family are neutrals. And I hope it says that way. (12)
>
>Tinny, I'm only getting technical here because I can, but neutrals are
>people that know about the war and consciously do not use their
>resources to benefit either side.
>

<shurg> Diffrence of definition. I define neutrals as any one who hasn't
knowingly taken a side in the War. That includes those who don't know
anything about the War. Just my definition.

>That means your answer to #24 is null and void and your entire test
>results will be thrown out. You can come out from behind that rock now.
>

Oh..ah well. I never did look good in chrome anyhow <wink>

--

TinyBunny

unread,
May 7, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/7/96
to

In article <Pine.ULT.3.91.960505212947.9671B-100000@arthur>,
rl...@st.nepean.uws.edu.au says...

>Cuddlebunni - "i always do what's right...i never do anything
>wrong....i'm a romper room doobee, a doobee all day long buzz buzz!"

i'Ve neVer seen suCh a kyooTie pie!!
it juSt seNds mY hEArt up hiGh..
wHat a buCk,oh mE, oh my!
IsnT he just a dreAmboat!!! [sigh]

--
TinyBunny

But I love you! Won't you be my friend and play with me?


Commandant Herringbone

unread,
May 7, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/7/96
to

On 6 May 1996, Chad Kirvan wrote:
: > Tinny, I'm only getting technical here because I can, but neutrals are

: > people that know about the war and consciously do not use their
: > resources to benefit either side.

[austerefluff] Do not exalt yourself to a station of any importance,
human. Officially, the militia does not recognize *anyone* as
"neutral"; anyone misguided enough not to support the Cause of Ky00t is
our enemy. The few buns who are exempted are those who qualify for
non-combatant status on religious grounds.

The staff at Will's are classified as... [flipflipflip] ah yes:
"useful". The sole reason we permit you to play your charade is that you
have the good taste to serve BunnHattens and DBN-issue rum to our
troops. [fangygrin] I advise you against toying with a certain
fair-haired Fuddette of recent acquaintance. "Usefulness" can too easily
be interpreted as "collusion"... >'=


Commandant Herringbone


Lilith DemHareIs Keyes

unread,
May 7, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/7/96
to

Daphnie replied:

>AWF said:
> >I wonder when Snug last *saw* a small forest creature?
> Well [giggle] It's been a while since I visited [winkblush]


He said "small forest creature," not "nightmarish neo-goddess <sic>
from Hell."


___________________
Auntie Dem

Amy Gillespie

unread,
May 8, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/8/96
to

Actually, Complain, that was a reference to The Hitchhikers Guide to the
Galaxy. Don't you buns ever read?

-Cpl. Amy Roth
I've read the books, I'm not an avid follower, but I've read the books.
*grin*
Now... if we get started talking about the Wheel of Time on the
other hand.... ;)

Amy Gillespie

unread,
May 8, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/8/96
to

On Mon, 6 May 1996, Axe-Wielding Fuddite wrote:

> In alt.devilbunnies, Ch...@neutral.parties.org (Chad Kirvan) wrote:
>

> <Neutrals basically include
> <me and Will (list subject to
> <change at any time)
>

> Nope. You both work in a place that serves Froze Toes(tm). Neutral,
> my toenail.

Hey now!
They're neutral, you've got my word on it.
End this discussion now, John.

> --
> We have witnesses, remember.

I would suggest not bring that incident up, John, but it's
a little too late for that now, isn't it?

*deepfrown*
Didn't you ever learn any tact?

-Cpl. Amy Roth


The Colective

unread,
May 8, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/8/96
to

mistress p wrote:

> "Depend$ wh@t y0u cl@$$ @$ k1nky, d0e$n't 1t? @fter @ll, m0$t
> bunn1e$ $eem t0 $pend the1r t1me try!ng t() $ecuce cre@ture$ ten
> t1me$ the1r $1ze. Y()u m@y dr@w y0ur ()wn c0nclu$10n."

who needs to seduce? i'm so ky00t'n'cuddly, i'm irrisitable!

> >oow, yew *are* kinky. sorry, i'm not *that* kind of buck ;)
>

> <boink!>
> I think I'm missing something here...what kind of buck are you, exactly?!

the kind of buck who luvs yew all! the squirrels, the ferrotti, the
bunnies, the four, the world!!!!

why? what kind of a buck did yew *think*?

(and to think she's getting married too)

___________
Cuddlebunny


Snug Fuzz

unread,
May 8, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/8/96
to

Lilith DemHareIs Keyes <hw9...@u.cc.utah.edu> wrote:
> Daphnie replied:

> > >I wonder when Snug last *saw* a small forest creature?
> > Well [giggle] It's been a while since I visited [winkblush]
> He said "small forest creature," not "nightmarish neo-goddess <sic>
> from Hell."

Actually, Dem, [cough fluff], the above describes *you*. Who used
the "Dreamworld" to pop into whose dreams? [raise eyebrow]

Snug
,--- Too much of a gentlebun to explain
| why the rest of the description fits.

Remus Shepherd

unread,
May 8, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/8/96
to

TinyBunny (yli...@flintheart.ead.auckland.ac.nz) wrote:
: >Cuddlebunni - "i always do what's right...i never do anything
: >wrong....i'm a romper room doobee, a doobee all day long buzz buzz!"
:
: i'Ve neVer seen suCh a kyooTie pie!!
: it juSt seNds mY hEArt up hiGh..
: wHat a buCk,oh mE, oh my!
: IsnT he just a dreAmboat!!! [sigh]

No, no. Nononononono.

TinyBunny and Cuddlebunni having a kyootie-pie courtship is far, far
too much saccharine for this newsgroup to handle. People will be writhing
in sugar-overloaded agony for hours. It'll clog up the newsfeeds with
excess electronic syrup. Digital Diabetes will take over Usenet...John
Grubor and Bob Allisat will admit to wearing rocket-ship underwear...
Joel Furr will start selling plush 'hug lemurs'...David Lawrence will
newgroup rec.cuddle...and Chris Lewis will start apologizing to spammers
with the dreaded line, 'I love you, you love me...'.

This may look like an innocent kit's first crush, but make no mistake --
this is a devious attack, meant to infiltrate and destroy the human users
of the internet.

Plus, please consider another thing. My name is Remus and I am a
cuteness addict. Now, I keep a cuton detector by my computer when I
read alt.devilbunnies. For most posts, the cuton irradiation produced
by the bunnies is within acceptable limits. But whenever a kit posts,
cuton levels double.

The post that I have quoted above registered a cuteness radiance
*four times* as intense as one of Snug's posts -- which are themselves barely
within allowable daily limits for a human being. I'm a recovering cuteness
addict, and being exposed to this level of cuteness may be damaging
to my mental health! <fluff!>

<grits teeth> Wabbits, can't you keep your kits off the net?!?

...
Remus Shepherd (re...@netcom.com)

Daphnie Mentat

unread,
May 8, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/8/96
to

Lilith DemHareIs Keyes <hw9...@u.cc.utah.edu> writes:
>Daphnie replied:

>>AWF said:
>
>> >I wonder when Snug last *saw* a small forest creature?
>> Well [giggle] It's been a while since I visited [winkblush]
>He said "small forest creature," not "nightmarish neo-goddess <sic>
>from Hell."

[giggle] Oh. My mistake [winkfluffgigglebounce]

-----
Daphnie Mentat


Kkatman (Furry Rep.)

unread,
May 8, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/8/96
to


Sallie approaches her beloved.

{sweetsmile} {cheekkiss} "Oh, Aldin, have you seen Lady
Pestilence's survey?"

"I got a 22! What did you get?"


_
_/` ; Sallie Squirrel
__/ />>
(_/|__\

Christopher Hemme

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

Amy Gillespie (a...@sunrem.com) wrote:

->*smirk*
->Oh, you are far too clever, Campion.

I am aware of that fact.

->Perhaps you should listen to your own words and apply it to yourself,
->my darling Major...

Please refrain from calling me that. Unlike some, I value my life.

==
Major Campion

Amy Gillespie

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

On 8 May 1996, Christopher Hemme wrote:
> Amy Gillespie (a...@sunrem.com) wrote:
> ->On 7 May 1996, Christopher Hemme wrote:

>
> ->> 'TinselTown' O'Donnel (chis...@buffnet.net) wrote:
> ->>
> ->> ->--
> ->> -><wrapstowelaroundhishead> Now the Ravenous Bunbalter Beast of Daphnie
> ->> ->can't see me! <giggle>
> ->>
> ->> And here we see demonstrated the latest Fudd combat technique...
>
> ->Actually, Complain, that was a reference to The Hitchhikers Guide to the
> ->Galaxy. Don't you buns ever read?
>
> <sigh> I think I see the problem now... Fudds have a difficult
> time recognizing banter. That would explain their ineptitude at
> comebacks. I suppose I have been expecting too much.

*smirk*


Oh, you are far too clever, Campion.

Perhaps you should listen to your own words and apply it to yourself,

my darling Major...

-Cpl. Amy Roth
*shrug*
It might work...


Amy Gillespie

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

On 8 May 1996, Kkatman (Furry Rep.) wrote:
>
>
> Sallie approaches her beloved.
>
> {sweetsmile} {cheekkiss} "Oh, Aldin, have you seen Lady
> Pestilence's survey?"
>
> "I got a 22! What did you get?"

*blinkstwice*
Why am I suddenly /VERY/ afraid?

-Cpl. Amy Roth
*gulp*


Amy Gillespie

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

On Wed, 8 May 1996, Axe-Wielding Fuddite wrote:

> In alt.devilbunnies, Amy Gillespie <a...@sunrem.com> wrote:
> ...of me...

>
> <*deepfrown*
> <Didn't you ever learn any tact?
>

> Shove it, Amy.

*sighsrolleyes*
What ever.

> Did I forget to answer the question?

Oh, no, you did, John.

-Cpl. Amy Roth


Merata Smith

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

Cuddlebunni writes:
>
> mistress p wrote:
*some.hack.n.slash*

> > <boink!>
> > I think I'm missing something here...what kind of buck are you, exactly?!
>
> the kind of buck who luvs yew all! the squirrels, the ferrotti, the
> bunnies, the four, the world!!!!

*blink* I've heard of the devilbunny libido before...
Amazing.

Merata Smith Do
(and stay away from me)


> ___________
> Cuddlebunny

Chaos

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

Major Campin' wrote while on a trip:

>'TinselTown' O'Donnel (chis...@buffnet.net) wrote:
>-><wrapstowelaroundhishead> Now the Ravenous Bunbalter Beast of Daphnie
>->can't see me! <giggle>
> And here we see demonstrated the latest Fudd combat technique...

Yes, the Somebody Else's Problem field is a wonder to behold (or not),
isn't it? You see, the way it works is you make something that you
wouldn't expect to ever happen happen, and then people tend to ignore
you. See, Tinsel's not there!

<LookAtTinselWithGarishTowelWrappedAroundHisHead>

All right, so that's a bad example.

-Chaos
"What's this? A switch? No, just fooling. We're going to die anyway!"
--- Ford Prefect, Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Teral Acorn

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

Amy Gillespie <a...@sunrem.com> writes:

>*deepfrown*
>Didn't you ever learn any tact?

Tact is a bunny plot, meant to keep people placid and easily controllable.
[flick] It never hurts to acknowledge the Truth! [bounce]

==---------
Teral Acorn

Ceredwyn Bensley

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

sm...@tiac.net (Axe-Wielding Fuddite) writes:
>(Not quite IC. Not quite OOC. Deal as you will...)
>In alt.devilbunnies, gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au (Geoffrey Brent) wrote:
><"Besides, I haven't seen anything here I'd feel comfortable about feeding
><from."
>Well, ShortHare...

<witheringlook> "!$n't 1t tr@d1t1()n@l t0 w@1t @t le@$t @ week bef0re
the $h0rth@re j0ke$ $t@rt?"

><>>>[9] Does ky00tness make you ill?
><>>No. I AM cute, or so strange men keep telling me.
>Er, Kralk... ah, nevermind. Be nice to newbies, after all.

<ominoussilence>

><><grin> "Re@d the F@Qs, de@r W1ll1@m. Welc0me t0 the f0ld."
><William smiles and borrows the FAQs. "So, what are the advantages to being on
><one side or the other ?" He looks between the Four, the Buns, the Fuddites,
><and anyone else I've forgotten, waiting for responses.

The Sibyl raises a razor taloned paw, only to have the Axe-Wielding
Fuddite WHOM SHE THOUGHT WAS A FRIEND butt in!
(1f he beh@ve$ l1ke th1$ much m0re ! m@y h@ve t0 c0nf1$c@te h1$
p@tented 'F()ur1er-We@p()n 0f m@$$ de$truct10n' (tm), He@ther.)

>If you choose to be a fluffer, you can engage in sick, unholy feasts involving
>human toes, unbelievable sexual acts that we can't even discuss, involving
>indiscrimate, horny fluffy partners, and you can write cheerfully about
>utterly callous acts of murder and mayhem against children. On the downside,
>robots have more free will than devilbunnies, your moral position will best be
>described as "cramped", and you have to like things like Barney, Fluffy Muffy
>Cuddle dolls, and Snapple, or at least be able to write about them with a
>determined cheerfulness that does not belie the revulsion that is the mark of
>all thinking beings in these matters. And, of course, you have to face Rick,
>Eric and I in banter. You also better have a lasting fondness for words like
>bounce, fluff, and wyggle. But spelling ability is completely optional.

<nervouslook> "@rtH^H^H^H, W1ll1@m, d0n't jump t0 @ny c0nclu$10n$..."

<deletiaofFuddpropaganda>

"$umm@ry. Y()u pr0b@bly $h0uldn't j01n the Fudd$ e1ther. @ n1ce
gr0up 0f pe0ple, but...y0u kn0w. $0mewh@t...k00ky."

>Fuddites are merely a vocal subset of Fudds; we attract the more
>Fuddamentalist sort and call for the outright extermination of fluffers. We're
>a bit of an embarassment to the existing Fudd establishment and there are
>costs to that. But you get to say *exactly* what you feel. And on the plus
>side, your reproductive options open right up again - you should see some of
>my fan mail. By the way, what are your thoughts on Language and Machinery?

"! h@ve @lw@y$ @dm1red the ten@c1ty ()f th1$ gr0up. Unf0rtun@tely,
$h()uld y0u m@ke *one* $pell!ng m!$T@ke, y0u're t@ken f0r @ $ymp @nd
$h0t."

>There may be a niche for you among the Squirrels. I doubt it - you seem like a
>bright sort - but if you like to write a lot and not ever actually affect the
>course of the war except by accident, life under Teral may be for you.

<bounce>
"The $qu1rrel$ @re @ n0ble group 0f f1ghter$ wh0$e @tt1tude t0 ()meg@
we@p0n$ 1$ excellent @nd c0ncur$ w1th my 0wn. D() n0t undere$t1m@te
the$e br@ve w@rr10r$. !f *you* were en$l@ved under th0$e wh0 f0rced
B@rney d0wn y0ur thr0@t every d@y, w0uldn't *you* be eccentr1c?"

>The criteria for Fourierism is largely acceptance by the existing Fouriers,
>and frankly I doubt you are screwy enough. If you felt the family life
>typified by the Addams family (the original panels, maybe the first movie) is
>homey and comfortable, give it a shot. But no one is going to *like* you for
>it, except the Sybil and Kralk, and they might like you *entirely* too much. No
>problem with Cheshire - he's totally barking but he doesn't swing that way. By
>the way, how do you feel about Art?

<STOMP!> "! @m @ m0n0g@m()u$ d0e, $1r! Why, h0w c()uld *@ny0ne*
c0mp@re w1th Che$h1re? H0w w0uld y()u feel 1f the $@me @ccu$@t10n$
were m@de @b0ut He@ther (@nd they were...the Bun$ w0uld h@ve t0 climb
t0 get *int0* the gutter)?!"
<injuredlook>
"Kr@lk...@hhh...he'$ very l0nely. P00r buck. !f Only m0re
under$t00d h1m! H1$ ded1c@t10n, h1$ k1ndne$$ t0 M@r@...he'$ @ F@m1ly
m@n."
<pause>
"@nd wh@t$ wr0ng w1th the @dd@m$ f@mily @nyw@y?"
<mortishapurrrrrr>

><>"We never suspected it. He was so quiet, you know?"
>< William Gordon - who never bothered the neighbours
>Well, that's over. Everyone's a bother in the war.

<leergrinnod>
<pause>
<gigglecrackedbrainspinjumpclickheels>

>I support animal rights - the right of animals to be tasty, to frolic
>in sour cream sauces with red peppers and garlic, and, at need, to
>complement a decent glass of wine.
>72.299W, 42.715N. Aim carefully, Fluffers.

^ ^ The Sibyl
\\// No one's hit 72.299W, 42.715N yet.
{--} The Fluffers can't get anything right.
[] +==+----oo-oo--+ Web Page :http://www-mugc.cc.monash.edu.au/~clben1
[]===|==| | | | ||)----------- De$tr()y the Ev!l! Get the F@Q fr0m:
[] +==+-----------+ http://www.xmission.com/~snowhare *n0w*!


Ceredwyn Bensley

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

The Colective <rl...@st.nepean.uws.edu.au> writes:
>mistress p wrote:
>> "Depend$ wh@t y0u cl@$$ @$ k1nky, d0e$n't 1t? @fter @ll, m0$t
>> bunn1e$ $eem t0 $pend the1r t1me try!ng t() $ecuce cre@ture$ ten
>> t1me$ the1r $1ze. Y()u m@y dr@w y0ur ()wn c0nclu$10n."
>who needs to seduce? i'm so ky00t'n'cuddly, i'm irrisitable!

<sigh> "!t w0uld be m0re fun 1f y()u d1dn't 1n$1$t 0n pr0v1ng my
p()1nt$ *f0r* me."

>> >oow, yew *are* kinky. sorry, i'm not *that* kind of buck ;)

>> <boink!>
>> I think I'm missing something here...what kind of buck are you, exactly?!
>the kind of buck who luvs yew all! the squirrels, the ferrotti, the
>bunnies, the four, the world!!!!

<smaksforeheadwithpaw>
<wince>
"When they were g1v1ng ()ut the $elf pre$erv@t10n 1n$t1nct, were y0u
*l@te*?"

>why? what kind of a buck did yew *think*?

"M@ybe @...l0nely buck wh0 need$ $0me c0mp@n10n$h1p?"

>(and to think she's getting married too)

<bounce!>

^ ^ The Sibyl
\\// Matchmaker...
{--}

Ceredwyn Bensley

unread,
May 9, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/9/96
to

The Art Auction continues...

ct...@which.way.to.ottowa.net (The Comedy Team from Hell) writes:
>Geoffrey Brent wrote:
>> The Sibyl wrote:
>> >"Well, we $0rt@ g0t bunn1e$ @nd hum@n$. )f c0ur$e,"
>*AnD*Re@llY*vERy*LittlE*ELsE*.
>...*hUMaNS*AnD*RaBBiTS*ARE*EnOUgh*to*Make*ANyoNe*g()*a*LittLe*...
>*maD*.

The Sibyl looks somewhat fondly at Eri*k*, in the manner of one
friend regarding another's idiosyncracies.

>> "Creativity is my profession. Dietary requirements and skin conditions
>> do not make the man."
>*hEH*. :)

<grin>

>> "Besides, I haven't seen anything here I'd feel comfortable about
>> feeding from."

>*DeVILbuNNieS*Are*,*unfORtuNaTElY*,*inEd!bLe*.
>*UnlEsS*You'Ve*Be&n*$1byLizEd*,*()F*CouRsE*.

<bounce!> "D1d 1 f0rget t0 ment!()n the ultr@ fun v1ru$ y0u get
1nfected w1th when y0u j01n the F()ur?"
<thinks>
"@ctu@lly, pr0b@bly n0t..."

>/The tall, albino figure's face, whose muscles have been rippling and
>contorting as he speaks, goes through a change; the muscles relax, the red
>eyes stop burning, the shoulders and back straighten from their strangely
>twisted position. Without knowing how, you know that it is a different
>person who now speaks to you from deep within the same throat. (Mainly
>because it takes way too much effort for the author to write for any
>length of time in the other format, and he just doesn't have the patience
>right now)/

"B()()()()000000! We w@nt Er1k b@ck! He'$ fun!"

>Enjoy the company of the
>Bandito Brigade, the best party-throwers in the Solar System, and the most
>accurate depiction of Pure Entropy ever seen by sentient life on this
>planet.

"Hey!" <STOMP>

>(Besides the Four, of course.)

"Th@t$ better."

>Ah, they don't have as good a dental plan.

<examinesEri*c*'steeth>
(OOC: Keeping track of the letter changes, Art? This is
*very*important* when dealing with our somewhat eccentric friend
here...)
"()ur dent@l pl@n 1$ better. L00k @t *my* teeth..."
<exposesvorpalfangs>

^ ^ The Sibyl
\\// Erik...if only Eric wouldn't keep putting
{--} him down...<shakeshead>

The Colective

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

remus wrote:

> Well, it's simple. You're human. That means that the bunnies either
> hate you or, at worst, *love* you.

and *whats* wrong with loving him? love is the way of the Mother. i love
him, i love yew too remus.

*bunnihugs*bunnisnuggles*bunnicuddles*

___________
Cuddlebunni


Geoffrey Brent

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

In article <clben1.831684350@giaec> clb...@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au (Ceredwyn Bensley) writes:

>The Art Auction continues...

I _am_ glad I chose that name...

><bounce!> "D1d 1 f0rget t0 ment!()n the ultr@ fun v1ru$ y0u get
>1nfected w1th when y0u j01n the F()ur?"
><thinks>
>"@ctu@lly, pr0b@bly n0t..."

"A virus ?" Art's eyes light up. He seems on the point of showing the
Sibyl a vein, but thinks better of it.

>>Ah, they don't have as good a dental plan.
><examinesEri*c*'steeth>
>(OOC: Keeping track of the letter changes, Art? This is
>*very*important* when dealing with our somewhat eccentric friend
>here...)
>"()ur dent@l pl@n 1$ better. L00k @t *my* teeth..."
><exposesvorpalfangs>

[William would, at this stage, show off his likewise...] Art steps over
to the Sibyl, face bright and curious, and looks at her teeth from close
up. He reaches out and almost touches them.

Art Black
not a vampire, but possibly a Lost Boy
--
(gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au)

Ceredwyn Bensley

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au (Geoffrey Brent) writes:
>But neither of them could quite cope with Barney.

<mutter> "!'d l1ke t(0 $ee the hum@n wh0 c0uld."

>>gets. And Wynn will hit on you, at which point you should just abandon all
>>hope. It's not like you'll ever get a date with anyone furless, either. Just
>>give up on the reproductive strategy aspects entirely, is my advice.
>Umm... If William was still here, this would be a really grave tactical
>error. His Tragic Lost Love (tm) was of the distinctly furry
>persuasion.

<paniclook>
<flinch>
"F()R Fr1th'$ $@ke d0n't g1ve the d@mned ev1l be@$T$ @munn1t10n!"

>>The criteria for Fourierism is largely acceptance by the existing Fouriers,
>>and frankly I doubt you are screwy enough. If you felt the family life

>I think the Sibyl might want to respond to that remark. Or her dear
>writer, at least.

(OOC : Geoffrey, *you* are screwy enough. But is *Art* up to it?
That is the question. 'Dear writer'? <grin>)

>>typified by the Addams family (the original panels, maybe the first movie) is
>>homey and comfortable, give it a shot. But no one is going to *like* you for
>>it, except the Sybil and Kralk, and they might like you *entirely* too much. No
>>problem with Cheshire - he's totally barking but he doesn't swing that way. By
>>the way, how do you feel about Art?

>Well, you get him interested, and then... oh. I like it.

<boink>
"!n$1nu@t10n 1$ g01ng t0 k1ll h1m."

^ ^ The Sibyl
\\// Banter awayyyyyyy!
{--}

Ceredwyn Bensley

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

Rickie Andersen <gr...@leland.stanford.edu> writes:

>Next.

"N0. F1r$t."

>The Four will offer you a job involving torturing bunnies to death and
>killing kits -- kits being the young of the lapine race, and almost the
>only subset which a few among us hope may yet be turned from their
>horrible fate.

"Bec@u$e k1t$ @re m0re ky00t th@n @dult$ they $h0uld be k1lled
*f1r$t*. !t m@ke$ $en$e! Be$1de$...th bunn1e$ t0rtured u$ unt0
de@th."
<utterlycoldshrug>

>Oh, yes, and the Four may also at some point involve you in the use of an
>Omega Weapon -- an Omega Weapon, that is, being a device so dangerous
>that it threatens the very existence of life on Earth, whether directly or
>through escalatory retaliation.

<excitedbounce> "()00h! $@y 1t @g@1n!"

>The Four were brought to justice once for the use of an Omega Weapon. If
>they employ one again, they will be hunted down again, and made to pay the
>price for their actions. As will any who aid them.

<pause>
"The m0$t recent ()meg@ v10l@t10n w@$ c@u$ed by @ dev1lbunny. !t w@$
d1rected @g@1n$t hum@n$. THe F()ur'$ u$e wa$ d1rected @g@1n$t
dev1lbunn1e$. T0 tr1@l were br0ught the F()ur. T0 @ $l@p 0n the
p@w, the dev1lbunny. The $y$tem 1$ c0rrupt."
<sadlook>
"M@ny Fudd$ h@ve been kn0wn t0 $@y th@t *we* @re @ w0r$e d@nger th@n
the Fluffer$!"
<STOMP!>

>Join us.

"Be SP@M."

^ ^ The Sibyl
\\// Rickie only hates the Four because we call him
{--} Rickie...

Geoffrey Brent

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

>>Fuddites are merely a vocal subset of Fudds; we attract the more
>>Fuddamentalist sort and call for the outright extermination of fluffers. We're
>>a bit of an embarassment to the existing Fudd establishment and there are
>>costs to that. But you get to say *exactly* what you feel. And on the plus
>>side, your reproductive options open right up again - you should see some of
>>my fan mail. By the way, what are your thoughts on Language and Machinery?

>"! h@ve @lw@y$ @dm1red the ten@c1ty ()f th1$ gr0up. Unf0rtun@tely,
>$h()uld y0u m@ke *one* $pell!ng m!$T@ke, y0u're t@ken f0r @ $ymp @nd
>$h0t."

"Well... I'm a good speller, but somewhere along the line we'd have a
misunderstanding about aluminium or honour or centers. Or how to
pronounce 'lever'. That would be rather sad."

Art Black
valour
tumour
etc
--
(gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au)

Geoffrey Brent

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

>>But neither of them could quite cope with Barney.
><mutter> "!'d l1ke t(0 $ee the hum@n wh0 c0uld."

"No you wouldn't."

>>>The criteria for Fourierism is largely acceptance by the existing Fouriers,
>>>and frankly I doubt you are screwy enough. If you felt the family life
>>I think the Sibyl might want to respond to that remark. Or her dear
>>writer, at least.

>(OOC : Geoffrey, *you* are screwy enough. But is *Art* up to it?
>That is the question. 'Dear writer'? <grin>)

[OOC: We shall see. You're a wonderful, kind, soft-hearted, cheerful
person, Ceredwyn, and so I'm sending you something in the mail today.]

>>>the way, how do you feel about Art?
>>Well, you get him interested, and then... oh. I like it.
><boink>
>"!n$1nu@t10n 1$ g01ng t0 k1ll h1m."

"There are worse ways to die."

Art Black
--
(gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au)

Geoffrey Brent

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

>>Oh, yes, and the Four may also at some point involve you in the use of an
>>Omega Weapon -- an Omega Weapon, that is, being a device so dangerous
>>that it threatens the very existence of life on Earth, whether directly or
>>through escalatory retaliation.
>
><excitedbounce> "()00h! $@y 1t @g@1n!"

Art looks curiously at the Sibyl, searches his memory for a while and
adopts a deep, authoritative voice.

"They're unstoppable, Mr. President !"

Dramatic pause.

"If Lex Luthor presses that button, the whole of California will slide
into the ocean !"

Another pause.

"Remove the control rods, Sonya."

And finally:

"This could be the end of civilisation as we know it."

Art Black
feeding the Sibyl
--
(gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au)

Geoffrey Brent

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

> Welcome, William! Let's see...we've skipped over the important criteria
>for joining the war against the Evil that Fluffs (tm)...you know, being
>barking mad, believing in talking killer rabbits (something I had trouble
>with), all that lot. Going straight for choosing a side, eh?

> Well, it's simple. You're human. That means that the bunnies either

>hate you or, at worst, *love* you. :/ You can be their friend or you
>can be their congealed lunchmeat. Only someone willing to throw away
>their humanity, their morality, their shoes, and their mortal soul would
>consider turning their back on their species and helping the devilbunnies.

[OOC: William isn't actually human, no longer has a mortal soul, and
doesn't always wear shoes. But he has a morality of sorts... ;-) Art, on
the other hand, is both human and humanitarian. It's just how he applies
it that causes the problems.]

> So be careful, William...they know you know, now, and they're going to
>try and come for you no matter what your final decision is. I'm sure
>you'll make the right choice...just be careful, my friend, that they
>don't try to make your choice for you. Take care, William! Beware anything
>that fluffs or winks at you!

Well, yes, but I KNOW about the dangers of the fair sex.

Art/William/Geoffrey
--
(gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au)

Geoffrey Brent

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

>> Well, it's simple. You're human. That means that the bunnies either
>> hate you or, at worst, *love* you.
>
>and *whats* wrong with loving him? love is the way of the Mother. i love

There's laws against that.

Art Black
--
(gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au)

Chad Kirvan

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

$1byl (A fender with paws) writes:

>sm...@tiac.net (Axe-Wielding Fuddite) writes:
>>In alt.devilbunnies, gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au (Geoffrey Brent) wrote:
>><"Besides, I haven't seen anything here I'd feel comfortable about feeding
>><from."
>>Well, ShortHare...
><witheringlook> "!$n't 1t tr@d1t1()n@l t0 w@1t @t le@$t @ week bef0re
>the $h0rth@re j0ke$ $t@rt?"

Well, sometimes the clinic is speedier in getting the test results in.

>"$umm@ry. Y()u pr0b@bly $h0uldn't j01n the Fudd$ e1ther. @ n1ce
>gr0up 0f pe0ple, but...y0u kn0w. $0mewh@t...k00ky."

As tempting as a discussion of cookware and shading comparisons seems,
I think I'll not even go there.

>>Fuddites are merely a vocal subset of Fudds; we attract the more
>>Fuddamentalist sort and call for the outright extermination of fluffers. We're
>>a bit of an embarassment to the existing Fudd establishment and there are
>>costs to that. But you get to say *exactly* what you feel. And on the plus
>>side, your reproductive options open right up again - you should see some of
>>my fan mail. By the way, what are your thoughts on Language and Machinery?
>"! h@ve @lw@y$ @dm1red the ten@c1ty ()f th1$ gr0up. Unf0rtun@tely,
>$h()uld y0u m@ke *one* $pell!ng m!$T@ke, y0u're t@ken f0r @ $ymp @nd
>$h0t."

Or if you're really persistent, you don't even need to make spelling
mistakes before they consider you a symp! *ironicsmile* And I can
only imagine Heather's reaction to this "fan mail" of yours, John.
BTW, has Heather become an official Fuddite after...well, recently?

>>There may be a niche for you among the Squirrels. I doubt it - you seem like a
>>bright sort - but if you like to write a lot and not ever actually affect the
>>course of the war except by accident, life under Teral may be for you.
><bounce>
>"The $qu1rrel$ @re @ n0ble group 0f f1ghter$ wh0$e @tt1tude t0 ()meg@
>we@p0n$ 1$ excellent @nd c0ncur$ w1th my 0wn. D() n0t undere$t1m@te
>the$e br@ve w@rr10r$. !f *you* were en$l@ved under th0$e wh0 f0rced
>B@rney d0wn y0ur thr0@t every d@y, w0uldn't *you* be eccentr1c?"

I'm sensing a problem here: I agree more with Sib than with John. Of
course, if one IS a squirrel, there are more options than just to work
under Teral. I mean you can.....
Well, there's....
Ummmmmm....
I'll get back to you on this one.

Maybe.

>><>"We never suspected it. He was so quiet, you know?"
>>< William Gordon - who never bothered the neighbours
>>Well, that's over. Everyone's a bother in the war.

Some more than others.

><leergrinnod>
><pause>
><gigglecrackedbrainspinjumpclickheels>

Click heels?
There's no place like (the) home...there's no place like (the) home...

>>72.299W, 42.715N. Aim carefully, Fluffers.

> \\// No one's hit 72.299W, 42.715N yet.
> {--} The Fluffers can't get anything right.

Now, if I *really* didn't like John, I'd ask Sibyl to show the little
lintballs how it's done and pummel the aforementioned coordinates.

I remain...
Chad Kirvan
Pianist/Singer
------------------
*onphonetotravelagent*
If I ever try to plan a trip to
Dunwich, don't let me.

Chit

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

CuddleBunny wrote:

>the kind of buck who luvs yew all! the squirrels, the ferrotti, the
>bunnies, the four, the world!!!!

So what? If you love everything, what does it mean?

It means you're hopped up on goofballs, that's what.

==
Chit

The Colective

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

On Thu, 9 May 1996, Merata Smith wrote:

> *blink* I've heard of the devilbunny libido before...
> Amazing.
>
> Merata Smith Do
> (and stay away from me)

<wigglefluff> but why? i wanna cuddle yew and hold yew, and give yew
*bunnisnuggles*!

<bouncebounce> come to ky00t Cuddlebunni and be luved ;)

________________________________________
Cuddlebunni - "i luv yew, yew luv me..."


Axe-Wielding Fuddite

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

**Note! Spelling requirements are waived in all posts that quote
The Sibyl(tm) extensively. Figure it out. **

In alt.devilbunnies, clb...@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au (Ceredwyn Bensley) wrote:
<sm...@tiac.net (Axe-Wielding Fuddite) wr0te:


<>In alt.devilbunnies, gbrent@rsc.@nu.edu.au (Ge0ffrey Brent) wrote:

<><"Besides, I haven't seen anything here I'd feel comfortable about feeding
<><from."

<>Well, ShortHare...

< <witheringlook> "!$n't 1t tr@d1t1()n@l t0 w@1t @t le@$t @ week bef0re
<the $h0rth@re j0ke$ $t@rt?"

A week from *what*? When the newbie joins? Absurd. Any newbie worth anything
spends a least a week in the Holy Archives beforehand. And if *you* haven't
warned him about ShortHare, I have to conclude you've been remus. Er. Remiss.


<><>>I AM cute, or so strange men keep telling me.

<>Er, Kralk... ah, nevermind. Be nice to newbies, after all.

< <ominoussilence>

Cat got your tongue? [wait for it]


<><><grin> "Re@d the F@Qs, de@r W1ll1@m. Welc0me t0 the f0ld."

<><William smiles and borrows the FAQs. "So, what are the advantages to being on
<><one side or the other ?" He looks between the Four, the Buns, the Fuddites,
<><and anyone else I've forgotten, waiting for responses.

<The Sibyl raises a razor taloned paw, only to have the Axe-Wielding
<Fuddite WHOM SHE THOUGHT WAS A FRIEND butt in!

Touchy, touchy! You *pawsed*. I wouldn't be me if I didn't jump in and deliver
my patented Words of Wisdom. We must present a *balanced* view, Sibyl! And
he *invited* responses from Fuddites explicitly!


<(1f he beh@ve$ l1ke th1$ much m0re ! m@y h@ve t0 c0nf1$c@te h1$
<p@tented 'F()ur1er-We@p()n 0f m@$$ de$truct10n' (tm), He@ther.)

You can't. She's using it to trim the roast. By the way, is it deliberate
that the selector switch won't go any lower than setting 3? We lose more
cutting boards that way.


<>If you choose to be a fluffer, you can engage in sick, unholy feasts involving

<>human toes, unbelievable sexual acts that we can't even discuss,...

< <nervouslook> "@rtH^H^H^H, W1ll1@m, d0n't jump t0 @ny c0nclu$10n$..."

If he can't jump to conclusions, he'd better stay out. This is not a place
for careful, considered actions. There's too much at stake to waste time
in forethought and planning. Ask teral.

< <deletiaofFuddpropaganda>

(sniff) My best stuff...!

<"$umm@ry. Y()u pr0b@bly $h0uldn't j01n the Fudd$ e1ther. @ n1ce
<gr0up 0f pe0ple, but...y0u kn0w. $0mewh@t...k00ky."

Doesn't she say just the sweetest things! But I'm not kooky, Sibyl. I
am Normal. Perpendicular, even.

<>Fuddites are merely a vocal subset of Fudds; we attract the more

<>Fuddamentalist sort and call for the outright extermination of fluffers....


<>By the way, what are your thoughts on Language and Machinery?

<"! h@ve @lw@y$ @dm1red the ten@c1ty ()f th1$ gr0up. Unf0rtun@tely,
<$h()uld y0u m@ke *one* $pell!ng m!$T@ke, y0u're t@ken f0r @ $ymp @nd
<$h0t."

That's *not* true! Hank made a typo in a private memo just three weeks
ago, and we even waived the Rite of Public Humiliation! Don't exaggerate,
Sibyl. We allow for error here in North Central Massachusetts.

< <bounce>
<"The $qu1rrel$ @re @ n0ble group 0f f1ghter$ wh0$e @tt1tude t0 ()meg@
<we@p0n$ 1$ excellent @nd c0ncur$ w1th my 0wn.

Which does not extend, you'll note, for the Four actually *lending*
the squirrels any such weapons. The Four has a lively sense of
Self Preservation. Heck, we can't even give teral "ops" on IRC.

<!f *you* were en$l@ved under th0$e wh0 f0rced

<B@rney d0wn y0ur thr0@t every d@y, ..."

*Blink*

I don't see much television, but I thought that was a *children's* show???

<>The criteria for Fourierism is largely acceptance by the existing Fouriers,
<>and frankly I doubt you are screwy enough. If you felt the family life
<>typified by the Addams family (the original panels, maybe the first movie) is
<>homey and comfortable, give it a shot. But no one is going to *like* you for
<>it, except the Sybil and Kralk, and they might like you *entirely* too much. No
<>problem with Cheshire - he's totally barking but he doesn't swing that way. By
<>the way, how do you feel about Art?

< <STOMP!> "! @m @ m0n0g@m()u$ d0e, $1r! Why, h0w c()uld *@ny0ne*
<c0mp@re w1th Che$h1re?"

I believe the courts faced that same question at various points... there's
just no legal precident in dealing with him!

<H0w w0uld y()u feel 1f the $@me @ccu$@t10n$
<were m@de @b0ut He@ther (@nd they were...the Bun$ w0uld h@ve t0 climb
<t0 get *int0* the gutter)?!"

The buns are truly the alligators in the sewers of life. But they killed
my child, Sibyl - we can handle the mere insults.

<<injuredlook>
<"Kr@lk...@hhh...he'$ very l0nely. P00r buck. !f Only m0re
<under$t00d h1m! H1$ ded1c@t10n, h1$ k1ndne$$ t0 M@r@...he'$ @ F@m1ly
<m@n."

Stop. You've said enough. Believe me.

<<pause>
<"@nd wh@t$ wr0ng w1th the @dd@m$ f@mily @nyw@y?"

My wife and I commented, on leaving the first movie, that it was nice to
see a movie for once that espoused family values. There was a family that
held together in adversity, supported each other (sometimes with
tape and electrodes!), protected itself against a hostile world. And the
man and wife were in love with *each other!* This, folk, is classic
family entertainment with a message that's hard to beat.

Just like alt.devilbunnies!

--
"You've done this before...!"

John Colwell

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

ct...@which.way.to.ottowa.net (The Comedy Team from Hell) writes:

>combination of other aircraft pilots. Fly classic World War II vintage
>warbirds, faithfully refitted and modified for anti-bunny warfare!
>Nothing beats the adrenaline rush of flying a classic aircraft at treetop
>level through the Rocky Mountains, especially when being chased by law
>enforcement officials!

Andersen? Any chance of becoming the official Fudd Liason Officer to WASP?

>Besides, women love pilots.

Please?

>Learn the fine arts of welding and metalworking, and enjoy the
>satisfaction of restoring a scrapped, dead skeleton of an aircraft to a
>shining, fully operational instrument of devilbunny death. Play with
>fully mobile, 150+ decibel sound systems, loaded with the Mormon
>Tabernacle Choir, Nine Inch Nails, George Thoroughgood, Tom Waits, and
>many other forms of Audio Bunny Anathema. Enjoy the pulsing throb of a
>high-power firehose firing a concentrated jet of Holy Vanilla Extract from
>the back of a low-flying DC-3, spreading short-lived terror into the
>fluffy hearts of your equally short-lived enemies below.

Ah. Did you see the Connie we got recently Eric?

>Did I mention that chicks dig pilots?

Yes you did.
Andersen. Pretty Please?

>Control the Friendly Skies! Thumb your nose at FAA regulations! Drop new
>and interesting items out of aircraft! (At last accounting, 21"
>television sets are the current favorite). Enjoy the company of the


>Bandito Brigade, the best party-throwers in the Solar System, and the most
>accurate depiction of Pure Entropy ever seen by sentient life on this

>planet. (Besides the Four, of course.) And *free* *tequila*!

Oooh a Party Plan.

>By the way, the ladies go *crazy* for pilots.

Unfortunately *crazy* women go for pilots too.


>Eric
>Co-founder of WASP, Aircraft Recruitment Specialist, and all-around froody guy.
^Thief?

Cheers
Cmdr. Gryphon, still a Fudd even after that.
I've found a calling in life.


Christopher Hemme

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

Ceredwyn Bensley (clb...@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au) wrote:

-><pause>
->"The m0$t recent ()meg@ v10l@t10n w@$ c@u$ed by @ dev1lbunny. !t w@$
->d1rected @g@1n$t hum@n$. THe F()ur'$ u$e wa$ d1rected @g@1n$t
->dev1lbunn1e$. T0 tr1@l were br0ught the F()ur. T0 @ $l@p 0n the
->p@w, the dev1lbunny. The $y$tem 1$ c0rrupt."
-><sadlook>
->"M@ny Fudd$ h@ve been kn0wn t0 $@y th@t *we* @re @ w0r$e d@nger th@n
->the Fluffer$!"
-><STOMP!>

That was not a weapon.
It was not directed against non-Fudds.
The only humans who died were Fudds.
There were no long-term effects.
It was an incredibly cool explosion.

==
Lenny, TechnoMage
Eat me

The Comedy Team from Hell

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

At 11:38 PM 5/6/96, Axe-Wielding Fuddite wrote:

>In alt.devilbunnies, Ch...@neutral.parties.org (Chad Kirvan) wrote:
>
><Neutrals basically include
><me and Will (list subject to
><change at any time)
>
>Nope. You both work in a place that serves Froze Toes(tm). Neutral,
>my toenail.

That was the gum-ball, I believe. :P

>We have witnesses, remember.

<grin>
Eric
(Witness)

The Comedy Team from Hell

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

At 12:36 AM 5/10/96, Geoffrey Brent wrote:

> The Collecticuddle wrote..


>>and *whats* wrong with loving him? love is the way of the Mother. i love
>
>There's laws against that.

Oh, he'll do *just* fine. :)

Eric

NoBunny

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

Cuddlbunni wrote:
> Merata Smith wrote:
>> *blink* I've heard of the devilbunny libido before...
>> (and stay away from me)
>
><bouncebounce> come to ky00t Cuddlebunni and be luved ;)

And if Cuddlebunni can't help, there's always me! <leer fluf>

NoBunny.
(Pinch-hitter to the stars!) =:)


NoBunny

unread,
May 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/10/96
to

The SWF wrote:
>The buns are truly the alligators in the sewers of life.

Hey, I *like* that line!

NoBunny.
(That makes Fudds the illiterate pipe-workers who get eaten by the second reel).


The Colective

unread,
May 11, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/11/96
to

art wrote:

> >and *whats* wrong with loving him? love is the way of the Mother. i love
>
> There's laws against that.

there is only the laws of the Mother, the rest are invented. i luv yew
<cuddlefluff>

___________
Cuddlebunni


The Colective

unread,
May 11, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/11/96
to

On Fri, 10 May 1996, Chit wrote:

> It means you're hopped up on goofballs, that's what.

umm, what are goofballs? oh, and chit.......

*iluvyewsnuggles*iluvyewcuddles*iluvyewhugs*

___________
Cuddlebunni


Axe-Wielding Fuddite

unread,
May 11, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/11/96
to

In alt.devilbunnies, gry...@sydney.DIALix.oz.au (John Colwell) wrote:

<ct...@which.way.to.ottowa.net (The Comedy Team from Hell) writes:

<>combination of other aircraft pilots. Fly classic World War II vintage
<>warbirds, faithfully refitted and modified for anti-bunny warfare!
<>Nothing beats the adrenaline rush of flying a classic aircraft at treetop
<>level through the Rocky Mountains, especially when being chased by law
<>enforcement officials!

<Andersen? Any chance of becoming the official Fudd Liason Officer to WASP?

Hey! I asked first. Weeks ago. I have a dream: that Fudds, Wanderers and
Squirrels will work together in a slightly chaotic, vastly entertaining,
bunny-pulping harmony.

<>Enjoy the pulsing throb of a

<>high-power firehose firing a concentrated jet of Holy Vanilla Extract...

You know, Eric, if I didn't know better, I'd say you need to get out more.


--
Or maybe much less.

John Colwell

unread,
May 11, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/11/96
to

sm...@tiac.net (Axe-Wielding Fuddite) writes:
>In alt.devilbunnies, sn...@caerbannog.drg.com (Snug Fuzz) wrote:
><William Gordon wrote:

>< You can also get free pets for all your friends!

>Out of deference to the under-age, I'm not taking this one.

I will. Actually it's a misprint it should read.

"you can also MAKE free pets OF all your friends"


>I wonder when Snug last *saw* a small forest creature?

Last night when he watched Bambi again. Snug thinks its an 'adult film'.
heh.

Cmdr. Gryphon


The Comedy Team from Hell

unread,
May 11, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/11/96
to

At 2:18 PM 4/26/96, Remus Shepherd wrote:

>The Sibyl wrote:
>> Could *you* be a member of the Four?
>> Do you have what it takes?
>
> Why do they bother to recruit? All they need to do is throw a net around
>a few institutions for the psychotically dangerous, and they'll have plenty
>of shock troops...

<ponder>

*hE*H@s*A*P()iNT*...

*Er1K*,*H()nORaRY*HorSEmAN*oF*ThE*ApOCAlYpSE*aNd*ArCHetYPe*oF*M@dNEs$*
("*ShOCk*"*trOoPS*...?)

Dr. Kralk

unread,
May 11, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/11/96
to

NoBunny writes:

: The SWF wrote:
: >The buns are truly the alligators in the sewers of life.

: Hey, I *like* that line!

[evilgrin] As do I. After all, we all know that alligators make
*wonderful* purses and shoes. >|)

Dr. Lawrence Kralk
Lord Death, Mad Scientist, Bon Vivant
"I see NoBunny as a nice pair of slingback pumps myself. He always did
make a heel of himself..."


Axe-Wielding Fuddite

unread,
May 11, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/11/96
to

In alt.devilbunnies, clb...@giaec.cc.monash.edu.au (Sibyl Bensley) wrote:
<Rickie Andersen <gr...@leland.stanford.edu> writes:


<>The Four were brought to justice once for the use of an Omega Weapon. If
<>they employ one again, they will be hunted down again, and made to pay the
<>price for their actions. As will any who aid them.

<<pause>


<"The m0$t recent ()meg@ v10l@t10n w@$ c@u$ed by @ dev1lbunny. !t w@$

<d1rected @g@1n$t hum@n$. THe F()ur'$ u$e wa$ d1rected @g@1n$t

<dev1lbunn1e$. T0 tr1@l were br0ught the F()ur. T0 @ $l@p 0n the

<p@w, the dev1lbunny. The $y$tem 1$ c0rrupt."

She has us there, Commander. The Whale Episode and the Kansas City
fracas were *never* adequately dealt with.

<<sadlook>


<"M@ny Fudd$ h@ve been kn0wn t0 $@y th@t *we* @re @ w0r$e d@nger th@n

<the Fluffer$!"

How silly!

< ^ ^ The Sibyl
< \\// Rickie only hates the Four because we call him
< {--} Rickie...

Well, there are other concerns, to be *quite* fair about it, Sibyl.


Axe-Wielding Fuddite

unread,
May 11, 1996, 3:00:00 AM5/11/96
to

In alt.devilbunnies, gbr...@rsc.anu.edu.au (Geoffrey Brent) wrote:
>Sibyl opined:
<>The AWF exclaimed:

<>>Fuddites are merely a vocal subset of Fudds...

<>"! h@ve @lw@y$ @dm1red the ten@c1ty ()f th1$ gr0up. Unf0rtun@tely,
<>$h()uld y0u m@ke *one* $pell!ng m!$T@ke, y0u're t@ken f0r @ $ymp @nd
<>$h0t."

Bah. This from the Sibyl, one of the best spellers in the war. And it
simply isn't true.

<"Well... I'm a good speller, but somewhere along the line we'd have a
<misunderstanding about aluminium or honour or centers. Or how to
<pronounce 'lever'. That would be rather sad."

Don't be silly. We cheerfully accept all British spellings except those
which are firmly obsolescent. I spell behaviour with a 'u', myself. You
are even permitted 'centre' if you write from a current or former British
colony!


--
The Fuddites have never denied their literary roots.
And that's _aluminum_.


It is loading more messages.
0 new messages