Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

A nice Médoc

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Colin Smith

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 7:08:00 PM9/12/02
to
But should I open that second bottle?

It goes rather well with ACDC as well as with pasta, pizza and light meat
dishes. Or maybe that's just me.

--
Colin Smith
(Colin.Smith at archeus.plus.com)

Dan L

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 2:35:37 PM9/13/02
to
Most definitely yes, particularly if its Haut Medoc

Dan L
(nobikeneverhadone)
"Colin Smith" <Amaps...@archeus.plus.com> wrote in message
news:slrnao1nqi.1...@dhcp10.homenetwork...

Bear

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 1:49:32 PM9/13/02
to
Dan L wrote:
>
> Most definitely yes, particularly if its Haut Medoc

FFS read the FFAQ and POST AT THE BOTTOM YOU CLUELESS CUNT.
--
Bastard Bear
These are my own opinions, and not necessarily those of all Bears
ZX-9R TART#1 UKRMHRC#8 GHPOTHUF#4 HB#2 TCP#1a DIAABTCOD#4 KotYTC# WG*
UKRMFBC#3 BOTAFOT#1 MSWR#2 "omnis culpa ursi est."
Bear's LimeWire Flavour: Puddle Of Mudd: "Blurry"
The UKRM FAQ: http://www.ukrm.net/faq/ukrmfaq1.html
Say "bye bye!" to saddo trolls: http://www.nfilter.org

Dan L

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 3:50:46 PM9/13/02
to

"Bear" <bastardUND...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3D82252C...@yahoo.com...

Thankyou for those wise words, Bear, indeed I read the ffaq after your last
prosaic words of wisdom.

I trust that this bottom posting is to your exacting specification, as being
posted in the bottom is clearly a big issue for you.

In the meantime, kindly refrain from calling me, indeed anybody a cunt (it's
not very nice is it)

Dan L


Bear

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 2:50:09 PM9/13/02
to
Dan L wrote:

> In the meantime, kindly refrain from calling me, indeed anybody a cunt (it's
> not very nice is it)

And you *still* haven't read the FFAQ and are *still* not snipping sigs.

If you stop posting like a cunt I'll stop calling you a cunt.

YOU FUCKING BRAINLESS CUNT.

Bear

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 3:42:50 PM9/13/02
to
Desmond Coughlan wrote:

> Whilst the reactions of the 'top-posting nazis' can often appear to be
> extreme,

No, wrong again.

Cunty bollocks got the usual polite warning, then failed to engage mr
brain.

Colin Smith

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 2:44:10 PM9/13/02
to
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 18:35:37 -0000, Dan L <d...@yodanet.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> Most definitely yes, particularly if its Haut Medoc

Ouch, bet that's gonna hurt. http://www.ukrm.net/faq/

So, till, well about a year ago, I hated wine. Couldn't drink the stuff at
all. My alcoholic beverages of choice were beer, vodka & coke, baileys and
an italian liqeur called limoncello[1]. But recently I've started liking
various wines, so what is it about the tastebuds that change over time?

[1] Fuck, google's clever.
--
|Colin Smith: Colin.Smith at archeus.plus.com | Windows 2000 |
|Configuration management library for Unix/Linux | AKA |
| http://www.archeus.plus.com/colin/libcfg/ | The W2K Bug |

The Older Gentleman

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 4:32:19 PM9/13/02
to
Dan L <d...@yodanet.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> In the meantime, kindly refrain from calling me, indeed anybody a cunt

King Canute has been reincarnated.

--
XJ900S 750SS XS500 CB400F Z400 BOF#30 GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1
WUSS#5 YTC#3 IHABWTJ#1 BOTAFOT#60 ANORAK#06 OSOS#1
www.btinternet.com/~Chateau.Murray/homepage2.html

The Older Gentleman

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 4:32:20 PM9/13/02
to
Colin Smith <Amaps...@archeus.plus.com> wrote:

> So, till, well about a year ago, I hated wine.

Lots of people do, at first. With practice, the dislike metamorphoses
into a craving.

Paul Corfield

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 4:35:55 PM9/13/02
to
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 21:32:20 +0100, chateau...@btinternet.com (The
Older Gentleman) wrote:

>Colin Smith <Amaps...@archeus.plus.com> wrote:
>
>> So, till, well about a year ago, I hated wine.
>
>Lots of people do, at first. With practice, the dislike metamorphoses
>into a craving.

And you would know :-)
--
Paul C - "the big camp bastard" (tm darsy)
VFR800 | ZX6R | R1150GS
BOD#5, two#4, BOTAFOT#23, BOTAFOF#4, URMSBC#09, COFF#09
Admits to working for London Underground!

Dan L

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 5:51:53 PM9/13/02
to

"Desmond Coughlan" <pasdespa...@zeouane.org> wrote in message
news:slrnao4ej9.mpg.p...@lievre.voute.net...
> Le Fri, 13 Sep 2002 19:50:46 -0000, Dan L <d...@yodanet.demon.co.uk> a
écrit :
> { snip }

>
> > I trust that this bottom posting is to your exacting specification, as
being
> > posted in the bottom is clearly a big issue for you.
> >
> > In the meantime, kindly refrain from calling me, indeed anybody a cunt
(it's
> > not very nice is it)
>
> Whilst the reactions of the 'top-posting nazis' can often appear to be
> extreme, the fact remains that long threads consisting of top-posted
> articles are _very_ difficult to follow.
>
> Consider bottom-posting as a courtesy for your readers. Its usefulness
> in making threads readable and coherent, will soon make itself obvious.
>
> --
> Desmond Coughlan |CUNT#1 YGL#4 YFC#1 YFB#1 UKRMMA#14 two#38
> Yamaha FJR1300 |BONY#48 ANORAK#11
> desmond @ zeouane.org
> http: // www . zeouane . org

Desmond: Thankyou very much

Bear: Go fuck a donkey

Regards


Bear

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 5:29:59 PM9/13/02
to
Dan L wrote:

> > Consider bottom-posting as a courtesy for your readers. Its usefulness
> > in making threads readable and coherent, will soon make itself obvious.
> >
> > --
> > Desmond Coughlan |CUNT#1 YGL#4 YFC#1 YFB#1 UKRMMA#14 two#38
> > Yamaha FJR1300 |BONY#48 ANORAK#11
> > desmond @ zeouane.org
> > http: // www . zeouane . org
>
> Desmond: Thankyou very much
>
> Bear: Go fuck a donkey

And you *still* haven't read the FFAQ or trimmed sigs.

Jesus christ; are you a fucking thick cunt or what?

Do you have trouble crossing the street unaided?

Do you have to carry a card so you know which foot to put in front of
the other next?

Are you regularly outplayed at chess by yoghurt?

The answers, I feel, must be "yes" in every case.

Now read the FFAQ or fuck *right* off, cunt.

Colin Smith

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 4:35:42 PM9/13/02
to
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 21:51:53 -0000, Dan L <d...@yodanet.demon.co.uk> wrote:

* >> --
* >> Desmond Coughlan |CUNT#1 YGL#4 YFC#1 YFB#1 UKRMMA#14 two#38
* >> Yamaha FJR1300 |BONY#48 ANORAK#11
* >> desmond @ zeouane.org
* >> http: // www . zeouane . org

> Desmond: Thankyou very much
>
> Bear: Go fuck a donkey

Trim the signature[1] off the post you are replying to and trim the
irrelevant bits of context out. Like this. See.

[1] Marked with *s
--
Colin.Smith at archeus.plus.com

Dan L

unread,
Sep 14, 2002, 4:54:06 AM9/14/02
to

"Bear" <bastardUND...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3D8258D7...@yahoo.com...

> >
> > Bear: Go fuck a donkey
>
> And you *still* haven't read the FFAQ or trimmed sigs.
>
> Jesus christ; are you a fucking thick cunt or what?
>
> Do you have trouble crossing the street unaided?
>
> Do you have to carry a card so you know which foot to put in front of
> the other next?
>
> Are you regularly outplayed at chess by yoghurt?
>
> The answers, I feel, must be "yes" in every case.
>
> Now read the FFAQ or fuck *right* off, cunt.
> --
> Bastard Bear

Would I be right in assuming that you are so far up yourself that you can
see yesterday's lunch?

Err...I fear that could be a resounding yes.

Dan (fucking) L


Pip

unread,
Sep 14, 2002, 5:12:55 AM9/14/02
to
On Sat, 14 Sep 2002 08:54:06 -0000, "Dan L" <d...@yodanet.demon.co.uk>
dipped quill in ink and scritched:

>
>"Bear" <bastardUND...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:3D8258D7...@yahoo.com...

>> Now read the FFAQ or fuck *right* off, cunt.
>> -- <--------------------
\
\
\
See this? I've arrowed it for you as I expect you can understand
pictures better than words. This is a "signature separator" or
sigsep, OK? It is made up of a dash dash space return and it
indicates to a decent newsreader that it, and the the text below it is
to be removed in a reply. As you are using terminally broken software
(Outlook Express) this doesn't work and so you are required to do it
manually.

So fucking get on with it and stop making such a fucking song and
dance about it - everybody else who posts here manages to do it, so I
see no reason why you shouldn't.

>Would I be right in assuming that you are so far up yourself that you can
>see yesterday's lunch?

Well no, he's not. Well not on some subjects, at least. Not to
mention that yesterday's lunch will be long gone by now ...


>
>Err...I fear that could be a resounding yes.

You, on the other hand I suspect haven't seen the light of day for
some time.

Now sort your posting out, or fuck off. Your call.

--

Pip, the Red Ruffian - RF900, the black RuFfian.
WS* DFWAG#0 MIB#10 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP MKA+E#3
ANORAK#8 MIRTTH#15 Coff#3(EFFA) BOTAFOT#47/34a BONY#13 FUB#4


Bear

unread,
Sep 14, 2002, 5:35:51 AM9/14/02
to
Dan L wrote:

> > Now read the FFAQ or fuck *right* off, cunt.
> > --
> > Bastard Bear
>
> Would I be right in assuming that you are so far up yourself that you can
> see yesterday's lunch?

And *still* Capt Cretin can't get it right ...

What are you, powered by batteries or summat?

Sort yerself out or fuck right off.

Bear

unread,
Sep 14, 2002, 5:36:09 AM9/14/02
to
Pip wrote:

> Now sort your posting out, or fuck off. Your call.

Indeed, brother Pip, indeed ...

Dan L

unread,
Sep 14, 2002, 6:44:09 AM9/14/02
to

"Pip" <p...@ukrm.net> wrote in message
news:usu5ouglrauar81ev...@4ax.com...
Wise words mate, think I'll fuck off for now 'cos I need to take a shit.

--


Bear

unread,
Sep 14, 2002, 6:33:22 AM9/14/02
to
Dan L wrote:

> > Now sort your posting out, or fuck off. Your call.
> >
> > --
> >
> Wise words mate, think I'll fuck off for now 'cos I need to take a shit.
>
> --

Nope ... still dumber than yeast, and laughed at by yoghurt ...

0 new messages