Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bt openworld limitations .. post `em here

0 views
Skip to first unread message

§õ¿ë§

unread,
Oct 29, 2000, 6:01:36 PM10/29/00
to
What can Bt openworld adsl NOT do :-------

1./ give you a monthly payement option.


Paul. . . . .

unread,
Oct 29, 2000, 7:43:45 PM10/29/00
to
a static i.p


"§õ¿ë§" <xk...@xk77.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8tia9p$14d$1...@uranium.btinternet.com...

xmedar

unread,
Oct 30, 2000, 10:40:37 AM10/30/00
to

"§õ¿ë§" wrote:

> What can Bt openworld adsl NOT do :-------
>
> 1./ give you a monthly payement option.

2. give you an "always on" service as advertised

3. give you the ability to run widely used Net software like Netmeeting

4. give you a modem that works with ALL makes and models of
computer and OSs.

5. give you a stable system to log into (HG RADIUS server probs)

6. give you any compensation for their problems.

7. give you the truth when you ring the Hinderdesk(TM).

XM

Adrian Kennard

unread,
Oct 30, 2000, 11:34:11 AM10/30/00
to
xmedar wrote:
>...

> 5. give you a stable system to log into (HG RADIUS server probs)
>...

I find this all quite amusing. Granted, we have nowhere near
the number of people as they do.

I had some trouble getting various off the shelf
RADIUS servers working with BT ADSL, so simply
wrote my own. Get the RFCs and the sample md5 code,
and bingo - an evenings work.

All directly on to an SQL database with accounting logs, etc, etc.

Seems a shame BT have so much trouble <-:

--
_ Andrews & Arnold Ltd, 0118 376 0000 http://aa.nu/
(_) _| _ . _ _ Professional Voice and Data Systems for Business.
( )(_|( |(_|| ) Gold Certified Alchemists, ADSL service providers
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We have been busy --- http://www.FireBrick.co.uk/

Worstisp98708017

unread,
Oct 30, 2000, 3:49:14 PM10/30/00
to
>What can Bt openworld adsl NOT do :-------
>
>1./ give you a monthly payement option.

2/ Give you a blow-job

xmedar

unread,
Oct 30, 2000, 4:00:38 PM10/30/00
to

Adrian Kennard wrote:

> xmedar wrote:
> >...
> > 5. give you a stable system to log into (HG RADIUS server probs)
> >...
>
> I find this all quite amusing. Granted, we have nowhere near
> the number of people as they do.
>
> I had some trouble getting various off the shelf
> RADIUS servers working with BT ADSL, so simply
> wrote my own. Get the RFCs and the sample md5 code,
> and bingo - an evenings work.
>
> All directly on to an SQL database with accounting logs, etc, etc.
>
> Seems a shame BT have so much trouble <-:

AFAIR some flavours of BSD come with RADIUS already
to go. XM

Technofreak

unread,
Oct 30, 2000, 7:45:07 PM10/30/00
to

1) an always on connection - nearly always off they mean :-)

Chris Heys

unread,
Oct 30, 2000, 8:02:16 PM10/30/00
to
yes, agreed. But then again would you want one from a male ?
If, however we gave them a blow-job and they gave us ADSL.....

;-)
"Worstisp98708017" <worstisp...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20001030154914...@ng-cm1.aol.com...

Joe Harrison

unread,
Oct 31, 2000, 11:29:40 AM10/31/00
to
Trades Descriptions Act... "always on" presumably means 100.00 % uptime for
the rest of infinity with nary a yottasecond's downtime.

http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=always "For all time;
forever"

"xmedar" <xme...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:39FD9675...@yahoo.com...

xmedar

unread,
Oct 31, 2000, 5:04:23 PM10/31/00
to
Well not the rest of infinity, only the length of the contract,
in legal terms it would be legitimate to argue that "always on"
constitutes the generally recognised five nines 99.999% uptime
in the rest of the telecoms industry, given my uptime varies between
50%-80% that would mean the service is 20,000 to 50,000 times
worse than the established norm therefore it is "not fit for purpose"
and "not of merchantable quality". XM

BR

unread,
Oct 31, 2000, 8:30:08 PM10/31/00
to

>
> 7. give you the truth when you ring the Hinderdesk(TM).
>

J.N. <enter - stage right>
J.N. "You can't HANDLE the truth"
J.N. <exeunt - stage left>

;o)


Carl Robson

unread,
Nov 1, 2000, 10:28:01 AM11/1/00
to
It is unbelievable that <39FDE176...@yahoo.com>, xme...@yahoo.com had the
genital spheroids to exhalt...

>
>AFAIR some flavours of BSD come with RADIUS already
>to go. XM

yeah, but if you can it's always better to "roll your own" for the specific task
in hand.

One of the Guys here wrote a custom radius here from the open source RadiusD for
the Bush WebTVs that are being advertised everywhere. Bush designed the tellies,
Virgin are providing the Web content and services, and we(can't say who because
we are just a service not a partner) are providing the dialup connectivety and
Webmail solutions.
--
The world would be a better place without the internet, then you wouldn't have
to read this pathetic Signature

Mark Evans

unread,
Nov 3, 2000, 2:57:19 AM11/3/00
to
Adrian Kennard <pleaseuser...@aaisp.net> wrote:
> xmedar wrote:
>>...
>> 5. give you a stable system to log into (HG RADIUS server probs)
>>...

> I find this all quite amusing. Granted, we have nowhere near
> the number of people as they do.

> I had some trouble getting various off the shelf
> RADIUS servers working with BT ADSL, so simply
> wrote my own. Get the RFCs and the sample md5 code,
> and bingo - an evenings work.

> All directly on to an SQL database with accounting logs, etc, etc.

> Seems a shame BT have so much trouble <-:

Maybe you should offer your services to BTOW, at a suitable
price...

Mark Evans

unread,
Nov 3, 2000, 2:55:52 AM11/3/00
to
DVDyke <ze...@heehaw.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2000 00:43:45 -0000, "Paul. . . . ."
> <arc...@igclick.net> wrote:

>>a static i.p
>>

> Use a dynamic DNS service like dyndns.org

They didn't mention anything about DNS.

There are plenty of other reasons which
a static IP address causes less problems
than dynamic.

0 new messages