Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
My Apologies Everyone as I know this is getting out of hand, bu..........t
217 views
Skip to first unread message
Lawrence13
Feb 27, 2012, 2:19:54 PM2/27/12
to
Sorry about this as it seems to be dragging the group down and I'm
going to stop posting for good while as some people here become very
aggressive and nasty if you show any disagreement. The whole thing is
becoming ugly and I'm partly responsible as I get involved in these
ding dongs.
Mr Garvey is patently quite bonkers and once I stop posting he will
find somebody else to fall out with as that seems to be his nature.
Paul Garvey has emailed threatening me with some sort of legal
action.
He claims I physically threatened him some time ago when basically he
was so arrogantly rude I offered him the opportunity to say it to me
man to man.
Okay a bit Macho and stupid but he really is to ready with insults and
general rudeness. I place this here as he is a madman and I want
everything open out in public, This is what he has just emailed me.
"I warned you last time, when you issued a verbal threat, that I would
act if you did anything similar. This afternoon, I registered your
details, two posts of threats of physical violence that you've been
silly enough to issue and this potential stalking. If you *ever*
decided to cross the moral boundary and holiday down here with intent
against me, the letter that is held by Jamie will show the intent was
planned.
One more actual threat of physical violence and Jamie sends the letter
on to the police. I can assure you they will pay you a visit.
I can't be clearer. Stick to the science and you'll have no problems.
issue threats, veiled, or otherwise and I will act. I've done it
before with great success, stopping what the police decribed as
"potentially dangerous" staking early on and I'll do it again."
Paul you need to see a therapist of some sort .
going to stop posting for good while as some people here become very
aggressive and nasty if you show any disagreement. The whole thing is
becoming ugly and I'm partly responsible as I get involved in these
ding dongs.
Mr Garvey is patently quite bonkers and once I stop posting he will
find somebody else to fall out with as that seems to be his nature.
Paul Garvey has emailed threatening me with some sort of legal
action.
He claims I physically threatened him some time ago when basically he
was so arrogantly rude I offered him the opportunity to say it to me
man to man.
Okay a bit Macho and stupid but he really is to ready with insults and
general rudeness. I place this here as he is a madman and I want
everything open out in public, This is what he has just emailed me.
"I warned you last time, when you issued a verbal threat, that I would
act if you did anything similar. This afternoon, I registered your
details, two posts of threats of physical violence that you've been
silly enough to issue and this potential stalking. If you *ever*
decided to cross the moral boundary and holiday down here with intent
against me, the letter that is held by Jamie will show the intent was
planned.
One more actual threat of physical violence and Jamie sends the letter
on to the police. I can assure you they will pay you a visit.
I can't be clearer. Stick to the science and you'll have no problems.
issue threats, veiled, or otherwise and I will act. I've done it
before with great success, stopping what the police decribed as
"potentially dangerous" staking early on and I'll do it again."
Paul you need to see a therapist of some sort .
Mike McMillan
Feb 27, 2012, 3:09:18 PM2/27/12
to
I will be sorry if you go, I enjoy your posts.
Mike McMillan
Garden Isle
Mike McMillan
Garden Isle
Dawlish
Feb 27, 2012, 3:10:17 PM2/27/12
to
way he will *ever* try again to threaten me on here, as he has been
silly enough to do *twice* before.
You, Larry, need to think very carefully about your posting in the
future.
Eskimo Will
Feb 27, 2012, 5:30:39 PM2/27/12
to
"Mike McMillan" <mmikem...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:29655341.3706.1330373358873.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfy7...
>I will be sorry if you go, I enjoy your posts.
>
> Mike McMillan
>
> Garden Isle
So do I, especially when we avoid stupid AGW arguments which are utterly
>
> Mike McMillan
>
> Garden Isle
pointless and boring.
At least the weather looks like turning colder and more interesting next
week with some snow around!
Will
--
Dawlish
Feb 27, 2012, 5:59:34 PM2/27/12
to
On Feb 27, 10:30 pm, "Eskimo Will" <w...@lyneside.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> "Mike McMillan" <mmikemcmil...@gmail.com> wrote in message
What on earth has it got to do with a behind the killfile 3rd party?
> "Mike McMillan" <mmikemcmil...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Weatherlawyer
Feb 27, 2012, 6:01:54 PM2/27/12
to
On Feb 27, 8:10 pm, Dwarvish <p...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> You, Larry, need to think very carefully about your posting in the
> future.
Feck me!
>
> You, Larry, need to think very carefully about your posting in the
> future.
Richard Dixon
Feb 27, 2012, 6:14:18 PM2/27/12
to
Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:0696e46a-41b1-42ad-83ae-
7f8757...@l7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com:
> You, Larry, need to think very carefully about your posting in the
> future.
Now - 1000 words on my desk on "Why I'm always right" before 9am tomorrow
morning otherwise you're in detention, Jenkins. Class dismissed!
You couldn't make this up. I'd say you've ruined the newsgroup but I'd be
lying as you've actually provided me with a wonderful laugh, Hyacinth.
Richard
7f8757...@l7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com:
> You, Larry, need to think very carefully about your posting in the
> future.
morning otherwise you're in detention, Jenkins. Class dismissed!
You couldn't make this up. I'd say you've ruined the newsgroup but I'd be
lying as you've actually provided me with a wonderful laugh, Hyacinth.
Richard
Weatherlawyer
Feb 27, 2012, 6:03:43 PM2/27/12
to
On Feb 27, 7:19 pm, Lawrence13 <lawrenc...@sky.com> wrote:
Stan Garvey?
Is he the bloke off crossroads?
Can you get me his autograph?
Togless
Feb 27, 2012, 6:35:23 PM2/27/12
to
"Lawrence13" <lawre...@sky.com> wrote:
> Sorry about this as it seems to be dragging the group down and I'm
> going to stop posting for good while as some people here become very
> aggressive and nasty if you show any disagreement. The whole thing is
> becoming ugly and I'm partly responsible as I get involved in these
> ding dongs.
Personally I enjoy your wicked sense of humour and think you're an asset to
> Sorry about this as it seems to be dragging the group down and I'm
> going to stop posting for good while as some people here become very
> aggressive and nasty if you show any disagreement. The whole thing is
> becoming ugly and I'm partly responsible as I get involved in these
> ding dongs.
the group, even though we disagree on some things. It would be a pity if
you stopped posting and I wouldn't want to think I'd contributed to that.
Tudor Hughes
Feb 27, 2012, 9:26:56 PM2/27/12
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
You really disappoint me. I had thought you had abandoned your
overbearing nature, at least on this group, and become more of a
logic disciplinarian who would shoot down unwarranted claims, and as
such to be welcomed. There is something to be said for trying to
think the best of people but I now conclude that you don't deserve
such a benign view.
I see no harm in Lawrie (that's Lawrie, not Larry, a cheap shot)
publicising your email. Anyone who can write stuff like that needs to
be exposed. Alan White was another recipient of your nastiness and
left the group as a result. Well done! Your email reveals you to be
a paranoid bully. Do you think that Lawrie is seriously going to go
down to Devon just to bop you on the nose? He would like to, of
course, and so would many others, including me. But it's not going
to happen coz u aint wurf it. That, like Lawrence's post, is of
course absurdly macho but it shows you what quite a number of people
think of you, viz. they want to hit you.
Go away - get treatment for your persecution complex. You may
then be invited to re-engage with the world. When you do, don't
pretend you know more about a subject than you actually do. It really
gets on people's tits!
In the next few days I'll probably get a visit from Surrey
Police. It will go thus:
Cop: Tudor Hughes?
Me: Yes
Cop: We understand you may be part of a conspiracy to shout at Paul
Garvey, to intimidate him with a trombone and possibly even poke him
in the tummy with it.
Me: Well, yeah, sort of.
Cop: We fully understand your point of view but would point out that
the last action is actually an offence and we would strongly advise
you not to do it, sir.
Me: Yeah OK.
Cop: Enjoy the rest of your day, sir.
Me: Do you *have* to say that?
Cop: Yeah, unfortunately we do. Is this your car?
Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.
Dawlish
Feb 28, 2012, 1:48:05 AM2/28/12
to
Larry, The bet stands. Either accept, or you really will be a
hypocrite. When you post your cherry picked idiocy, you'll see it
again. Think before you write when you get annoyed and consider
issuing your threats. Other people's opinions are other people's
opinions, but I take them seriously and I will do what I said I would.
Rob
Feb 28, 2012, 3:21:35 AM2/28/12
to
"Dawlish" <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:136d3512-0d57-4289...@i2g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...
planet.......................perhaps i may have!
Case of wasting police time i would have thought.
Rob
Tony Kenyon
Feb 28, 2012, 4:25:19 AM2/28/12
to
"Dawlish" wrote in message
news:0dc4599f-9705-411a...@eb6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
'previous' when it comes to people taking a dislike to you even when they've
never met you!
Personally I enjoy Lawrence's posts even if I might disagree with him on
occasions. I also enjoy some of yours but I know who I'd prefer to have a
drink with.
Tony
Stephen Wolstenholme
Feb 28, 2012, 5:52:31 AM2/28/12
to
Which has what to do with weather?
Steve
Steve
Alastair
Feb 28, 2012, 7:35:59 AM2/28/12
to
On Feb 28, 9:25 am, "Tony Kenyon" <tony.kenyon...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
I would just like to urge everyone to do as I do and not to read
Dawlish's posts. When I did read then they were either bland and
uninformative, or rude and upsetting. So long as you don't read them
then you can't be upset by them. Moreover, you are not goaded into
replying to him and then recirculating his messages under your name.
It is too much to hope that everyone will ignore him and that he will
then go away. But at least you can protect yourself by not reading his
posts.
Cheers, Alastair.
wrote:
Dawlish's posts. When I did read then they were either bland and
uninformative, or rude and upsetting. So long as you don't read them
then you can't be upset by them. Moreover, you are not goaded into
replying to him and then recirculating his messages under your name.
It is too much to hope that everyone will ignore him and that he will
then go away. But at least you can protect yourself by not reading his
posts.
Cheers, Alastair.
Wendy Tinley
Feb 28, 2012, 7:59:30 AM2/28/12
to
On 28/02/2012 12:35, Alastair wrote:
> I would just like to urge everyone to do as I do and not to read
> Dawlish's posts. When I did read then they were either bland and
> uninformative, or rude and upsetting. So long as you don't read them
> then you can't be upset by them. Moreover, you are not goaded into
> replying to him and then recirculating his messages under your name.
> It is too much to hope that everyone will ignore him and that he will
> then go away. But at least you can protect yourself by not reading his
> posts.
Hear, hear and triple hear!
> I would just like to urge everyone to do as I do and not to read
> Dawlish's posts. When I did read then they were either bland and
> uninformative, or rude and upsetting. So long as you don't read them
> then you can't be upset by them. Moreover, you are not goaded into
> replying to him and then recirculating his messages under your name.
> It is too much to hope that everyone will ignore him and that he will
> then go away. But at least you can protect yourself by not reading his
> posts.
Well said Alastair!
--
Wendy Tinley
Buchan Meteo
Feb 28, 2012, 8:01:22 AM2/28/12
to
Lawrence13 scrive:
> Sorry about this as it seems to be dragging the group down and I'm going
> to stop posting for good while ...
Don't stop posting Lawrence. I would get lonely.
--
Gianna
Peterhead, Scotland
buchan-meteo.org.uk
> Sorry about this as it seems to be dragging the group down and I'm going
Don't stop posting Lawrence. I would get lonely.
--
Gianna
Peterhead, Scotland
buchan-meteo.org.uk
Roger Smith
Feb 28, 2012, 8:02:52 AM2/28/12
to
another thoughtless person reproduces them and exposes them to everybody.
Unless of course I have killfiled that other person...
Roger
Alastair
Feb 28, 2012, 7:37:10 AM2/28/12
to
> In the next few days I'll probably get a visit from Surrey
> Police. It will go thus:
>
> Cop: Tudor Hughes?
> Me: Yes
> Cop: We understand you may be part of a conspiracy to shout at Paul
> Garvey, to intimidate him with a trombone and possibly even poke him
> in the tummy with it.
> Me: Well, yeah, sort of.
> Cop: We fully understand your point of view but would point out that
> the last action is actually an offence and we would strongly advise
> you not to do it, sir.
> Me: Yeah OK.
> Cop: Enjoy the rest of your day, sir.
> Me: Do you *have* to say that?
> Cop: Yeah, unfortunately we do. Is this your car?
>
> Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.
LOL,
> Police. It will go thus:
>
> Cop: Tudor Hughes?
> Me: Yes
> Cop: We understand you may be part of a conspiracy to shout at Paul
> Garvey, to intimidate him with a trombone and possibly even poke him
> in the tummy with it.
> Me: Well, yeah, sort of.
> Cop: We fully understand your point of view but would point out that
> the last action is actually an offence and we would strongly advise
> you not to do it, sir.
> Me: Yeah OK.
> Cop: Enjoy the rest of your day, sir.
> Me: Do you *have* to say that?
> Cop: Yeah, unfortunately we do. Is this your car?
>
> Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.
Cheers, Alastair.
Joe P
Feb 28, 2012, 8:23:46 AM2/28/12
to
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:35:59 -0800, Alastair wrote:
>
> I would just like to urge everyone to do as I do and not to read
> Dawlish's posts. When I did read then they were either bland and
> uninformative, or rude and upsetting. So long as you don't read them
> then you can't be upset by them. Moreover, you are not goaded into
> replying to him and then recirculating his messages under your name. It
> is too much to hope that everyone will ignore him and that he will then
> go away. But at least you can protect yourself by not reading his posts.
>
> Cheers, Alastair.
I'd say read what you want. The problem's in the reaction, not the action.
>
> I would just like to urge everyone to do as I do and not to read
> Dawlish's posts. When I did read then they were either bland and
> uninformative, or rude and upsetting. So long as you don't read them
> then you can't be upset by them. Moreover, you are not goaded into
> replying to him and then recirculating his messages under your name. It
> is too much to hope that everyone will ignore him and that he will then
> go away. But at least you can protect yourself by not reading his posts.
>
> Cheers, Alastair.
I think Will has the right of it: Wu-wei
If all else fails try thinking of this when you read his posts:
http://xkcd.com/386/
Tudor Hughes
Feb 28, 2012, 10:49:13 AM2/28/12
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
You really are a scream, as my old Mum would say. On the other
> - Show quoted text -
hand take great care anyway because not all your enemies will be a
convenient 200 miles away and on the evidence of this group and others
they surely must be numerous. And ubiquitous.
Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.
Eskimo Will
Feb 28, 2012, 12:04:14 PM2/28/12
to
"Alastair" <a...@abmcdonald.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:855e1a00-3bf9-4a9c...@l7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com...
<snip>
I would just like to urge everyone to do as I do and not to read
Dawlish's posts. When I did read then they were either bland and
uninformative, or rude and upsetting. So long as you don't read them
then you can't be upset by them. Moreover, you are not goaded into
replying to him and then recirculating his messages under your name.
It is too much to hope that everyone will ignore him and that he will
then go away. But at least you can protect yourself by not reading his
posts.
Cheers, Alastair.
Well said Alastair.
Will
--
Graham
Feb 28, 2012, 12:08:29 PM2/28/12
to
>I will be sorry if you go, I enjoy your posts.
>
> Mike McMillan
>
> Garden Isle
>So do I, especially when we avoid stupid AGW arguments which are utterly
>pointless and boring.
>At least the weather looks like turning colder and more interesting next
>week with some snow around!
delete them and move on.
We could all argue forever more, life's too short.
Let's hope something changes next week, two days of this muck is enough for
anyone.
Damp, drizzly and foggy today with temps around 10.8c, can't see much chance
of any sun this week:(
Graham (North Staffs)
Weatherlawyer
Feb 28, 2012, 12:14:17 PM2/28/12
to
On Feb 28, 10:52 am, Stephen Wolstenholme <st...@npsl1.com> wrote:
>
> Which has what to do with weather?
It's a storm in a tea-cup.
>
> Which has what to do with weather?
Doesn't look like I'm going to get an autograph.
Col
Feb 28, 2012, 12:55:29 PM2/28/12
to
"Joe P" <Jo...@Thisisnotarealaddress.net> wrote in message
news:jiikh2$b5g$2...@dont-email.me...
I think we've all had that kind of moment :)
--
Col
Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Dawlish
Feb 28, 2012, 12:51:14 PM2/28/12
to
sanctimonios replies like this from someone who actually believes in
"cold radiation".
Larry: the bet stands. If you feel the world is cooling, you have a
chance to win a lot of money. But you don't really believe that at all
do you? That's because you are a hypocrite.
Scott W
Feb 28, 2012, 1:08:46 PM2/28/12
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
For crying out loud why can't you two take this dispute elsewhere?
> - Show quoted text -
Dawlish
Feb 28, 2012, 1:27:36 PM2/28/12
to
"elsewhere to the newsgroup.
JCW
Feb 28, 2012, 1:38:31 PM2/28/12
to
"Lawrence13" wrote in message
news:d7320eef-e0ce-484e...@w19g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
Sorry about this as it seems to be dragging the group down and I'm
going to stop posting for good while as some people here become very
aggressive and nasty if you show any disagreement. The whole thing is
becoming ugly and I'm partly responsible as I get involved in these
ding dongs.
Mr Garvey is patently quite bonkers and once I stop posting he will
find somebody else to fall out with as that seems to be his nature.
Ah, hang in there, Lawrence. Life's too short! You might have views and
opinions that differ from others but one thing that doesn't matter is your
wit and, of all things, we could do with the light-hearted banter around
here at times.
Joe
ewok
Feb 28, 2012, 3:53:31 PM2/28/12
to
mr google (i hope i got his name right) and your local plod will duff
you up lawrence.
there are harsh sentences for crimes of "your wrong" and "i dont like
you" , "GW is not happening", "your a fraud" etc etc
the MET, MI6 , ASDA, C&A, M&S, LIDL, ALDI, and now the CIA take this
VERY seriously and have departments set up for this kind of horrendous
blood thirsty violence on a newsgroup.
i hope you tremble with fear of, erm...ah, erm..ah some kind of internet
RFC (request for comments) qualified ascii written email retaliation,
super death match (sponsered by ladbrokes of course)
your looking at 30yrs minimum stretch, ill give you 10/1 on that.
now, see if the GFS and ECM show the same tomorrow, maybe then i will
issue a forecast, or is that a sectioning?
reality mode ON:
COME BACK LAWRENCE!
you up lawrence.
there are harsh sentences for crimes of "your wrong" and "i dont like
you" , "GW is not happening", "your a fraud" etc etc
the MET, MI6 , ASDA, C&A, M&S, LIDL, ALDI, and now the CIA take this
VERY seriously and have departments set up for this kind of horrendous
blood thirsty violence on a newsgroup.
i hope you tremble with fear of, erm...ah, erm..ah some kind of internet
RFC (request for comments) qualified ascii written email retaliation,
super death match (sponsered by ladbrokes of course)
your looking at 30yrs minimum stretch, ill give you 10/1 on that.
now, see if the GFS and ECM show the same tomorrow, maybe then i will
issue a forecast, or is that a sectioning?
reality mode ON:
COME BACK LAWRENCE!
Norman
Feb 28, 2012, 4:01:51 PM2/28/12
to
before sunset.
--
Norman Lynagh
Tideswell, Derbyshire
303m a.s.l.
Graham
Feb 28, 2012, 4:22:26 PM2/28/12
to
"> Let's hope something changes next week, two days of this muck is enough
for
> anyone. Damp, drizzly and foggy today with temps around 10.8c, can't see
> much chance of any sun this week:(
>
>
> Graham (North Staffs)
>It certainly was a bit grim today, Graham. We had thick fog and drizzle
>back
>before sunset.
today forecast.
I'm hoping for at least a few brighter spells tomorrow, it certainly can't
get any worse:)
Graham
ewok
Feb 28, 2012, 4:51:21 PM2/28/12
to
yeah lawrence, when your out of prison in 2042
can you stop fucking well replying to him! lol
can you stop fucking well replying to him! lol
ewok
Feb 28, 2012, 5:53:36 PM2/28/12
to
dont you mean a earthquake in a blender
Tom2131
Feb 28, 2012, 6:10:30 PM2/28/12
to
Increasingly, this Newsgroup has become unrecognisable from the one I
first remember discovering over 10 years ago, and we're all the poorer
for that.
Although I've struggled to resist it, I've become thoroughly fed-up
with the raw unpleasantness that some posts to this Group have
contained, of late. They're introverted, boring, narrow-minded,
disrespectful and nasty, and are bloody awful to have to wade through
but they are difficult to avoid as they often pop up in the most
unlikely places. What's worse, they don't add one iota to the sum of
knowledge, nor are they in the spirit of sensible discussion which I
always thought this Group was set-up to promote.
To those who take delight in all this: Go and fight your petty spats
somewhere else. I've neither the time or patience to listen to them
any longer.
- Tom.
first remember discovering over 10 years ago, and we're all the poorer
for that.
Although I've struggled to resist it, I've become thoroughly fed-up
with the raw unpleasantness that some posts to this Group have
contained, of late. They're introverted, boring, narrow-minded,
disrespectful and nasty, and are bloody awful to have to wade through
but they are difficult to avoid as they often pop up in the most
unlikely places. What's worse, they don't add one iota to the sum of
knowledge, nor are they in the spirit of sensible discussion which I
always thought this Group was set-up to promote.
To those who take delight in all this: Go and fight your petty spats
somewhere else. I've neither the time or patience to listen to them
any longer.
- Tom.
Dennis
Feb 28, 2012, 6:22:04 PM2/28/12
to
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:10:30 -0800, Tom2131 wrote:
> To those who take delight in all this: Go and fight your petty spats
> somewhere else. I've neither the time or patience to listen to them any
> longer.
>
> - Tom.
Ooooh... Who's mister Grumpypants, then?
> To those who take delight in all this: Go and fight your petty spats
> somewhere else. I've neither the time or patience to listen to them any
> longer.
>
> - Tom.
Ian Bingham
Feb 29, 2012, 1:24:10 AM2/29/12
to
"Tom2131" wrote in message
news:78027fb0-1cc0-4409...@w4g2000vbc.googlegroups.com...
Ian Bingham,
Inchmarlo, Aberdeenshire.
sutart...@googlemail.com
Feb 29, 2012, 7:56:21 AM2/29/12
to
No need. It has happened before my very eyes.
Thankyou. I now have enough material for my Phd thesis.
Tudor Hughes
Feb 29, 2012, 1:50:41 PM2/29/12
to
On Feb 28, 9:25 am, "Tony Kenyon" <tony.kenyon...@btinternet.com>
wrote:
> "Dawlish" wrote in message
>
> news:0dc4599f-9705-411a...@eb6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Feb 27, 10:30 pm, "Eskimo Will" <w...@lyneside.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Mike McMillan" <mmikemcmil...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:29655341.3706.1330373358873.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfy7...
>
wrote:
> "Dawlish" wrote in message
>
> news:0dc4599f-9705-411a...@eb6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
>
> On Feb 27, 10:30 pm, "Eskimo Will" <w...@lyneside.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Mike McMillan" <mmikemcmil...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:29655341.3706.1330373358873.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfy7...
>
> > >I will be sorry if you go, I enjoy your posts.
>
> > > Mike McMillan
>
> > > Garden Isle
>
> > So do I, especially when we avoid stupid AGW arguments which are utterly
> > pointless and boring.
> > At least the weather looks like turning colder and more interesting next
> > week with some snow around!
>
>
> > > Mike McMillan
>
> > > Garden Isle
>
> > So do I, especially when we avoid stupid AGW arguments which are utterly
> > pointless and boring.
> > At least the weather looks like turning colder and more interesting next
> > week with some snow around!
>
> > Will
> > --
>
> >What on earth has it got to do with a behind the killfile 3rd party?
>
> Surely Dawlish the question you need to answer for yourself is why you have
> 'previous' when it comes to people taking a dislike to you even when they've
> never met you!
>
> Personally I enjoy Lawrence's posts even if I might disagree with him on
> occasions. I also enjoy some of yours but I know who I'd prefer to have a
> drink with.
>
> Tony- Hide quoted text -
> > --
>
> >What on earth has it got to do with a behind the killfile 3rd party?
>
> Surely Dawlish the question you need to answer for yourself is why you have
> 'previous' when it comes to people taking a dislike to you even when they've
> never met you!
>
> Personally I enjoy Lawrence's posts even if I might disagree with him on
> occasions. I also enjoy some of yours but I know who I'd prefer to have a
> drink with.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Me too, having had a drink with Lawrence last night. Not a
> - Show quoted text -
monster. Rather good company.
Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey.
Graham Easterling
Feb 29, 2012, 2:12:57 PM2/29/12
to
On Feb 27, 8:09 pm, Mike McMillan <mmikemcmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will be sorry if you go, I enjoy your posts.
>
> Mike McMillan
>
> Garden Isle
I've just caught up with this thread, and I totally agree with Mike
> I will be sorry if you go, I enjoy your posts.
>
> Mike McMillan
>
> Garden Isle
(and several others who have said much the same.) In any case, I can't
believe that anyone who quotes lyrics from Neil Young songs is bad.
During all the times Lawrence & I have replied to each others posts
he's never said anything to annoy me, and he's frequently so funny.
The fact that we may disagree at times matters not.
Graham
Penzance
Ian Bingham
Feb 29, 2012, 2:40:57 PM2/29/12
to
"Lawrence13" wrote in message
news:d7320eef-e0ce-484e...@w19g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
because it takes all types, the Lawrences, the Dawlishes and everyone else
to make a Newsgroup. The thing is, just don't let people get to you. It
they're rude, be big enough to ignore them. If you're in the right,
everyone will see you are and be on your side; if you're wrong, well, you
can't really grumble! We all get really hacked off with flame wars.
Ian Bingham,
Inchmarlo, Aberdeenshire.
Neil
Feb 29, 2012, 4:36:10 PM2/29/12
to
This is what he has just emailed me.
>
> "I warned you last time, when you issued a verbal threat, that I would
> act if you did anything similar. This afternoon, I registered your
> details, two posts of threats of physical violence that you've been
> silly enough to issue and this potential stalking. If you *ever*
> decided to cross the moral boundary and holiday down here with intent
> against me, the letter that is held by Jamie will show the intent was
> planned.
>
> One more actual threat of physical violence and Jamie sends the letter
> on to the police. I can assure you they will pay you a visit.
>
> I can't be clearer. Stick to the science and you'll have no problems.
> issue threats, veiled, or otherwise and I will act. I've done it
> before with great success, stopping what the police decribed as
> "potentially dangerous" staking early on and I'll do it again."
The way I see it is Dawlish's arrogance is his undoing and many people
>
> "I warned you last time, when you issued a verbal threat, that I would
> act if you did anything similar. This afternoon, I registered your
> details, two posts of threats of physical violence that you've been
> silly enough to issue and this potential stalking. If you *ever*
> decided to cross the moral boundary and holiday down here with intent
> against me, the letter that is held by Jamie will show the intent was
> planned.
>
> One more actual threat of physical violence and Jamie sends the letter
> on to the police. I can assure you they will pay you a visit.
>
> I can't be clearer. Stick to the science and you'll have no problems.
> issue threats, veiled, or otherwise and I will act. I've done it
> before with great success, stopping what the police decribed as
> "potentially dangerous" staking early on and I'll do it again."
on many newsgroups are totally fed up with him. However, it is (mostly)
a free world and I wouldn't want to see the internet globally censored.
That's what the killfile is for.
I'm fairly amazed that his address and phone number was so easy to find
on Google (sorry but I couldn't resist when I came across his real name
somewhere in this thread!) but I guess he's so brazen that he thinks
he's untouchable.
Many years ago, I was in to amateur radio. There used to be a repeater
up on the Crystal Palace mast in South London, that attracted all sorts
of dross from many miles around.
One day, a twit like Dawlish appeared and rubbed a lot of people up the
wrong way. So much so that some nutter took it upon themselves to petrol
bomb the twits car!!!!
Apparently, the flames went up the side of the house, in to the roof and
burnt the house down!
I wouldn't wish that upon anyone but there are nutters out there and I
think Dawlish really should pull his neck in before he upsets the wrong
person.
By the way Dawlish, is that your website about Trains I came across when
googling "Paul Garvey Dawlish"?
Global Cooling Charlie
Feb 29, 2012, 5:02:22 PM2/29/12
to
lawrence is to blame as well.
why the hell doesnt he just ignore that twat. but he keeps coming back
for more.
im mean its not rocket science.
kill file or not, just bloody well ignore the oaf.
dullish has been exposed fully now. i think most have made their minds
up now.
if lawrence has any sense, is that when he returns, and i know he will,
he vows to never to reply to him ever again.period.
why the hell doesnt he just ignore that twat. but he keeps coming back
for more.
im mean its not rocket science.
kill file or not, just bloody well ignore the oaf.
dullish has been exposed fully now. i think most have made their minds
up now.
if lawrence has any sense, is that when he returns, and i know he will,
he vows to never to reply to him ever again.period.
Richard Dixon
Feb 29, 2012, 5:55:59 PM2/29/12
to
Tudor Hughes <tudo...@aol.com> wrote in
news:d39c7c19-2b63-4047...@9g2000vbq.googlegroups.com:
> Me too, having had a drink with Lawrence last night. Not a
> monster. Rather good company.
You too can find love on uk.sci.weather (ducks objects flying from Sydenham
and Surrey).
Richard
news:d39c7c19-2b63-4047...@9g2000vbq.googlegroups.com:
> Me too, having had a drink with Lawrence last night. Not a
> monster. Rather good company.
and Surrey).
Richard
Adam Lea
Feb 29, 2012, 6:43:51 PM2/29/12
to
On 29/02/12 21:36, Neil wrote:
>
> The way I see it is Dawlish's arrogance is his undoing and many people
> on many newsgroups are totally fed up with him. However, it is (mostly)
> a free world and I wouldn't want to see the internet globally censored.
> That's what the killfile is for.
>
> I'm fairly amazed that his address and phone number was so easy to find
> on Google (sorry but I couldn't resist when I came across his real name
> somewhere in this thread!) but I guess he's so brazen that he thinks
> he's untouchable.
>
> Many years ago, I was in to amateur radio. There used to be a repeater
> up on the Crystal Palace mast in South London, that attracted all sorts
> of dross from many miles around.
>
> One day, a twit like Dawlish appeared and rubbed a lot of people up the
> wrong way. So much so that some nutter took it upon themselves to petrol
> bomb the twits car!!!!
>
> Apparently, the flames went up the side of the house, in to the roof and
> burnt the house down!
>
> I wouldn't wish that upon anyone but there are nutters out there and I
> think Dawlish really should pull his neck in before he upsets the wrong
> person.
>
> By the way Dawlish, is that your website about Trains I came across when
> googling "Paul Garvey Dawlish"?
The way I see it Lawrence is as much to blame for this. The stuff he
>
> The way I see it is Dawlish's arrogance is his undoing and many people
> on many newsgroups are totally fed up with him. However, it is (mostly)
> a free world and I wouldn't want to see the internet globally censored.
> That's what the killfile is for.
>
> I'm fairly amazed that his address and phone number was so easy to find
> on Google (sorry but I couldn't resist when I came across his real name
> somewhere in this thread!) but I guess he's so brazen that he thinks
> he's untouchable.
>
> Many years ago, I was in to amateur radio. There used to be a repeater
> up on the Crystal Palace mast in South London, that attracted all sorts
> of dross from many miles around.
>
> One day, a twit like Dawlish appeared and rubbed a lot of people up the
> wrong way. So much so that some nutter took it upon themselves to petrol
> bomb the twits car!!!!
>
> Apparently, the flames went up the side of the house, in to the roof and
> burnt the house down!
>
> I wouldn't wish that upon anyone but there are nutters out there and I
> think Dawlish really should pull his neck in before he upsets the wrong
> person.
>
> By the way Dawlish, is that your website about Trains I came across when
> googling "Paul Garvey Dawlish"?
comes out with regarding AGW is like he is deliberately trying to
provoke Dawlish. Not to mention the nasty ad-hominen political attacks
he has made about climate scientists in the past, or the hypocrisy of
accusing people of "alarmism" then making equally alarmist statements
about the economic consequences of taking action. Yet all this seems to
be fair game because he has a good sense of humour at other times. I'm
tempted to say it is an example of style trumps substance.
BTW I do think Dawlish has gone way OTT and I do not approve of the way
he communicates with others on here. I wonder if this is because he
simply lacks social skills.
Col
Mar 1, 2012, 2:22:57 AM3/1/12
to
"Adam Lea" <lea...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:Lb2dnchfpr6rJdPS...@bt.com...
>
> The way I see it Lawrence is as much to blame for this. The stuff he comes
> out with regarding AGW is like he is deliberately trying to provoke
> Dawlish. Not to mention the nasty ad-hominen political attacks he has made
> about climate scientists in the past, or the hypocrisy of accusing people
> of "alarmism" then making equally alarmist statements about the economic
> consequences of taking action. Yet all this seems to be fair game because
> he has a good sense of humour at other times. I'm tempted to say it is an
> example of style trumps substance.
There have been many times when I've considered them as bad
> The way I see it Lawrence is as much to blame for this. The stuff he comes
> out with regarding AGW is like he is deliberately trying to provoke
> Dawlish. Not to mention the nasty ad-hominen political attacks he has made
> about climate scientists in the past, or the hypocrisy of accusing people
> of "alarmism" then making equally alarmist statements about the economic
> consequences of taking action. Yet all this seems to be fair game because
> he has a good sense of humour at other times. I'm tempted to say it is an
> example of style trumps substance.
as each other but at least Lawerence has the decency to accept
a portion of the blame, some awareness regarding his actions.
Can you imagine Dawlish even admitting that he might have got
a little carried away on occaision?
Graham P Davis
Mar 1, 2012, 3:04:01 AM3/1/12
to
On 29/02/12 22:02, Global Cooling Charlie wrote:
> lawrence is to blame as well.
> why the hell doesnt he just ignore that twat. but he keeps coming back
> for more.
> im mean its not rocket science.
> kill file or not, just bloody well ignore the oaf.
Talking of twats and oafs, Terry, why don't you stop hiding behind all
> lawrence is to blame as well.
> why the hell doesnt he just ignore that twat. but he keeps coming back
> for more.
> im mean its not rocket science.
> kill file or not, just bloody well ignore the oaf.
these pseudonyms? The only reason I can think of is that you enjoy
inflicting your twattishness and oafishness on as many people as possible.
--
Graham Davis, Bracknell, Berks. E-mail: change boy to man
LibreOffice: http://www.documentfoundation.org/
openSUSE Linux: http://www.opensuse.org/en/
Adam Lea
Mar 1, 2012, 3:24:06 AM3/1/12
to
he goes too far and for that I do have some respect for him.
Joe P
Mar 1, 2012, 3:56:59 AM3/1/12
to
On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 08:24:06 +0000, Adam Lea wrote:
> True. I have noticed Lawrence does sincerely apologise on occasion when
> he goes too far and for that I do have some respect for him.
Yes; manners maketh man. When Lawrence has a bout of hot-headed cooling
> True. I have noticed Lawrence does sincerely apologise on occasion when
> he goes too far and for that I do have some respect for him.
he sometimes accepts that he is "partly responsible".
What a gent! I'll bet he puts his hazards on if he parks in an
inconsiderate way too.
David Mitchell
Mar 1, 2012, 12:00:08 PM3/1/12
to
OMG, just realised why it's been some time since I last visited this site.
Two sides to every story of course, but I do hope you don't take time out Lawrence, have often, (not always) enjoyed your posts and the ng would be lacking without your contribution.
Do try and get on guys, it's really not that difficult.
David Mitchell. Langtoft, East Riding.
Two sides to every story of course, but I do hope you don't take time out Lawrence, have often, (not always) enjoyed your posts and the ng would be lacking without your contribution.
Do try and get on guys, it's really not that difficult.
David Mitchell. Langtoft, East Riding.
Eskimo Will
Mar 1, 2012, 12:14:16 PM3/1/12
to
"Richard Dixon" <rdng...@yah00.c0.uk> wrote in message
news:XnsA008E94A8...@88.198.244.100...
Will
--
ge...@homeblueyonder.co.uk
Mar 1, 2012, 1:22:16 PM3/1/12
to
Tudor has a trombone.
(;-))
Geoff
Desperate Dan
Mar 2, 2012, 8:42:09 AM3/2/12
to
On Feb 29, 12:56 pm, "cudd...@britpost.com"
Good luck with the Phd but I fear it's doomed to failure. Who would
believe that Lawrence, Weatherlayer, Dawlish and last but by no means
least the Eskimo man who who has to justify his existence on earth by
telling us that he's a "leader", sleeps in a room at close to absolute
zero etc, etc, etc, actually exist. Complete nutters all of them!
believe that Lawrence, Weatherlayer, Dawlish and last but by no means
least the Eskimo man who who has to justify his existence on earth by
telling us that he's a "leader", sleeps in a room at close to absolute
zero etc, etc, etc, actually exist. Complete nutters all of them!
Global Cooling Charlie
Mar 2, 2012, 5:37:30 PM3/2/12
to
and your perfect arent you, god?
yeah, your desperate all right, dan
yeah, your desperate all right, dan
Global Cooling Charlie
Mar 2, 2012, 5:40:00 PM3/2/12
to
my names not terry
and sorry, the reason you like reply to trolls like me are??
just like larry, just cant help it can you
and sorry, the reason you like reply to trolls like me are??
just like larry, just cant help it can you
Global Cooling Charlie
Mar 2, 2012, 7:02:50 PM3/2/12
to
I always thought it would be better to be a fake somebody than a real
nobody.
On 01/03/2012 8:04 AM, Graham P Davis wrote:
nobody.
On 01/03/2012 8:04 AM, Graham P Davis wrote:
sutart...@googlemail.com
Mar 3, 2012, 10:11:12 AM3/3/12
to
made on this group.
Sadly, I really do believe they think that cyber bullying is something
that doesn't apply to the over 50s and are going to get a shock when
their ISPs produce lists of all their posts from the year dot.
Comments do not look quite so amusing when read out in court by a
barrister, even if the originals did have a ;) after them.
Weatherlawyer
Mar 3, 2012, 2:12:47 PM3/3/12
to
On Mar 3, 3:11 pm, "cudd...@britpost.com"
know what is wrong with our schools.
Anyone have a list of this person's online names?
<sutartsor...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Sadly, I really do believe they think that cyber bullying is something
> that doesn't apply to the over 50s and are going to get a shock when
> their ISPs produce lists of all their posts from the year dot.
If that's a free consultation, it was grossly over-priced. But now I
>
> Sadly, I really do believe they think that cyber bullying is something
> that doesn't apply to the over 50s and are going to get a shock when
> their ISPs produce lists of all their posts from the year dot.
know what is wrong with our schools.
Anyone have a list of this person's online names?
Adam Lea
Mar 3, 2012, 4:45:48 PM3/3/12
to
On 01/03/12 17:00, David Mitchell wrote:
> Do try and get on guys, it's really not that difficult.
>
http://tinyurl.com/6g22l8z
> Do try and get on guys, it's really not that difficult.
>
http://tinyurl.com/2bzzn82
Weatherlawyer
Mar 4, 2012, 4:18:22 PM3/4/12
to
I always thought it was:
Perhaps most interesting is the fact that in studies on the
aforementioned “mirror neurons,” women tended to have stronger motor
responses when watching others than men did. One experiment involved
men and women playing games with a partner who was really a lab
assistant. In one group, the men and women enjoyed working together
and playing a game with their partner. Then, while the subjects looked
on, their partners were seemingly subjected to pain. The pain areas in
both the male and female subjects’ brains lit up as they watched their
partners in pain. But in the next group, the partners cheated during
the game with the subjects and played unfairly. This time when the
subjects watched theirs partner in pain, the pain areas of the women’s
brains still lit up in empathy.
But in the men’s brains, it wasn’t the pain areas that lit up, it was
the pleasure areas.
:~D
The men got a kick out of seeing the cheater get their comeuppance.
The men seemed to be more focused on fairness and justice. Again this
is not likely a matter of socialization; the same result has even been
found in similar studies with male mice.
sutart...@googlemail.com
Mar 5, 2012, 11:44:00 AM3/5/12
to
On Mar 3, 7:12 pm, Weatherlawyer <weatherlaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If that's a free consultation, it was grossly over-priced. But now I
> know what is wrong with our schools.
> Anyone have a list of this person's online names?
Why would you want a list of my online names?
>
> If that's a free consultation, it was grossly over-priced. But now I
> know what is wrong with our schools.
> Anyone have a list of this person's online names?
What do you intend doing with such a list?
Weatherlawyer
Mar 5, 2012, 10:19:27 PM3/5/12
to
On Mar 5, 4:44 pm, "cudd...@britpost.com"
I'll answer yours if you answer mine.
(I know you are a bit hard of reading so I will just mention that I
asked first and leave others to explain.)
(I know you are a bit hard of reading so I will just mention that I
asked first and leave others to explain.)
sutart...@googlemail.com
Mar 6, 2012, 6:46:12 AM3/6/12
to
that you have asked is:- was Stan Garvey someone from Crossroads?
I'm afraid that I have no idea whether he was on Crossroads or not, so
I can't answer your question however irrelevant it might be.
You didn't ask me if I had any other online names, presumably because
you have not got the guts. You asked anyone here if they had a list of
my online names.
I find this a most sinister development for a couple of reasons;
1, That you expect people on this newsgroup to be compiling a list of
online names for other contributors who may not agree with your views.
2, That you go on the defensive when asked what you would do with such
a list if one came into your possession.
Given that this is one of a number of threads where a group of people
are trying to argue that one person is bullying them, rather than the
other way round - you may wish to reconsider your strategy.
Weatherlawyer
Mar 6, 2012, 10:48:57 AM3/6/12
to
On Mar 6, 11:46 am, "cudd...@britpost.com"
Hear now the reason
Where reason begins
Your eyes are your temple.
And you bang into things
Forearmed is forehead
Dullish with pain
You reach out in wonder that none will explain.
Where reason begins
Your eyes are your temple.
And you bang into things
Forearmed is forehead
Dullish with pain
You reach out in wonder that none will explain.
Jim Cannon
Oct 24, 2014, 9:16:07 PM10/24/14
to
On Monday, February 27, 2012 7:19:54 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
> Sorry about this as it seems to be dragging the group down and I'm
> going to stop posting for good while as some people here become very
> aggressive and nasty if you show any disagreement. The whole thing is
> becoming ugly and I'm partly responsible as I get involved in these
> ding dongs.
>
> Mr Garvey is patently quite bonkers and once I stop posting he will
> find somebody else to fall out with as that seems to be his nature.
>
>
>
> Paul Garvey has emailed threatening me with some sort of legal
> action.
>
> He claims I physically threatened him some time ago when basically he
> was so arrogantly rude I offered him the opportunity to say it to me
> man to man.
>
> Okay a bit Macho and stupid but he really is to ready with insults and
> general rudeness. I place this here as he is a madman and I want
> everything open out in public, This is what he has just emailed me.
> Sorry about this as it seems to be dragging the group down and I'm
> going to stop posting for good while as some people here become very
> aggressive and nasty if you show any disagreement. The whole thing is
> becoming ugly and I'm partly responsible as I get involved in these
> ding dongs.
>
> Mr Garvey is patently quite bonkers and once I stop posting he will
> find somebody else to fall out with as that seems to be his nature.
>
>
>
> Paul Garvey has emailed threatening me with some sort of legal
> action.
>
> He claims I physically threatened him some time ago when basically he
> was so arrogantly rude I offered him the opportunity to say it to me
> man to man.
>
> Okay a bit Macho and stupid but he really is to ready with insults and
> general rudeness. I place this here as he is a madman and I want
>
>
>
>
>
> "I warned you last time, when you issued a verbal threat, that I would
> act if you did anything similar. This afternoon, I registered your
> details, two posts of threats of physical violence that you've been
> silly enough to issue and this potential stalking. If you *ever*
> decided to cross the moral boundary and holiday down here with intent
> against me, the letter that is held by Jamie will show the intent was
> planned.
>
> One more actual threat of physical violence and Jamie sends the letter
> on to the police. I can assure you they will pay you a visit.
>
> I can't be clearer. Stick to the science and you'll have no problems.
> issue threats, veiled, or otherwise and I will act. I've done it
> before with great success, stopping what the police decribed as
> "potentially dangerous" staking early on and I'll do it again."
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "I warned you last time, when you issued a verbal threat, that I would
> act if you did anything similar. This afternoon, I registered your
> details, two posts of threats of physical violence that you've been
> silly enough to issue and this potential stalking. If you *ever*
> decided to cross the moral boundary and holiday down here with intent
> against me, the letter that is held by Jamie will show the intent was
> planned.
>
> One more actual threat of physical violence and Jamie sends the letter
> on to the police. I can assure you they will pay you a visit.
>
> I can't be clearer. Stick to the science and you'll have no problems.
> issue threats, veiled, or otherwise and I will act. I've done it
> before with great success, stopping what the police decribed as
> "potentially dangerous" staking early on and I'll do it again."
>
>
> Paul you need to see a therapist of some sort .
Its obviously a viscous cycle Larry. Leave it out he aint worth it
Col
Oct 25, 2014, 1:56:21 AM10/25/14
to
"Jim Cannon" <jimc...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:2f3a0cb9-079a-493e...@googlegroups.com...
> On Monday, February 27, 2012 7:19:54 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
<Snip>
>> Paul you need to see a therapist of some sort .
>
> Its obviously a viscous cycle Larry. Leave it out he aint worth it
post??
--
Col
Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
Snow videos:
Col
Bolton, Lancashire
160m asl
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3QvmL4UWBmHFMKWiwYm_gg
Message has been deleted
Bob Martin
Oct 25, 2014, 4:58:30 AM10/25/14
to
in 405620 20141025 021606 Jim Cannon <jimc...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>Its obviously a viscous cycle Larry. Leave it out he aint worth it
A "viscous cycle", now there's a thought!
>Its obviously a viscous cycle Larry. Leave it out he aint worth it
Dawlish
Oct 25, 2014, 6:03:47 AM10/25/14
to
On Monday, February 27, 2012 7:19:54 PM UTC, Lawrence Jenkins wrote:
> Paul you need to see a therapist of some sort .
You've now threatened a whole bunch of people on different newsgroups and you have been confronted by a strengthening of the law. Hurts, doesnt it, eh larry?
Lawrence Jenkins
Oct 25, 2014, 6:29:58 AM10/25/14
to
Lawrence Jenkins
Oct 25, 2014, 6:34:54 AM10/25/14
to
But a 'cycle path'? All green tarmac which we know is far better for the environment than the black stuff but liable towards violent malicious behaviour, so is it really better.
Sir Jim Cannon
Jun 9, 2016, 2:54:40 PM6/9/16
to
Sir Jim Cannon
Jun 10, 2016, 5:16:09 PM6/10/16
to
0 new messages