Re: Who Wants Me to Stop Posting?
Mr. Benn
news:4e2558a6$0$2533$da0f...@news.zen.co.uk...
> There is one person in particular (let's call him "Mr X") who would love
> to believe that I am massively unpopular on this newsgroup, and that
> pretty much everyone except one or two supposedly equally unwelcome
> "cyclist-haters" is desperate for me to stop posting, and sees nothing
> of value in anything that I write.
I'm sure BP would like Simon Mason to stop posting while he's getting paid.
Paul - xxx
> There is one person in particular (let's call him "Mr X") who would
> love to believe that I am massively unpopular on this newsgroup, and
> that pretty much everyone except one or two supposedly equally
> unwelcome "cyclist-haters" is desperate for me to stop posting, and
> sees nothing of value in anything that I write.
>
> So, no trick: is he correct? If you find my posts so unpalatable that
> you not only aren't that interested in them, but you actively and
> passionately want me in particular to stop posting, now is your chance
> to say so. If enough people do so then they will probably get their
> wish. If most people don't bother then Mr X (who could he possibly
> be?) will, for the first time ever in his life I'm sure, be proven
> wrong.
>
> I've no idea which way it's going to go, but I'll be interested to
> find out: if the truth is inconvenient then it's best to face up to
> it rather than desperately suppressing it, don't you think, Mr X?
>
> Needless to say (or at least it should be), socks (e.g. "N Ron
> Hubbard") and those who don't normally post here (e.g. people who Mr
> X invites here specially for this topic, because that's what he's
> like) need not apply.
I don't care whether you post or not, mostly. I dislike kill-files,
but know how to use them, there are one or two people in mine now, but
you're not one of them.
I mostly ignore any anti-cycling/cyclist rants, or ad-hominems, other
times you post intelligently and I respond .. Occasionally I'll have a
play .. ;)
OTOH I could also be mixing you up with some other posters who appear
to dislike cycling so much they make themselves look like children,
ranting away between each other .. in much the same way that the
cycling obsessed go off and do their own thing .. ;)
I don't care who posts what, I mostly reply to the content if I feel
like it or find it interesting/irritating, whoever posts it and
wherever they sit wrt cycling.
--
Paul - xxx
Mentalguy2k8
> to believe that I am massively unpopular on this newsgroup, and that
> pretty much everyone except one or two supposedly equally unwelcome
> "cyclist-haters" is desperate for me to stop posting, and sees nothing
> of value in anything that I write.
>
> So, no trick: is he correct? If you find my posts so unpalatable that
> you not only aren't that interested in them, but you actively and
> passionately want me in particular to stop posting, now is your chance
> to say so. If enough people do so then they will probably get their
> wish. If most people don't bother then Mr X (who could he possibly be?)
> will, for the first time ever in his life I'm sure, be proven wrong.
>
> I've no idea which way it's going to go, but I'll be interested to find
> out: if the truth is inconvenient then it's best to face up to it rather
> than desperately suppressing it, don't you think, Mr X?
>
> Needless to say (or at least it should be), socks (e.g. "N Ron Hubbard")
> and those who don't normally post here (e.g. people who Mr X invites
> here specially for this topic, because that's what he's like) need not
> apply.
If people don't like your posts, they shouldn't read them.
I used to lurk here a lot for the info and the arguments, but it's turned
into the Simon Mason self-appreciation society.
Judith
Indeed - more than 2000 posts this year in total - the most prolific poster
in URC by a long way.
A quarter of them were made courtesy of BP.
Other interesting little points:
A mere 226 posts made on Holiday
500 plus posts made via BP's Secure system
But then - 2 Directly from BP's LAN - I bet he shouldn't have done that -
possible security breach.
My pension company holds BP shares.
I think I need to raise my concerns with someone.
Would anyone suggest the pension company, or perhaps BP personnel at Hull
direct?
What about the possible security breach - BP's Internal Systems Department?
I don't want to be losing money due to employees being Simple.
--
Simple Simon Mason - who cycles at 25mph in 20mph limits just because the limits do not apply to cyclists.
This includes exceeding the speed limit past three schools. A total disregard for the well-being of vulnerable road users.
The actions of a true psycholist.
Simon Mason
>
> I used to lurk here a lot for the info and the arguments, but it's turned
> into the Simon Mason self-appreciation society.-
Not really.
I've been on urc since 1998.
--
Simon Mason
Mentalguy2k8
"Simon Mason" <swld...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5320d7d2-99ed-45ff...@n28g2000vbs.googlegroups.com...
I don't recall you flooding the place daily over the last few years.
Mrcheerful
BP employee code would give the answer:
Never
. Use company electronic communications systems
to transmit without authorization:
- Confidential data about individuals.
- Confidential company information.
- Copyrighted or licensed materials.
. Deliberately access, store, send, post or publish:
- Pornographic, sexually explicit or sexually exploitative
images or text.
- Any materials promoting violence, hatred, terrorism
or the intolerance of others.
- Any material that is harassing, obscene, abusive or
inconsistent with BP's non-harassment and equal
opportunity policies (see the Respectful, harassmentfree
workplace section of this code).
In the event that you receive inappropriate unsolicited
material - e.g. through e-mail spam - forward it to BP
digital security (BlockInte...@bp.com) and delete
it immediately.
If the company identifies obscene material on company
digital systems or premises, or other behaviour which
is inconsistent with the above policies, not only will
disciplinary action be taken, local management may also
notify civil and/or criminal authorities.
Under BP's privacy and data protection policies and within
the bounds of law, BP may access and monitor computer
files and electronic communications stored on company
servers, PCs and other devices for maintenance, business
need or to meet a legal or policy requirement.
See also the Privacy and employee confidentiality and
Protecting BP's assets sections of this code.
i This section should be read in conjunction with the full set
of guidelines contained in the BP Digital security standard
http://digitalsecurity.bp.com
- which offers further
clarification and explanations. If you are unclear on any
issue regarding information on digital systems use and
security, speak to your line manager or contact BP digital
security direct.
Judith
wrote:
ffs
He did not say that you were new here.
He said it had turned in to the Simple Mason self-appreciation society;
nothing to do with dates and years.
Yep - another own goal.
I said somewhere else that your IQ was probably 53.
I think 47 is probably nearer the mark.
Judith
wrote:
He now posts about a quarter of all posts to the group - most from BP system.
I guess there is nothing to do at work; probably soon be made redundant.
Mentalguy2k8
"Judith" <jmsmi...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5c9b27lvlhalocd3n...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:05:37 +0100, "Mentalguy2k8"
> <Mental...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Simon Mason" <swld...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:5320d7d2-99ed-45ff...@n28g2000vbs.googlegroups.com...
>>On Jul 19, 1:04 pm, "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I used to lurk here a lot for the info and the arguments, but it's
>>> turned
>>> into the Simon Mason self-appreciation society.-
>>
>>>Not really.
>>>I've been on urc since 1998.
>>
>>I don't recall you flooding the place daily over the last few years.
>
>
> He now posts about a quarter of all posts to the group - most from BP
> system.
>
> I guess there is nothing to do at work; probably soon be made redundant.
Then he'll be posting *more* !
I used to see a lot of decent advice and discussion on cycling as a sport
and a hobby. Now it's just a constant stream of reposted articles where
someone says that bikes are great, or a driver breaks the law.
Simon Mason
> I used to lurk here a lot for the info and the arguments, but it's turned
> > into the Simon Mason self-appreciation society.-
> >Not really.
> >I've been on urc since 1998.
>
> I don't recall you flooding the place daily over the last few years.
I was *much* more prolific in the early days, even more so than today as we
used to work night shifts then and had loads more time on our hands. I must
say I learned a lot from some of the old crowd who were really welcoming and
friendly. I met up with more than a few of them when they were passing by my
location and had some great times with them.
--
Simon Mason
JNugent
> There is one person in particular (let's call him "Mr X") who would love
> to believe that I am massively unpopular on this newsgroup, and that
> pretty much everyone except one or two supposedly equally unwelcome
> "cyclist-haters" is desperate for me to stop posting, and sees nothing
> of value in anything that I write.
>
> So, no trick: is he correct? If you find my posts so unpalatable that
> you not only aren't that interested in them, but you actively and
> passionately want me in particular to stop posting, now is your chance
> to say so. If enough people do so then they will probably get their
> wish. If most people don't bother then Mr X (who could he possibly be?)
> will, for the first time ever in his life I'm sure, be proven wrong.
Do not take this post as a vote. It is a request for information only.
What's the score so far?
Rob Morley
You noticed that too? Too many posts, too little content, increasingly
bad over the last month or two. He's about to go into the bozo bin.
Simon Mason
>
> Well no-one has emailed me about this topic, so we only need consider
> public replies. I believe that so far, it's a big fat ZERO as far as
> those who want me to stop posting (and are prepared to say so) are
> concerned. (Paul - xxx was one of the few who I thought might be a
> candidate, but his post says otherwise, which I'm grateful to him for.)
>
> Thanks to everyone for their support. So far it looks like Cha - sorry,
> Mr X is more-or-less alone in his opposition to my presence here. It's
> almost enough to make me feel sorry for the car-hating PoS.-
Since I responded immediately to two of your e-mails to my personal e-
mail address, you should be able to deduce something from that.
--
Simon Mason
Dave - Cyclists VOR
> There is one person in particular (let's call him "Mr X") who would love
> to believe that I am massively unpopular on this newsgroup, and that
> pretty much everyone except one or two supposedly equally unwelcome
> "cyclist-haters" is desperate for me to stop posting, and sees nothing
> of value in anything that I write.
Granted that there is nothing of value in what you write, you are so
stupid its fucking funny.
Don't stop posting, its so much fun ripping the piss out of you.
--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University
Judith
wrote:
>On Jul 19, 7:03 pm, Nuxx Bar <nuxx....@live.co.uk> wrote:
You don't get many emails and you have a lot of time on your hands?
Peter Keller
> There is one person in particular (let's call him "Mr X") who would love
> to believe that I am massively unpopular on this newsgroup, and that
> pretty much everyone except one or two supposedly equally unwelcome
> "cyclist-haters" is desperate for me to stop posting, and sees nothing
> of value in anything that I write.
>
> So, no trick: is he correct? If you find my posts so unpalatable that
> you not only aren't that interested in them, but you actively and
> passionately want me in particular to stop posting, now is your chance
> to say so. If enough people do so then they will probably get their
> wish. If most people don't bother then Mr X (who could he possibly be?)
> will, for the first time ever in his life I'm sure, be proven wrong.
>
> I've no idea which way it's going to go, but I'll be interested to find
> out: if the truth is inconvenient then it's best to face up to it rather
> than desperately suppressing it, don't you think, Mr X?
>
> Needless to say (or at least it should be), socks (e.g. "N Ron Hubbard")
> and those who don't normally post here (e.g. people who Mr X invites
> here specially for this topic, because that's what he's like) need not
> apply.
I don't give a shit if you are popular or unpopular or what views you
hold anything else.
Just post. That is what newsgroups are for!
--
If you are riding a bicycle you are winning.
Peter Keller
> On 19/07/2011 19:41, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>>
>> Don't stop posting, its so much fun ripping the piss out of you.
>
> Um...are you sure you've got the right person? I recall you agreeing
> with me more than once but never "ripping the piss".
Oh don't worry. It is a congenital insultor. Cannot post without
ripping into someone's personal characteristics.
It is insecure and is trying to bully others into writing posts which
meet with its "approval"
Dave - Cyclists VOR
> On 19/07/2011 19:41, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>>> There is one person in particular (let's call him "Mr X") who would love
>>> to believe that I am massively unpopular on this newsgroup, and that
>>> pretty much everyone except one or two supposedly equally unwelcome
>>> "cyclist-haters" is desperate for me to stop posting, and sees nothing
>>> of value in anything that I write.
>>
>> Granted that there is nothing of value in what you write, you are so
>> stupid its fucking funny.
>>
>> Don't stop posting, its so much fun ripping the piss out of you.
>
> with me more than once but never "ripping the piss".
Not paying attention then?
Dave - Cyclists VOR
> On 20/07/2011 01:02, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>> On 19/07/2011 20:37, Nuxx Bar wrote:
>>> On 19/07/2011 19:41, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>>>> On 19/07/2011 11:12, Nuxx Bar wrote:
>>>>> There is one person in particular (let's call him "Mr X") who would
>>>>> love
>>>>> to believe that I am massively unpopular on this newsgroup, and that
>>>>> pretty much everyone except one or two supposedly equally unwelcome
>>>>> "cyclist-haters" is desperate for me to stop posting, and sees nothing
>>>>> of value in anything that I write.
>>>>
>>>> Granted that there is nothing of value in what you write, you are so
>>>> stupid its fucking funny.
>>>>
>>>> Don't stop posting, its so much fun ripping the piss out of you.
>>>
>>> Um...are you sure you've got the right person? I recall you agreeing
>>> with me more than once but never "ripping the piss".
>>
>> Not paying attention then?
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling/msg/216f2f0459109d60
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling/msg/0418bccf9212375b
>
> Now where is this "ripping the piss"? Because it's certainly not in
> reply to me. It must have been done *very* subtly, without even
> mentioning me, and subtlety doesn't seem to be your style. Help me out,
> point me to some examples.
>
> Are you *sure* you're not confusing me with someone else? Your views
> usually seem to be fairly similar to mine, even if they are expressed in
> a...different way.
We seem to be at cross purposes here. I was referring to ripping the
piss out of Simple Simon & his mates, not you.
Sorry if the error was mine.
Squashme
> On 20/07/2011 01:02, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 19/07/2011 20:37, Nuxx Bar wrote:
> >> On 19/07/2011 19:41, Dave - Cyclists VOR wrote:
> >>> On 19/07/2011 11:12, Nuxx Bar wrote:
> >>>> There is one person in particular (let's call him "Mr X") who would
> >>>> love
> >>>> to believe that I am massively unpopular on this newsgroup, and that
> >>>> pretty much everyone except one or two supposedly equally unwelcome
> >>>> "cyclist-haters" is desperate for me to stop posting, and sees nothing
> >>>> of value in anything that I write.
>
> >>> Granted that there is nothing of value in what you write, you are so
> >>> stupid its fucking funny.
>
> >>> Don't stop posting, its so much fun ripping the piss out of you.
>
> >> Um...are you sure you've got the right person? I recall you agreeing
> >> with me more than once but never "ripping the piss".
>
> > Not paying attention then?
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling/msg/216f2f0459109d60
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling/msg/0418bccf9212375b
>
> Now where is this "ripping the piss"? Because it's certainly not in
> reply to me. It must have been done *very* subtly, without even
> mentioning me, and subtlety doesn't seem to be your style. Help me out,
> point me to some examples.
>
> Are you *sure* you're not confusing me with someone else? Your views
> usually seem to be fairly similar to mine, even if they are expressed in
> a...different way.
Blue on blue.
Squashme
wrote:
Wow! That's a first! I'm going to print it out and frame it.
Mind, he's still weaselling a bit there. "If!" Thickskinned or what?
Bertie Wooster
I'd be inclined to describe the Medway Bottler as yellow.
Squashme
> On 21/07/2011 20:01, Squashme wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Sorry if the error was mine."
>
> > Wow! That's a first! I'm going to print it out and frame it.
> > Mind, he's still weaselling a bit there. "If!" Thickskinned or what?
>
"Nobody's perfect":-
http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l8rbgoF4L81qcqr3so1_500.jpg
>
> Have you ever seen your friend Chapman apologise for *anything*, no
> matter how bang to rights he is?
Should he apologize for anything, if he is "bang to rights?"
Squashme
> On 21/07/2011 22:09, Squashme wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 21, 8:29 pm, Nuxx Bar <nuxx....@live.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On 21/07/2011 20:01, Squashme wrote:
>
> >>> "Sorry if the error was mine."
>
> >>> Wow! That's a first! I'm going to print it out and frame it.
> >>> Mind, he's still weaselling a bit there. "If!" Thickskinned or what?
>
>
> > "Nobody's perfect":-
> >http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l8rbgoF4L81qcqr3so1_500.jpg
>
> >> Have you ever seen your friend Chapman apologise for *anything*, no
> >> matter how bang to rights he is?
>
> > Should he apologize for anything, if he is "bang to rights?"
>
> to set your spellchecker to a British English, and not US English,
> dictionary)
Spellchecker!! What will they think of next?
Please note that, at home, when I apologize (and that happens often),
I have to do it in American English, for personal reasons. And I
really prefer zeds or zees. Esses are a bit soft, I feel.
By the way, thanks for your postings, they produce many zeds for me. I
start to read them, and then it's
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz......................
Simon Mason
>
> - Show quoted text -
"Friendly fire" came to me this morning.
Still, that is what happens when you flail about like a drunken boxer,
you end up lamping your corner man ;-)
--
Simon Mason
Squashme
"Friendly fire?" No more curried eggs for breakfast then!
Anyway, Nuxx Bar can't afford to lose potential allies, so he has
magnanimously forgiven the Battling Bottler.
Mr Pounder
"Nuxx Bar" <nuxx...@live.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4e2558a6$0$2533$da0f...@news.zen.co.uk...
> There is one person in particular (let's call him "Mr X") who would love
> to believe that I am massively unpopular on this newsgroup, and that
> pretty much everyone except one or two supposedly equally unwelcome
> "cyclist-haters" is desperate for me to stop posting, and sees nothing
> of value in anything that I write.
>
> you not only aren't that interested in them, but you actively and
> passionately want me in particular to stop posting, now is your chance
> to say so. If enough people do so then they will probably get their
> wish. If most people don't bother then Mr X (who could he possibly be?)
> will, for the first time ever in his life I'm sure, be proven wrong.
>
> I've no idea which way it's going to go, but I'll be interested to find
> out: if the truth is inconvenient then it's best to face up to it rather
> than desperately suppressing it, don't you think, Mr X?
>
> Needless to say (or at least it should be), socks (e.g. "N Ron Hubbard")
> and those who don't normally post here (e.g. people who Mr X invites
> here specially for this topic, because that's what he's like) need not
> apply.
FFS who gives a fuck?
Just keep on posting.
>
Dave - Cyclists VOR
>>
>> Sorry if the error was mine.
>>
>
> "Sorry if the error was mine."
>
> Wow! That's a first! I'm going to print it out and frame it.
> Mind, he's still weaselling a bit there. "If!" Thickskinned or what?
>
individual - not a fuckwit cyclist.
Simon Mason
No - he admits he cycles and is considering getting an electric
bicycle.
--
Simon Mason
Dave - Cyclists VOR
But you are well known for being an idiot Cwispin, so it doesn't matter.
And if you really believe Front Bottom Pikey Bloke was ever in Dover or
Gillingham come to that, you are a thick idiot.
Dave - Cyclists VOR
> On 22/07/2011 08:27, Squashme wrote:
>>
>> "Friendly fire?" No more curried eggs for breakfast then!
>> Anyway, Nuxx Bar can't afford to lose potential allies, so he has
>> magnanimously forgiven the Battling Bottler.
>
> know. Are you saying you wouldn't do the same if, say, Car-Hater
> Chapman made one of his disparaging remarks at you by mistake?
Squashme is so thick he probably wouldn't notice.
Simon Mason
wrote:
> On 22/07/2011 14:07, Nuxx Bar wrote:
>
> > On 22/07/2011 08:27, Squashme wrote:
>
> >> "Friendly fire?" No more curried eggs for breakfast then!
> >> Anyway, Nuxx Bar can't afford to lose potential allies, so he has
> >> magnanimously forgiven the Battling Bottler.
>
> > As I would anyone who made an attribution error. It does happen, you
> > know. Are you saying you wouldn't do the same if, say, Car-Hater
> > Chapman made one of his disparaging remarks at you by mistake?
>
> Squashme is so thick he probably wouldn't notice.
Are we on the whisky yet?
--
Simon Mason
Squashme
>
> > On 22/07/2011 08:27, Squashme wrote:
>
> >> "Friendly fire?" No more curried eggs for breakfast then!
> >> Anyway, Nuxx Bar can't afford to lose potential allies, so he has
> >> magnanimously forgiven the Battling Bottler.
>
> > As I would anyone who made an attribution error. It does happen, you
> > know. Are you saying you wouldn't do the same if, say, Car-Hater
> > Chapman made one of his disparaging remarks at you by mistake?
>
> Squashme is so thick he probably wouldn't notice.
>
Awhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Churchill!!!
Squashme
wrote:
> On 21/07/2011 20:38, Bertie Wooster wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:57:34 -0700 (PDT), Squashme
And you proved Front Mech was not in Dover how? Remind us. Re-live
your victory.
Bertie Wooster
He can't, he bottled.
Dave - Cyclists VOR
As usual you miss the point completely because you are very, very stupid.
The key word is 'fuckwit'.
Dave - Cyclists VOR
First of all, he wanted to meet me in Strood. He used Google Maps with
my postcode and (due to an error with Google and him being a thick twat)
specified the meet in Gillingham, 6 miles away. Realising he had fucked
up he went very quiet.
He repeatedly requested another meeting outside a hotel that doesn't
exist and gave two different address's for it - and then claimed he
drove & also rode past for 30 and then 31 minutes.
Being much smarter than an idiot who thinks a push bike is a viable form
of transport, I gave him at least 6 opportunities to confirm the venue &
he didn't manage to spot it. He dug a deeper hole.
Realising he had fucked up yet again, he kept digging.
Then he changed his name, thinking it would fool anyone.
He then claimed to be at the venue that doesn't exist & and at the same
time 'proved' he was on a ferry at sea. His stupidity is simply astounding.
I do hope you understand that. I typed it slowly so that you could
follow it.
Now, lets cut to the chase shall we?
Front Bottom Pikey Bloke Justin lacked the intellectual capacity to beat
me in an argument, clearly punching well above his weight, so he tried
to formulate a plan. Being a thick cyclist he failed.
The other muppets [1] who, obviously cross at being repeatedly
humiliated latched onto Front Bottom Pikey Bloke Justin's seriously
flawed plan in a desperate attempt to finally find a stick to beat me with.
[1] Cwispin, Simple, Squashme, Anchor etc.
They of course made themselves look even more stupid than Front Bottom
Pikey Bloke Justin.
Do let me know if there is anything more I can help you understand.
Dave - Cyclists VOR
Are you sure you are actually a teacher? Did you buy your degree from
some weird American university?
If you really believe Front Bottom Pikey Bloke Justin was there, perhaps
you would be interested in a marketing opportunity? Its not pyramid
selling honest.
Dave - Cyclists VOR
No. Which pint are you on? 6 or 7 ?
Dave - Cyclists VOR
in Dover.
Ask Front Bottom Pikey Bloke Justin. He didn't drive or ride past it
for 30 or 31 minutes, and then didn't wait outside whilst on a ferry at sea.
Squashme
And that proves that he was not in Dover, does it?
>
> He repeatedly requested another meeting outside a hotel that doesn't
> exist and gave two different address's for it - and then claimed he
> drove & also rode past for 30 and then 31 minutes.
And that proves that he was not in Dover, does it?
>
> Being much smarter than an idiot who thinks a push bike is a viable form
> of transport, I gave him at least 6 opportunities to confirm the venue &
> he didn't manage to spot it. He dug a deeper hole.
And that proves that he was not in Dover, does it?
>
> Realising he had fucked up yet again, he kept digging.
>
> Then he changed his name, thinking it would fool anyone.
>
> He then claimed to be at the venue that doesn't exist & and at the same
> time 'proved' he was on a ferry at sea. His stupidity is simply astounding.
>
You are still stuck with an 81 bedroom hotel that you say doesn't
exist, more ferry companies than you knew of, and sailing times of
ferries that you said did not exist. (Remember Sea France?). Plus a
photograph about which you can only mumble "Photoshop". None of which
you can erase despite your pathetic attempts to muddy the waters yet
again. You know what you are doing, and everybody else can see.
For you it is OK to lie and pretend that you will go to Dover for some
contest, when you admit that you never intended to, and set up your
excuses in advance. But you pretend to be offended by the possibility
that FM should lie and not turn up for such a contest. You are a
hypocrite, plain and simple.
Squashme
wrote:
> On 22/07/2011 20:00, Squashme wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 22, 6:53 pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR<davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> >> On 22/07/2011 14:07, Nuxx Bar wrote:
>
> >>> On 22/07/2011 08:27, Squashme wrote:
>
> >>>> "Friendly fire?" No more curried eggs for breakfast then!
> >>>> Anyway, Nuxx Bar can't afford to lose potential allies, so he has
> >>>> magnanimously forgiven the Battling Bottler.
>
> >>> As I would anyone who made an attribution error. It does happen, you
> >>> know. Are you saying you wouldn't do the same if, say, Car-Hater
> >>> Chapman made one of his disparaging remarks at you by mistake?
>
> >> Squashme is so thick he probably wouldn't notice.
>
> > Awhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Churchill!!!
>
> Confirmation of exactly how thick you are. There is no Churchill Hotel
> in Dover.
When The Medway Handyman transmutes into Dave - Cyclists VOR does he
cease to exist? Sadly no. When The Best Western Churchill Hotel
transmutes into The Best Western Dover Marina Hotel does it cease to
exist?
(Although you claimed that it wasn't a Best Western anymore, so who's
the twat?)
>
> Ask Front Bottom Pikey Bloke Justin. He didn't drive or ride past it
> for 30 or 31 minutes, and then didn't wait outside whilst on a ferry at sea.
How many Sea France sailings that day? At what times?
Which way was the ferry pointing?
You went rather quiet for a while, once it all sank in. Now you think
that you can rewrite history. Give up. You twice had a chance to prove
that FM was not there. All you had to do was be there yourself.
Simple. You chose not to be there. You had your chance. You blew it.
Instead you set up a half-arsed attempt at a "cunning plan", which
failed to prove anything. Trying to be clever you flopped. Then you
tried to prove that FM was lying. You got the ferry companies wrong,
you got the ferry times wrong, you came up against the photo, and the
all-too-solid hotel.
And so you set up your usual barrage of bluster and insult. Like an
over-enthusiastic cat with a litter tray. The litter goes everywhere,
but your shit still is plainly visible.
Squashme
> On 22/07/2011 16:33, Mr Pounder wrote:
>
>
>
> > FFS who gives a fuck?
>
> this thread has gone, I don't doubt. He has frequently painted me as
> the bad guy who "we" (the good-thinking URC "majority") are trying to
> get rid of.
>
> I realise that most people indeed don't give a fuck, which was really
> what I was trying to illustrate. Sorry that I had to take up the time
> of you and others in order to do that. I'm sure that Chapman will now
> change his attacks on me to make it clear that it's actually just him
> who has such a problem with my presence here, and the fact that I dare
> to express my opinions. He is after all scrupulously honest, and would
> never lie or deceive in order to make something appear to be the case
> when he knows it's not. He's a Christian, whose wife edits the local
> church newsletter, dontchaknow.
>
> > Just keep on posting.
>
> Thank you; on the strength of the replies so far, I'm sure I will.
To quote you:-
"Nuxx Bar
Jul 22, 2:08 pm
On 21/07/2011 23:56, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
> wiht
Oh dear...left hand being slow and uncontrollable again? Thanks for
reminding me, I must get round to telling the DVLA about that
disability
of yours. I'm sure you understand, since you clearly care about road
safety so very much."
Do you know I think that I want you to stop posting after all, at
least for a while, and think it all through. Do you really like
yourself?
Peter Keller
>>
> I'm apologizing to Mr Nuxx Bar because he is obviously a right minded
> individual - not a fuckwit cyclist.
I am so glad I am a fuckwit.
--
If you are riding a bicycle you are winning.
Simon Mason
>
> And you proved Front Mech was not in Dover how? Remind us. Re-live
Yes, we are all still waiting.
--
Simon Mason
Bertie Wooster
<davi...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> He can't, he bottled.
>
>Are you sure you are actually a teacher? Did you buy your degree from
>some weird American university?
Are you now claiming that you didn't bottle it?
Dave - Cyclists VOR
>
> And that proves that he was not in Dover, does it?
>
>>
>> Being much smarter than an idiot who thinks a push bike is a viable form
>> of transport, I gave him at least 6 opportunities to confirm the venue&
>> he didn't manage to spot it. He dug a deeper hole.
>
> And that proves that he was not in Dover, does it?
>
>>
>> Realising he had fucked up yet again, he kept digging.
>>
>> Then he changed his name, thinking it would fool anyone.
>>
>> time 'proved' he was on a ferry at sea. His stupidity is simply astounding.
>>
>
> You are still stuck with an 81 bedroom hotel that you say doesn't
> exist, more ferry companies than you knew of, and sailing times of
> ferries that you said did not exist. (Remember Sea France?). Plus a
> photograph about which you can only mumble "Photoshop". None of which
> you can erase despite your pathetic attempts to muddy the waters yet
> again. You know what you are doing, and everybody else can see.
>
> For you it is OK to lie and pretend that you will go to Dover for some
> contest, when you admit that you never intended to, and set up your
> excuses in advance. But you pretend to be offended by the possibility
> that FM should lie and not turn up for such a contest. You are a
> hypocrite, plain and simple.
>
intended to be at any of those venues?
Another feeble minded cyclist desperately clutching at straws.
Simon Mason
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:17:58 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>
> >> He can't, he bottled.
>
> >Are you sure you are actually a teacher? Did you buy your degree from
> >some weird American university?
>
> Are you now claiming that you didn't bottle it?
Medway admits he was not there.
FM posted a picture of himself at the Dover waterfront.
End of, I'd have thought.
--
Simon Mason
Simon Mason
> far from "end of" as it could have been taken at any time.
>
TMH likes to keep it on the boil, not us.
He imagines that bottling out of two clear invitations to verbally
abuse a cyclist to his face is something to be proud of.
--
Simon Mason
Squashme
You obviously admitted that he was in Dover that day, in your reaction
to his photo.
>
> Another feeble minded cyclist desperately clutching at straws.
>
Do you seriously intend us to believe that you ever intended to be at
any of those venues?
Another feeble minded motorist desperately clutching at straws, when
he's lost the bottle in which to put them.
Squashme
> On 22/07/2011 16:33, Mr Pounder wrote:
>
>
>
> > FFS who gives a fuck?
>
> Chapman most certainly does. He'll be crying into his helmet at the way
> this thread has gone, I don't doubt.
You really fancy yourself, don't you? What a fantasy!
>He has frequently painted me as
> the bad guy who "we" (the good-thinking URC "majority") are trying to
> get rid of.
No, you are the bad guy who got rid of the good-thinking urc majority.
You and Judith. Most sensible urc posters long ago got tired of Bedlam
coming to visit them.
>
> I realise that most people indeed don't give a fuck, which was really
> what I was trying to illustrate.
Most people have left urc. You bored them to death. They ran off
tearing their own faces off in sheer horror. Sorry, you (and Judith)
"won" all the arguments.
>Sorry that I had to take up the time
> of you and others in order to do that. I'm sure that Chapman will now
> change his attacks on me to make it clear that it's actually just him
> who has such a problem with my presence here, and the fact that I dare
> to express my opinions. He is after all scrupulously honest, and would
> never lie or deceive in order to make something appear to be the case
> when he knows it's not. He's a Christian, whose wife edits the local
> church newsletter, dontchaknow.
>
> > Just keep on posting.
>
> Thank you; on the strength of the replies so far, I'm sure I will.
On the strength of your mania over the years so far, I'm sure that you
will.
Squashme
> On 23/07/2011 11:54, Simon Mason wrote:
>
> far from "end of" as it could have been taken at any time.
Despite the time details on the image?
>
> It seems that (unsurprisingly I guess) people are just believing whoever
> they want to. It's particularly the case that those who generally
> oppose TMH are determined to believe that he "bottled" it, and aren't
> really interested in establishing what actually happened.
So you believe that TMH was in Dover, despite his admission of
preplanned non-appearance? Wow!
Squashme
Two kinds of lies, maybe?
Squashme
> make his mind up.
>
> Do you know how often Chapman has made complaints to various people
> about me (and "boasted" about it)? Even the police if you're to believe
> him (still waiting for the knock on the door...). The fact that those
> complaints are invariably dismissed as the rantings of a madman with a
> clear extremist anti-car agenda and a wish to suppress the opinions of
> his opponents doesn't mean that he didn't make them.
>
> Rest assured that if he actually knew my details, and he thought there
> was anything that he could tell the DVLA about *me*, he'd be writing a
> pompous letter to them in a flash. He has absolutely no problem trying
> to get me into trouble, so why should I not do the same to him? If it
> was anyone else then I certainly wouldn't tell the DVLA, but with
> Chapman....
>
> In any case, I first thought about telling the DVLA months ago and
> haven't yet. Maybe I'm just bluffing and trying to make him sweat.
> Maybe not. Either way, I'm afraid that I'm not going to lose much sleep
> over you telling me not to post when you're one of Chapman's
> longest-standing supporters and a clear fellow car-hater. And, as with
> all Chapman supporters, you condemn his opponents for the slightest
> "infraction" while ignoring much worse examples from him. It's the kind
> of fundamental, hypocritical lack of logic which is fundamentally
> necessary for anyone to be able to take the side of the Arch-Car-Hater.
And you are prepared to lick up any of Dave or Judith's emissions
without a second thought, while rejecting my nectar! That's yer actual
Chew Cock, that is!
Dave - Cyclists VOR
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:17:58 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
> <davi...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>> He can't, he bottled.
>>
>> Are you sure you are actually a teacher? Did you buy your degree from
>> some weird American university?
>
> Are you now claiming that you didn't bottle it?
Are you really claiming FBPBJ was ever there?
Dave - Cyclists VOR
>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:17:58 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>>
>> <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> He can't, he bottled.
>>
>>> Are you sure you are actually a teacher? Did you buy your degree from
>>> some weird American university?
>>
>> Are you now claiming that you didn't bottle it?
>
> Medway admits he was not there.
I said in advance I wouldn't be.
> FM posted a picture of himself at the Dover waterfront.
No he didn't. He posted a picture of a hand.
> End of, I'd have thought.
You would think that.
Dave - Cyclists VOR
> On 23/07/2011 11:54, Simon Mason wrote:
> far from "end of" as it could have been taken at any time.
>
> they want to. It's particularly the case that those who generally
> oppose TMH are determined to believe that he "bottled" it, and aren't
> they're determined to believe that helmets don't save lives, or that
> speed cameras do save lives, etc, and aren't really interested in
> establishing the reality of the situation (and indeed some are extremely
> and notoriously aggressive towards anyone who does try to).
Excellent post as usual.
Dave - Cyclists VOR
> On Jul 23, 12:10 pm, Nuxx Bar<nuxx....@live.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 23/07/2011 11:54, Simon Mason wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 23, 8:54 am, Bertie Wooster<ber...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:17:58 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>>
>>>> <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> He can't, he bottled.
>>
>>>>> Are you sure you are actually a teacher? Did you buy your degree from
>>>>> some weird American university?
>>
>>>> Are you now claiming that you didn't bottle it?
>>
>>> Medway admits he was not there.
>>> FM posted a picture of himself at the Dover waterfront.
>>> End of, I'd have thought.
>>
>> I find this whole argument rather tedious, but you must know that that's
>> far from "end of" as it could have been taken at any time.
>>
>
> TMH likes to keep it on the boil, not us.
Alas not. It is the feeble minded cyclists, so desperate to have a
stick to beat me with, they will grasp at anything.
> He imagines that bottling out of two clear invitations to verbally
> abuse a cyclist to his face is something to be proud of.
It was three shit for brains - do pay attention. And he didn't turn up
at any of them.
Squashme
wrote:
> On 23/07/2011 11:54, Simon Mason wrote:
>
> > On Jul 23, 8:54 am, Bertie Wooster<ber...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:17:58 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>
> >> <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>> He can't, he bottled.
>
> >>> Are you sure you are actually a teacher? Did you buy your degree from
> >>> some weird American university?
>
> >> Are you now claiming that you didn't bottle it?
>
> > Medway admits he was not there.
>
> I said in advance I wouldn't be.
>
> > FM posted a picture of himself at the Dover waterfront.
>
> No he didn't. He posted a picture of a hand.
>
How do you think that he got the photo of the hand, and the newspaper,
and the ferry, and the hotel, plus the date and time?
Wrigle, wriggle, wriggle, from Churchill the pre-bottler.
Squashme
wrote:
> On 23/07/2011 12:13, Simon Mason wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 12:10 pm, Nuxx Bar<nuxx....@live.co.uk> wrote:
> >> On 23/07/2011 11:54, Simon Mason wrote:
>
> >>> On Jul 23, 8:54 am, Bertie Wooster<ber...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:17:58 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>
> >>>> <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>> He can't, he bottled.
>
> >>>>> Are you sure you are actually a teacher? Did you buy your degree from
> >>>>> some weird American university?
>
> >>>> Are you now claiming that you didn't bottle it?
>
> >>> Medway admits he was not there.
> >>> FM posted a picture of himself at the Dover waterfront.
> >>> End of, I'd have thought.
>
> >> I find this whole argument rather tedious, but you must know that that's
> >> far from "end of" as it could have been taken at any time.
>
> > TMH likes to keep it on the boil, not us.
>
> Alas not. It is the feeble minded cyclists, so desperate to have a
> stick to beat me with, they will grasp at anything.
>
> > He imagines that bottling out of two clear invitations to verbally
> > abuse a cyclist to his face is something to be proud of.
>
> It was three shit for brains - do pay attention. And he didn't turn up
> at any of them.
>
You cannot know, as you were not there. You just have this belief,
based on an irrational fear of cyclists.
Simon Mason
Maybe Medway thinks that a hand on its own went to Dover.
--
Simon Mason
Squashme
That would make Front Mech The Dover Handlessman.
Front Mech and a group of friends celebrating at Dover?:-
Simon Mason
> > > How do you think that he got the photo of the hand, and the newspaper,
> > > and the ferry, and the hotel, plus the date and time?
>
> > Maybe Medway thinks that a hand on its own went to Dover.
>
> > --
> > Simon Mason
>
> That would make Front Mech The Dover Handlessman.
>
FM could have been this guy on the far left :-)
http://www.boostinspiration.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/01-The_Addams_Family.jpg
--
Simon Mason
Dave - Cyclists VOR
Cyclophobia?
Lycraphobia?
Tosserphobia?
Dave - Cyclists VOR
No, like most he simply doesn't care.
Dave - Cyclists VOR
The only evidence conforms that a hand was in Dover. Who it belongs to
is another matter.
Would you like me to post a picture of my hand? You could have an
identity parade?
Dave - Cyclists VOR
I have already made it quite clear I never intended to. I'm not stupid.
>
> Another feeble minded motorist desperately clutching at straws, when
> he's lost the bottle in which to put them.
You seem to be becoming rather obsessed with this.
Dave - Cyclists VOR
> On Jul 22, 8:05 pm, Squashme<squas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> And you proved Front Mech was not in Dover how? Remind us. Re-live
>
> Yes, we are all still waiting.
All?
You mean the feeble minded gang of three?
Dave - Cyclists VOR
> On Jul 23, 12:21 am, Dave - Cyclists VOR<davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> wrote:
>> On 22/07/2011 20:00, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 22, 6:53 pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR<davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 22/07/2011 14:07, Nuxx Bar wrote:
>>
>>>>> On 22/07/2011 08:27, Squashme wrote:
>>
>>>>>> "Friendly fire?" No more curried eggs for breakfast then!
>>>>>> Anyway, Nuxx Bar can't afford to lose potential allies, so he has
>>>>>> magnanimously forgiven the Battling Bottler.
>>
>>>>> As I would anyone who made an attribution error. It does happen, you
>>>>> know. Are you saying you wouldn't do the same if, say, Car-Hater
>>>>> Chapman made one of his disparaging remarks at you by mistake?
>>
>>>> Squashme is so thick he probably wouldn't notice.
>>
>>> Awhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, Churchill!!!
>>
>> Confirmation of exactly how thick you are. There is no Churchill Hotel
>> in Dover.
>
> When The Medway Handyman transmutes into Dave - Cyclists VOR does he
> cease to exist? Sadly no. When The Best Western Churchill Hotel
> transmutes into The Best Western Dover Marina Hotel does it cease to
> exist?
I asked the delusional idiot at least six times to confirm the meet was
at the Churchill. He didn't manage to spot there wasn't one. Despite
claiming to have both driven & rode past it for 30 or 31 minutes.
> (Although you claimed that it wasn't a Best Western anymore, so who's
> the twat?)
>
>>
>> Ask Front Bottom Pikey Bloke Justin. He didn't drive or ride past it
>> for 30 or 31 minutes, and then didn't wait outside whilst on a ferry at sea.
>
> How many Sea France sailings that day? At what times?
>
> Which way was the ferry pointing?
>
> You went rather quiet for a while, once it all sank in. Now you think
> that you can rewrite history. Give up. You twice had a chance to prove
> that FM was not there.
I have proved on many occasions that FBPBJ wasn't there.
> All you had to do was be there yourself.
Oh yes. Of course. I should have driven 40 miles to meet a delusional
fuckwit who had not intention of being there.
> Simple. You chose not to be there. You had your chance. You blew it.
Nothing to blow.
> Instead you set up a half-arsed attempt at a "cunning plan", which
> failed to prove anything. Trying to be clever you flopped. Then you
> tried to prove that FM was lying. You got the ferry companies wrong,
> you got the ferry times wrong, you came up against the photo, and the
> all-too-solid hotel.
Its quite clear to anyone with a modicum of intelligence that Front
Bottom Pikey Bloke Justin was never there. That obviously exclude you &
your bum chums.
>
> And so you set up your usual barrage of bluster and insult. Like an
> over-enthusiastic cat with a litter tray. The litter goes everywhere,
> but your shit still is plainly visible.
Oh dear. I really seem to be getting under your skin.
Great news. I'm only here to wind up feeble minded cyclists after all.
Squashme
wrote:
> On 24/07/2011 07:34, Simon Mason wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 23, 9:53 pm, Squashme<squas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jul 23, 5:39 pm, Dave - Cyclists VOR<davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> On 23/07/2011 11:54, Simon Mason wrote:
>
> >>>> On Jul 23, 8:54 am, Bertie Wooster<ber...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:17:58 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
>
> >>>>> <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>>> He can't, he bottled.
>
> >>>>>> Are you sure you are actually a teacher? Did you buy your degree from
> >>>>>> some weird American university?
>
> >>>>> Are you now claiming that you didn't bottle it?
>
> >>>> Medway admits he was not there.
>
> >>> I said in advance I wouldn't be.
>
> >>>> FM posted a picture of himself at the Dover waterfront.
>
> >>> No he didn't. He posted a picture of a hand.
>
> >> How do you think that he got the photo of the hand, and the newspaper,
> >> and the ferry, and the hotel, plus the date and time?
>
> > Maybe Medway thinks that a hand on its own went to Dover.
>
> The only evidence conforms that a hand was in Dover. Who it belongs to
> is another matter.
Does William of Ockham mean nothing to you?
>
> Would you like me to post a picture of my hand? You could have an
> identity parade?
>
No thanks. Your hand would stand out easily from the others on the
parade. It would be too red and grooved from the repeated friction.
Dave - Cyclists VOR
> On Jul 23, 12:09 am, Nuxx Bar<nuxx....@live.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 22/07/2011 16:33, Mr Pounder wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> FFS who gives a fuck?
>>
>> Chapman most certainly does. He'll be crying into his helmet at the way
>> this thread has gone, I don't doubt.
>
> You really fancy yourself, don't you? What a fantasy!
>
>> He has frequently painted me as
>> the bad guy who "we" (the good-thinking URC "majority") are trying to
>> get rid of.
>
> No, you are the bad guy who got rid of the good-thinking urc majority.
> You and Judith. Most sensible urc posters long ago got tired of Bedlam
> coming to visit them.
Oi! Be fair, I've helped.
>
>>
>> I realise that most people indeed don't give a fuck, which was really
>> what I was trying to illustrate.
>
> Most people have left urc. You bored them to death. They ran off
> tearing their own faces off in sheer horror. Sorry, you (and Judith)
> "won" all the arguments.
I'm sure they did. Its not exactly difficult to win arguments with
retarded fuckwit cyclists.
>
>
>> Sorry that I had to take up the time
>> of you and others in order to do that. I'm sure that Chapman will now
>> change his attacks on me to make it clear that it's actually just him
>> who has such a problem with my presence here, and the fact that I dare
>> to express my opinions. He is after all scrupulously honest, and would
>> never lie or deceive in order to make something appear to be the case
>> when he knows it's not. He's a Christian, whose wife edits the local
>> church newsletter, dontchaknow.
>>
>>> Just keep on posting.
>>
>> Thank you; on the strength of the replies so far, I'm sure I will.
>
> On the strength of your mania over the years so far, I'm sure that you
> will.
So will I. Until I've driven you out of your tiny feeble mind.
JNugent
Or Magna Carta?
Did she die in vain?
Squashme
Spooky how you can read my mind, too.
"Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain? Brave
Hungarian peasant girl who forced King John to sign the pledge at
Runnymede and close the boozers at half past ten! Is all this to be
forgotten?"
Squashme
> >> On 22/07/2011 16:33, Mr Pounder wrote:
>
> >>> FFS who gives a fuck?
>
> >> Chapman most certainly does. He'll be crying into his helmet at the way
> >> this thread has gone, I don't doubt.
>
> > You really fancy yourself, don't you? What a fantasy!
>
> thread. He's always gracious and honest in defeat when proved utterly
> wrong.
>
> >> He has frequently painted me as
> >> the bad guy who "we" (the good-thinking URC "majority") are trying to
> >> get rid of.
>
> > No, you are the bad guy who got rid of the good-thinking urc majority.
> > You and Judith. Most sensible urc posters long ago got tired of Bedlam
> > coming to visit them.
>
> to say it himself rather than being such a coward and hiding behind you?
> Like Bin Laden hiding behind his wife, isn't it?
>
> >> I realise that most people indeed don't give a fuck, which was really
> >> what I was trying to illustrate.
>
> > Most people have left urc.
>
> "then"? I agree that some of the more intolerant and extremist
> car-hating posters have run off to the censored URCM sanctuary, or left
> Usenet altogether, but I don't see that as a bad thing. They have been
> replaced with largely better posters. URC is now much more balanced in
> terms of opinions than it was then, and people on either side can now
> say what they think without running the risk of organised bullying
> campaigns being launched against them.
"Where they make a desert, they call it peace."
Just look back to 2008.
>
> I realise that some are not happy with that, but that says more about
> them than it does about anything else.
>
> Anyway, I'm bowing out of this subthread now. Tell Chapman that if he
> wants to try to derail this thread (despite "not being bothered" about
> it, honest) then he'll just have to be very brave and do it all by
> himself. Even with you so loyally fighting by his side, that's still
> only one supporter that he has on this group, and only one person who
> agrees with him that I am a menace to Usenet who needs to be stopped
> from posting, despite the very different picture that he so likes to paint.
Who's Chapman?
---------------------------------------------------------
On First Looking into Chapman's Homer (Keats)
Much have I travell'd in the realms of gold,
And many goodly states and kingdoms seen;
Round many western islands have I been
Which bards in fealty to Apollo hold.
Oft of one wide expanse had I been told
That deep-browed Homer ruled as his demesne;
Yet did I never breathe its pure serene
Till I heard Chapman speak out loud and bold:
Then felt I like some watcher of the skies
When a new planet swims into his ken;
Or like stout Cortez when with eagle eyes
He star'd at the Pacific — and all his men
Look'd at each other with a wild surmise —
Silent, upon a peak in Darien.
Simon Mason
>
> Who's Chapman?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> On First Looking into Chapman's Homer (Keats)
>
> Much have I travell'd in the realms of gold,
> And many goodly states and kingdoms seen;
> Round many western islands have I been
> Which bards in fealty to Apollo hold.
> Oft of one wide expanse had I been told
> That deep-browed Homer ruled as his demesne;
> Yet did I never breathe its pure serene
> Till I heard Chapman speak out loud and bold:
> Then felt I like some watcher of the skies
> When a new planet swims into his ken;
> Or like stout Cortez when with eagle eyes
> He star'd at the Pacific — and all his men
> Look'd at each other with a wild surmise —
> Silent, upon a peak in Darien.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Like it - painting pictures with words like you did with the "War of
Chapman's Ear", re-enacted on the beach-head of Dover earlier this
month :-)
--
Simon Mason
The Medway Handyman
In this case Mr Hanlon is more appropriate.
>
>>
>> Would you like me to post a picture of my hand? You could have an
>> identity parade?
>>
>
> No thanks. Your hand would stand out easily from the others on the
> parade. It would be too red and grooved from the repeated friction.
I did notice that FBPBJ only showed the back of his.
--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk
Squashme
wrote:
Hanlon? But sir surely that's impossible without at least one live
chicken and a rabbi?
JNugent
> On Jul 24, 4:18 pm, JNugent<jennings...@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> On 24/07/2011 15:39, Squashme wrote:
>>> Dave - Cyclists VOR<davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
[ ... ]
>>>> The only evidence conforms that a hand was in Dover. Who it belongs to
>>>> is another matter.
>>> Does William of Ockham mean nothing to you?
>> Or Magna Carta?
>> Did she die in vain?
> Spooky how you can read my mind, too.
> "Does Magna Carta mean nothing to you? Did she die in vain? Brave
> Hungarian peasant girl who forced King John to sign the pledge at
> Runnymede and close the boozers at half past ten! Is all this to be
> forgotten?"
:-)
Simon Mason
> >> Would you like me to post a picture of my hand? You could have an
> >> identity parade?
>
> > No thanks. Your hand would stand out easily from the others on the
> > parade. It would be too red and grooved from the repeated friction.
>
> I did notice that FBPBJ only showed the back of his.
Was it his knuckles that scared you off then?
--
Simon Mason
Squashme
> On 23/07/2011 14:12, Squashme wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> On 23/07/2011 11:54, Simon Mason wrote:
>
> >>> On Jul 23, 8:54 am, Bertie Wooster <ber...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> <davidl...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>> He can't, he bottled.
>
> >>>>> Are you sure you are actually a teacher? Did you buy your degree from
> >>>>> some weird American university?
>
> >>>> Are you now claiming that you didn't bottle it?
>
> >>> Medway admits he was not there.
>
> >> I find this whole argument rather tedious, but you must know that that's
> >> far from "end of" as it could have been taken at any time.
>
> > Despite the time details on the image?
>
> that's because I *don't care*. And unlike people such as Chapman (who
> sided against TMH simply because he disagrees with him in general), I am
> not going to believe one person over the other just because I "prefer"
> their opinions in general.
But you do.
>
> That's just the kind of attitude which damages URC: people refusing to
> objectively look at the facts in order to genuinely make up their minds,
> and instead just believing whatever they *want* to believe.
>
Yes, I've seen how objective you are on the subject of speeding.
Simon Mason
> bothered to spend the time trying to find out,
That's how we feel about "Lou Knee".
Glad you can empathise with us.
--
Simon Mason
Squashme
Does Judith post as Nuxx Bar? I think that we should be told.
Simon Mason
I had my suspicions when I saw the live.co.uk address, but no obvious
Judith cloven hoof has appeared yet, so at the moment, I am assuming
it is Nuxx Bar. The posts so far have been typically Nuxx-like in
length and content.
--
Simon Mason