(3) Paralegal Poetry Portraying Piss-Poor Ploddery (P^6)
Plod's Conscience
© Copyright 7th & 8th March 2005 by Gareth Alun Evans.
This little song was composed in a disgustingly dirty
plod cell during the night of 7th and 8th March 2005
and is dedicated to "Fucking Idiot" Richard
"Boot-In-The-Face" Fuller, collar number 177, of the
"We'll Shite (All Over You) Constabulary". The song was
inspired as the direct result of his behaviour when
arresting me, behaviour if which conducted by
people who are unable to hide like a craven coward
behind a plod uniform, would result in
long jail sentences.
(Tune as yet to be determined)
I'll sing you a song of social justice,
BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
Of two deserving deaths, of public justice.
BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
The plods are no longer the plods of yore,
BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
Their crimes and fit-ups have come to the fore.
BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
David Bieber had his fill of the rot,
BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
So cleansed out the pus and squeezed out the spot.
BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
The time may come yet when sense is restored,
BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
And the cemeteries filled up with plods in their boards.
BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
huLLy
> Is The Death Of A Plod A Matter Of Social Justice?
>
> © Copyright 7th & 8th March 2005 by Gareth Alun Evans.
>
ab...@network-i.net informed
--
huLLy
Tel: 07976 123278
ICQ 136-987-925
Mike G4KFK
Plod's Conscience wrote:
> This little song was composed in a disgustingly dirty
Here's a song for you, Gareth:
They're coming to take you away, ha ha!
huLLy
Hopefully when you do... Wiltshire papers will be reporting 'suicide in
cell'..
Brian Reay
"huLLy" <s...@f2s.com> wrote in message
news:SKKdnbS6HfK...@giganews.com...
> Plod's Conscience wrote:
>> Is The Death Of A Plod A Matter Of Social Justice?
>>
>> © Copyright 7th & 8th March 2005 by Gareth Alun Evans.
>>
>
> ab...@network-i.net informed
>
Twice. Also Wiltshire Police.
__
73
Brian
www.g8osn.org.uk
Plod's Conscience
poem has arisen directly from what is known as, "BRIAN
REAY'S LEGACY".....
That anyone is subjected to a malicious, misleading
and perjurous complaint to the plods is a reflection
on the complainer and not on the victim.
Brian Reay subjected me to a scurrilous,
distressing and grossly offensive campaign of harassment
over a two-year period when he regularly accused me of
sheep-shagging and of drinking methylated spirit. He said that
my wife was a sheep next to me in the bed. It is difficult to
understand the relevance of such a campaign to the pursuit
that is Ham Radio, but he found it within his psyche to so behave.
That he conducted that campaign when he was under
training as a teacher in a girls' school in Dartford is very,
very worrying now that the matter of Ian Huntley has been
brought once again into our consciences.
That he is a sexual pervert who is obsessed with sheep
shagging is in no doubt. That he is a danger to children
because of that obsession is also in no doubt. That he
should not be employed in _ANY_ capacity in any school
because he repeatedly published his obsession in an
international news group to which children have access is also
in no doubt.
When "the worm turned" and I finally made a stand against
his grossly offensive tirade, Brian Reay made his
false complaint to the plods. That he attempted to hide the
true nature of what had passed is a further reason why he
is unsuitable to be employed in any capacity in any school.
Richard Fuller
>© Copyright 7th & 8th March 2005 by Gareth Alun Evans.
Why bother copyrighting this piece of offensive shite? Who in their right mind would pretend that they wrote it instead?
Fuckin Cretin (_*_)
Plod's Conscience
you could well be Richard Fuller!
(Except that you're Chris Groom)
DrBoris
"Plod's Conscience" <aiyr....@lycos.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1139658482....@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Ensure that you include in your complaints that this
poem has arisen directly from what is known as, "BRIAN
REAY'S LEGACY".....
[untrue, libelous comments removed]
You really ought to stop libelling Brian Reay, Gareth.
What you said above is untrue. According to a Google search
he made on or two jokes about sheep and meths, and they
were made indirectly.
Making such jokes does not make him a sexual pervert or
be unfit to teach schoolchildren. Let us not forget it is you
who quite openly said that "the murder of other peoples
children is a minor matter", and that the furore over the murders
of Holly and Jessica by Huntley, was nothing but "silly fuss".
In all sincerity, I would suggest you seek treatment from
a mental health professional.
Patmore
> Twice. Also Wiltshire Police.
>
> __
> 73
> Brian
> www.g8osn.org.uk
>
Make that three now Brian, also hard copies of his postings are being
sent to Wiltshire police, and his wife. Is it not interesting that all
this stress of continual posting is not causing him to develop
convenient chest pains ?
Alan Holmes
"Richard Fuller" <ful...@britishhero.com> wrote in message
news:5c70bd8c18724c08...@newspe.com...
The Grand Anus of Wiltshire wrote:
>Š Copyright 7th & 8th March 2005 by Gareth Alun Evans.
Why bother copyrighting this piece of offensive shite? Who in their right
mind would pretend that they wrote it instead?
Fuckin Cretin (_*_)
And you are a fucking cretin for following it up!
Plod's Conscience
which is not a joke, it is deadly serious and grossly offensive
material, and no-one who posts such material should be
employed in _ANY_ capacity in _ANY_ school.
The behaviour that Brian Reay exhibits below is an entirely
inappropriate role model for anyone who has the responsibility
of others' children.
I have never libelled Brian Reay; however, he has libelled me as
he does in the posting quoted below.
I have _NEVER_ originated personal remarks - I may at times
assert the right of reply, but then I am playing the adult to
the childish outbursts of others; as I do to you in this
rejoinder, Mr.Gilfillan.
-----ooooo-----
Path:
archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!client-82-3-67-66.mant.adsl.virgin.NET!not-for-mail
From: "Brian Reay" <brian.r...@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: uk.radio.amateur
Subject: Re: Merry Christmas
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 18:12:02 -0000
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <bsa0co$aq8m7$1...@ID-140397.news.uni-berlin.de>
References: <bs14ij$8l7mk$1...@ID-201868.news.uni-berlin.de>
<8s88uv4ohiblujdnj...@4ax.com>
<3MVEb.7067$FN....@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net>
<bs66vm$9q4bk$8...@ID-217727.news.uni-berlin.de>
<3fe751c7...@news.blueyonder.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: client-82-3-67-66.mant.adsl.virgin.net (82.3.67.66)
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1072202968 11346631 82.3.67.66 ([140397])
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
<g...@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3fe751c7...@news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 07:07:01 -0000, "Airy R. Bean"
> <airy.r.b...@lycos.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >Superstitious nonsense followed by the
> >ignoramuses of yesteryear and by the mental defectives
> >of today.
> >
> >"Steve" <yzf1000r1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:3MVEb.7067$FN....@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
> >> A Merry Christmas
>
> You must have a very boring life.
I suspect Gareth would welcome a boring life. Even a boring life must
be
better than no life - waking up each day with bitter negative thoughts
and
only a sheep next to you.
Could make you turn to drink
>
> Don't you know that for most people Christmas has little or nothing to
> do with the religion you so vehemently oppose? They just enjoy
> themselves at this time of year!
Enjoying yourself requires a positive frame of mind. For that you need
a
mind.
>
> From the above statement I assume you never let your children enjoy
> Christmas..
He has children? That is a depressing thought. Poor little s**s. I
bet
their maths homework was always wrong ;-)
> Are you a pagan, atheist, humanist or what? Even our local Humanist
> Group has a Christmas dinner each year!
Is there a 'sad lonely old git' group in Chippenham?
>
> Let your hair down man!
Nah, imagine want might fall out.
-----ooooo-----
huLLy
> I suggest that you search again. The follwoing is a case in point
> which is not a joke, it is deadly serious and grossly offensive
> material, and no-one who posts such material should be
> employed in _ANY_ capacity in _ANY_ school.
>
a) She's fuckin' stupid
b) She's under the patio
c) She's a 6 foot builder called Garry
d) She's writing a PHD on your bizarre behaviour
e) She's a mole from Wiltshire CID
which one is it? The public has a right to know!
Plod's Conscience
who says it repeatedly, and that is someone with the
pseudonym of, "DrBoris".
Anybody we know?
Sounds like a pretty sick kiddy whoever he is!
my way to@nicks-place.com one foot in the grave
"Plod's Conscience" <radi...@lycos.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1139681590....@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> I have never libelled Brian Reay; however, he has libelled me as
> he does in the posting quoted below.
>
Will you be attending Didcott tomorrow? Will you be trying to get my name,
private address, phone number and email details again? Will you be
earwigging in on private conversations with my Brian Reay and the posting
them over the Internet?
Isn't that what happened last year?
tox
my way to@nicks-place.com one foot in the grave
"one foot in the grave" <on my way t...@nicks-place.com> wrote in message
news:dJqHf.41362$Rw6....@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "Plod's Conscience" <radi...@lycos.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1139681590....@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> I have never libelled Brian Reay; however, he has libelled me as
>> he does in the posting quoted below.
>>
>
Should read Mr Brian Reay
tox
huLLy
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:15:21 GMT, "one foot in the grave" <on my way
> t...@nicks-place.com> wrote:
>
>> Will you be trying to get my name,
>> private address, phone number and email details again?
>
> else, for that matter) from a person who is unwilling to disclose
> these details. Such a person places himself under immediate suspicion
> of being a fly-by-night trader or of having something else to hide
> (perhaps from the Inland Revenue).
>
> 73 de G3NYY
Hummm... that sounds kinda daft when you consider how long Tox has been
hanging out on this newsgroup..
Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
Deputy badge.
--
;-)
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
http://turner-smith.co.uk
zBBPK
[[snip]]
> --
hully!
do you really really really have to bring another's name into this ?
how would your own relations feel if someone refered to them as
"a 6foot builder called gary" ?
for gawds sake...
my way to@nicks-place.com one foot in the grave
"Walt Davidson" <g3...@despammed.com> wrote in message
news:pvfsu1tkpvdmfd5ri...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:15:21 GMT, "one foot in the grave" <on my way
> t...@nicks-place.com> wrote:
>
>>Will you be trying to get my name,
>>private address, phone number and email details again?
>
> else, for that matter) from a person who is unwilling to disclose
> these details.
As G4SDW did NOT want to buy anything from me, he just wanted my private
details, he can go and f*ck himself. ANY customer who asks for a receipt is
given one containing my name, address and phone number, WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
I NEVER attend a rally without a receipt book...
Since attending rallies, I have sold two defective battery cells and one
defective PMR radio, ALL replaced without question.
HTH
tox
huLLy
>
> for gawds sake...
Bet you managed a wry smile tho...!
my way to@nicks-place.com one foot in the grave
"Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI" <g3...@turner-smith.co.uk> wrote in message
news:swrHf.86984$zt1....@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
>>> Should read Mr Brian Reay
>>
>> tox
> I was just wondering if this was one of the fringe benefits of your Deputy
> badge.
Take it from me Frank, there a very few fringe benefits in working for Nick
:-(
tox (on the bread line)
Brian Reay
"one foot in the grave" <on my way t...@nicks-place.com> wrote in message
news:srrHf.41375$Rw6....@newsfe7-gui.ntli.net...
I've bought from tox several times and always been pleased with the goods.
As regards his reluctance to give away his contact details freely, are you
surprised? Someone targeted my daughters, my wife, and myself with porn. It
took some time to track down one of the culpritts, and I'm sure there is
another- although since an arrest was made the problem greatly subsided. Why
was this done? Some petty vendetta, no more no less.
--
73
Brian
www.g8osn.org.uk
zBBPK
> zBBPK wrote:
> >
> > for gawds sake...
>
> Bet you managed a wry smile tho...!
NO I DIDNT.
IF YOU WANT TO HAVE A GO AT AIRY FOR ANYTHING
THEN LEAVE HIS RELATIONS OUT OF IT.
AS I SAID BEFORE...
NOW THAT YOU HAVE MENTIONED HIS RELATIONS ON
THIS NEWSGROUP, *ANYONE* CAN NOW PUBLISH THE NAMES
OF *YOUR* RELATIONS ON HERE, COMPARE THEM TO
6FT HIGH BUILDERS AND *THERES IS NOTHING* YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT.
I would also recommend you consider that Airy's relations
are separate legal entities and as such can engage a
solicitor to take action on their behalf against those who
drag their name(s) through the mud.
zBBPK
> tox (on the bread line)
tut tut tut...
TOAST line.
*TOAST*
huLLy
> "huLLy" <s...@f2s.com> wrote:
>
>> zBBPK wrote:
>>>
>>> for gawds sake...
>>
>> Bet you managed a wry smile tho...!
>
>
> NO I DIDNT.
>
I think you should take a Guiness or two
zBBPK
> I think you should take a Guiness or two
based on what you recently posted...no i wont.
it is my opinion that your recent posts have demonstrated
that you can only kick someone when theyre down.
i'm disappoointed in your behaviour.
IT IS MY OPINION THAT...one minute you demonstrate advanced technical
know-how and the next your gnashing your teeth at someone with postings
not fit to be flushed down the toilet.
my way to@nicks-place.com one foot in the grave
"zBBPK"
<class-a-licens...@didnt-run-away-from-a-morse-test.es.eircom.com.net>
wrote in message news:43ee4b29...@news.iol.ie...
Now that WAS funny...
tox
my way to@nicks-place.com one foot in the grave
<luc...@eternal-flames.gov> wrote in message
news:iujsu1hhlvcbbo663...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:23:22 GMT, "one foot in the grave" <on my way
> t...@nicks-place.com> wrote:
>
> Complaints, complaints... Nothing but bleedin complaints!
>
> What about your rights to 'all of the over-16 virgins you can find in
> Clacton-on-Sea, Dagenham and miscellaneous parts of Essex.''
> That's a benefit isn't it?
Forty years of searching, have proved friutless, Me Lord...
> Then there's the monthly bonus of authority to disembowel a
> traffic-warden of your choice.
> That's a benefit isn't it?
>
That's no fun anymore :-(
tox
Brian Reay
"zBBPK"
<class-a-licens...@didnt-run-away-from-a-morse-test.es.eircom.com.net>
wrote in message news:43ee4bf2...@news.iol.ie...
> IT IS MY OPINION THAT...one minute you demonstrate advanced technical
> know-how and the next your gnashing your teeth at someone with postings
> not fit to be flushed down the toilet.
Where as you Paul just skip the first bit all the time.
Brian
my way to@nicks-place.com one foot in the grave
"Brian Reay" <brian.reay@(spamstopper)bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:LisHf.5826$gB4....@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net...
ROTFLMAO
tox
Plod's Conscience
A bona fide trader would have no difficulty in
producing proper receipts and not just give
out a phone number to be used "in case
of difficulty". Yeah. Right. A coward, indeed.
A decent person would not hide behind anonymity
in order to dispense the childish toilet-mouth that
he uses in this NG. A coward indeed.
A coward indeed - I wonder if he's ever thought about
joining the We'll Shite (All Over You) Conplodulary?
His yellow-streak would make him fit in so well!
Walt Davidson wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:15:21 GMT, "one foot in the grave" <on my way
> t...@nicks-place.com> wrote:
>
> >Will you be trying to get my name,
> >private address, phone number and email details again?
>
> As I remarked about a year ago, I would not buy batteries (or anything
> else, for that matter) from a person who is unwilling to disclose
> these details. Such a person places himself under immediate suspicion
> of being a fly-by-night trader or of having something else to hide
> (perhaps from the Inland Revenue).
>
> 73 de G3NYY
>
> --
> Walt Davidson Email: g3nyy @despammed.com
huLLy
I thank you but someone has to stop that cretinous bully.
Plod's Conscience
period with a series of grossly offensive posts wherein you
accused me of sheep-shagging, you said my wife was a
sheep next to me in the bed and you repeatedly accused me
of drinking methylated spirit. I cannot see the connection
between this NG and the subjects with which you are
obsessed, as described above. There _IS_ no connection
and yet something deviant and maladjusted in your psyche
drove you onwards.
Nevertheless, the pre-occupation with sheep-shagging, a
sexual deviation in fact, was entirely in your own mind and in
no-one elses. That you made frequent publications on
the topic of sheep-shagging onto a NG to which children
have access means that you should not be a school-teacher
under any circumstances.
I can only assume that you took some form of infantile
offence at my attempts to maintain standards in _REAL_
Ham Radio and disliked my comments about the
gangrenous degeneration that is the M3/CB Fools'
Licence scheme, especially my criticism of those who
were too lazy or too stupid, or both, to be able to tackle
and pass a Morse exam set for 14-year-olds and had to
wait until one was made available for 6-year-olds?
If you disagreed with my comments you only had to say so. There
was no reason for you to institute a series of childish
outbursts such as you did. What would the members of
your latest school radio club think of your infantile behaviour
were they to read this NG and the Google archives?
Whatever. I still cannot see any justification for your
sexual deviation and the way in which you made a public
issue of it. Your habit of uttering grossly offensive and
abusive tirades have no place in civilised society and
no-one who indulges so is a fit role model for the care
of anyone else's children.
YOU ARE AN ABSOLUTE DISGRACE TO TEACHING EVERYWHERE.
As to "his" personal details - I have good reason to want them. He
has repeatedly revealed my own personal details and has done
so in the most infantile and offensive manner. Perhaps it is no wonder
that he has been unable to pass even an exam set for 6-year-olds?
Richard Fuller
>A bona fide trader would have no difficulty in
>producing proper receipts and not just give
>out a phone number to be used "in case
Why should he have to show official documents to to anyone who waltzes up
and asks to see them at a rally? Who are you today? The law? Trading
Standards? Inland Revenue? Napoleon? Be careful Gareth, impersonating an
official person is an arrestable offence and we're keeping a cell nice and
filthy just for you.
my way to@nicks-place.com one foot in the grave
"Plod's Conscience" <radi...@lycos.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1139693407.3...@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Well said.
>
> A bona fide trader would have no difficulty in
> producing proper receipts and not just give
> out a phone number to be used "in case
> of difficulty". Yeah. Right. A coward, indeed.
>
Customers are always welcome to my details, fruit cases, are not.
tox
Plod's Conscience
an absolute disgrace?
huLLy
> I don't know what he has been saying - is he proving to be
> an absolute disgrace?
>
Pray tell how you can issue an harrasment order against me if you don't
watch my posts, MORON?!
zBBPK
>
> "zBBPK"
> <class-a-licens...@didnt-run-away-from-a-morse-test.es.eircom.com.net>
> wrote in message news:43ee4bf2...@news.iol.ie...
> > IT IS MY OPINION THAT...one minute you demonstrate advanced technical
> > know-how and the next your gnashing your teeth at someone with postings
> > not fit to be flushed down the toilet.
>
> Where as you Paul ____________________________________.
ahhhh isnt this nice.
Mr. Reay has me out of his killfile again.
Ahhhh... oh this is nice.
Perhaps my comments came up for discussion at a
recent inner sanctum meeting ?
or is it to resume some unfinished ''project'' of yours ??????
Well, me gud buddie Brian ol' boy.
i suggest you go back to your amstrad901 and play-away.
zBBPK
> I don't know what he has been saying - is he proving to be
> an absolute disgrace?
he is posting stuff that in my opinion degrades himself to the level of an
anonymois foul-mouthed cb'er.
i think that no matter what the subject is on this newsgroup, to post
something nasty about someone who has no ability to reply is just an
example of behaviour not consistent with the term gentleman.
i will however praise him for having the courage to post from an known
username (unlike some others who hide in the shadows with white feathers)
zBBPK
>
> Now that WAS funny...
yes...but not as funny as you hiding in the shadows
taking pot-shots at me from the shadows
Plod's Conscience
the postings have not come from his Internet address but from mine?
Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
>
> IF YOU WANT TO HAVE A GO AT AIRY FOR ANYTHING
> THEN LEAVE HIS RELATIONS OUT OF IT.
>
daily 'life' as Mrs Bean. She must have the patience of a saint.
--
;-)
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
http://turner-smith.co.uk
huLLy
> on 11/02/2006 20:37 zBBPK said the following:
>>
>> IF YOU WANT TO HAVE A GO AT AIRY FOR ANYTHING
>> THEN LEAVE HIS RELATIONS OUT OF IT.
>>
> I must agree, that poor woman has quite enough to contend with in her
> daily 'life' as Mrs Bean. She must have the patience of a saint.
I agree also. In fact, I have decided as from today not to rise to the
obvious bait from the cretinous fool any more, and to ignore his insane
rants, whoever much they make my blood boil.
huLLy
> insane rants, whoever much they make my blood boil.
*however* , before someone helpfully points that out!
Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
1985 Mental Health Act, especially his poetic attempts at around 0800
yesterday on this NG.
Mrs Bean must have a lot in common with the long suffering Mrs Victor
Meldrew.
huLLy
>>
> His recent posts should be sufficient to get him sectioned under the
> 1985 Mental Health Act, especially his poetic attempts at around 0800
> yesterday on this NG.
> Mrs Bean must have a lot in common with the long suffering Mrs Victor
> Meldrew.
I think he would have been sectioned 20 years ago, but times have changed
and mental health beds are scarce, there are a lot of people on the streets
that really should not be allowed out to mingle with the general public.
Plod's Conscience
and insulting words ("You're going to get _FUCKING_ hurt",
"You are a _FUCKING_ idiot") by the We'll Shite (All Over You)
Conplodulary, and neither do you have any objection to their
use of gratuitous violence by standing over someone and deliberately
grinding the boot into the face, but you _DO_ have an objection
to a poem that was inspired by that same disgraceful and shameful
behaviour and is critical of that behaviour?
Is that the same morality that enables you to pollute the Internet with
your pornographic emails that are obsessed with the sexual deviation
of sheep-shagging, and yet lets you complain when some other
(unknown to me) person pollutes the Internet with pornographic emails?
Is that the same morality that lets you opine that you are against
the use of a Morse Test aimed at 14-year-olds to control access
to the HF bands until, that is, a test aimed at 6-year-olds comes along
that you can pass because no effort is required (Are you not on record
as advertising it as a "No Fail" test?)?
Brian Reay wrote:
> "huLLy" <s...@f2s.com> wrote in message
> news:SKKdnbS6HfK...@giganews.com...
> > Plod's Conscience wrote:
> >> Is The Death Of A Plod A Matter Of Social Justice?
> >>
> >> © Copyright 7th & 8th March 2005 by Gareth Alun Evans.
> >>
> >
> > ab...@network-i.net informed
> >
>
> Twice. Also Wiltshire Police.
>
> __
> 73
> Brian
> www.g8osn.org.uk
Conrad Poos
Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote:
> Mrs Bean must have a lot in common with the long suffering Mrs Victor
> Meldrew.
This whole farce is like One Foot in the Grave on acid with Victor
'tripping balls' after dropping some high strength blotter.
Pooz
Carol B
Plod's Conscience wrote:
> Is The Death Of A Plod A Matter Of Social Justice?
>
> © Copyright 7th & 8th March 2005 by Gareth Alun Evans.
>
> plod cell during the night of 7th and 8th March 2005
> and is dedicated to "Fucking Idiot" Richard
> "Boot-In-The-Face" Fuller, collar number 177, of the
> "We'll Shite (All Over You) Constabulary". The song was
> inspired as the direct result of his behaviour when
> arresting me, behaviour if which conducted by
> people who are unable to hide like a craven coward
> behind a plod uniform, would result in
> long jail sentences.
>
> (Tune as yet to be determined)
>
> I'll sing you a song of social justice,
> BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
> Of two deserving deaths, of public justice.
> BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
>
> The plods are no longer the plods of yore,
> BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
> Their crimes and fit-ups have come to the fore.
> BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
>
> David Bieber had his fill of the rot,
> BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
> So cleansed out the pus and squeezed out the spot.
> BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
>
> The time may come yet when sense is restored,
> BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
> And the cemeteries filled up with plods in their boards.
> BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
What a horrible nasty man your are, you are making fun, and glorifying
the death of policemen. I am surprised the laws of your country allow
this. To make lite of anyones death is despicable. May horrible things
come to you and your family. You are subhuman.
chippy
> What a horrible nasty man your are, you are making fun, and glorifying
> the death of policemen. I am surprised the laws of your country allow
> this. To make lite of anyones death is despicable. May horrible things
> come to you and your family. You are subhuman.
Yet you repost it in full?
What kind of "horrible" things do you want to happen to the innocent
members of his family?
--
wigwambam
Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
> What a horrible nasty man your are, you are making fun, and glorifying
> the death of policemen. I am surprised the laws of your country allow
> this. To make lite of anyones death is despicable. May horrible things
> come to you and your family. You are subhuman.
>
Well said. PC Fuller didn't kick him hard enough.
Carol B
chippy wrote:
> Carol B wrote:
>
> What kind of "horrible" things do you want to happen to the innocent
> members of his family?
>
him and his family ten fold. If he has a family he will be the family
head, and as such his actions must reflect on the whole family. I could
not believe it when his filthy poems were pinned to my college notice
board. Fortunatly a senior master has now removed them.
Dennis M. Hammes
Visits from her darling policemen, of course.
It's what they're /for/.
Princess is having a *feeling* that she needs a servant militia to
"enforce."
--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
In Victorian times, a "swell" was a frog in his Prince phase.
By the Depression, "swell" was the frog's *feeling* on being
"kissed" into a Prince. Thus, the Depression.
http://scrawlmark.org
Dennis M. Hammes
> on 12/02/2006 18:47 Carol B said the following:
>
>> What a horrible nasty man your are, you are making fun, and glorifying
>> the death of policemen. I am surprised the laws of your country allow
>> this. To make lite of anyones death is despicable. May horrible things
>> come to you and your family. You are subhuman.
>>
> Well said. PC Fuller didn't kick him hard enough.
Too bad you two don't know the First Rule of cocksucking.
Andy Cowley
It is hardly his family's fault. I think they deserve our sympathy. Save
the retribution for him alone.
vy 73
Andy, M1EBV
Mike G4KFK
Plod's Conscience wrote:
> David Bieber had his fill of the rot,
> BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
> So cleansed out the pus and squeezed out the spot.
> BROAD-HURST!! BLAKE-LOCK!!,
For those who, like me, were wondering what this verse was all about:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/3700770.stm
You've reached an all-time low, Mr Evans.
Amazing AJ
bottoms to brit top lawyers(CO2Amen).
The fag-brit-lawyers have all the fuck.
Signed: Mr. Evans (esqueer)
--
AJ - http://clitin.com
(the biggest clit in pornetry)
Sat.Map: http://tinyurl.com/cjo5b
"Mike G4KFK" <mi...@g4kfk.co.uk> wrote in message news:1139831025....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI
> Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote:
>
>> on 12/02/2006 18:47 Carol B said the following:
>>
>>> What a horrible nasty man your are, you are making fun, and glorifying
>>> the death of policemen. I am surprised the laws of your country allow
>>> this. To make lite of anyones death is despicable. May horrible things
>>> come to you and your family. You are subhuman.
>>>
>> Well said. PC Fuller didn't kick him hard enough.
>
>
>
> Too bad you two don't know the First Rule of cocksucking.
>
The Magnum
news:1139831025....@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
An interesting note about someone's thoughts on David Bieber,
"My impression of him was that he thought, 'I am better than you - you're
not going to catch me.' He was that type of person. He thought he was better
than everybody else," he said.
Makes me wonder if David Bieber was a Radio Amateur friend of Mr Evans...
they both seem to have the same attitude...
Graham
--
-.-. -... / .-. .- -.. .. ---
Radio is only a Hobby. Don't let it rule your life...
73/51 - Graham, 26-Golf Charlie-19 (www.open-channel.co.uk)
Thomas Ernshaw
> on 13/02/2006 09:34 Dennis M. Hammes said the following:
>> Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Too bad you two don't know the First Rule of cocksucking.
>>
> Sorry we can't teach you. Ask Beanie, he's an expert.
Thomas Ernshaw
minded person would behave in such a manner. He makes M3's look
intelligent. Mind you I bet he was made up in his cell, after all he
could use his morse skills to plan an escape by tapping out a plan at
12wpm with his fellow criminals.
Dennis M. Hammes
> on 13/02/2006 09:34 Dennis M. Hammes said the following:
>
>> Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote:
>>
>>> on 12/02/2006 18:47 Carol B said the following:
>>>
>>>> What a horrible nasty man your are, you are making fun, and glorifying
>>>> the death of policemen. I am surprised the laws of your country allow
>>>> this. To make lite of anyones death is despicable. May horrible things
>>>> come to you and your family. You are subhuman.
>>>>
>>> Well said. PC Fuller didn't kick him hard enough.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Too bad you two don't know the First Rule of cocksucking.
>>
> Sorry we can't teach you. Ask Beanie, he's an expert.
If he's an "expert," he may exhibit the First Law, but he knows the
First Rule (its /statement/) no more than you.
You gotta find one /small enough/ to appreciate your Ministry.
I.e., /Nobody/ "sucks /up/."
Why for 1500 years it's been called "Kissing Frogs Into Princes."
No one who knows that will brag who he does or how well he does
it, or ever claim it for Authority or "backup"; the sum of "small" is
"smaller."
--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
/Addo, ergo sum/.
http://scrawlmark.org
Dennis M. Hammes
More likely why he uses mint sauce after the fact.
(Presuming your observation about the mint.)