It doesn't take much to complete your Saturday.
Again you have displayed *in public just how simple you are.
There is a point for internet access to be withdrawn from your
institution, but then who would the others laugh at.
If they gave you a TV set then you would have seen pictures too.
You are an embarrassment to Ireland, no to humanity
max.it (the orange cage)
What had Princess Margaret ever done to you, or Ireland in fact? Don't you get
sick of just hating things for the sake of it? It's time to wake up and move
on buddy. You do not represent the people of Ireland with your lunatic
ranting, and gloating over people dying.
> The old slag Margaret once called the Irish "pigs", and yet she was being
> screwed by Llewyin and "Ned" who was and is Irish. She came to Ireland in
> 1963 and there were several demonstrations against her. May she rot in
hell.
> I wonder what she is chatting to Mountbatton about tonight? LOL
Probably about having to make room for you once you attain your final
reward. -the Troll
> "Top Gun" wrote in message
> > Woke up this morning feeling terrible, but soon I was cheered up when I
> > heard on the radio that the old bitch maggie was dead. My Saturday was
> > complete. I am now happy. She died not a minute too soon. her body will
stay
> > fresh for years as she is pickled in gin, like her old mother.
Parasites.
> >
>
> What had Princess Margaret ever done to you, or Ireland in fact? Don't you
get
> sick of just hating things for the sake of it? It's time to wake up and
move
> on buddy. You do not represent the people of Ireland with your lunatic
> ranting, and gloating over people dying.
I still think he is a Unionist making Nationalists look bad. No real person
is that much of a drooling idiot. -the Troll
See we can be racist arseholes when we want to be, it just helps when you
can point to a fact as a justification. You comments have no basis in fact
whatsoever.
"eugene" <eugene...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:goC98.36832$H37.4...@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com...
The Brits are arogant beer belly football freaks
The Irish are ignorant Catholic loving dummies.
hippo wrote in message ...
People who derive satisfaction from Margarets' death should bear in mind
that this woman had a sister and other members of her family that are deeply
upset now she has gone. Anyone who feels that they have a right to try and
score pathetic points over this should consider how they would feel if one
of their close relatives died and some unfeeling bastard started making
highly insulting comments.
But as you come from a country where normal human rules of decency don't
apply I guess that no one would really be too surprised if you can't see my
point.
"Top Gun" <pro...@me.com> wrote in message
news:_5V98.3687$D6.1...@news.iol.ie...
"tomorrow" <li...@nospamyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:HMZ98.35557$8s4.1...@news.indigo.ie...
>And you??????????
>tomorrow <li...@nospamyahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:HMZ98.35557$8s4.1...@news.indigo.ie...
>> What all this crap? Ireland is a piece of crap and UK is a piece of crap!
>> Fuck it all.
>>
>> The Brits are arogant beer belly football freaks
>>
>> The Irish are ignorant Catholic loving dummies.
>>
>>
happy new year
Heretic wrote in message
<1013530807.21585....@news.demon.co.uk>...
Top Gun wrote in message <1w2a8.3779$D6.1...@news.iol.ie>...
> Hey Heretic, that is a bit of a generalisation. Rules of decency by the
> Irish are the norm. Naturally there are exceptions. I would not personally
> speak ill of the dead (although I would make an exception for that
warmonger
> Thatcher, and not because of her arrogant dismissal of the Irish, but
> because she should be in jail for crimes against humanity for ordering the
> sinking of the Belgrano).
You don't know anything about the Belgrano and the reasons for her sinking.
The only way you could was to have been there and in command. If the Argies
hadn't invaded the Falklands the ship and her crew would still be among us.
It is something nations should consider before invading other people's real
estate. Britain spent fortunes and lives so that the people of the Falklands
could remain British which was their collective wish. If there ever was a
righteous war it was that one.
But, to the point. I don't believe that any of the
> Royal family have any feelings about anything. I believe that they, like
the
> rest of the so called upper class, never learned the rudiments of human
> feeling.
You couldn't be more wrong. They have exactly the same feelings which,
because of how they were born, they are not permitted to follow as you or I
can. Where they go to school, who they can have as friends and who they can
marry are all severly restricted, some even by law. Plain old Charlie
Windsor could have married the woman with whom he was in love. Because he
was the Prince of Wales he couldn't.
[snip]
> The Russians had the answer in the revolution when they put them
> against a wall and were done with them.
The Russians had no answers to anything. Executing defenseless women and
children is never an answer. The cowardly bastards even shot the Doctor and
servants.
I don't feel this way about the
> Windsor's because I am Irish mind you. I just hate class differences which
> are accepted by too many too easily.
So you would shoot them for an accident of birth?
It almost made
> me throw up the other day when Tony Blair stood wringing his hands in
grief
> when told that Margaret had died. You could see him trying to force out
> tears. What a piece of superficial acting.
Blair is a politician. He clawed and fought and bribed and lied and
threatened his way into his job. The Royals did not - not a single one of
them. Probably half of them would retire to private life if given the
chance. There are several who think they are making a difference so stay in
there and put up with the public duties and lack of privacy and personal
freedom to do the job. Blair can retire when he wants to, the Queen can
not. -the Troll
"ChArRo" <elvis...@nospamyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:_5fa8.35723$8s4.1...@news.indigo.ie...
No you are completely wrong here I'm afraid, the capacity to feel emotion is
part of what makes humans. That is something that can never be removed
entirely from anyone, the cold aloofness that is seen in the royal family is
something that has been bred into them, but it doesn't take away their
humanity at all. You only had to see the pictures of Brenda visiting the
homeless hostel to know that she was bottling back tears.
Other than that I agree with most of your points ;-) Except Thatch did the
right thing when she sank the Belgrano, the lesson here is "don't start wars
if you can't take the consequences".
Heretic <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1013530594.21473....@news.demon.co.uk...
hippo <hi...@southsudan.net> wrote in message
news:vgla8.18385$td.46...@news2.nash1.tn.home.com...
The North has been held by Loyalists since the early 16th Century, this is
longer than most countries have existed including the USA. Or are you
seriously advocating that all countries are decolonised ? If this is the
case you can expect a few of your former breathren to return from the
states...
As to the falklands this is a historical dispute dating back to the 1700s we
claimed sovreingty in 1771. The argentine position appears to be solely
based on Argentine claims of a secret treaty. For further info look at
http://www.falklandshistory.com/chronology.html . Please read it before
commenting further.
Haven't you got anything better to do than liberally spread your bile
everywhere ?
I said nothing about knowing better than you. I wasn't there on scene
either.
Command in war is one of the toughest jobs there is. The very first
consideration
is the protection of one's troops/force. I have no doubt that it was the
commander made
the decision, not the PM. The PM may have been asked for form's sake, but
she would have agree with his decision. The Nam war taught governments not
to second guess commanders in the field.
You stand upright and defend the Royal family.
> Well, that is your right in the civilized world, but just because you
> disagree totally with me does not mean that you are right. You insist that
I
> couldn't be more wrong about the Royal's and their lack of feelings for
> "normal" things. "I couldn't be more wrong". How the hell would you know
> that? Are you some kind of confidante or Father Confessor to the Royals,
> somehow I don't think so.
I said this before, *all* human beings are the same. There is nothing
peculiar in the genetics
of the Royal Family which prevents thsm from feeling, only a job which
prevents them
from showing it.
As it is, I am in many ways almost a Father
> Confessor to quite a few people, certainly a confidante. These people
trust
> me and can talk about their fears and concerns about daily living. They
can
> come to terms with their usually chaotic and quite often disturbing
> pasts.And the common thread that I have seen over many years is that so
many
> people simply do not know "How to Feel". As people, the Royal's are
> biologically the same as everyone else so I think it is fair enough for me
> to consider that they will suffer from the same sort of hang-ups that
> everyone else does (except that they are probably more extreme in their
> case). So. Hippo, if the Royals just happen to be where they are "by
> accident of birth", as you put it, if they had any dignity they would see
> that they are no different from other people and would walk away from this
> parasitical life. But they don't! They love it!
That is an assumption on your part. The position of Monarch is
constitutional. One
is or one is not by law. The only way the Queen could quit her job is to
abdicate which
would put Charles on the throne, also by law. I think there are obvious
reasons why
she has not taken that course of action. By personality the Queen is reputed
to
be shy and retiring. It must be hell for her to be in public all the time.
She does it
because, like you, she has a sense of responsibility towards others. The
Royals are
hardly parasitic. The civil list gives back to the Monarch revenues from
their
own estates. Parliament spends more than 2/3 of the annual revenue
themselves
which would stop the minute the Queen became a private person with no other
monarch. In other words she would be richer and could live in peace
wherever
she wished if the monarchy were abolished. The laws of Great Britain at the
moment
requires that there be a Monarch as head of state. The Monarch is the only
check
on the powers of the PM since he is also majority leader in Parliament as
well
as head of the government. If the Monarchy should be dissolved, it would
have
to be replaced with another system which provides this needed balance.
I am Republican and
> naturally I run the risk here of being accused of all sorts of things
> because too many people here abuse and have no understanding of what this
> really means. I have no time for people who regard themselves as above the
> rest of us. If you defend them so strongly, you are either one of them or
> you have little self-respect. I was not advocating the Russian solution to
> class difference but the principle of everyone being the same and no-one
> being subservient, although idealistic, is where my head is. "hippo"
I am right there with you bud. Your problem is you do not understand there
will always be class differences. The old way was a class of birth. Now it
is
becoming a class of wealth. In the USSR it was a class of power and
privilege. People are naturally unequal in ambition, brains, and ability.
You
could take everything away from every person on earth and within a week or
two there would be rich and poor all over again. That is the human condition
the way it is. Still there should always be equality under the law. Our
system
is not perfect, but it is a long way ahead of the system in second place in
providing that guarantee. -the Troll
> We helped Mountbatton "retire". We can do the same for Charlie when he
> arrives if you like
You need to be sure there are no children in the boat this time. Mistakes
like that can be expensive. The guy needs retiring is the fuckwit who pulled
off the job. -the Troll
> Falklands are like the north. Stolen property
I'll spell it for you HISTORY. The place had no population when the Brits
got there. Most folks didn't even know it was there. -the Troll
Now then toparse you must get the language right
op Gun <pro...@me.com> wrote in message
news:Vgxa8.3970$D6.1...@news.iol.ie...
Lordy more innuendo !