In an attempt to improve the web site, I have another mock-up for you
to peruse [1]. Take into account there is some stuff missing, we need
to mention more about the screencasts and whatever, which I seem to
have omitted, but content can be shuffled, added and removed so
comments on the concept - please tell me it's not too influence by ror!
- I have NOT even touched this in internet explorer yet so any problems
there, please let me know and I will cry!
Thinking on the lines of consistent feel in toolbox too - the top bar
inspired by these shots [2] (thanks Ronald)
[1] http://koorb.co.uk/turbogears/preview/
[2] http://www.checkandshare.com/blog/?p=37
Swap the toolbox and examples blurbs, move the community activity to
the bottom. I think more could be done with the community activity
presentation, but I have no good ideas, so I'll just be happy.
Some weird stuff going on with the markup that is part of the column,
the images are in paragraph tags but the content is not. I was going
to complain about some text being 1.5 spaced while other text was 1.0
spaced, but that seems to be the source of the problem. :]
Nice work, looks good.
The layout is good, but how about shrinking everything by half? I'd
like not to scroll to see everything. That fading/changing link in
the middle is amazing: that's one of the things that will attract
people. The "megaframework" logo could be shrunk by 2/3 and still
make an impact. The main menu links would look better in sans-serif
font.
I'd also consider lining them up vertically; it looks like they're wrapping now.
--
Mike Orr <slugg...@gmail.com>
(m...@oz.net address is semi-reliable)
> In an attempt to improve the web site, I have another mock-up for you
> to peruse [1]. Take into account there is some stuff missing, we need
SUPER COOL! :-) Specially the icons! :-)
--
Jorge Godoy <jgo...@gmail.com>
Looks very good overall! The banner just below the navigation is too
wide (and maybe slightly overbearing in general), but I like the
overall look and the icons you've chosen.
Kevin
On 3/13/06, Richard (koorb) <richard.s...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
--
Kevin Dangoor
Author of the Zesty News RSS newsreader
email: k...@blazingthings.com
company: http://www.BlazingThings.com
blog: http://www.BlueSkyOnMars.com
Now that you are done banging your head into the wall, it does look
awesome. I agree that some parts could be made smaller to get it to fit
onto one page, or at least make it closer to doing so. I would suggest
shrinking down the blurbs and putting them horizontally inline with
each other, or finding a fourth blurb and doing a 2x2. Either way the
python blurb should probably be last on the list, as it will be the
least interesting for most of the traffic.
Anyways, great concept, too bad it does not work in our favorite
brain-dead browser. I agree that the fading link effect will turn some
heads, and would recommend tossing in as many TurboGears Shiny
Bauble(TM) effects as you can while keeping it relatively subtle.
Ciao
Michele
I agree, seeing it at work today on a smaller screen, it does look a
little ... over powering, I will look to shrinking it all down some.
> Since no one else has I looked at it in IE (6.0). It was not too
> pretty. The good news is your awesome fading feed display widget worked
> perfectly and was centered properly. Bad news is that just about
> everything else had problems
I do love internet explorer! I particularly like the fact that the menu
vanished entirely!
I will see what I can do with IE, I might have to invest in some kind
of virtual pc maybe ...
Jorge Vargas wrote:
> great work!
>
> are you running linux? you can run VMWare without charge now :)
I was under the impression that only VMware player was free - and seeing
as Windows is certainly not free, I don't think that's a solution.
-Rob
>
> On 3/14/06, *Richard (koorb)* < richard.s...@googlemail.com
Jorge Vargas wrote:
> great work!
>
> are you running linux? you can run VMWare without charge now :)
I was under the impression that only VMware player was free - and seeing
as Windows is certainly not free, I don't think that's a solution.
-Rob
>
> On 3/14/06, *Richard (koorb)* < richard.s...@googlemail.com
> <mailto: richard.s...@googlemail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> > Specially the icons! :-)
> thank you, I was quietly pleased with those :-) I made some others if I
> find a use for them.
>
> I agree, seeing it at work today on a smaller screen, it does look a
> little ... over powering, I will look to shrinking it all down some.
>
> > Since no one else has I looked at it in IE ( 6.0). It was not too
I'm willing to take care of it once you finalize the design.
nope! the on and only Mac OS X :-)
> I was under the impression that only VMware player was free - and seeing
> as Windows is certainly not free, I don't think that's a solution
I have a copy of windows XP, just nothing left to install it on! I seen
a couple of cheap virtual pc types around so, I will take a look at the
viability of these, but I'm on intel mac so adds to the complecations!
> Well we can still send you screen shots :)
well if your volunteering, you could send me a screenshot say, every 30
seconds ;-p
> For better or worst we should get TG main site working on all browsers
Indeed, I completely agree. As much as I dislike windows and IE, I
always try to get my sites working in it. I have a windows box at work
which I remote desktop to, so I take a look first thing in the morning
each day :-)
Anyway, if anyone has time to look over the html/css and can input some
IE debugging this would help me a great deal.
Hey Karl,
That would be magic. I'll email you tonight
-Rob
Jorge Vargas wrote:
> ohh not having a windows copy is a real problem, you need to buy a laptop :p
>
> Well we can still send you screen shots :)
>
> For better or worst we should get TG main site working on all browsers.
>
> On 3/14/06, *Robin Haswell* <r...@digital-crocus.com
> <mailto:r...@digital-crocus.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Jorge Vargas wrote:
> > great work!
> >
> > are you running linux? you can run VMWare without charge now :)
>
> I was under the impression that only VMware player was free - and seeing
> as Windows is certainly not free, I don't think that's a solution.
>
> -Rob
>
> >
> > On 3/14/06, *Richard (koorb)* < richard.s...@googlemail.com
> <mailto:richard.s...@googlemail.com>
> > <mailto: richard.s...@googlemail.com
I noticed that the "TurboGears Planet" Icon is shining,
it apear as "gears under the planet", looks like a pearl ring :)
The current is good and is it possible to improve it to look like
"gears around the planet"? (as "circle around saturn")
--
Fred
hmm there's an idea. the best thing is kind of on demand screenshots,
but that would be tricker I suppose. Karl says he's happy to work on it
once we finalise the most.
There is actually a service that will render screenshots on demand in
something like 40 browsers. I don't use it, but it hit digg two months
ago or so.
> Karl says he's happy to work on it once we finalise the most.
As long as you're not using IE no-nos (complex float stuff, fixed
positioning, etc), it's not that big of a deal to do the IE tweaks. I
find it necessary to have access to IE for testing, as I always forget
something.
I was searching for the same thing, this one is free dunno the final
result anyway the site is enqueued:
http://browsershots.org/website/845504/
http://browsershots.org/website/845503/
http://browsershots.org/website/845502/
http://browsershots.org/website/845501/
http://browsershots.org/website/845500/
http://browsershots.org/website/845499/
http://browsershots.org/website/845498/
Ciao
Michele
It is using floats, don't know if it would be considered complex usage
though!
> I find it necessary to have access to IE for testing, as I always forget
> something
I have a remote desktop at work, i'm for ever jumping in to tweak. I
was explaining to a client the other day that an element of there site
didn't look right because I hadn't tested it in IE fully. They didn't
seem to know there were other browsers, so I departed some w3c wisdom.
they though microsoft had invented the web!
Michele Cella wrote:
> I was searching for the same thing, this one is free dunno the final
> result anyway the site is enqueued:
You little gem! I had seen this site some time ago, but I lost it.
Shame it takes so long, trouble I have is the need to tweak, refresh,
repeat until not broken. This is certainly going into del.icio.us :-)
It's good to see IE7 makes some stunning improvements:
IE6 - http://browsershots.org/job/845502/
IE7 - http://browsershots.org/job/845503/
thank goodness for their groundbreaking idea of tabbed browsing
otherwise upgrading would be almost pointless! (sorry - I don't like
IE, you may have gathered!)
Thanks all. I will work on this during the week. must sleep now.
g-night!! zzzzz ...
Richard (koorb) wrote:
>
> I have a remote desktop at work, i'm for ever jumping in to tweak. I
> was explaining to a client the other day that an element of there site
> didn't look right because I hadn't tested it in IE fully. They didn't
> seem to know there were other browsers, so I departed some w3c wisdom.
> they though microsoft had invented the web!
Look I am by no means a fan of IE and I work in the website trade so you
know what that means, but let's be honest here, Microsoft virtually has
invented the web. Or more accurately, they invented the web we have
right here right now, not the W3C's standards utopia we all wish we had!
Like it or not, what IE says is what goes, and meanwhile we do our best
to promote more predictable browsers and hope to ride out the storm.
Hell if IE7 turns out to be as compliant as FF/Safari then I'll be just
as happy as if IE died a death altogether.
-Rob
IE7, from all the reports I've heard, is quite solid in terms of CSS
support. It will not, unfortunately, have SVG support, which is a
disappointment. I also know that alex russell (dojo project lead) has
complained that the scripting system has not seen as much work and is
essentially IE6.
I get annoyed with IE on a regular basis, but it is nothing compared
to the that was NN4. I absolutely hated that browser.
Or you could just let me handle it like I said earlier. ;]
Karl Guertin wrote:
> Or you could just let me handle it like I said earlier
Totally!
There is a free download of VMware-Server:
http://www.vmware.com/
Uwe