On Jun 3, 10:27 am, Bob Silverberg <
bob.silverb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You cannot do that with Transfer, not in the way you suggest anyway.
> Transfer works with objects, not table rows, so you'd have to ask Transfer
> to get each object, update its property and then ask Transfer to save the
> object. You could use one of the listXXX methods to get a query that
> contains the records you are interested in, and then loop over that query,
> getting each object, etc.
>
> If the expected number of records is small this will probably be fine, but
> if it may be a large number then you'd probably be better off just coding it
> in SQL. If you do go that route (using SQL) don't forget to discard the
> objects from the cache after you update them - otherwise your cache will be
> out of synch.
>
> Cheers,
> Bob
>