On Sun, 13 Jan 2013, PMario wrote:
> Just to see if it would be simple enough to throw some (cheap)
> hardware at the TW save problem. ... and get some sort of scalability,
> without using the cloud.
Awesome that you are pursuing this.
> * As chris pointed out in [1], TiddlyWebWiki would be the easiest
> option.
> But It creates a single TW per instance. Having a look at the RasPi
> CPU and memory usage to get things done, imo 2 or 3 instances at the
> same time would be possible.
As I've said several times a tiddlywebwiki installation can have as
many tiddlywiki's as desired, just by creating recipes.
So instead of using hoster you could have pursued the option of making
it easy to create recipes. The advantage there would be that
tiddlywebwiki + <a recipe tool> would have a smaller footprint than
hoster. You would, though, lose quite a few features that hoster
provides.
> * IMO Hoster is the next option.
> Installing it is allmost the same, but possibilities are much more
> powerful. The UI doesn't do well enough (for me) but that can be
> fixed.
As with pretty much everything I've created that has a frontend on it,
the frontend is entirely there to provide a place for someone else to
improve. So my hope, all along, with hoster, has been that people
would make better looking and better functioning UI.
> Step 2:
I can guess some of the steps you have planned here:
> Multi user Multi TW system
change registration system in hoster
> Revisions are done by tiddlyWeb
> A new UI for hoster that can handle several users.
I'm not sure what you mean here, as the UI is already multi-user?
> Storing the tiddlers on a harddisk should be an option.
using diststore so some of the bags are on the hard drive
> Public and private tiddlers are possible
this is already possible in hoster. hoster has the concepts of public,
private and proctected for both recipes and bags, as well as editable
policies.
> No inclusion mechanism like in TiddlySpace. If you want to have this
> function just use TiddlySapce :)
hoster has a form of inclusion that is _far_ more powerful than what
is used in tiddlyspace: You can favorite bags and then include them in
recipes. This means you can choose functionality from across the
system with greater granularity than tiddlyspace provides.
So I would say if you're going to pursue using hoster, make sure you
really dig around in the system to see all that it can do. Good luck
and please keep posting about your progress.
--
Chris Dent
http://burningchrome.com/
[...]