sports-schema-collab

Hi I've been lurking in the group for a little while but haven't posted before, so for those

Hi All Me either cannot make it. I share your concern over losing momentum. I am finalizing "

Just to let folk here know that a few of the Sports-related improvements developed here have gone

Hello My comments: unless I misunderstood the sport complete structure... property: athlete, coach

Hello My comments: unless I misunderstood the complete structure... property: athlete, coach should

All, I'm pleased to formally announce and encourage review and feedback on an updated version of

Hi Paul, In the about-to-be-published updated draft proposal, I believe this hierarchy of

Em sexta-feira, 14 de março de 2014 19h48min22s UTC-3, Gerald Bauer escreveu: Hello, Great initiative

In case anyone is interested, I tentatively modelled a match report in RDF using the Sport ontology,

All, I have published an updated version of this proposal which removes the ability to define

Argh! Just seeing this now as I was about to re-post my 'new draft published' announcement

Examples like this are why people are pushing for using JSON-LD. Mixing up the presentation markup

On Tuesday, January 7, 2014 2:16:32 AM UTC-8, Tom Grahame BBC wrote: On Monday, January 6, 2014 7:46:

OK, I get it now. Thanks. On 2014-01-06, at 1:18 PM, Jason Johnson <jasjo...@gmail.com>

I have posted a google document with a revised / updated version of this proposal for comments.

In order to ensure our proposals meet real-world complex use cases, I have established an initial set

Hi all, I have established a location for maintaining documents associated with our sports proposal.

On 2013-12-13, at 7:58 AM, Tom Grahame <tfgr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Minor syntactic point:

Sorry, for the delay. Here is an updated Event schema. I feel like it has gotten a lot simpler with

Yes, I have an updated version that represents the roles in some instances for clarification: (Not

We've probably enough to discuss at the moment but I though I would send this to the list anyway,

I wonder if it would be easier to handle the boxing use case if for a given boxer we have something

Agreed. I think we should move forward with second approach. On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 12:14:39

Sure, unless this has been superseded by our current vertical push? (Apologies for the late reply) On

Apologies for missing the meeting everyone, I may have been the victim of a DST change... Tom

Once again, a reflection of the structure of SportsML. In this case there are so many stats they are

That's weird. I have "Ice Hockey" as the subject line. I did initially reply to that to

All, I've tried to organize this the way SportsML organizes things, by dividing stats and

Definitions and General Structure qualifying_teams, qualifying_athlete: teams and athletes that

Posted on behalf of Alice. I could have gone on forever creating statistics for baseball players,