I have a question pertaining to ASAPRatio.
Can I actually get ASAPRatio to give me a ratio of Kmethylated / Kheavy
+methylated (i.e. K142/K148)? If it can be done, how do I specify on
the commandline different modified forms of Lys as the numerator and
denominator of the ratio? Both modifications have been specified under
variable mods in Xtandem. Does Xpress need to be specified everytime
ASAPRatio is run, or can it be omitted? Can the following work?
xinteract -NinteractHeavyMethyl2.pep.xml -p0 -l6 -OA -A-
lR170.11676K142.11061-F-r0.1-mK148.13061R180.12476
"*HeavyMethyl.tandem.pep.xml"
I also tried specifying static mod on Lys (i.e. 14@K), and variable
mod of 20@K to represent the Heavy+Methyl form in Xtandem first,
then :
xinteract -Ninteractstatic.pep.xml -p0 -l6 -OA -X-nR,10K,6 -A-lRK-F-
r0.1-mK148.13061R180.12476 "*static.tandem.pep.xml"
But in this case, PeptideProphet's probabilities were all 0,
presumably because there were very few significant peptide assignments
due to the static mod specified on all Lys. Does anybody have any idea
how I can get around this problem with ASAPRatio?
I look forward to any suggestions. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Bernard
We've successfully used ASAPRatio for heavy dimethyl labeled
quantitation using the following workflow, which might help you get to
where you want:
* Run *two* searches, with the light and heavy methyl n-term and
lysine mods specified as *static* modifications, i.e.
Search 1: Dimethyl (K) + Dimethyl (n-term) as static mods.
Search 2: Dimethyl:2H4 (K) + Dimethyl:2H4 (n-term) as static mods.
* Run xinteract on the resulting pair of search results using the
static mods option for ASAPRatio, i.e.
-A-lnK-S-r0.05
There's no need to run XPRESS if you are only interested in ASAPRatio
results.
DT
Really grateful for your advice. I get what you mean, I have 2 more
concerns: can we change which form to be the numerator and which form
to be the denominator? When we specify -A-lnK-S, would the ratio be
Search1 / Search 2 or Search 2 / Search 1? Do you get Peptide Prophet
probabilities when you place a static mod on Lys?
Another interesting point for discussion in methylation: would you be
able to distinguish dimethyl Lys from Arginine? Would placing static
mod of dimethyl on Lys give you many false positives which might be
just Arginines instead? How do you manage them?
Bernard
P.S: Has anybody come across methylated tryptophan W?
Sorry for the slow reply. ASAPRatio will know which label is heaviest,
it shouldn't matter which way around the searches are.
With regard to the questions r.e. dimethyl false positives, the
procedure we are using this for involves labeling for quantitation
where all lysines should be dimethylated / heavy dimethylated. I
probably wrongly assumed you were doing this labeling, whereas I guess
you are not forcing complete dimethylation of lysines? What exactly is
your experiment? What biological changes are you trying to measure?
DT