@@ Revealed: UK develops secret nuclear warhead @@
Arash
March 12, 2006
Revealed: UK develops secret nuclear warhead
By Michael Smith
Michael.Smith[AT]sunday-times.co.uk
letters[AT]sunday-times.co.uk
letters[AT]thetimes.co.uk
comment[AT]thetimes.co.uk
editor[AT]sunday-times.co.uk
insight[AT]sunday-times.co.uk
online.editor[AT]timesonline.co.uk
debate[AT]thetimes.co.uk
Full text of Trident report by Foreign Policy Center (FPC)
http://www.times-archive.co.uk/onlinespecials/wmdmar10final.pdf [PDF-200KB]
Britain has been secretly designing a new nuclear warhead in conjunction with the
Americans, provoking a legal row over the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
The government has been pushing ahead with the programme while claiming that no
decision has been made on a successor to Britain’s Trident nuclear deterrent. Work on
a new weapon by scientists at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston in
Berkshire has been under way since Tony Blair was re-elected last May, and is now
said to be ahead of similar U.S. research.
The aim is to produce a simpler device using proven components to avoid breaching the
ban on nuclear testing. Known as the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW), it is being
designed so that it can be tested in a laboratory rather than by detonation.
“We’ve got to build something that we can never test and be absolutely confident
that, when we use it, it will work,” one senior British source said last week.
The secret programme to build a new warhead in close co-operation with the Americans
will spark anger among Labor opponents of any replacement of the Trident programme,
which is estimated to have cost nearly £10 billion.
Developing a new weapon would also, according to expert advice from Cherie Booth’s
Matrix chambers, be a material breach of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The
office of Lord Goldsmith, the attorney-general, refused to comment on whether it had
been asked for legal advice by No. 10.
Both Labor backbenchers and the Liberal Democrats accused the government of
introducing a replacement nuclear weapon by the back door without a parliamentary
debate.
Paul Flynn, a Labor backbencher who has drafted parliamentary motions questioning the
need for a Trident replacement, insisted there had to be a proper debate. “The
Trident missiles will last for another 20 years”, he said. “Who on earth are we going
to take on with them anyway? Replacing them wrecks any standing we have when we
preach non-proliferation to countries like Iran”.
Michael Moore, the Lib Dem foreign affairs spokesman, called for a statement. “This
work would appear to pre-empt the proper debate the prime minister has promised”, he
said.
The controversy is set to ignite this week with an embarrassing report by the Foreign
Policy Centre (FPC), set up under Blair’s patronage, calling for Trident to be
scrapped and not replaced.
On Tuesday the defence select committee will take evidence from experts, most of whom
are expected to say that there is no need for a new nuclear deterrent.
The FPC report says that Britain’s independent deterrent is an illusion. The missiles
are stored in the United States and have to be collected by a British submarine
before it goes on patrol.
Aldermaston is run by a consortium headed by Lockheed Martin, a U.S. company, and
there are 92 Americans working there, including the managing director and four of his
senior managers.
“The UK should cease to try to keep up appearances and adopt a policy based on the
reality that it is not an independent nuclear power”, the FPC report concludes.
“Trident should not be replaced and should be phased out now”.
Blair is said to want to decide on Trident’s replacement before he steps down. “It is
a huge decision for the country and it will probably be done in a far more open way
than the decisions have been taken before,” he said last month.
As he spoke, work was well advanced at Aldermaston on designs for the RRW. The US Los
Alamos and Lawrence Livermore nuclear laboratories began a competition to produce an
RRW last May. But Washington sources say the British have been designing their own
Reliable Replacement Warhead and “are now ahead of the Americans”.
One possible way to avoid breaching the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is for Blair
to announce that the new deterrent will have fewer warheads. We currently have about
200.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2081800,00.html
Related article:
--------------------
Britain's secret nuclear blueprint
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/fa33b3845ed79be0
U.S. and Britain conducted the 22nd underground nuclear explosion, in full violation
of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/151341cfb6372100
Britain participated in the U.S. underground nuclear explosion in violation of the
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.iranian/msg/303e9d2f711b924f
The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT)
http://www.ctbto.org
The Text of the Treaty (CTBT)
http://www.ctbto.org/treaty/treatytext.tt.html
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty / Test Moratorium
http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/ctbt/
Photos: Krakatau nuclear test
http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/photos/subcritical.aspx
Video: Krakatau nuclear test
http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/films/other.aspx?ID=152
Gallery of U.S. Nuclear Tests
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/
Nevada Nuclear Test Site
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/facility/nts.htm
Ballistic Submarines (SSBN)
http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server.php?show=nav.2420
Trident D-5 Ballistic Missile
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/slbm/d-5.htm
British nuclear policy
http://www.basicint.org/nuclear/UK_Policy/main.htm
The Current British Arsenal
http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Uk/UKArsenalRecent.html
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (UK)
http://www.cnduk.org
U.S. nuclear forces, 2006
http://www.thebulletin.org/article_nn.php?art_ofn=jf06norris
British nuclear forces, 2005
http://www.thebulletin.org/article_nn.php?art_ofn=nd05norris
Background on US-UK nuclear weapons collaboration under the Mutual Defence Agreement
http://www.basicint.org/nuclear/MDAReport.pdf
Background on the CTBT, a resource page from BASIC
http://www.basicint.org/nuclear/CTBT/main.htm
“Does the U.S. Science-Based Stockpile Stewardship Program Pose a Proliferation
Threat?”, in-depth article by the Natural Resources Defense Council, 1998.
http://www.nrdc.org/nuclear/athreat.asp
U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground: Basin for Bio-testing
http://www.greens.org/s-r/34/34-05.html
Dig Up Dugway
http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/dud/index.html
Dugway Proving Ground conducted nine open-air experiments on hazards of M-55
disposal, decontamination operations nerve agents GB and VX.
http://home.comcast.net/~kknowlto/testlist.htm
U.S. nerve gas leak 1968
http://lists.jammed.com/IWAR/1998/01/0004.html
Skull Valley chemical leak in 1968 from the Dugway base
http://www.geocities.com/cbellnt/skullvalley.html
Family hopes story will stop dangerous tests
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,590045514,00.html
Nevada tests worry Utahns
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,595065623,00.html
Bills could restrict information access
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635180035,00.html
Is U.S. Preparing to Break Out of the Nuclear Weapons Testing Moratorium?
http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0630-03.htm
Chemical Weapons Testing Created Controversy at Dugway
http://historytogo.utah.gov/utah_chapters/utah_today/chemicalweaponscreatedcontroversyatdugway.html
Anthrax Letters: Made in the USA
http://rwor.org/a/v23/1140-1147/1145/anthrax%201145.htm
Nerve agents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerve_agent