Shared names

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Mark <ma...@illuminae.com> wrote: so I'm not ready to say

In the discussion about possible URI Formats to use while testing the new federated PURL software

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Melanie Courtot <mcou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, >

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Stefano Bocconi <stefano...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi

I've had a longstanding action item to write down considerations regarding the alphabetic vs.

FYI: It would be good for the Shared Names project members to comment on this draft ebook. Cheers,

I wrote up a Shared Names project for possible staffing via Google Summer of Code: http://wiki.

Thanks for the excellent review, Peter - I agree with all of it, I think. Local resolvers are a big

Hi all - To those who don't know me, I'm Ben Hyde, I did a bit of work last fall to try and

I see that some have joined. Great! However please identify yourself by putting your full name in if

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:22 PM, M. Scott Marshall <mars...@science.uva.nl> wrote: Hi Jonathan

Alan, thanks for approving the shared-names request. Here's a brief introduction. I have an

I made a new page http://sharedname.org/page/Basic_functionality that starts to collect (candidate)

... have been posted here: http://sharedname.org/page/Meetings/2009-04-29_Steering Best Jonathan

Jonathan Rees wrote: > Thanks to Kaitlin Thaney for the following. > > http://www.flickr.com

The problem here is the reliance on free services rather than free data. With free data if someone

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Peter Ansell <ansell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Alan

My bad, I was thinking it couldn't be abbreviated but I realized later that I *could* make a

Douglas Burke wrote: > > Thanks for the interesting meeting today. I briefly chatted with Alan

On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:10:48 -0700, Eric Prud'hommeaux <er...@w3.org> wrote: > Alan is

Jonathan just stepped out. I'll ask him to get back to you as soon as he gets in. -Alan On Tue,

Hi, We drafted some of our own initial ideas for the Shared Names project. This is currently just a

On Apr 28, 2009, at 1:52 PM, e...@acm.org wrote: > > Could you please provide more details on

Came across http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/32699780?report=GenPept Note that there are a number

+1 on having a normalized dataset namespace that is upper or lower-cased. When it comes to individual

A number of what one might consider databases, in the common schemes (lsrn, ncbi, etc) are given

I have been thinking about how to handle the versioning issue in the context of shared names.

Here's an example: http://rdf.freebase.com/rdf/en/bm_gensat However if you try to get a list of

A few comments: 1, I don't know the resolution referenced in "...may mislead someone into

From the TIB press release of about one month ago "The goal of this cooperation is to establish