Reward Energy Independence - NOT Energy Incumbantism
American
of the right kind of scientific culture, but there always seems
to be an "overdomestication", resulting in often blind and
shallow, left-brained marginalization, rather than deep and
mysterious, WHOLE-brained application or manifestation.
Therefore, what is "whole-brained" application? IMO Whole-
brained" application brings both left- and right- brained
activity into a cohesive whole, facilitating things like shades
of meaning in what would normally be subtly overlooked
ideas, such as "How compartmentalized should a new energy
technology be without being bureaucratically codependent?"
or "How independent does a new energy technology need
to be before it becomes a monopoly?" or "What kinds of
new industries will arise from a new energy technology
being implemented?"
What kind of energy independence can become "rewarded"
by a new energy technology, corporate or otherwise, without
having some sense of perception by the energy distribution
and advertising network industry-at-large, other than an
increase in value of its positive potential that would lead to
even more abundant and free energy? If "positive potential"
can be solely based on distributive networking and advertising,
one way to "remarket" this kind of positive potential is to
consider the energy that goes into another kind of whole-
brained, revolutionary technology: e.g. meals consisting of
edible nanofibres!
Edible Nano-Paper Money Doubles as a Distributive Network
At $2.00 per meal, edible, invisible nanofibres are mixed
into a freeze dried or irradiated food, consumed, and
provide all the nourishment required. If a person chooses
not to eat, the fibers form a distributed parallel processing
network via their proximity with other irradiated food.
The memory capacity of the nanofibre network would not
require any removable media, and would therefore handle
a much larger storage capacity, since growth of the in-
dustry would be solely based on distributive networking
and advertising. The fibers can be made with any flavor
and consistency as any freeze dried breakfast, lunch,
or dinner. The cobalt-irradiated packages would have a
standard shelf life of over a year, and would not require
refrigeration. They can be used as a remote terminal for
the purpose of mass marketing through advertising, on
the basis that fasting produces enlightenment, and en-
lightenment draws a mass of believers closer to enlight-
enment. Everytime the nanofibre is utilized as a terminal,
it increases in value according to how the usage interacts
with the most widely distributed grouping of similar poten-
tial parallel processors. If the interaction is judged positive,
the face value of the nanofibre package increases.
While the potential benefits of a new energy technology
are enormous, self-direction in this area is no walk-over,
and must be maintained with a little caution, especially
w.r.t. viewing distributive work teams as one of several
pre-engineered methods for improving sales and adver-
tising productivity, as well as quality and morale on the
R & D side. New energy companies can achieve this
through the destructuring of overcompartmentalization in
the overbureaucratized business environment, therefore
streamlining whatever product line with the public percep-
tion, even supraconsciously, way beyond the colonial and/or
spartan business environment.
Thus we have a kind of scalar meta-programming in the
human "biocomputer" that supports the move away from
earthbound, co-dependent economics to space-bound,
interstellar infrastructure. FTL astronauts require these
kinds of technological advances.
Reinventing the Wheel of Transportation, Energy-wise
The problem with America's energy infrastructure is
in the cost of continuing streamlining in creating extensive,
inexpensive inter-industry airborne transportation and dis-
tribution systems, resulting in malfeasance, dormancy,
stagnation, and isolation in local and global markets. Yet
because of class envy with things like UAW retirement and
medical care government bailouts, all taxpayers get to share
in UAW's suffering, even though non-establishment industry
entrepreneurs continue to generate revolutionary transpor-
tation technology that utilizes a free source of energy, with
a completely reliable, replacement technology infrastructure.
What's up with that?
Undoubtedly, it was the high pay and EEOC of the auto-
worker that has helped to keep companies like GM and Ford
co-dependent with the bureaucracy, while the non-strapped,
small shop tinkerer has turned those functionary GM and
Ford behemoths into so much hay overnight.
It is this co-dependency that Americans were supposed
to have become so enamoured with the now-antiquated-
but-soon-to-be-updated auto manufacturers that creates
headstones of so much domestication down memory lane
that it ruins the spirit of real promise-marketing overnight,
and it is also this co-dependency which causes our pluralistic
society to create the image of conflict between the "haves"
and the "have-nots", when it should be more about where
Americans continue to create success stories rather than
devote themselves in domestification to the extreme.
Levels of co-dependency in a pluralistic society, that values
engineering orthodoxy EQUALLY with self-directed work
teams, "blows up" the word "orthodoxy" to include "sacred"
and "profane" methodologies that are more "youthful"
(emotional) and "elderly" (wise), than they are scientifically
"accurate" or "precise". "Elderly and wise" inevitably
merges with the all-inclusive "worker" category, as we have
"Communist WORKERS Party" instead of a self-directed
and cutting-edge and widespread
ENERGY TECHNOCRACY.
Thus without there ever being a new emergent energy tech-
nology on the horizon, the demand for current populist
science becomes way too overdomesticated, while the
bureaucracy continues to swell to unprecedented
proportion.
This is what co-dependency with an overmonitoring burea-
cracy does with western style, whole-brained intelligence,
in shedding the RIGHT KIND OF self-directed work teams
for the sake of "towing the party line".
Self-directed work teams are NOT and should NOT be in
the domain of what a welfare state offers to prescribe to
a burgeoning and overdomesticated bureaucracy. Such
implementations can only serve as factories of paranoia
in both public and private enterprise. Government should
not be the "mirror" of what goes on inside of private
industry - government should be the "lens" through which
the rest of society can observe its own progress
as a whole.
American