Hold The Press, Rewrite The Textbooks, Physicist must be scarrying to do damage control in the light of new evidence
cjcountess
(Geometrical Interpretation of E=mc^2), Defies “Point Particle,
Probability Waves”, description of Electron, “Uncertainty Principle”,
and the “Inverse Square Law”, as leading to infinity and therefore
“Black Holes”, and “Big Bangs”, Defines the true geometrical structure
of Electron, and geometrical limits of “ Inverse Square Law” and
reveals
Quantum gravity in 3 Steps:
Using the simplest, clearest, explanation, possible
1) “c” in the linear direction
2) x “c” in the 90 degree angular direction,
3) = c^2 as a balance of centrifugal/centripetal forces of rotating
energy, enabling “rest mass’ where (E=mc^2 = F=mv^2), ( c^2 = G = h/
2pi/2)
see:http://wbabin.net/science/countess.pdf
Recent evidence also backs this.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13545453
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/06/quantum-mechanics-gets-weirdly-l.html
What happened before The Big Bang
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bGx3UB-Slg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OutKE3tyG94&feature=related
And after Black Hole
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EBfaoI8n8Bo&feature=related
It’s only a matter of time before this discovery is fully
acknowledged, and we all have a heads up.
Again see:
http://wbabin.net/science/countess.pdf
Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
Analogous to a line of 1 inch in horizontal direction x a line of 1
inch in the vertical direction, c ^2 =
1) c in the linear direction
2) x c in the 90 degree angular direction
3) = c ^2 for a balance of centrifugal and centripetal forces to
create circular and or spherical motion with E=mc^2 being analogous
to
and equal on quantum level to F=mv^2/r
The two 90 degree angular vectors of motion creates a 90 degree arc
which if constant creates a circle of energy = cx2pi with angular
momentum h/2pi, and if amplitude is constant, will creates energy in
spherical rotation, as circle making two rotations, at right angle
which is spin ½ with angular momentum h/2pi/2.
G as L/T^2 = c^2 as the ultimate v^2 and the ultimate L/T^2.
As such G = h/2pi/2 = c^2 on quantum level.
This is where E=hf=mc^2, as deBroglie stated it, as a mathematical
representation of an Electron, emerging from the same EM spectrum as
photons, except that they are "standing spherical waves" rotating at
"c", because of the centripital / centrifugal force balence, which
gives it rest mass, instead of moving at "c" along the linear path,
like photons.
And thus the "EM spectrum" is not only the electromagnetic spectrum,
but also the energy / matter spectrum, as well.
Quantum Gravity was right in front of our faces all the time, and all
it took to see it was a "Geometrical Interpretation of the most famous
equation in the world E=mc^2".
Thus (E=mc^2 = E=mc^circled and/or sphered) with angular momentum of h/
2pi for circle h/2pi/2 for circle making two rotations to complete one
wave cycle spin1/2, which is also point on EM spectrum where a wave
atains rest mass = "G" as the highest v^2 = highest L/T^2 uniting
Special Relativity General Relativity and Quantum Theory.
And if spin is counterclockwise it has -1 charge and if clockwise +1
charge, and thus E=mc^2, h/2pi/2, spin1/2, -1 charge, which are all
experimentally varified atributes of Electron, emerge naturaly from
this geometrical model.
How many points of coincidence must match before a fingerprint is
considered a match, or a clear picture emerges from scattered pieces
of a puzzel? It is statistically very improbable for all this to match
and it not be correct geometry for electron.
Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
> And if spin is counterclockwise it has -1 charge and if clockwise +1
> charge, and thus E=mc^2, h/2pi/2, spin1/2, -1 charge, which are all
> experimentally varified atributes of Electron, emerge naturaly from
> this geometrical model.
>
Above, to be more accurate, I should have said that, "if spin is
counter to trajectory", in case where the wave is traveling
horrizontally from left to right, same direction as this writing, like
----->, and equaly from botom to top as __!, the trajectory follows a
90 degree counterclockwise rotation, sort of as if you drew a 90
degree arc from begining of horizontal line to end of vertical line of
equal measure, which if constant will create a backward
counterclockwise spinning circle of energy with angular momentum, of h/
2pi, and if ampitude is constant, or we begin with circular polarized
wave, it will make two rotations to complete one wave cycle, with
angular momentum of h/2pi/2. The momentum of the Planck's constant "h"
in circular and or spherical motion, comes from the kinetic energy of
the constant speed of light or "c" in circular and or spherical
rotation.
Also, we will notice that one unit vector pointing straight up in
vertical direction, leading to 90 degree angular rotation, is also the
electronic and electrical enginere's version of a geometrical
representation of "sqrt-1". And so this togather with the fact that
"c^2", as we have geometrically presented it, leads to a (-1 charged
particle the Electron), lets us safely state tthat ("c" in the 90
degree angular counterclockwise direction = the natural unite sqrt of
the natural unit -1 charge or Electron), and explains why "sqrt-1",
works so well in solving problems in electronics.
> Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
1) (h/2pi/2) is the measure of "Electron's" certain momentum,
position, not its uncertainty proclaimed by "Uncertainty Priciple", as
well as energy, time, charge, and temp, as "c^2" is revealed to be the
conversion factor of not only energy and matter but all the above.
2) (sqrt-1) is revealed to be a real natural unit "c", not just a
imaginary number.
3) Circular motion is more simply defined by a balence of equal and 90
degree angular centripital and centrifugal forces as opposed to just a
centripital force alone. Centrifugal force was deemed to be ficticious
and just the result of the inertia of an object traveling at constant
speed in straight line by scientist, but as Gravity which was also
deemed to be ficticious force is the centripital force still used in
circular motion equations is equal to inertia this makes gravity
centipital force equal to constant sopeed in straight line centrifugal
force, and as we can see through this geometry togather they supply
the simplest explination for circular motion as a balence of two equal
and 90 degree angular centripital and centrifugal forces as "v^2" or
in this case "c^2", whic can be stated as F=nv^2/r or E=mc^2/c.
4) "Inverse Square Law," does not lead to infinity, which gives rise
to "Big Bang", "Black Holes" and "Uncertianty Principle", due to
infinite momentum and or position, but instead leads to a geometrical
limit of "h/2pi/2" which is "c" in spherical rotation or "h/2pi" "c"
in circular rotation.
5) If "c^2" is the combined trajectory of two equal and 90 degree
angular vectors of motion, than "c^2" also = sqrt2
6) Just as E=hf=mc^2 at level of Electron/Positron and no where else
than c^2 = -1 = h/2pi/2 = G = sqrt2 = basic unit of L, m. E, T, t, Q.
and E=mc^2 =E=mc^2 =E=mc^sphered = E=mc^triangled at this level where
c^2 is conversion factor of all these.
Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
1) (h/2pi/2) is the measure of "Electron's" certain momentum,
position, not its uncertainty proclaimed by "Uncertainty Principle",
as
well as energy, time, charge, and temp, as "c^2" is revealed to be
the
conversion factor of not only energy and matter, but of all the above
and also equal to “h/2pi/2” and “G” on this level.
2) (sqrt-1) is revealed to be a real natural unit "c", not just an
imaginary number.
3) Circular motion is more simply defined by a balance of equal and
90
degree angular centripetal and centrifugal forces, as opposed to just
a
centripetal force alone. Centrifugal force was deemed to be
fictitious
and just the result of the inertia of an object traveling at constant
speed in straight line by scientist, but as “gravity”, which was also
deemed to be fictitious force, is the “centripetal force” still used
in
circular motion equations, is equal to inertia, this makes the
“gravity
centripetal force” equal to the resistance to the “constant speed in
straight line centrifugal
force”. We can see through this geometry that together they supply
the simplest explanation for circular motion as a balance of two
equal
and 90 degree angular centripetal and centrifugal forces, as "v^2" or
in this case "c^2", which can be stated as F=mv^2/r or E=mc^2/c.
Analogous to a line of one inch in the horizontal direction, x a line
of 1 inch in vertical direction, to equal a square inch, any velocity
in the horizontal direction, times that same equal and 90 degree
angular or vertical velocity equals v^2, and create circular motion
from a balance of centripetal and centrifugal forces. If we draw a
90degree arc from the beginning of the horizontal line to the end of
the vertical line we have the foundation of our circle, which we only
need to complete by making this trajectory constant.
4) "Inverse Square Law," does not lead to infinity, which gives rise
false notions of
"Big Bang", "Black Holes" and "Uncertainty Principle", due to
infinities, but instead leads to a geometrical
limit of "h/2pi/2" which is "c" in spherical rotation or "h/2pi" "c"
in circular rotation.
5) If "c^2" is the combined trajectory of two equal and 90 degree
angular vectors of motion, than "c^2" also = sqrt2
6) Just as E=hf=mc^2 at level of Electron/Positron and nowhere else,
than c^2 = -1 = h/2pi/2 = G = sqrt2 = basic unit of L, m. E, T, t, Q,
and E=mc^2 =E=mc^circled =E=mc^sphered = E=mc^triangled, at this
level, where
’c^2”, is conversion factor of all these
.
As "c^2" was found to be conversion factor between not only energy and
matte,r but charge, length, time, temp, rest mass, these basic unites
follow as equal to "c^2" and sense "c^2" has angular momentum of "h/
2pi/2" and is highest possible "v^2" or "L/T^2' it also equals "h/2pi/
2" and "G". Furthermore because "c^2" equals –1 and +1 as it produces
particles with these natural charges, these are include among
equalities as well as sqrt2, for reasons already explained.
More to come
Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
“Point Particles”, “Probability waves”, “String Theory”…
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.particle/browse_frm/thread...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/f2c4f4c1...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/954839c3...
And in favor of
(The Geometrical Interpretation of E=mc^2 = E=mc^circled and/or
sphered)
It is easy to show that “h/2pi/2”, is the certain measure of electron
angular momentum, not measure of its uncertainty, as well as it
standing spherical wave shape, its spin “1/2”, its origin of “-1
charge”, and the origin of its rest mass which is because “c^2” is a
“UV” limit and cut off, frequency/wavelength, where energy attains
“Rest Mass”, because it takes on a circular and or spherical
rotation.
String Theory version of Quantum Gravity, can be saved if it is put
in
simplest form, which is just within our usual 4 D space-time in this
manner.
The longest possible Electromagnetic wave can indeed be considered
analogous to a string as the constant speed of light in straight line
with momentum of “h”. This would also be the Cosmological Constant
centrifugal force, and also = to being still as ground state energy
as
foundation upon which all wave and rest mass is built.
Electromagnetic waves = “E=hf/c^2”, would mark beginning of departure
from this constant speed in straight line and = acceleration gravity
and produce wavy strings or lines. This would also be analogous and
equal on quantum level to
“F=Mm/r^”2 as “E=F”’, as force and energy where seen as equivalent in
the old days, and can still be if defined correctly, and “h=M” as the
constant mass around which “f=m”, the secondary masses, oscillates
about analogous and equal to orbiting. This is than “/r^2” for
planets, satellites, and rocks attached to strings, which is equal to
“c^2” on quantum level, which can be geometrically demonstrated.
When “E=hf=mc^2” is attained, which is highest frequency, and where
energy attains rest mass, energy “strings”, moves in circular, and or
spherical motion, and “E=mc^2” = “F=mv^2”.
And “Loop Quantum Gravity theory” as well as “String Theory” can
still
claim that gravity rest mass comes about because of closed loops.
1) c in linear direction
2) x c in 90 degree angular direction
3) = 90 degree arc trajectory, which if constant, creates a
circle =
c^2 as energy in circular and or spherical rotation, as a result of a
balance of centrifugal / centripetal forces, and has angular momentum
of “h/2pi”, for circle, and “h/2pi/2”, for circle making two
rotations
to complete one wave cycle or “spin1/2” = “G” as highest possible “L/
T^2” or “v^2”and point on EM spectrum, where energy attains "Rest
Mass", and the "EM spectrum", is clearly revealed to be not only the
“electromagnetic”, but the “Energy/Matter”, spectrum.
This makes (c^2 = h/2pi/2 = G) on this quantum level, as attributes
of
the same particle, the "electron" uniting Special, General
Relativity,
and Quantum Theory around its geometry.
Again I ask;
how many points of similarity or coincidence must a fingerprint have
before it is considered a match? How many coincidences such as pieces
of a puzzle must fit together to form a picture? All.
Energy = mc^2, h/2pi/2, spin ½, -1charge, all empirically verified,
experimental, mathematical facts, measured points of coincidence,
that
fit logically seamlessly together, to form this picture, and cannot
statically be considered just coincidence in negative sense of word,
but a complete match.
Presenting my case to Discovery Blog:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2008/11/21/confirmed-scient....
Presenting my case to Sylvester James Gates:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=dsn5q6f_105cmq85bgt&hl=en
This along with the recent picture of electron shown on you tube,
seem
to support my geometrical description:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofp-OHIq6Wo
See: http://gsjournal.net/science/countess.pdf
Conrad J Countess
Some post from my first sci physics thread that was not rejected.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/b32e369a2befd376?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/477a4d82cdc3de61?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/35584a38f8585f55?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/40f46061eeda33da?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/46e453d95c593d5d?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/678c8d89883e57bc?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/8c37adf2b492ff5f?hl=en
THERE IS NO WAY AROUND IT.
Now it just come down to, which physicist is more interested in what
is objectively right, than who is right and gets credit for it.
And remember, the world is watching, and will ask; why did you not
acknowledge this and continue to waste so much time and money on
something that is in light of new evidence obviously not correct, when
we are in such a finantial and time limited situation concerning world
events?
Say No to Foolish Pride and acknowledge the truth of this discovery.
Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
1) The speed of light is not constant regardless of motion of
observed
and observer. This is demonstrated by the variability of frequency
(Doppler effect), which also has a corresponding varying relative
mass/
kinetic energy
2) Light is not mass-less, as its mass is (M=hf/c^2), as
demonstrated
by photo-electric effect, and increases to (M=hf=Ec^2), the
counterpart of deBroglies, (E=hf=mc^2), at level of electron/
positron,
which is rest mass which is just the result of relative mass/kinetic
energy, in circular and or spherical rotation.
3) The speed of light is not highest speed in the universe
because it
varies with frequency of which c^2 is the highest on the EM spectrum
making it not only the electromagnetic but the energy/matter
spectrum.
Furthermore; because rest mass exist along the same spectrum as
regular photons its drastic change of speed in linear direction
proves
dramatically that the speed of light is not constant.
In the least the speed of light varies between c and c^2.
Relating this to Galileo’s and Newton’s
1) An object in uniform reticular motion is equivalent to the same
object at rest
Newton’s extended laws
2) The force required to divert an object from this uniform reticular
motion or rest is equivalently F=ma=mv^2.
3) And for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction
can also be applied to light in this way
1) A photon moving at constant speed in straight line is
equivalent to
being at rest with a constant speed of “c” and constant energy of
“h”,
This can be considered the centrifugal force or the rest mass of a
photon
2) Any deviation from this constant speed in straight line is
equivalent to acceleration subject to formula F=ma=mv^2= hf/c^2 which
happens with waves, and E=hf=mc^2 which is rest mass from our
perspective as energy in circular and or spherical rotation. Thus
E=mc^2 = F=mv^2 = h/2pi for circle and h/2pi/2 for circle making two
rotations to complete one wave cycle such as standing spherical wave
(electron). Special Relativity, transitions smoothly into General
Relativity, and Quantum mechanics, as the Lorenz contraction,
“Doppler
effect”, of photons turn to space-time curvature off photons, and
waves turn to rest mass particles.
3) The speed of light in the linear direction is deflected into
the
angular direction by compressing against the light barrier which
creates waves from straight lines, generating acceleration, inertia,
and gravity mass, of photons of M=hf/c^2 and rest mass at M=hf=Ec^2
and rest energy, “same thing” at E=hf=mc^2. This is where space
pushes back on every particle of E=mc^2 with an equal and opposite or
right angular F=mv^2.
Through pattern recognition and analogy one can see that E=mc^2 =
F=mv^2 and E=hf/c^2 = F=Mm/r^2 if (F=E), (M=h), as the central sun
around which “f” which = “m” oscillates, analogous to orbiting and
c^2
= r^2 because the speed of light in circular rotation = cx2pi with
angular momentum of h/2pi thereby making c = r.
One can view this as a photon orbiting or vibrating on a string, at
the speed and radius of c, “highest speed/ smallest radius”. There is
no need for “G” as a constant since “h” is a constant.
One can also see that Schwartzchild radius (r=2G/c^2), which is said
to be simplest solution to Einstein’s General Relativity, = Newton’s
(F=Gmm/r^2), and r=Gm/r^2 for one particle. This is because if (r =
F)
and (2Gm) = (Gmm) and (c^2) = (r^2).
Therefore an electron is indeed a Black Hole in the sense that it is
composed of light trapped by its own gravity strength but not in the
sense that it is infinitely small and/or dense. And the Planck
scale
at which Quantum Gravity becomes evident is revealed to be (c^2 = G =
h/2pi..h/2pi/2) manifested in naturally occurring particle the
“Electron”, not (c = G = h/2pi), which leads to unnatural,
unrealistic
Planck Length 1.616 252(81) × 10−35 m , Time of 5.391 24(27) × 10−44
s, and mass of 2.176 44(11) × 10−8 kg. According to:
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units
This is “Quantum Gravity”, and the origin of ‘Rest Mass”, in a
Nutshel
I think that it was deBroglie, as well as a few others, Planck among
them, who said that it would take a new generation with fresh un-
indoctrinated minds to see and except new revolutionary ideas about
physics, and so I am not surprised that a child is seeing what to
many
of us un orthodoxed physicist is common sense. And I welcome it as it
can only support my findings if he sees it the same as I.
Photons are not mass-less.
Most physicists agree that photons have relative mass due to kinetic
energy, that gets higher with higher frequency and shorter
wavelength.
They also agree that mass-energy of these photons is M=hf/c^2 = E=hf/
c^2, that they higher the frequency, shorter the wavelength, the more
particle like the wave becomes according to Photo-electric effect,
and
that at E=hf=mc^2 of the EM spectrum, a standing spherical wave, the
electron, used in electron microscopes, and therefore its wave nature
empirically verified, appears.
If an electron is a wave rotating at “c”, with angular momentum of h/
2pi/2, and energy of E=hf=mc^2, has rest mass because of its
rotation,
rest mass is just relative mass kinetic energy in rotation and the EM
energy which it is made of has to have mass also.
Furthermore, if anything moving in straight line at constant speed,
is
considered equivalent to being still, as per Galilean and Newtonian
philosophy, the speed of light at constant speed of “c”, in straight
line, with constant mass-energy of “h”, can be considered the “rest
frame” of the universe, on quantum level, and therefore of the
photon,
as indeed the equation E=hf/c^2 is analogous and equivalent to
Newton’s F=Gmm/r^2, just as E=mc^2 is analogous and equivalent to
F=mv^2. “E = F”, as the energy, which can also be considered force,
“h
= M”, as the constant mass around which “f” and or “m”, orbit for
the
planets, and oscillate about, or vibrate along as with a string, for
the wave; and of course c^2 = r^2 as we saw earlier.
Besides, if everything is interrelated, including energy, matter,
motion, time, and space, through out all matter, motion, space, time
and energy, than “mass-energy”, is at the very foundation of the
universe, and weather you call it “Zero point field”, “Higgs field”,
“Ground state dark energy”, or Ether, does not matter. It’s all
interrelated, and in a quantified logical manner which makes common
sense.
Out with the pure mathematics based on dimensionless integers, of
which there is no such thing “all things have dimensions”, as these
dimensionless integers lead to false infinities resulting in Black
Holes of infinite mass, Big Bangs, which started from nothing, and
Uncertainty Principle which itself is wrong, Renormalization, and
Running coupling constants, as well as overly complicated and
misleading Dimensional analysis, which lead to unrealistic Planck
Unites.. And in with the Geometrical Interpretation of (E=mc^2 =
E=mc^circled and or sphered), which explains this is the simplest
manner that even a child can understand.
Maybe the established physicist did not want us to understand physics
for fear of something equivalent to the “Atom Bomb”, getting into the
wrong hands, or maybe they just hide the truth for selfish reasons
like maintaining a control over a knowledge by keeping it as
mysterious to the public as possible, knowing that people love a
mystery, and that if they were seen as the only group capable of
understanding such things, this would give them great power,
prestige,
and wealth, as indeed it has, or maybe they really did not know and
are blind to geometrical interpretations of physics really believing
that one cannot visualize these things because they believe they have
no geometry.
What ever the case, the cat is out of the bag, and the LHC project,
which cost
billions of dollars, although it keeps some physicist working, and
fosters cooperation between nations, can now move on to other
things, like solving the world economy problem, which too has some
blame to place on the so called dimensionless integers 'infinities",
and the health
of the planet, by working on non polluting sustainable energy
sources.
Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
Motion
1) The constant speed of light in straight line = being still =
inertia base upon which all wave and rest mass particles oscillate,
analogous and equal to orbiting, and also = centrifugal force=
Cosmological constant.
2) Any deviation from this constant speed of light in straight
line,
measured as “c=h” is = to acceleration, inertia mass and gravity
mass,
generating waves, as this constant speed straight line of energy is
displaced into angular direction, creating waves = E=hf/c^2,
increasing
in relative mass, kinetic energy, and momentum, as demonstrated by
Photo-
Electric Effect, and reaches E=hf=mc^2, at high end of EM spectrum,
where
energy attains rest mass, equal to F=ma =mv^2 = Gmm/r^2.
3) For every quantum of E=mc^2 generated by this compression
against
light barrier, an equal and opposite or right angular push back of
space = to F=mv^2 occurs as rest mass gravity.
Just as gravity exhibits the same “inverse square law” as, and in
direct proportion to, “electromagnetic energy”, it stands to
reason that gravity too, would exhibit waves and travel at speed of
light, or “c”. But no waves are detected, and the speed of its
influence seems to be instant.
Instead, apart from its curvature around matter, space seems to be an
immovable barrier that pushes back on matter with no apparent inner
structure, such as wave, and instead acts as if it is continuous.
Einstein is said to have demonstrated gravity’s curvature of space
and
the corresponding waves and light speed, by placing a heavy ball in
the
middle of a sheet or hammock, and letting a lighter ball roll around
it. After which if heavier ball is lifted, the center impressed by the
heavy
ball would be relieved first, and the wave of relief would ripple
outward at finite speed to also relieve the smaller ball from its
being trapped in the curve caused by the heavier ball.
But another point of view is available, of which the smaller ball is
instantly relieved of its capture in the curved space, as if it were
tethered to a rope, being spun by the larger ball, and suddenly
released, providing instant relief from capture of larger ball.
To simplify the visual, let’s imagine that we have a rope that is
stretched out without slack. If we were to pull the rope from one
end,
because it is one unit, the other end would also be pulled instantly,
at least from the point of view of us as observers unable to see any
finer detail of this cause and effect action. This pulling of the
rope
to cause the other end to move instantly, from our limited
perspective,
would be analogous to the seemingly instant pull and release of
gravity, while a whipping of the rope, making a wave travel down the
rope length, at an observable finite time, slower that the seemingly
instant pull, would be analogous to light traveling as a wave at its
finite speed.
Einstein seemed to describe gravity as emanating first, from the
larger
object, and then rippling out at light speed to capture the smaller
object, in his description of the balls on the sheets, and the ripple
originating from the larger ball. But he also described gravity as
the
curvature space, which would have had the influence of the big ball
curving the space within, which the little ball is captured, and in
direct contact with both balls at once, and not needing to ripple out
from the larger ball at the center, to the smaller ball.
This same type of instant effect may account for quantum entanglement
also, as waves traveling along strings, that can also be pulled as 1
unite, to move instantly, from our limited perspective, or maybe
there
is a more classical explanation that we are just missing
Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
I like this argument, which contains
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/e5387b75d5843d74?hl=en
which contains
This is for everyone truely interested in the discovery of Quantum
Gravity
Do not let anyone do your thinking or interpret the evidence for you.
Look at and interpret it for yourself, as it is straight forward and
simple.
Analogous to a line of one inch in horizontal direction x a line of I
inch in vertical direction to equal 1 square inch,
1) c in horizontal direction
2) x c in vertical direction
3) = c^2
But instead of creating a square shape, energy following trajectory
of
c^2 will follow a 90 degree arc trajectory which if constant creates
a
circle or c in circular motion = c x 2 pi with angular momentum of
h /
2pi and if amplitude is constant, which there are reasons to believe,
the energy will make two rotations at 90 degree angles to complete
one
wave cycle, creating a standing spherical wave of spin ½, with
angular
momentum of h /2pi/2. If the spin of trajectory is counter to its
trajectory it
will have –1 charge.
Now following that simple line of analogy, logic, mathematics, and
geometry, what did we draw? A standing spherical wave making two
rotations to complete one wave cycle spin ½ with angular momentum of
h/
2pi/2 and - 1 charge.
These are the dimensions of an electron, not to mention that this
geometry agrees exactly with Einstein’s (E=mc^2), that energy and
matter are interrelated, and convertible through conversion factor
c^2, as we see geometrically that “c^2”, is point where energy turns
to matter by taking on a circular and or spherical rotation.
Is this a Cosmic Coincidence? There are just too many points of
already established evidence that connect through a line of unbroken
logic to draw a perfect geometrical picture that exactly matches that
of electron.
This cannot be just coincidence in usual sense of the word, it would
be statistically very improbable for all this evidence to logically
connect so seamlessly, to draw such a clear picture, that matches the
evidence if it did not fit naturally because they are all apart of
the
same thing. It would be like finding a bunch of scattered pieces of
material, noticing that they fit seamlessly together to form a
intricate picture, and not realizing that you have indeed found a
puzzle set that fits because it is meant to fit.
Circular motion has long been considered as a balance of two 90
degree
angular forces, a centripetal (center seeking), and a centrifugal
(center fleeing) force, called velocity squared, and appears in
equations, (F=mv^2/r), (F=mv/r^2), (a=v^2/r) and (F=mv^2=Gmm/r^2).
This reveals that the same force that traps things in gravity
circular
motion, compresses energy into matter at c^2 and that (E=mc^2) =
(F=mv^2), on quantum level.
And thus special relativity equation (E=mc^2), gravity equation
(F=mv^2=Gmm/r^2), and Quantum Mechanics equation, (h/2pi/2) are
unified.
(E=mc^2 = E=mc^circled and or sphered) and (c=sqrt-1)
Quantum gravity was right under our noses all the time, all it took
was to view the most famous equation in the world, Einstein’s
(E=mc^2), geometrically.
The natural unite square root of –1 is “c”, because “c^2” creates the
natural unite –1 charge particle, or electron.
Coincidentally, this also agrees with electrical engineers
description
of sqrt-1 as 90 degree angular vector pointing straight up in
vertical
direction creating 90 degree angular counterclockwise rotation.
This overlaps seamlessly with my version, except that I make the 90
degree angular rotation constant, to complete a 360 degree circle,
and
than make amplitude constant, to make two rotations to complete one
wave cycle, which creates standing spherical wave of (spin1/2), (–1
charge), and angular momentum of (h/2pi/2).
This is empirically verified dimensions of electron, the natural
unite
–1 charge, enabling us to bring (sqrt-1), out of realm of imaginary
numbers, into realm of real natural unites, and eliminating (h/2pii/
2)
as measure of uncertainty in (The Uncertainty Principle), and
replacing it with certainty, as indeed it is certain measure of
electron, as a geometrical dimensional particle, as opposed to a
point
particle probability wave, that must be statistically measured every
time, as it would be statistically very improbable, the way all this
evidence fits together, that it is not correct.
Conrad J Countess
Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
“All "Rest Mass" Comes From the "Relative Mass/Kinetic Energy" in
Circular and or Spherical Motion.
Starting with Energy being Compressed against the Light Barrier into
waves at “E=hf/c^2”, and “Rest Mass”, which is “Circular and or
Spherical Motion” measuring “E=hf=mc^2” and “E=mc^2”.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUfXJ1Qszgk&feature=related
See: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dsn5q6f_107jx6qsgdg
Also see:
http://gsjournal.net/science/countess.pdf
Conrad J Countess
f
cjcountess
I am an independent researcher.
My approach has been based on the very basics of research, the
objective evidence itself, free of all prejudices, including ones
title, degree, and any pre conceived postulates.
I am quite aware that titles, degrees, and preconceived postulates are
valuable
if they have proved themselves before, but not always. And many a
deception has been made because of this, the recent financial crises
being the latest and greatest examples of this.
Instead, what I ask is that you consider the bare naked evidence
itself, letting
it speak for itself, and I am sure that you will find that in this
case,
this is the best policy, for otherwise a great discovery would be
overlooked
In other words, let the evidence speak for itself, and therefore
act as it’s own credentials.
One very important lesson therein is that all great discoveries don’t
come from
people with said titles, degrees, and or ideas based on preconceived
postulates. And that some discoveries come from outside of the box
thinking, and lots of ideas can be missed if this is not considered.
Although this may indeed be rare and statistically very improbable,
maybe even as rear as diamonds, on occasion it is fruitful, and even
just as valuable as indeed those very diamonds.
I think that this is one of those occasions.
How to frame and present such an exception to the rule has challenged
me, and I have come to the conclusion that this too should speak for
itself, free of framing “outside of the box or frame “ also.
It is so simple and straightforward, as are many finds that are
valuable and right under our noses, ones that were missed more because
of its simplicity and obviousness than because of its complication and
difficulty.
What I have discovered is a geometrical interpretation of the most
famous equation in the world E=mc^2, one that gives this equation
physical form, and shows not only like the equation itself, that
energy and matter are equal inter-convertible through conversion
factor c^2, but actually shows how, geometrically. Thus the geometry
contains much more information than the equation alone.
The implications are far reaching for unification physics and I can
show that it solves the “Quantum Gravity”, “Origin of Rest Mass”,
“Mass Gap” problems.
The evidence will show that ‘c^2”, is actually a conversion frequency
where energy turns to matter “rest mass”, because it takes on a
circular and or spherical rotation.
Analogous to a line of 1 inch in the horizontal direction x 1 inch in
the vertical direction
1) c in the horizontal direction
2) x c in the vertical direction
3) = c^2 as a balance of centripetal/centrifugal forces
This fits very well with deBroglie’s “E=hf=mc^2” indicating a smooth
transition from photons to electrons, along the same EM spectrum,
which can also be called the energy / matter spectrum, as electrons
were also discovered to be waves. This together with the recent
discovery that protons get most of their “rest mass” from internal
rotating energy collaborates this as well.
This unique perspective has shown that “c^2” is not only the
conversion factor between energy and matter, but possibly all the
other most basic unites of measure, such as length, time, temp,
charge, and so on.
This eliminates lots of laborious renormalization, running coupling
constants problems, and uncertainty, as it resolves “Uncertainty
Principle”, brings “sqrt-1” out of realm of imaginary numbers into
realm of real natural units, and much more.
It is a truly revolutionary discovery, with multiple spin offs.
More Detail
1) c in the linear direction
2) x c in the 90 degree angular direction
3) = c^2, which creates a 90 degree angular arc trajectory, which if
constant, creates a circle of energy, cx2pi, with angular momentum of
h/2pi, and if amplitude is constant, will make 2 rotations at right
angles (1 for magnetic moment), to complete 1 wave cycle, as a spin ½
particle with angular momentum of h/2pi/2. And if spin is counter to
trajectory, will have –1 charge.
Energy of mc^2, angular momentum of h/2pi/2, spin of ½, charge of –1
all experimentally verified attributes of electron emerge naturally
from this model. It is highly statistically improbable that it is just
coincidence especially in light of the new evidence damping the
Uncertainty Principles.
The certain measure and momentum of electron is h/2pi/2, not just its
average due to uncertainty and this also equals c^2 as the highest v^2
or L/T^2 = to “G”, revealing that this is the UV cut off frequency
where energy attains gravity rest mass, thereby uniting SR GR and QM.
Furthermore, this geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2, being also a
geometrical interpretation of the “inverse square law” concerning
energy / matter conversion, shows that this law has a limit of ‘c^2”,
interpreted as c in circular and or spherical rotation, which equals
“r=Gm/c^2” = “h/2pi/2” = “wavelength/2pi”, equating the Schwartzchild
radius, the reduced Compton wavelength, and uncertainty limit, as
opposed to infinity small radius and large mass and location thereby
effecting theories such as Big Bang and Black Holes, point particles
and probability waves.
An “Electron” can be considered a “Black Hole”, in the sense that it
is light trapped in gravity rotation, but not in the sense that it is
infinitely dense and small point particle. This can be represented by
r=Gm/c^2 = h/2pi/2 = F=mv^2/r = E=mc^2/c = wavelength/2pi, and
squeezing it beyond this will generate particle creation, as expansion
follows the smallest length of contraction defined by Quantum Theory,
not a continual collapse as defined by General Relativity’s, Black
Hole interpretation.
And the back-story itself is inspirational, and may go a long way in
inspiring the next generation of would be physicist, and scientist in
general.
Conrad J Countess
cjcountess
Using the natural units c^2 = h/2pi/2 for states of contraction, and c
= h = Cosmological Constant for states of expansion
1) Space within which to move
2) Something to mark position and or provide resistance to
motion
3) Something that moves
As two poles and a field, as the very simplest state of motion, than
these components will have the very real quantum measurements of
1) c = h = Cosmological constant as a measure of space energy on
quantum level
2) c^2 = h/2pi/2 for something "particle" to mark position and or
provide
resistance
3) and c^2 = h/2pi/2 for something "particle', that moves in
relation to that
other thing
Or even perhaps a smaller motion set of E=hf/c^2 as
1) “h” as the constant mass/energy around which
2) “f” oscillates about analogous and equal to orbiting or
vibrating
along
3) /c^2 =r^2 as c in circular and or spherical rotation around
the
smallest radius. This is analogous to a system F=Gmm/r^2
The dimensionless interger and the infinities it provolks are
responsible for allot of the falacies such as "Big Bangs", "Black
Holes" and "Infinitely small and dense point particles", and
"probability waves', with the mysterious "Uncertainty Principle"
haunting physics, that geometrically can be replaced with the
certainty of "h/2pi/2" as particles measurement, limit on Black Hole
and Big Bang.
According to Quantum mechanics, this is also Compton wavelength where
squeezing particle beyond this creates more particles thereby inducing
expansion of particles from contraction of particles, but according to
misinterpretation of General Relativity the version which Einstein did
not like it creates Black Hole and exponential continual contraction.
Einstein did not like this interpretation of “General Relativity’ nor
did he like ‘Quantum Mechanics” idea of “Uncertainty Principle” and
“infinitely small point particles and probability waves’, but he did
like the idea that contraction of particle lead to an expansion.
As a matter of fact, the Schwartzchild radius, “r=2Gm/c^2”, which is
supposed to greatly simplify “General Relativity”, exactly equals
Newton’s “F=Gmm/r^2” geometrically, and the simplified version
pertaining to one particle “r=GM/c^2”, geometrically equals the
dimensions of an “Electron” which is in line with fact that an
Electron is a Black Hole in the sense that it is light trapped in its
own gravity rotation but not in the sense that it is an infinitely
small and dense point particle, which is unreasonable geometrically
anyway.
The Uncertainty Principle holds on tight because people love a
mystery, but they also love solving them.
And this one has been solved.
http://wbabin.net/science/countess.pdf
Conrad J Countess