The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
dan@@pixelphase.com
Under normal circumstances I would have rejected this post as being off
topic (i.e. no mention of plasma physics per se) at a minimum. -JimL ]
Hello,
I would like to share with new discoveries regarding fundamental
understanding in physics and astronomy. The article below contradicts
the usual explanation for the sun energy source as a fusion reactor
and suggests that the sun is heated by magnetic fields from the
Galactic center.
The article could be downloaded at:
http://www.pixelphase.com/sun/sun.pdf
http://www.tikunim.co.il/sun/sun.pdf
http://www.philica.com/display_article.php?article_id=65
Its title is:
The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from
the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass
to energy.
Abstract:
The sun energy source thought to be a nuclear fusion reactor inside
the sun core. The sun is not heated by fusion reaction but by magnetic
fields coming from the galactic center. The nuclear fusion is a by
product of the magnetic fields heating. The changing magnetic fields
from the galactic center induce electric currents inside the sun that
heat the sun. The heat and the high kinetic energy of particles in the
sun core, trigger high energy collisions that create the main
constituents of matter, electron, proton and neutron. The collisions
also fuse or nucleosynthesis heavier elements like deuterium, tritium,
helium and lithium. This leads to the fact that the stars and galaxies
constantly produce mass and energy. The article will explain the
clockworks behinds the galaxies energy production. The galaxy energy
and mass production cancel out the Big Bang theory and leads to a
steady state cosmological model with large amount of new mass created
that expand and accelerate the universe.
Cordially yours,
Dan Bar-Zohar
MTwain
Blessings Dan!
Truly, Sun does NOT act out the nonsensical
'nuclear fusion' physics of the institution of propaganda
physics. The mechanism is filamentary plasma fusion,
and the source of 'electromagnetodynamic' 'fuel' is the
galaxy.
Looking forward to reviewing your articles.
Here is an 'Electric Cosmos' physics reference
just posted to Greenglow ...
http://thunderbolts.info/resources.htm
And these are the chapters of my whole plasma
and aether physics:
http://www.groupkos.com/mtwain/TheElectron.pdf
http://www.groupkos.com/mtwain/TheProtron.pdf
http://www.groupkos.com/mtwain/Proof.pdf
http://www.groupkos.com/mtwain/FTLpart1.pdf
http://www.groupkos.com/mtwain/FTLpart2.pdf
http://www.groupkos.com/mtwain/NuScarlet-pt1.pdf
http://www.groupkos.com/mtwain/NuScarlet-pt2.pdf
http://www.groupkos.com/mtwain/NucleonSong.pdf
Including descriptions of and references to the vision
of Piddington and a few dozen of the other true physics
pioneers of the the last century-plus ...
For our world come together,
Millennium Twain
cc: NuclearStructure
~~~~~
~~~~~~~
Ace0f_5pades
Hi Millennium Twain.
On a very deep level, I would agree that all things could be
interpreted in terms of an Electric Universe. And I see that you have
some gone to effort into defining protons, electrons, neutrons, and
determining the amplitude of shell fields for electrons, linear spins,
and angular spins etc.
I was wondering if you have managed to delve further into the
constructions of protons and electrons etc in their make up of
elements? what limits have been applied to allow for the variations in
the periodic table? Is there any free information, or algorithms that
have managed to take your work that little bit further?
Thomas Smid
I would agree that there is no (or little) nuclear fusion in the sun
but much more likely in 'super stars' in the center of galaxies (where
the pressure and temperature is much more favorable), but the energy
output (as well as the hot corona) of the sun can simply be explained
in terms of its gravitational energy and electronic processes in the
photosphere (it is not at all so that this would have lasted just a
few million years as energy conservation is a concept of classical
mechanics and does not apply to light).
See my webpage regarding the coronal heating
http://www.plasmaphysics.org.uk/research/sun.htm
and my discussion page http://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/discussions/
sun.htm for more in this respect.
Thomas