Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The inevitability of an influenza pandemic.

30 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Aug 29, 2007, 7:32:22 PM8/29/07
to
convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/994cba67177e27
> >> > 67?
> >> >
> >> > You have a short memory
> >>
> >> You wish I did.
> >
> > Everyone knows you do:
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/00104d22eac70d25?
> >
> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS continuing
> > to compel you to unwittingly serve as HIS proof :-)
>
> That's just proof of your dishonesty

It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

Meanwhile, the threat of an H5N1 Pan-Flu looms larger...

http://tinyurl.com/23ekat

and larger...

http://tinyurl.com/22x6lf

Earlier SMC discussion for review:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/c3a0d6ec71b30b10?

"An influenza pandemic is inevitable." -- Director of US. Centers for
Disease Control

It would be my wish that you survive the Pan-Flu when it happens by
learning what the Holy Spirit has taught me concerning HIS way for us
to survive it when it strikes:

http://TheHealthFair.com

This health fair is completely free thanks to the generous support of
The Wellness Foundation.

Alternatively, you can borrow from dear neighbor Don Kirkman the DVD
recording of the presentation that I have been giving at these health
fairs to prepare our local Atlanta community.

The good folks at the Wellness Foundation have been sending out these
DVDs as free gifts to those who have given charitable donations of US
$30 or more:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/Donations

Note that US$30 is the usual nominal cost of online access to a
journal article and is going toward helping defray the material,
handling, and shipping costs associated with the DVD.

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you healthier (hungrier)
than ever:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Aug 30, 2007, 5:20:47 AM8/30/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <hear...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1188430342.7...@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com to
alt.support.anxiety-panic:

> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/994cba67177

>> >> > e27 67?


>> >> >
>> >> > You have a short memory
>> >>
>> >> You wish I did.
>> >
>> > Everyone knows you do:
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/00104d22eac70d
>> > 25?
>> >
>> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS
>> > continuing to compel you to unwittingly serve as HIS proof :-)
>>
>> That's just proof of your dishonesty
>
> It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
>

Unsupported assertion. And you deleted all of my arguments, which means
you cannot but agree with them, and don't have the guts to admit it.

--
David Silverman C.B.E.
aa #2208

"Fuck! I used up my last non-sequitur" - Andrew B Chung

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Aug 30, 2007, 5:29:40 AM8/30/07
to
convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d41ec8780271527c?

> >
> > It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
> >
>
> Unsupported assertion.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b53ddd59310ad496?

Hollywood

unread,
Aug 30, 2007, 8:09:41 AM8/30/07
to
On Aug 29, 7:32 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<heartd...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:

> Meanwhile, the threat of an H5N1 Pan-Flu looms larger...

I'm not gonna feed the troll, but, as a government employee, I have to
chime in.
Just because a political appointee or a civil servant says something
doesn't make it
true. As is the case with Pan-Flu. There are agendas at work behind
the Panic-Flu
fear mongering. But then again, there always is.

Now be good or you'll spend eternity with all of your convicted
neighbors. Unless you
plan to roam the southeast united states forever.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Aug 30, 2007, 10:19:45 AM8/30/07
to
satan, via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon), hissed:

> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d41ec8780271527c?

>
> > Meanwhile, the threat of an H5N1 Pan-Flu looms larger...
>
> I'm not gonna feed the troll, but, as a government employee, I have to
> chime in. Just because a political appointee or a civil servant says something
> doesn't make it true.

It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

Moreover, I am neither a political appointee nor a civil servant.

Bottom line:

You remain untruthful, satan

In Jesus' name, I rebuke you yet again, satan.

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

Bondservant to the KING of kings and LORD of lords.

Flying Rat

unread,
Aug 30, 2007, 12:03:23 PM8/30/07
to
In article <1188483585.1...@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>,
hear...@emorycardiology.com says...

>
> It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

Andrew Chung:

Is a frequent and proven liar (evidence archived forever on Google)

Has lost numerous NNTP accounts with supernews and others, has had many
Google accounts nuked, and his vanity domain heartmdphd.com is now
banned from setting up accounts. He is instead using multiple Google
sock accounts and email addresses in the format love#@thetruth.com (#
being a number)

Is unemployed after being sacked with cause from his one and only job
after just over 80 days

Fled the state of Florida, and now claims to practice in Georgia despite
having no admission priveliges in the State's hospitals

Runs a phony foundation with a total declared income of circa $200, the
ownership and contact details of which are obfuscated on its website

Makes failed prophecies concerning earthquakes with areas and dates,
which don't happen (remember the bible quotes about false prophets)

Performed a public attempt at 'exorcising' a Malaysian sock on usenet,
then denied doing it. He has recently reversed position again and admits
to practicing exorcism by usenet, proving himself a liar in the process.

Promotes a dangerous diet, with a million dollar guarantee that he
demands thirty dollars to access details of. This despite being
unemployed. His soliciting and spamming for donations looks to be
similar to the Nigerian Advance Fee Fraud, where victims pay money
upfront in the hope of coming into riches but find they have merely
bought into a lie. Part of his advice is to pour nail polish remover onto food.

Declares he has a cardiology practice despite posting night and day from
the same IP address (his home presumably) or a coffee shop internet cafe

Makes further false prophecies that we should now be all dying in a bird
flu pandemic. When these fail to happen, he does them all over again and
changes the dates. Nuclear war is another Chung spciality, which
naturally doesn't happen when he says it is going to.

Worships evil hatemonger Fred Phelps and will not denounce the acts of
Westboro's congregation. He even accuses someone with the name Phelps of
being Fred's son and refuses to accept he is completely wrong.

Uses the same patter as Pat Robertson, indicating his religious activity
is confined to watching cable TV. No evidence Chung has ever attended a
church.

Has a tendency to cyberstalk, particularly women. His wife fled some
time ago to another state, an act which Chung tries to pass off as "being
on vacation".

Frequently passes himself off as being qualified in areas such as
endocrinology, despite making incredibly fundamental blunders in his
'advice'. It is no wonder the Florida heart facility terminated him, and
has publicly denounced his version of events. Again archived on Google.

Don't forget the fake fast, where he didn't lose any weight, as well as
the infamous 666 stamping fiasco. His latest vile trick is spamming the
blogs of dying cancer patients and then crowing triumphantly when they
pass away.

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Aug 31, 2007, 5:39:17 AM8/31/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heart...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1188466180.3...@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com to
alt.support.anxiety-panic:

> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d41ec878027152
>> > 7c?
>> >
>> > It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
>> >
>>
>> Unsupported assertion.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b53ddd59310ad496?
>

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/44caf91cb2c2b4df

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Aug 31, 2007, 7:13:47 AM8/31/07
to
convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d41ec8780271527c?
> >> >
> >> > It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
> >>
> >> Unsupported assertion.
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b53ddd59310ad496?
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/44caf91cb2c2b4df?

Without the LORD, your opinions, fantasies, and writings are all
meaningless (Ecclesiastes)

This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
you:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

Hollywood

unread,
Aug 31, 2007, 9:41:36 AM8/31/07
to
On Aug 30, 10:19 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

<heartd...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> satan, via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon), hissed:
>
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d41ec8780271527c?
>
> > > Meanwhile, the threat of an H5N1 Pan-Flu looms larger...
>
> > I'm not gonna feed the troll, but, as a government employee, I have to
> > chime in. Just because a political appointee or a civil servant says something
> > doesn't make it true.
>
> It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

As you understand the truth. Which may be a facet of the truth. Or it
may bear little
resemblance to any truth containing substance.

> Moreover, I am neither a political appointee nor a civil servant.

Doesn't mean you don't have an agenda. You are the one citing the
director of the CDC.
The CDC is part of your Federal Government, just like me. It's headed
by a political
appointee. You are pushing his agenda, which is an agenda with things
besides
preparedness for the flu going forward. Read something that was penned
recently and
you might be up on this.

> Bottom line:
>
> You remain untruthful, satan

The Allman Brothers Band once asked, "Are you really Satan, yes or
no?" They were
pretty good when I saw them in concert. When they asked, I said no.
But the problem with
asking the reputed Prince of Lies a question like "Are you a liar?" is
that there's no way you
can believe the answer. I think that's your problem Andy. You've been
such a piece of crap
for so long that if anyone asks you about honest, even if you said you
were lying, no one
would believe you.

> In Jesus' name, I rebuke you yet again, satan.

In the name of His Holy Noodleness, the Flying Spaghetti Monster, I
mildly repudiate you.

PS- Satan is the proper name for a (possibly fictional) divine being.
He is accorded
capitalization, even when He is referred to in pronoun. Equal billing
with your Jesus.
Or should I call him jesus?

> Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
>
> Andrew <><
> --
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

> Manservant to the KING of kings (Which Maloof brother is that?)
> Cabana Boy to the LORD of lords (That would be Prince Charles I guess, as the head of the House of Lords)


Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Aug 31, 2007, 3:20:01 PM8/31/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1188558827.3...@l22g2000prc.googlegroups.com to
alt.support.anxiety-panic:

<snip>

Simple straightforward question:

Rod, your rottweiler, claims you are resident at a hospital in Atlanta.
Which one? How long have you been working there, and in what capacity?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Aug 31, 2007, 6:09:09 PM8/31/07
to
convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8f42be712afb63f2?

>
> Simple straightforward question:
>
> Rod, your rottweiler

Name-calling simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to
convict you:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

> , claims you are resident at a hospital in Atlanta.


> Which one? How long have you been working there, and in what capacity?

Attempt at social engineering noted:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/7b231363fab847e3?

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Aug 31, 2007, 8:20:54 PM8/31/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heart...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1188598149....@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com to
alt.support.anxiety-panic:

> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8f42be712afb63
>> > f2?
>>
>> Simple straightforward question:
>>
>> Rod, your rottweiler
>
> Name-calling simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to
> convict you:
>
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>
>> , claims you are resident at a hospital in Atlanta.
>> Which one? How long have you been working there, and in what
>> capacity?
>
> Attempt at social engineering noted:
>

WTF are you talking about? Just answer the question. Why does it have you
stumped? You do know where you work, don't you? You don't think you'd get
away with accusing the prosecution in a court of law of "attempted social
engineering" do you?

It's a straighforward enough question, and if you don't answer it, the
readers of this thread can only assume that you find the question, and
the truth it is aimed at revealing, embarrassing. I note that Rod has not
been able to answer it either. Such a pity, as it was your opportunity to
prove conclusively that you actually are a cardiologist.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Aug 31, 2007, 8:38:58 PM8/31/07
to
convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8f42be712afb63
> >> > f2?
> >>
> >> Simple straightforward question:
> >>
> >> Rod, your rottweiler
> >
> > Name-calling simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to
> > convict you:
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> >
> >> , claims you are resident at a hospital in Atlanta.
> >> Which one? How long have you been working there, and in what
> >> capacity?
> >
> > Attempt at social engineering noted:
> >
>
> WTF are you talking about? Just answer the question. Why does it have you
> stumped? You do know where you work, don't you? You don't think you'd get
> away with accusing the prosecution in a court of law of "attempted social
> engineering" do you?
>
> It's a straighforward enough question, and if you don't answer it, the
> readers of this thread can only assume that you find the question, and
> the truth it is aimed at revealing, embarrassing. I note that Rod has not
> been able to answer it either. Such a pity, as it was your opportunity to
> prove conclusively that you actually are a cardiologist.

Such is the utility of having GOD's peace, which transcends all
worldly understanding.

We, who are HIS brethren, remain secure in the truth, Who is LORD
Jesus Christ.

You and other atheists, will remain insecure ever pining for proof but
never receiving any. Knowing this fact saddens me.

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Aug 31, 2007, 8:42:28 PM8/31/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1188607138....@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com to
sci.med.cardiology:

> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8f42be712af

>> >> > b63 f2?


>> >>
>> >> Simple straightforward question:
>> >>
>> >> Rod, your rottweiler
>> >
>> > Name-calling simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right
>> > to convict you:
>> >
>> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>> >
>> >> , claims you are resident at a hospital in Atlanta.
>> >> Which one? How long have you been working there, and in what
>> >> capacity?
>> >
>> > Attempt at social engineering noted:
>> >
>>
>> WTF are you talking about? Just answer the question. Why does it have
>> you stumped? You do know where you work, don't you? You don't think
>> you'd get away with accusing the prosecution in a court of law of
>> "attempted social engineering" do you?
>>
>> It's a straighforward enough question, and if you don't answer it,
>> the readers of this thread can only assume that you find the
>> question, and the truth it is aimed at revealing, embarrassing. I
>> note that Rod has not been able to answer it either. Such a pity, as
>> it was your opportunity to prove conclusively that you actually are a
>> cardiologist.
>
> Such is the utility of having GOD's peace, which transcends all
> worldly understanding.
>

Attempt at running away and hiding noted.

--
David Silverman C.B.E.
aa #2208

"Fuck! I used up my last non-sequitur" - Andrew B Chung

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Aug 31, 2007, 8:52:55 PM8/31/07
to
> > We, who are HIS brethren, remain secure in the truth, Who is
> > LORD Jesus Christ.
> >
> > You and other atheists, will remain insecure ever pining for proof
> > but never receiving any. Knowing this fact saddens me.
>
> Attempt at running away and hiding noted.

Without the LORD, your fantasies are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you healthier (hungrier)
than ever:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

~tanya

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 2:44:50 AM9/1/07
to
On Aug 29, 6:32?pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

> It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

YOUR choice? it used ta be the holy spirit's choice.

GUESS OLE BOY TOOK'AH BACK SEAT... hahHAHHAhahhaa

(LEMME GUESS: your choice IS the holy spirit's choice.)

....answer for everything, i fergot.

~t

now WHERE are you practicing medicine? i missed that one. please
fill me in on tha good news and congratulations on your new position !


~tanya

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 2:48:26 AM9/1/07
to
On Aug 30, 4:20?am, "Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org>
wrote:

> "Fuck! I used up my last non-sequitur" - Andrew B Chung-

you are OFFICIALLY ON NOTICE,SANITY'S !

ONE more use of the word "fuck" without a damned good reason, i.e.
"let's fuck, tanya"... you will be removed from this forum and placed
firmly in my 4-poster bed and i got rope.

there.

that'll learn ya.

hmmph.

~tanya

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 3:12:45 AM9/1/07
to
convicted friend ~tanya wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d41ec8780271527c?

>
> > It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
>
> YOUR choice?

Yes.

> it used ta be the holy spirit's choice.

No.

> GUESS OLE BOY TOOK'AH BACK SEAT... hahHAHHAhahhaa
>
> (LEMME GUESS: your choice IS the holy spirit's choice.)

It remains GOD's choice that all souls retain HIS generous gift of
free will.

> ....answer for everything, i fergot.

GOD is the Source of all knowledge and wisdom.

> ~t
>
> now WHERE are you practicing medicine?

In Georgia.

> i missed that one.

You've missed it since 1995.

> please
> fill me in on tha good news and congratulations on your new position !

May GOD help you with your memory.

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

~tanya

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 3:30:41 AM9/1/07
to
On Aug 31, 6:13?am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

<and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d41ec8780271527c?
>
> > >> > It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
>
> > >> Unsupported assertion.
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b53ddd59310ad496?
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/44caf91cb2c2b4df?
>
> Without the LORD, your opinions, fantasies, and writings are all
> meaningless (Ecclesiastes)
>
> This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
> you:
>
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>
> Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

you can bet yer ass yer hungry if yer drivin'ah neon.

(at least i, personally, can't think of another reason ta do so,
unless unemployeed, or in personal dire straits, in which case i
apologize to all that find themselves in that position.)

BUT THIS BOY'S'AH CARDIOLOGIST !!!!!

me? i've lived on tha streets many time and i'd panhandle for'ah 2
legged tricycle and eat pop rocks before i'd made excuses for
drivin'ah Neon, but that's just me.

> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Cardiologist

yer a fuckwad.. tha holy spirit told me so.

::sittin' here tappin' muh foot, holy spirit'n me, (HS playin' back-
up,) with'ah whimsical twinkle in muh brown/black eyes jammin' out sum
elvis tunes with pop rocks::

".....now g'on witcha badselff, DUBBUL, SCHWANNNNNG DAT KAZOOOOOOO !"

....::rockin' on out.... manamana beep di bi di hi bi di bi di bi dee
dee dee deeeeeeeeeeee::

(I LOVE garage bands, lava lamps and neon posers.)

OOP, i mean "posters."

FREUDEAN SLIP!!!!


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 3:49:25 AM9/1/07
to
convicted friend ~tanya wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> > > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> > > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d41ec8780271527c?
> >
> > > >> > It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
> >
> > > >> Unsupported assertion.
> >
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/b53ddd59310ad496?
> >
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/44caf91cb2c2b4df?
> >
> > Without the LORD, your opinions, fantasies, and writings are all
> > meaningless (Ecclesiastes)
> >
> > This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
> > you:
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> >
> > Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
> >
> > http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

>
> you can bet yer ass yer hungry if yer drivin'ah neon.

Typically I walk to be hungrier (healthier) :-)

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you healthier (hungrier)
than ever:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/PressRelease

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--

~tanya

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 5:04:44 AM9/1/07
to
On Sep 1, 2:12 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

>
> > > It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

to which tanya, tha great dumbass replied:

> > YOUR choice?

then our Andaroooo:

> Yes.

tanya:

> > it used ta be the holy spirit's choice.

Andarooo::

> No.

tanya:

"NO?" it was, once upon'ah time, that everything was tha will of tha
holy spirit or god or whoever was convenient.

yanno? that more ya contradict yerself, tha shorter yer responses
get. contradict yerself more, k?

> > GUESS OLE BOY TOOK'AH BACK SEAT... hahHAHHAhahhaa
>
> > (LEMME GUESS: your choice IS the holy spirit's choice.)

Andodamando:

> It remains GOD's choice that all souls retain HIS generous gift of
> free will.

tanya:

if'n we all got free will, why's yers tha "right" one? we all got our
own truth, you don't own tha truth, and you can't HANDLE THA TRUTH !
(didn't sumbody say that in'ah movie?)

> > ....answer for everything, i fergot.

Andaroonie:

> GOD is the Source of all knowledge and wisdom.

tanya:

then why don't you shut tha fuck up and let ole Big G getta word're
two in... ya ain't his spokesperson, last i heard.

> > now WHERE are you practicing medicine?

Andewwwwwwwwwwraluralura:

> In Georgia.

tanya:

ahhhhh, but i understand you're employed at a hospital now.
i missed that one.

Andrewonwalls:

> You've missed it since 1995.

tanya:

that'd be 74, and i don't miss it a bit. virginity ain't all it's
cracked up ta be, albeit the will'ah tha holy spirit... OH GOD !

> > please
> > fill me in on tha good news and congratulations on your new position !


Andagindrronie:

> May GOD help you with your memory.

tanya:

may god help you with yours, as yer Neon's towed ta never never land
when ya pull inta the "RESERVED FOR PHYSICIAN" parkin' lot.

you don't work at no hospital.

[[[[ i just received a personal e-mail from you, Andrew: "My
affiliation with Atlanta area hospitals remain the same.

Would enjoy having lunch with you after the health fair on
9/22/07: ]]]]

the Atlanta area hospitals may well be the same, Andrew. "the same"
would be that they have or desire NO affiliation with you.

p.s. the health fair on 9/22/07 is NOT a hospital.

WHAT hospitals are you affiliated with that welcomes your credibility?

the 'health fair' is non too difficult to investigate and would be
presumably motivated to become involved, based on responses from
Emory. This is an organization i'm not familiar with and intend to
become familiar with.

i've had many conversations with the Emory staff and not only are you
not employed there, you are a thorn in their side, consider you a
whacko, and i have the emails to prove it, phone calls aplenty were
not recorded. actually, LESS than asked from me, i have provided.
noticeably, your Emory crap disappeared for awhile, and i'm about ta
jump back on that bandwagon, but this time with a vengeance, should ya
choose ta tamper with their good name.

you, yourself, said ya had a clinic that "treated" cardiology
patients, and nobody answers that phone and yer voice is on the
answering machine, and i hardly call that a hospital.

ONE MORE turn of events involving Emory, know i'm not as shy as i used
to be. (awwww.) as a matter of fact, COUNT ON IT !

you might consider a peace that passeth understanding is not in
everyone's heart.

while my memory is making it's way back to present tense, please know
my e-mail box can and will be full, and cooperation with be fair,
just, documented, and sound.

my agenda, Andrew, is not to hurt you, embarrass you, enlighten you,
nor is it my job to bring you face to face with reality.

what is IS my responsibility to do is to see that you are stopped dead
in your tracks that are irresponsibily taking away venues for folks in
need in these forums. it will be my personal responsibility as a
patient, human, humane member of this planet that you will not
discount, via a position held in esteem, (though fraudulent) an
establishment/establishments that has/have missions of goodness and
abide by professional practices not only dictated by a personal oath,
but by a professional one, as well.

i actaully thought you would have the good sense to respect the
medical establishment through a very lowly effort to remove you and
your distainful banter from this and other cross-posted forums would
be sufficient.

i now see that i was incorrect and loftier goals, along with more
indulgent practices, as well as soliciting more detailed involvements
from others are necessary to curb your sociopathic agenda.

involving myself and others with higher-ranking officials is also time-
comsuming, and i will dedicate the time, means, and medium necessary.

should it come to light that you have harmed, or even left a path of
carnage, which will be above and beyond anything i could claim a
modicum of expertise in, i can assume you i will hunt down and in DUE
time, the proper legal arenas, to indulge reasonability in dealing
with you.

i'm one plain ole redneck chick that don't know shit from shinola, and
as luck would have it, i'm geographyically closest to and as as
business owner of 22 years, have had my share of litigious dealings,
and can network like'ah bitch. i can't DO much, but i sure as hell
can locate folks that would like nothing more than to bring possibly
an action, maybe even the first class-action suit (i could be wrong)
within the International Superhighway arena.

Andrew? there are less serious sandboxes to play in. if you were
fuckin' with yahoo.bingo, i woudn't give'ah good goddam

this one is one of "physical comfort and trust in a serious arena," at
least. it is "life and death," at best.

~tanya


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 7:31:42 AM9/1/07
to
convicted friend ~tanya wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a3387e70837d6322?

> >
> > > > It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
>
> to which tanya, tha great dumbass replied:
>
> > > YOUR choice?
>
> then our Andaroooo:
>
> > Yes.
>
> tanya:
>
> > > it used ta be the holy spirit's choice.
>
> Andarooo::
>
> > No.
>
> tanya:
>
> "NO?"

Correct.

It remains my choice to receive the guidance of the Holy Spirit in
order to do HIS will.

> it was, once upon'ah time, that everything was tha will of tha
> holy spirit or god or whoever was convenient.

GOD's will be done and not my will.

> yanno? that more ya contradict yerself, tha shorter yer responses
> get. contradict yerself more, k?

There has been no contradiction.

Obedience remains as much a free will choice as disobedience albeit a
much more difficult one for those who do not have hearts made
discerning by the Holy Spirit.

> > > GUESS OLE BOY TOOK'AH BACK SEAT... hahHAHHAhahhaa
> >
> > > (LEMME GUESS: your choice IS the holy spirit's choice.)
>
> Andodamando:
>
> > It remains GOD's choice that all souls retain HIS generous gift of
> > free will.
>
> tanya:
>
> if'n we all got free will, why's yers tha "right" one?

Mine isn't...

... GOD's is.

GOD is the Source of all righteousness.

> we all got our
> own truth, you don't own tha truth, and you can't HANDLE THA TRUTH !
> (didn't sumbody say that in'ah movie?)

Correct.

The truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ, remains my Boss.

> > > ....answer for everything, i fergot.
>
> Andaroonie:
>
> > GOD is the Source of all knowledge and wisdom.
>
> tanya:
>
> then why don't you shut tha fuck up and let ole Big G getta word're
> two in... ya ain't his spokesperson, last i heard.

GOD's purpose for me here remains to inform and not to serve as HIS
mouthpiece (ie oracle).

> > > now WHERE are you practicing medicine?
>
> Andewwwwwwwwwwraluralura:
>
> > In Georgia.
>
> tanya:
>
> ahhhhh, but i understand you're employed at a hospital now.
> i missed that one.
>
> Andrewonwalls:
>
> > You've missed it since 1995.
>
> tanya:
>
> that'd be 74, and i don't miss it a bit. virginity ain't all it's
> cracked up ta be, albeit the will'ah tha holy spirit... OH GOD !

You did not sound 74 on the phone :-)

> > > please
> > > fill me in on tha good news and congratulations on your new position !
>
>
> Andagindrronie:
>
> > May GOD help you with your memory.
>
> tanya:
>
> may god help you with yours, as yer Neon's towed ta never never land
> when ya pull inta the "RESERVED FOR PHYSICIAN" parkin' lot.
>
> you don't work at no hospital.

Without the LORD, your beliefs are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).

> [[[[ i just received a personal e-mail from you, Andrew: "My
> affiliation with Atlanta area hospitals remain the same.
>
> Would enjoy having lunch with you after the health fair on
> 9/22/07: ]]]]
>
> the Atlanta area hospitals may well be the same, Andrew. "the same"
> would be that they have or desire NO affiliation with you.

Without the LORD, your fantasies are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).

> p.s. the health fair on 9/22/07 is NOT a hospital.

Did not write that it were.

This would be at least your third invitation to attend.

> WHAT hospitals are you affiliated with that welcomes your credibility?

Attempt at social engineering noted.

> the 'health fair' is non too difficult to investigate and would be
> presumably motivated to become involved, based on responses from
> Emory. This is an organization i'm not familiar with and intend to
> become familiar with.

So you have said in the past but you have yet to attend.

> i've had many conversations with the Emory staff and not only are you
> not employed there, you are a thorn in their side, consider you a
> whacko, and i have the emails to prove it, phone calls aplenty were
> not recorded.

If that were true, it should be easy for you to post them here as you
have posted parts of my email responses to your emails.

> actually, LESS than asked from me, i have provided.
> noticeably, your Emory crap disappeared for awhile, and i'm about ta
> jump back on that bandwagon, but this time with a vengeance, should ya
> choose ta tamper with their good name.

Actually, the Holy Spirit has not guided me to post less here on
usenet.

> you, yourself, said ya had a clinic that "treated" cardiology
> patients, and nobody answers that phone and yer voice is on the
> answering machine, and i hardly call that a hospital.

Emory probably wishes that they too could give you a phone number that
they don't have to answer :-)

> ONE MORE turn of events involving Emory, know i'm not as shy as i used
> to be. (awwww.) as a matter of fact, COUNT ON IT !
>
> you might consider a peace that passeth understanding is not in
> everyone's heart.
>
> while my memory is making it's way back to present tense, please know
> my e-mail box can and will be full, and cooperation with be fair,
> just, documented, and sound.
>
> my agenda, Andrew, is not to hurt you, embarrass you, enlighten you,
> nor is it my job to bring you face to face with reality.
>
> what is IS my responsibility to do is to see that you are stopped dead
> in your tracks that are irresponsibily taking away venues for folks in
> need in these forums. it will be my personal responsibility as a
> patient, human, humane member of this planet that you will not
> discount, via a position held in esteem, (though fraudulent) an
> establishment/establishments that has/have missions of goodness and
> abide by professional practices not only dictated by a personal oath,
> but by a professional one, as well.

Hope you breathed while writing the above :-)

> i actaully thought you would have the good sense to respect the
> medical establishment through a very lowly effort to remove you and
> your distainful banter from this and other cross-posted forums would
> be sufficient.
>
> i now see that i was incorrect and loftier goals, along with more
> indulgent practices, as well as soliciting more detailed involvements
> from others are necessary to curb your sociopathic agenda.
>
> involving myself and others with higher-ranking officials is also time-
> comsuming, and i will dedicate the time, means, and medium necessary.
>
> should it come to light that you have harmed, or even left a path of
> carnage, which will be above and beyond anything i could claim a
> modicum of expertise in, i can assume you i will hunt down and in DUE
> time, the proper legal arenas, to indulge reasonability in dealing
> with you.

You remind me of dearly departed Bob Pastorio except Bob never asked
for benzodiazepine scripts from me:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob

> i'm one plain ole redneck chick that don't know shit from shinola, and
> as luck would have it, i'm geographyically closest to and as as
> business owner of 22 years, have had my share of litigious dealings,
> and can network like'ah bitch. i can't DO much, but i sure as hell
> can locate folks that would like nothing more than to bring possibly
> an action, maybe even the first class-action suit (i could be wrong)
> within the International Superhighway arena.
>
> Andrew? there are less serious sandboxes to play in. if you were
> fuckin' with yahoo.bingo, i woudn't give'ah good goddam
>
> this one is one of "physical comfort and trust in a serious arena," at
> least. it is "life and death," at best.
>
> ~tanya

You remain in my prayers, dear Tanya whom I love unconditionally.

~tanya

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 11:09:59 AM9/1/07
to
On Sep 1, 6:31 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" >

> The truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ, remains my Boss.

aHA, so LJC is tha head of tha cardiology unit at the hospital you've
gained recent employment. (i should'ah known.)

how many on staff? i'm sure along with them and thy rod they are
comforted.

so you're NOT employed in a hospital in Atlanta that could be
confirmed? if so, please name the hospital. when oneh as nothing to
hide, one hides nothing.

> > then why don't you shut tha fuck up and let ole Big G getta word're
> > two in... ya ain't his spokesperson, last i heard.
>
> GOD's purpose for me here remains to inform and not to serve as HIS
> mouthpiece (ie oracle).

then consider us informed and let tha boy talk... fer chrissake.


>
> > > > now WHERE are you practicing medicine?
>
> > Andewwwwwwwwwwraluralura:
>
> > > In Georgia.
>
> > tanya:
>
> > ahhhhh, but i understand you're employed at a hospital now.
> > i missed that one.
>
> > Andrewonwalls:
>
> > > You've missed it since 1995.
>
> > tanya:
>
> > that'd be 74, and i don't miss it a bit. virginity ain't all it's
> > cracked up ta be, albeit the will'ah tha holy spirit... OH GOD !
>
> You did not sound 74 on the phone :-)

tanya explains:

Andrew: you've missed it since 1995
tanya: that'd be 74.
Andrew: you don't sound 74.

that'd be 1974 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and while we're on tha subject, what happened in 1995? what'd i
miss? the Neon COLLECTOR EDITION? ...or tha day andrew lost his
tweezers attemptin' ta participate in'ah 'circle jerk'?

> > you don't work at no hospital.
>
> Without the LORD, your beliefs are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).

without'ah job, yer fantasies are meaningless. (Maybelline)


>
> > [[[[ i just received a personal e-mail from you, Andrew: "My
> > affiliation with Atlanta area hospitals remain the same.
>
> > Would enjoy having lunch with you after the health fair on
> > 9/22/07: ]]]]
>
> > the Atlanta area hospitals may well be the same, Andrew. "the same"
> > would be that they have or desire NO affiliation with you.
>
> Without the LORD, your fantasies are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).

correction: til ya had exam, your first, ass planned, YOUR fantasies
were meaningless. (Revelation !!! )

::newsflash:: "long lost tweezers turn up in prostate check up while
crack up." (no pun)

> > p.s. the health fair on 9/22/07 is NOT a hospital.
>
> Did not write that it were.

didn't say ya wrote it was.

> This would be at least your third invitation to attend.

This would be at least your 8,298,398th invitation to leave this and
cross-posted forums. what's yer point?

> > WHAT hospitals are you affiliated with that welcomes your credibility?
>
> Attempt at social engineering noted.

social engineering? as if *i* could engineer a social realm inclusive
of you???? Trump's engineering firm, as well as architectural Masters
would throw in their hat on THAT'n.

(... oh, and that was industrial espionage, which i had no faith in,
as well. )


>
> > the 'health fair' is non too difficult to investigate and would be
> > presumably motivated to become involved, based on responses from
> > Emory. This is an organization i'm not familiar with and intend to
> > become familiar with.
>
> So you have said in the past but you have yet to attend.

i said "INtend", not "ATtend". (can you get ta Sesame Street?)


>
> > i've had many conversations with the Emory staff and not only are you
> > not employed there, you are a thorn in their side, consider you a
> > whacko, and i have the emails to prove it, phone calls aplenty were
> > not recorded.
>
> If that were true, it should be easy for you to post them here as you
> have posted parts of my email responses to your emails.

no, it IS easy for me to post them here.

nothin' "should" about it.

AM I? no. i have a mutually respectful relationship with guidelines,
also respected, intact.

based on THAT theory, it should be easy for you to get the fuck outta
these forums, as it is easy for you to come in. give it'ah whirl,
ballerina !


>
> > actually, LESS than asked from me, i have provided.
> > noticeably, your Emory crap disappeared for awhile, and i'm about ta
> > jump back on that bandwagon, but this time with a vengeance, should ya
> > choose ta tamper with their good name.
>
> Actually, the Holy Spirit has not guided me to post less here on
> usenet.

Andy? do yourself a favor.

NEVER assume that on your smartest day that you are as smart as i am
on my dumbest day.


>
> > you, yourself, said ya had a clinic that "treated" cardiology
> > patients, and nobody answers that phone and yer voice is on the
> > answering machine, and i hardly call that a hospital.
>
> Emory probably wishes that they too could give you a phone number that
> they don't have to answer :-)

if Emory wished to give me a phone number that they didn't have to
answer, it would be one that no one called, i'm sure, and it would be
yours.

as luck would have it, i'm the recipient of phone calls.


> > ONE MORE turn of events involving Emory, know i'm not as shy as i used
> > to be. (awwww.) as a matter of fact, COUNT ON IT !
>
> > you might consider a peace that passeth understanding is not in
> > everyone's heart.
>
> > while my memory is making it's way back to present tense, please know
> > my e-mail box can and will be full, and cooperation with be fair,
> > just, documented, and sound.
>
> > my agenda, Andrew, is not to hurt you, embarrass you, enlighten you,
> > nor is it my job to bring you face to face with reality.
>
> > what is IS my responsibility to do is to see that you are stopped dead
> > in your tracks that are irresponsibily taking away venues for folks in
> > need in these forums. it will be my personal responsibility as a
> > patient, human, humane member of this planet that you will not
> > discount, via a position held in esteem, (though fraudulent) an
> > establishment/establishments that has/have missions of goodness and
> > abide by professional practices not only dictated by a personal oath,
> > but by a professional one, as well.
>
> Hope you breathed while writing the above :-)

don't hold your breath.

> > i actaully thought you would have the good sense to respect the
> > medical establishment through a very lowly effort to remove you and

> > your disdainful banter from this and other cross-posted forums would


> > be sufficient.
>
> > i now see that i was incorrect and loftier goals, along with more
> > indulgent practices, as well as soliciting more detailed involvements
> > from others are necessary to curb your sociopathic agenda.
>
> > involving myself and others with higher-ranking officials is also time-
> > comsuming, and i will dedicate the time, means, and medium necessary.
>
> > should it come to light that you have harmed, or even left a path of
> > carnage, which will be above and beyond anything i could claim a
> > modicum of expertise in, i can assume you i will hunt down and in DUE
> > time, the proper legal arenas, to indulge reasonability in dealing
> > with you.
>
> You remind me of dearly departed Bob Pastorio except Bob never asked
> for benzodiazepine scripts from me:

Andrew? i know many doctors, nurses, health care practitioners on
this forum, or people with the ability to write benzo scripts. i
invite ANY of them and ALL of them to make it public if i have EVER
asked anyone or anyone that KNOWS anyone to write me a script for
benzos. i have siezed, been hospitalized, spent days in ERs with no
insurance, and 2 crisis centers, along with every other arena social
services has to offer and been denied a xanax script. i have made NO
secret about my inability to secure xanax in oklahoma. after 16 years
in the tattoo business and pretty fucking tight with every drug dealer
within my arm's reach, i have never purchased street benzos. i have
never purchased a street drug (well, since i was a kid) that was
necessary for my medical needs and i have ONE (xanax,) that is a
NEED. NOR have i even SUGGESTED a medical professional go under the
table with a script. ON THE OTHER HAND, i asked a friend for an un-
needed medication, not a script and before he/she got "no" out of
their mouth, i retracted the request.

i will tolerate a LOT, buddy boy, and questioning MY integrity don't
make a good goddam to me.

suggesting i did such is back-handed behavior that would constitute
others' involvement, is suggesting i asked the same of others (why
would i single you out) and that is not tolerable.

i talked to you on thanksgiving day 2 years ago and i was not EVEN
thinking of medication, as you are no doctor, nor did i entertain the
idea and i never do and never will. i will NEVER compromise even a
legitimate professional in that manner. Many have seen me suffer on
this forum, and rightfully so, due to lack of medication. i
advertised it on a consistent basis and not only did i never
personally speak with anyone regarding obtaining a script, i was never
contacted by anyone offering.

i have discussed my angst personally, and been offered help, should i
fly several states away to a psychriatrist's office, pay the fee, and
go through "new patient" procedure, just as anyone else in this
particular reputable psychiatrist's office would. THAT offer was from
a friend that knew i was in trouble. Luckily, that very legitimate
agenda was not necessary, and became unnecessary at the eleventh
hour.

YES, an eleventh hour friend knew of my angst and gave me 4 klonopin
samples after ok'ing it with his/her doctor at one time. this person
saved my life.

lemme tell ya sumthin, Andrew B. Chung, you slander me on this forum
and lemme clue ya in.... i'm not much on what anybody says about me,
call me a fuckin' crack ho, 20 dollah hookah and a shit eatin'
kinkster, but NEVER suggest i asked you for drugs, medication, etc.,
as it suggests an involvment inclusive of other people on this forum.

and one more thing. there's nothin' scarier with'ah chick with
nothin' ta lose and nad'ah fearful bone in her body and you got one on
ya hands, and ONE chance to retract that, Mr. Chung......

YA FUCK WIMME? YA STUCK WIMME !

cuz boy? i'd soon gut ya as cut ya and i don't mean maybe.

ONE CHANCE, i say, and i don't generally repeat myself.

you could'ah kept your lying cock-sucker shut, but instead you are in
a position to re-open it one last time regarding this issue.

> You remain in my prayers, dear Tanya whom I love unconditionally.

brang em on, babycakes.

> Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

and don't ya think it's 'bout time ya came clean with that ole boy,
too?

cuz baby, i don't take no prizners.... you fuck wimme in that arena,
nothing and nobody in your world is safe. and i mean NObody.


i do hope that little matter will be cleared up.

within 24 hours.

happy labor day to you and yours.

::muahhhhhhhhhhhhh::

~t

(who can't get enough of forwarding emails to "request central."

oh, and for you of those that feel i'm terribly unprofessional in
dealing with this one particular hospital and more than a few of it's
investigators along with the licensing board? we ALL agree that i
do not HAVE to be professional, i''m not representing their profession
or establishment/s.

When one on one, i change my clothes.

JESUS WAS A COCKSUCKER!

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 1:30:12 PM9/1/07
to

"~tanya" <Subnb...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1188659399....@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
kick his fucking ass tanya.
chunks needs to be locked up for the safety of others.
you know who i am,tanya-we talked a few months ago by telephone-i gave you
my office cam ip address.remember?


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 1:52:04 PM9/1/07
to
convicted friend ~tanya wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/2914edf94c425965?

>
> > The truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ, remains my Boss.
>
> aHA, so LJC is tha head of tha cardiology unit at the hospital you've
> gained recent employment. (i should'ah known.)

LORD Jesus Christ is GOD.

> how many on staff? i'm sure along with them and thy rod they are
> comforted.

HE has legions of angels on staff :-)

> so you're NOT employed in a hospital in Atlanta that could be
> confirmed? if so, please name the hospital. when oneh as nothing to
> hide, one hides nothing.

There is wisdom in not trusting the untrustworthy.

> > > then why don't you shut tha fuck up and let ole Big G getta word're
> > > two in... ya ain't his spokesperson, last i heard.
> >
> > GOD's purpose for me here remains to inform and not to serve as HIS
> > mouthpiece (ie oracle).
>
> then consider us informed and let tha boy talk... fer chrissake.

GOD has spoken and HIS words have been written down.

Simply read the Gospels :-)

> > > > > now WHERE are you practicing medicine?
> >
> > > Andewwwwwwwwwwraluralura:
> >
> > > > In Georgia.
> >
> > > tanya:
> >
> > > ahhhhh, but i understand you're employed at a hospital now.
> > > i missed that one.
> >
> > > Andrewonwalls:
> >
> > > > You've missed it since 1995.
> >
> > > tanya:
> >
> > > that'd be 74, and i don't miss it a bit. virginity ain't all it's
> > > cracked up ta be, albeit the will'ah tha holy spirit... OH GOD !
> >
> > You did not sound 74 on the phone :-)
>
> tanya explains:
>
> Andrew: you've missed it since 1995
> tanya: that'd be 74.
> Andrew: you don't sound 74.
>
> that'd be 1974 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You don't sound 1974 either :-)

> and while we're on tha subject, what happened in 1995?

That would be when GOD's calling for me to become a physician was
fully realized with licensure in Georgia.

> what'd i
> miss? the Neon COLLECTOR EDITION? ...or tha day andrew lost his
> tweezers attemptin' ta participate in'ah 'circle jerk'?

1995 would be a year rather than a day. Your getting this wrong is
understandable in the middle of your being distracted by what appears
to be penis-envy with sour grapes.

The following would be therapeutic for you:

http://www.afa.net/emails/p_1700.html

> > > you don't work at no hospital.
> >
> > Without the LORD, your beliefs are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>
> without'ah job, yer fantasies are meaningless. (Maybelline)

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

> > > [[[[ i just received a personal e-mail from you, Andrew: "My
> > > affiliation with Atlanta area hospitals remain the same.
> >
> > > Would enjoy having lunch with you after the health fair on
> > > 9/22/07: ]]]]
> >
> > > the Atlanta area hospitals may well be the same, Andrew. "the same"
> > > would be that they have or desire NO affiliation with you.
> >
> > Without the LORD, your fantasies are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>
> correction: til ya had exam, your first, ass planned, YOUR fantasies
> were meaningless. (Revelation !!! )

Your waxing incoherent here.

> ::newsflash:: "long lost tweezers turn up in prostate check up while
> crack up." (no pun)

You seem to have a tweezer fetish. This may be consistent with your
passion for body piercing.

> > > p.s. the health fair on 9/22/07 is NOT a hospital.
> >
> > Did not write that it were.
>
> didn't say ya wrote it was.

Actually you inferred it.

> > This would be at least your third invitation to attend.
>
> This would be at least your 8,298,398th invitation to leave this and
> cross-posted forums. what's yer point?

You are not to be trusted.

> > > WHAT hospitals are you affiliated with that welcomes your credibility?
> >
> > Attempt at social engineering noted.
>
> social engineering? as if *i* could engineer a social realm inclusive
> of you???? Trump's engineering firm, as well as architectural Masters
> would throw in their hat on THAT'n.
>
> (... oh, and that was industrial espionage, which i had no faith in,
> as well. )

You remain in my prayers.

> > > the 'health fair' is non too difficult to investigate and would be
> > > presumably motivated to become involved, based on responses from
> > > Emory. This is an organization i'm not familiar with and intend to
> > > become familiar with.
> >
> > So you have said in the past but you have yet to attend.
>
> i said "INtend", not "ATtend". (can you get ta Sesame Street?)

Over the phone you said you would attend but have not.

> > > i've had many conversations with the Emory staff and not only are you
> > > not employed there, you are a thorn in their side, consider you a
> > > whacko, and i have the emails to prove it, phone calls aplenty were
> > > not recorded.
> >
> > If that were true, it should be easy for you to post them here as you
> > have posted parts of my email responses to your emails.
>
> no, it IS easy for me to post them here.
>
> nothin' "should" about it.
>
> AM I? no. i have a mutually respectful relationship with guidelines,
> also respected, intact.

That is not what I discern.

> based on THAT theory, it should be easy for you to get the fuck outta
> these forums, as it is easy for you to come in. give it'ah whirl,
> ballerina !

It remains my choice to continue to receive the guidance of the Holy
Spirit in everything I say, do, and write.

> > > actually, LESS than asked from me, i have provided.
> > > noticeably, your Emory crap disappeared for awhile, and i'm about ta
> > > jump back on that bandwagon, but this time with a vengeance, should ya
> > > choose ta tamper with their good name.
> >
> > Actually, the Holy Spirit has not guided me to post less here on
> > usenet.
>
> Andy? do yourself a favor.
>
> NEVER assume that on your smartest day that you are as smart as i am
> on my dumbest day.

Dearly departed Bob Pastorio thought he was smart too:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/libel.asp

GOD slaying Bob (my continued condolences to his surviving friends and
family) on Fool's day should help you understand that it remains wiser
and smarter to obey GOD.

> > > you, yourself, said ya had a clinic that "treated" cardiology
> > > patients, and nobody answers that phone and yer voice is on the
> > > answering machine, and i hardly call that a hospital.
> >
> > Emory probably wishes that they too could give you a phone number that
> > they don't have to answer :-)
>
> if Emory wished to give me a phone number that they didn't have to
> answer, it would be one that no one called, i'm sure, and it would be
> yours.

**ding** **ding** **ding**

> as luck would have it, i'm the recipient of phone calls.

Receiving my voicemail message when you call does not make you a
recipient of phone calls :-)

> > > ONE MORE turn of events involving Emory, know i'm not as shy as i used
> > > to be. (awwww.) as a matter of fact, COUNT ON IT !
> >
> > > you might consider a peace that passeth understanding is not in
> > > everyone's heart.
> >
> > > while my memory is making it's way back to present tense, please know
> > > my e-mail box can and will be full, and cooperation with be fair,
> > > just, documented, and sound.
> >
> > > my agenda, Andrew, is not to hurt you, embarrass you, enlighten you,
> > > nor is it my job to bring you face to face with reality.
> >
> > > what is IS my responsibility to do is to see that you are stopped dead
> > > in your tracks that are irresponsibily taking away venues for folks in
> > > need in these forums. it will be my personal responsibility as a
> > > patient, human, humane member of this planet that you will not
> > > discount, via a position held in esteem, (though fraudulent) an
> > > establishment/establishments that has/have missions of goodness and
> > > abide by professional practices not only dictated by a personal oath,
> > > but by a professional one, as well.
> >
> > Hope you breathed while writing the above :-)
>
> don't hold your breath.

Have not been :-)

This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is clearly absolutely right in
convicting you:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

> happy labor day to you and yours.

Back to you and yours for a blessed Labor Day weekend.

> ::muahhhhhhhhhhhhh::
>
> ~t
>
> (who can't get enough of forwarding emails to "request central."
>
> oh, and for you of those that feel i'm terribly unprofessional in
> dealing with this one particular hospital and more than a few of it's
> investigators along with the licensing board? we ALL agree that i
> do not HAVE to be professional, i''m not representing their profession
> or establishment/s.
>
> When one on one, i change my clothes.

Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS guiding me
to say "no" when you asked for a benzodiazepine script.

No amount of clothes changing on your part is going to change the
truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ.

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you healthier (hungrier)
than ever:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/PressRelease

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><

~tanya

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 2:24:26 PM9/1/07
to
On Sep 1, 6:31?am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:

>
> You remind me of dearly departed Bob Pastorio except Bob never asked
> for benzodiazepine scripts from me:

you failed to retract the suggestion that i asked you for a
benzodiazepine script, the one chance i gave you to clear that up.

no more chances.

i'm in the "warning" arena now. retract the suggestion, warnings have
consequences.

~tanya


Gray Spyder

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 2:46:36 PM9/1/07
to

Actually, he repeated it:


"Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS guiding me
to say "no" when you asked for a benzodiazepine script."

"No amount of clothes changing on your part is going to change the

truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ."

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0246def40d5eb2b5?

Fuck him up, baby girl!


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 2:51:40 PM9/1/07
to
convicted friend ~tanya wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0246def40d5eb2b5?

> >
> > You remind me of dearly departed Bob Pastorio except Bob never asked
> > for benzodiazepine scripts from me:
>
> you failed to retract the suggestion that i asked you for a
> benzodiazepine script, the one chance i gave you to clear that up.
>
> no more chances.
>
> i'm in the "warning" arena now. retract the suggestion, warnings have
> consequences.
>
> ~tanya

If you look back in the Google archives, you will see that the Holy
Spirit had guided me to write months ago that you had asked for
benzodiazepine scripts and that you had at that time not been bothered
by this fact.

One has to wonder why you are bothered by this fact now.

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you healthier (hungrier)
than ever:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 2:52:04 PM9/1/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1188607975....@o80g2000hse.googlegroups.com to
sci.med.cardiology:

Without a leg to stand on, you can't run away.

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 2:53:01 PM9/1/07
to
~tanya <Subnb...@aol.com> wrote in news:1188629306.611901.168980
@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com to sci.med.cardiology:

Fuck!

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 3:09:42 PM9/1/07
to

Sad to read that you have had complications from your being stricken
with diabetes.

Gray Spyder

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 5:38:54 PM9/1/07
to
On Sep 1, 2:51 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, ex MD/PhD"

<heartd...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> If you look back in the Google archives, you will see that the Holy
> Spirit had guided me to write months ago that you had asked for
> benzodiazepine scripts and that you had at that time not been bothered
> by this fact.

Post a link, liar.

~tanya

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 7:17:53 PM9/1/07
to
On Sep 1, 1:24 pm, ~tanya <Subnbel...@aol.com> wrote:

> i'm in the "warning" arena now. retract the suggestion, warnings have
> consequences.

the consequence is the con, the one you have pulled on yourself. you
have, sadly, pulled on yourself, the greatest con possible...
believing that "he" is you.

"he" has conned no one else and lives alone. some, when alone, cease
to exist.

'his" uncompromising attitude is more indicative of an inner
uncertainty than a deep conviction. "his" implacable stand is directed
more against the doubt within than the assailant without.

often liars and dishonorable people actually come to believe their own
lies. it's a function of making their lies true, a survival trait.

it's also common for 'method actors' to become so emersed in their
part that they become their character. Dustin Hoffman sustained many
injuries to his left leg while maintaining his character in Midnight
Cowboy. years later, in Rainman, the hobble is still evident.

liars and illusionists are similar in that respect. they must believe
the illusion to become believable to the unsuspecting public.

in the end, there are consequences for indulging this duality. more
times than not, they will end up experiencing the trials of the person
they pretemd/pretended to be. it is the nature of the liar/illusionist
to become the lie/illusion.

in no way am i suggesting that an illusionist and a liar are mutually
inclusive. i'm suggesting that there are similiarities mutually
exclusive of honor and integrity.

honor may be the key out of this prison, adhering to one's personal
truth in any event.

self-sacrifice is much easier than self realization, Andrew.

"he" is of your own creation, a protection from you.

"he" is yours.

"you" are are ours, "you" are who we know.

we remain free of the con.

to most of us nothing is so invisible as an unpleasant truth. it can
be held right in front of our very eyes, pushed under our noses,
rammed down our throats and we still don't know it or see it, nor do
we choose to.

freedom's just another word for nothin' left ta lose, and i truly
think you're on that thresh hold, and maybe freedom is something it's
time for you to consider and LIVE IT UP !

i will personally think that "he" is tired.

... and i personally guarantee that "you" will be accepted by everyone
that participates on these forums. it may take time and humility and
some convincing, but ultimately, doing the work is the means to an
end, worthwhile.

how can i guarantee that?

i have faith.

don't believe everything you think.

c'mon and give "you" a whirl.

you may even catch yourself having fun.

~t


~tanya

unread,
Sep 1, 2007, 7:23:54 PM9/1/07
to
On Sep 1, 1:46?pm, Gray Spyder <goinkgo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Actually, he repeated it:
> "Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS guiding me
> to say "no" when you asked for a benzodiazepine script."

yeah, thank GOD he didn't write me that dang script i pleaded for.
LOL

actually, i'd be jankin' a boy for sum opiates if i was on tha
prowl.

a couplah lortabs'n'ah brewski? nada bad thought a'tall.

(ok, i'm addicted ta lortabs, but i DO pop'ah couple ever now'n then.
i don't believe in "never agains"... they make me nutty.)

can ya blame'ah gal coppin'ah decent buzz?????????

ain't no shame in MY game.

(some wish there was, i'm sure, i tell way too much about me.)

::wink::


xoxooxoxo

~t

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 2, 2007, 6:03:53 AM9/2/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <hear...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1188673782.4...@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com to
alt.support.anxiety-panic:

> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper)
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >> >> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper)
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8f42b

>> >> >> >> > e71 2afb63f2?

>> Without a leg to stand on, **you** can't run away.


>
> Sad to read that you have had complications from your being stricken
> with diabetes.
>

See emphasis

--
David Silverman C.B.E.
aa #2208

"Fuck! I used up my last non-sequitur" - Andrew B Chung

~tanya

unread,
Sep 2, 2007, 3:36:06 PM9/2/07
to
On Sep 1, 1:51?pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

<heartd...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
>
> If you look back in the Google archives, you will see that the Holy
> Spirit had guided me to write months ago that you had asked for
> benzodiazepine scripts and that you had at that time not been bothered
> by this fact.

if it's archived, it was posted. right? i'ved googled my ass off and
i fine NO posts to the affect you speak of.

> One has to wonder why you are bothered by this fact now.

uhhhhh, maybe because i just now HEARD ABOUT IT? and "fact" suggests
that the situation transpired, and it did not.

PLEASE post the archived google reference of whence you speak, i'm
very interested in when and how i missed that particular post.


and THANKS !

~tanya

~tanya

unread,
Sep 2, 2007, 3:38:14 PM9/2/07
to

i''ve googled it 8 zillion times. i must be losin' my touch ! LOL


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 2, 2007, 4:03:09 PM9/2/07
to
convicted friend ~tanya wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/30cae3d0f4a8a756?

> >
> > If you look back in the Google archives, you will see that the Holy
> > Spirit had guided me to write months ago that you had asked for
> > benzodiazepine scripts and that you had at that time not been bothered
> > by this fact.
>
> if it's archived, it was posted. right? i'ved googled my ass off and
> i fine NO posts to the affect you speak of.
>
> > One has to wonder why you are bothered by this fact now.
>
> uhhhhh, maybe because i just now HEARD ABOUT IT? and "fact" suggests
> that the situation transpired, and it did not.

It did happen.

> PLEASE post the archived google reference of whence you speak, i'm
> very interested in when and how i missed that particular post.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/5b883129ad44703b?

"Your dependence on anxiolytics indicate otherwise. It seems you are
still sore that the Holy Spirit guided me not to help you with your
prescription needs. " -- Dr. Andrew Chung

> and THANKS !
>
> ~tanya

You are welcome, Tanya :-)

Redirecting all thanks and praises to GOD so that we will both be that
much more blessed (hungrier):

~tanya

unread,
Sep 2, 2007, 5:30:17 PM9/2/07
to
On Sep 2, 3:03?pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<heartdo...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
>
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/30cae3d0f4a8a756?

ok, where's me beggin' for benzos?


>
> > > If you look back in the Google archives, you will see that the Holy
> > > Spirit had guided me to write months ago that you had asked for
> > > benzodiazepine scripts and that you had at that time not been bothered
> > > by this fact.
>
> > if it's archived, it was posted. right? i'ved googled my ass off and
> > i fine NO posts to the affect you speak of.
>
> > > One has to wonder why you are bothered by this fact now.
>
> > uhhhhh, maybe because i just now HEARD ABOUT IT? and "fact" suggests
> > that the situation transpired, and it did not.
>
> It did happen.

didn't happen, i'd have no shame in MY game ta say it did.

now ya wanna get down ta brass tacks, ask my ex to verify that you
were asking me to come by when i was in alabama and if was god's will,
i would give you a blow job. if it was god's will, we would fuck.

and i said "i'm bettin' it would be god's will."

even my boyfriend heard it and laffed his ass off.

now i got at least a witness, and honestly, that shit don't bother me
one bit, i just thought i'd put it out there for you ta deny.

and i never asked you for benzos, i didn't, wouldn't, and never
entertained the idea. i never entertained the possibility that you
were a doctor. why would i ask ya for benzos? i told ya about 87
time you were no more a doctor than i was a supermodel. i NEVER
considered you a benzo dude. yer whack.


>
> > PLEASE post the archived google reference of whence you speak, i'm
> > very interested in when and how i missed that particular post.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/5b883129ad44703b?

and? where's the benzo conversation?

> "Your dependence on anxiolytics indicate otherwise.

my dependence on xanax indicates WHAT? otherwise WHAT??

>It seems you are
> still sore that the Holy Spirit guided me not to help you with your
> prescription needs. "

yeah, i'm SORE, WALLY ! ya wanna google sumthin.... google my
bitchin' like'ah big dawg about not having my prescriptions written in
oklahoma. and i'm gonna ask YOU for benzos? hell, i wouldn't ask my
best friend, and he can actually WRITE scripts !

where'd i ask you for benzos, boy? TROT IT OUT ! TROT OUT THA
EVIDENCE !

i rarely say anyone's a liar, as there's always room for error, in my
world. YOU are a liar.

i really don't mind ya lyin' on me, but by doin' so, you implicate
alotta other people that i'm way closer to than you that actually ARE
health care professionals.

in my book? that ain't cool.

agin. ya dun fucked wimme, yer stuck wimme, i gave you every
opportunity available to retract your lie, to even give you room to
get yer head outta yer ass and participate in the forums with a
modicum of fun, the past forgotten.

you didn't take that offer. you kinda worry me.

liars put me in'ah mood.

it ain't'ah good mood

ain't'ah bad one neither.

just'ah mood.

i reckon one mood's good's another when yer in'ah mood.

DAMN, them shovels make a lotta racket !


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 2, 2007, 5:38:41 PM9/2/07
to
convicted friend ~tanya wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6a6a48035dafa84c?

>
> ok, where's me beggin' for benzos?

Did not write that you begged for benzodiazepines but rather that you
asked me to write you a prescription for them (anxiolytics).

Benzodiazepines are anxiolytics.

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you healthier (hungrier)
than ever:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 2, 2007, 5:44:54 PM9/2/07
to
> > Sad to read that **you** have had complications from **your being stricken
> > with diabetes.**
>
> See emphasis

Indeed. You are the one who has been stricken with diabetes.

Meanwhile, in my ever closer walk with LORD Jesus Christ, HE continues
to keep me completely well.

Laus Deo !

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

~tanya

unread,
Sep 2, 2007, 9:51:42 PM9/2/07
to
On Sep 2, 4:38?pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

> Did not write that you begged for benzodiazepines but rather that you
> asked me to write you a prescription for them (anxiolytics).

well sue me for not rememberin' what i never said.

anyway, where's the post about me askin' for the script? you said you
had it archived. if i'm so fucked up that i don't remember sumthin'
like THAT, i should check myself inta tha HOTEL CALIFORNIA ! PLEASE
produce the archived post that contains my asking for an illegal
script. (from a non-medical professional.) oh, and btw, how would i
get it filled? ya can't get xanax filled in tha state ya ain't in,
and i was in oklahoma and you were in georgia, so figger me THAT'n
out, white boy !

> Benzodiazepines are anxiolytics.

maybe you have me confused with sumbody that told ya that "Ann? she
sho licked it."

anyhooooooooooo, TROT THAT POST OUT ! i didn't have ta ask for
sumthin' THIS many times from my crackhead tat artists.
(hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm)

ya stuck a post in that didn't say shit about it, so stick tha one in
that DOES !

(and don't bogart that stem pipe.)

~tanya

unread,
Sep 2, 2007, 10:04:37 PM9/2/07
to
On Sep 2, 4:44?pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

(omg, i just saw this. ROFLMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOO)

> You and other atheists, will remain insecure ever pining for
> proof but never receiving any.

ya think ya made their POINT?????

i mean... ya THINK?

> "Knowing this fact saddens me.

agin... ya THINK?

KNOWIN' i was lookin' for tha tooth fairy made me sad, TOO !!!!!!!!!

(ya gotta admit.... THAT post was "spot on"... "CLASSIC !!!!! )

i ain't laffed this hard since i saw a 400 pound dominatrix in'ah
corset spankin' a dude (with'ah crop she weilded like'ah feather) that
was about'ah buck ten while he was yellin "oh please stop.... it
hurts, MOMMY!!!!! "

i really didn't think that one was top-able. (no pun)

bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

~TANYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 2, 2007, 10:06:49 PM9/2/07
to
convicted friend ~tanya wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/ffd895f2c273a768?

> >
> > Did not write that you begged for benzodiazepines but rather that you
> > asked me to write you a prescription for them (anxiolytics).
>
> well sue me for not rememberin' what i never said.

You asked for the prescription for benzodiazepines multiple times
during a phone conversation months ago. The Holy Spirit guided me to
refuse you many times by saying "Ours is not that kind of
relationship, though I still love you unconditionally as I love any
neighbor or enemy."

In that conversation, you became troubled with how I could forgive and
still love someone even if they were to kill my wife and daughter.

> anyway, where's the post about me askin' for the script?

Again, here's the link to the usenet post where I described not
helping you with prescriptions for anxiolytics:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/5b883129ad44703b?

"Your dependence on anxiolytics indicate otherwise. It seems you are


still sore that the Holy Spirit guided me not to help you with your

prescription needs. " -- Dr. Andrew Chung

Be healthy... be hungry... be healthier... be blessed:

~tanya

unread,
Sep 2, 2007, 11:38:35 PM9/2/07
to
On Sep 2, 9:06?pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

>
> You asked for the prescription for benzodiazepines multiple times
> during a phone conversation months ago. The Holy Spirit guided me to
> refuse you many times by saying "Ours is not that kind of
> relationship, though I still love you unconditionally as I love any
> neighbor or enemy."

are ya sayin' that i asked YOU if i could give you a blow job, i asked
YOU if i could fuck you when in georgia????? and i told YOU that
that'd happen only if it was tha lawd's will?????? i can SAFELY say
that i ain't asked NObody either of them questions since b'fore my
mama pushed my big head outta her loins, (and i ain't real
forgetful.) but YOU broke me down??????

(well, ok... i beg Gary daily for tha high hard one, but he don't
count. he no longer answers tha phone with "hello"... it's "hell
no"... so we get that outta tha way and g'on chattin'. but NOW i
gotta new angle.... i'm gonna tell him he's in DEEP MEERKAT SHIT if
he don't give it up when that holy spirit says ta duit, and even BUDDA
said "YER IN TROUBLE, BOY" if ya don't do tha will'ah tha lawd."
hey, i gotta new attiTUDE now, thanks for tha suggestion ! )

> In that conversation, you became troubled with how I could forgive and
> still love someone even if they were to kill my wife and daughter.

correctamundo ! i was tellin' you about my Dad's wife's antics that
destroyed my finances, and i said i tried even that forgiveness shit
and it don't work. then you tried to explain it to me, and how it was
unconditional, blah blah blah... and i said "so you would forgive
somebody that killed your wife and kid, even?" and you said "yes."
THAT conversation was on Thanksgiving day, 2005.

btw, i talked to my ex today, i mentioned what you'd said about tha
script thang and guessie whattie... he heard the entire conversation.
he said "dude's smokin' crack because you never asked him for a
script, i was there the whole time. don't even pay him any
attention, he ain't worth it." so i gotta witness if ya wanna fuck
with that'n... you even talked to him. after y'all talked he said
"why is he on the phone with YOU on thanksgiving day when he has a
family? he even said "THAT guy's a doctor? oh man." i said
"yeah... weird, huh... he's a bullshitter, he ain't no doctor and he
ain't gotta family, and he agreed, and that was that.

> > anyway, where's the post about me askin' for the script?
>
> Again, here's the link to the usenet post where I described not
> helping you with prescriptions for anxiolytics:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/5b883129ad44703b?

IS IT JUST ME, FOLKS, OR IS THERE NOOOOOO MENTION OF ME ASKIN' FOR'AH
SCRIPT IN THAT POST??????? i'm not real smart, granted, but i've
read it like 8 times and still don't see it. OH, and since that
conversation was on the same day as the one about forgivein' sumbody
that killed yer wife and daughter, why ain't it posted even AROUND
thanksgiving, 2005?

I WANT THA DATE TA MATCH UP ! oh hell, i don't give'ah groovy goddam,
gimme a date, any date, i ain't picky.... i'll take tha IDES OF MARCH,
fer chrissake, just TROT IT OUT !

cuz if i'm THAT far gone, i need sum medical attention and in'ah
quickness. NURSE? THORAZINE !!!!!!!!

> "Your dependence on anxiolytics indicate otherwise.

do WHUT? my dependance on anxolyctics indicate WHUT????? otherwise,
WHAT??????

> It seems you are
> still sore that the Holy Spirit guided me not to help you with your
> prescription needs. "

welllllllll, truth be known... that holy spirit dude played ya like'ah
stradivarious violin at'ah back yard hoe-down, cuz HE wrote my scripts
in exchange for 3 hand jobs, one ::gulp::, 3 anal fucks (2 without
lube) and'ah golden shower in central park.... and i took him up on
it, and threw in a 3-way on'ah public park bench with this hot chick
with really nice tits and shaved her hoo hoo while i was at it. (ok,
i was bein' a tad selfish, but who's tha wiser.)

ya gotta watch them holy spirit dudes like'ah hawk, i tell ya, they is
up ta NO DAMN GOOD, i'm here ta tell ya.

now show me my post where i asked for scripts. 3rd time's GOTTA be'ah
charm... i didn't have ta ask this many times for'an extra bounce on
santa's knee !

and it wasn't even christmas.

now go get it ! kiss yer snot-nosed kid g'nite and pull that post
up.. (yer bout ta irritate me as bad as midgets do. yanno, i can't
hardly eat'ah hamburger around'ah midget, they irritate me so bad. i
ain't sayin' it's right, it's just the way it is. now don't get me
tha midget brand'ah irritated, cuz i gotta hankerin' for sum blood ta
spew like old faithful, i get that way sometimes.

i don't reckon i'll kill nobody anytime soon unless ya ask me what i'm
doin' with this here hammer in my hand.

i'll tell ya i'm aimin' ta kill ya with it.

nothin' like a head split clean down tha middle. i like accuracy a
lot.

bye.


Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 3, 2007, 12:34:14 PM9/3/07
to
~tanya <Subnb...@aol.com> wrote in
news:1188785077.4...@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com to
alt.support.anxiety-panic:

It was his response to being asked for evidence of his current employment
status. 'Nuff said?

--
David Silverman C.B.E.
aa #2208

Not authentic without this signature.
Not necessarily authentic with it, either.

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 4, 2007, 7:13:24 AM9/4/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1188607138....@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com to
alt.support.anxiety-panic:

> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

>> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >>

>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8f42be712af
>> >> > b63 f2?
>> >>
>> >> Simple straightforward question:
>> >>
>> >> Rod, your rottweiler
>> >
>> > Name-calling simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right
>> > to convict you:
>> >
>> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>> >
>> >> , claims you are resident at a hospital in Atlanta.
>> >> Which one? How long have you been working there, and in what
>> >> capacity?
>> >
>> > Attempt at social engineering noted:
>> >
>>
>> WTF are you talking about? Just answer the question. Why does it have
>> you stumped? You do know where you work, don't you? You don't think
>> you'd get away with accusing the prosecution in a court of law of
>> "attempted social engineering" do you?
>>
>> It's a straighforward enough question, and if you don't answer it,
>> the readers of this thread can only assume that you find the
>> question, and the truth it is aimed at revealing, embarrassing. I
>> note that Rod has not been able to answer it either. Such a pity, as
>> it was your opportunity to prove conclusively that you actually are a
>> cardiologist.
>
> Such is the utility of having GOD's peace, which transcends all
> worldly understanding.
>

Dance, dance
Wherever you may be
"I am the lord of the dance" said he

It's good the way Andyboi maqnages to run away at full speed *and* dance
round the point at one and the same time.

You'd make a good Jesuit, you would, Andy!

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 4, 2007, 10:57:29 AM9/4/07
to

Still here helping folks by posting on usenet in between seeing
patients :-)

> You'd make a good Jesuit, you would, Andy!

It remains my choice to not be religious.

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

Gray Spyder

unread,
Sep 4, 2007, 11:40:05 AM9/4/07
to
On Sep 4, 10:57 am, "Andrew B. Chungp" <and...@emorycardiology.com>
wrote:

> Still here helping folks by posting on usenet in between seeing
> patients :-)

Actually, he's probably not lying about this! His last patient was
maybe eight years ago, so while he's waiting for his next patient...

Archie Leach

unread,
Sep 4, 2007, 2:41:12 PM9/4/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:

>It remains my choice to not be religious.

"My posts are not repetitive"--Dr. Andrew Ben-Hua Chung, "MD"/"PhD"

http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=&num=100&scoring=d&hl=en&as_epq=It+remains+my+choice+to+not+be+religious.&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=4&as_maxm=9&as_maxy=2007&safe=off

Results 1 - 28 of 28 for "It remains my choice to not be
religious ."

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 4, 2007, 3:48:13 PM9/4/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1188917849.3...@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com to
alt.support.anxiety-panic:

> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:

Hatred noted.

>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Arrogance noted.

>> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:

hatred again

>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Arrogance again

>> >> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper)

Hatred again

>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Arrogance again

>> >> >>
>> >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8f42be71
>> >> >> > 2afb63f2?

Well, 8 years ago until now is quite a long interval, but it is an
interval.

>> You'd make a good Jesuit, you would, Andy!
>
> It remains my choice to not be religious.
>

Your repetitiveness/verbigeration indicates otherwise. Unless you're
pleading insanity, which would also explain what kind of patients you are
seeing, and what kind of doctor is treating both you and them.

<snip troll droppings>

BY THE WAY:

You haven't got away with not answering the question as to which hospital
you are treating patients at.

We all want to know.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 4, 2007, 5:06:22 PM9/4/07
to
convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/2b7ec3aed38156d6?

<snip>


> >
> > Still here helping folks by posting on usenet in between seeing
> > patients :-)
>
> Well, 8 years ago until now is quite a long interval, but it is an
> interval.

My usenet posts have not been separated by 8 year intervals :-)

> >> You'd make a good Jesuit, you would, Andy!
> >
> > It remains my choice to not be religious.
>
> Your repetitiveness/verbigeration indicates otherwise.

Not for folks with normal reading comprehension.

This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
you:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

<incoherent babbling snipped>

> We all want to know.

Your false belief that you write for everyone would be a delusion of
grandeur.

Would suggest you inform your doctor about your suffering from this
delusion.

JESUS WAS A COCKSUCKER!

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 7:35:54 AM9/5/07
to

"Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote in message
news:Xns99A1D3A06...@194.177.96.26...
he can not tell us that-cuz the hospital where he is employed as a part-time
janitor is ashamed of him.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 2:22:17 PM9/5/07
to
convicted friend David Solomonson (dsolo) wrote:
> satan via a sockpuppet hissed in his usual lying fashion:

>
> >"he can not tell us that-cuz the hospital where he is employed as a part-time janitor is ashamed of him."
>
> Why do you hate part-time janitors?

Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.

GOD is love.

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 3:40:46 PM9/5/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1188939982.3...@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com to
alt.support.anxiety-panic:

> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/2b7ec3aed38156
>> > d6?
>
> <snip>
>> >
>> > Still here helping folks by posting on usenet in between seeing
>> > patients :-)
>>
>> Well, 8 years ago until now is quite a long interval, but it is an
>> interval.
>
> My usenet posts have not been separated by 8 year intervals :-)
>

Sophistry and supercilliousness noted.

>> >> You'd make a good Jesuit, you would, Andy!
>> >
>> > It remains my choice to not be religious.
>>
>> Your repetitiveness/verbigeration indicates otherwise.
>
> Not for folks with normal reading comprehension.
>

Do I need to point out the obvious?

> This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
> you:
>
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>
> <incoherent babbling snipped>


Incoherent babbling? Oh, yes! the repeated request, written in perfectly
good English - my native tongue for 52 years - that you tell us exactly
where you treat patients.

>> We all want to know.
>

Still the truth, despite your sophistry and cheap insults.

Andrew, **you** personalised this debate, live with it. You're the one
trying to pull rank, you're the one claiming to be not just a doctor, but
a consultant. Prove it, or your rank-pulling is futile, and your
"helping" people is very probably contrary to the law.

Here are some helpful questions, which you should be happy to answer in a
direct and unambiguous manner:

What is the name and location of the practice/hospital where you have
lawful permission to treat patients?

What inspection process is it subject to, and by whom?

When does its licence expire?

Can you show us samples of its documentation e.g. brochures, patient
information, weekly cleaning and inspection schedule, policies/procedures
for the sterilization of instruments, infection control policy? If not,
can you at least point us to an up-to-date inspection report for the
practice you work at?

How many patients have you treated in the last 12 months?

These are not leading questions, they are your opportunity to establish
your credibility.

--
David Silverman C.B.E.
aa #2208

Brain surgeon.

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 3:47:35 PM9/5/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1189016537.4...@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com to
alt.atheism:

> convicted friend David Solomonson (dsolo) wrote:
>> satan via a sockpuppet hissed in his usual lying fashion:
>>
>> >"he can not tell us that-cuz the hospital where he is employed as a
>> >part-time janitor is ashamed of him."
>>
>> Why do you hate part-time janitors?
>
> Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.
>

Just tell us where you work and stop jerking people about.

--
David Silverman C.B.E.
aa #2208

Not authentic without this signature.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 3:56:19 PM9/5/07
to
convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/2b7ec3aed38156d6?
> >
> > <snip>
> >> >
> >> > Still here helping folks by posting on usenet in between seeing
> >> > patients :-)
> >>
> >> Well, 8 years ago until now is quite a long interval, but it is an
> >> interval.
> >
> > My usenet posts have not been separated by 8 year intervals :-)
>
> Sophistry and supercilliousness noted.

Truth is simply neither.

> >> >> You'd make a good Jesuit, you would, Andy!
> >> >
> >> > It remains my choice to not be religious.
> >>
> >> Your repetitiveness/verbigeration indicates otherwise.
> >
> > Not for folks with normal reading comprehension.
>
> Do I need to point out the obvious?

Without the LORD, your needs are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).

> > This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
> > you:
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> >
> > <incoherent babbling snipped>
>
> Incoherent babbling?

Yes.

> Oh, yes!

Glad you agree.

> the repeated request, written in perfectly
> good English - my native tongue for 52 years - that you tell us exactly
> where you treat patients.

QED :-)

Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS compelling
you to unwittingly be incoherent and babbling.

> >> We all want to know.
>
> Still the truth, despite your sophistry and cheap insults.

Untrue.

Not everyone wants to know.

> Andrew, **you** personalised this debate, live with it.

It remains my choice to not debate.

> You're the one
> trying to pull rank, you're the one claiming to be not just a doctor, but
> a consultant.

Not a claim but a fact.

> Prove it, or your rank-pulling is futile, and your
> "helping" people is very probably contrary to the law.

GOD's purpose for me here remains to inform and not to either prove or
convince.

> Here are some helpful questions, which you should be happy to answer in a
> direct and unambiguous manner:
>
> What is the name and location of the practice/hospital where you have
> lawful permission to treat patients?

If you had a true need to know, you would already know.

> What inspection process is it subject to, and by whom?

If you had a true need to know, you would already know.

> When does its licence expire?

If you had a true need to know, you would already know.

> Can you show us samples of its documentation e.g. brochures, patient
> information, weekly cleaning and inspection schedule, policies/procedures
> for the sterilization of instruments, infection control policy? If not,
> can you at least point us to an up-to-date inspection report for the
> practice you work at?

If you had a true need to know, you would already know.

> How many patients have you treated in the last 12 months?

If you had a true need to know, you would already know.

> These are not leading questions, they are your opportunity to establish
> your credibility.

It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

This is all that those with discerning hearts require.

JESUS WAS A COCKSUCKER!

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 4:39:20 PM9/5/07
to

"Sanity's Little Helper" <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote in message
news:Xns99A2D384...@194.177.96.26...

> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
> news:1189016537.4...@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com to
> alt.atheism:
>
>> convicted friend David Solomonson (dsolo) wrote:
>>> satan via a sockpuppet hissed in his usual lying fashion:
>>>
>>> >"he can not tell us that-cuz the hospital where he is employed as a
>>> >part-time janitor is ashamed of him."
>>>
>>> Why do you hate part-time janitors?
>>
>> Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.
>>
>
> Just tell us where you work and stop jerking people about.
>
> --
> David Silverman C.B.E.
> aa #2208
> it, either

> Not authentic without this signature.
> Not necessarily authentic with .

chunks is a god damn liar-he is not a licensed practitioner.
the closest hospital he gets to is the mental hospital.
that is where he digs in the garbage cans for his supper.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 5:01:42 PM9/5/07
to
convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted friend David Solomonson (dsolo) wrote:
> >> satan via a sockpuppet hissed in his usual lying fashion:
> >>
> >> >"he can not tell us that-cuz the hospital where he is employed as a
> >> >part-time janitor is ashamed of him."
> >>
> >> Why do you hate part-time janitors?
> >
> > Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.
> >
>
> Just tell us where you work and stop jerking people about.

Those who have a true need to know, already know :-)

duke

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 5:34:50 PM9/5/07
to
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:47:35 +0200 (CEST), "Sanity's Little Helper"
<elv...@noshpam.org> wrote:

>> Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.

An EXCELLANT comment.


duke, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 5:52:38 PM9/5/07
to
friend duke wrote:
> convicted neighbor David Silverman "satan's Little Helper" wrote:

> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> >> Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.
>
> An EXCELLANT comment.

Reminds me of a verse that my office manager has placed in our waiting
room in the form of a framed picture titled "The impact of a person's
life is in direct proportion to their commitment to Godly excellence"
with forest hills partially obscured in the background with a thick
blanket of clouds.

"Do you see a man skilled in his work? He will serve before kings; he
will not serve before obscure men." Proverbs 22:29

Amen.

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 5:58:14 PM9/5/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1189022179.8...@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com to
alt.atheism:

> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >>
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/2b7ec3aed3815
>> >> 6d6?
>> >
>> > <snip>
>> >> >
>> >> > Still here helping folks by posting on usenet in between seeing
>> >> > patients :-)
>> >>
>> >> Well, 8 years ago until now is quite a long interval, but it is an
>> >> interval.
>> >
>> > My usenet posts have not been separated by 8 year intervals :-)
>>
>> Sophistry and supercilliousness noted.
>
> Truth is simply neither.
>

Deliberate misconstruction noted.

>> >> >> You'd make a good Jesuit, you would, Andy!
>> >> >
>> >> > It remains my choice to not be religious.
>> >>
>> >> Your repetitiveness/verbigeration indicates otherwise.
>> >
>> > Not for folks with normal reading comprehension.
>>
>> Do I need to point out the obvious?
>
> Without the LORD, your needs are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>

You're good at misconstruing things. It's about all that you're good at.

>> > This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to
>> > convict you:
>> >
>> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>> >
>> > <incoherent babbling snipped>
>>
>> Incoherent babbling?
>
> Yes.
>
>> Oh, yes!
>
> Glad you agree.
>

Deliberate misconstruction noted.

>> the repeated request, written in perfectly
>> good English - my native tongue for 52 years - that you tell us
>> exactly where you treat patients.
>
> QED :-)
>

Deliberate misconstruction noted.

> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS compelling
> you to unwittingly be incoherent and babbling.
>

You are the only one who doesn't understand the question.

>> >> We all want to know.
>>
>> Still the truth, despite your sophistry and cheap insults.
>
> Untrue.
>
> Not everyone wants to know.
>
>> Andrew, **you** personalised this debate, live with it.
>
> It remains my choice to not debate.
>
>> You're the one
>> trying to pull rank, you're the one claiming to be not just a doctor,
>> but a consultant.
>
> Not a claim but a fact.
>
>> Prove it, or your rank-pulling is futile, and your
>> "helping" people is very probably contrary to the law.
>
> GOD's purpose for me here remains to inform and not to either prove or
> convince.
>

Tough. You just did. Sometimes a refusal to answer is an answer in
itself.


>> Here are some helpful questions, which you should be happy to answer
>> in a direct and unambiguous manner:
>>
>> What is the name and location of the practice/hospital where you have
>> lawful permission to treat patients?
>
> If you had a true need to know, you would already know.
>

And again.

>> What inspection process is it subject to, and by whom?
>
> If you had a true need to know, you would already know.
>

And again.

>> When does its licence expire?
>
> If you had a true need to know, you would already know.
>

And again.

>> Can you show us samples of its documentation e.g. brochures, patient
>> information, weekly cleaning and inspection schedule,
>> policies/procedures for the sterilization of instruments, infection
>> control policy? If not, can you at least point us to an up-to-date
>> inspection report for the practice you work at?
>
> If you had a true need to know, you would already know.
>

And again.

>> How many patients have you treated in the last 12 months?
>
> If you had a true need to know, you would already know.
>

And again. Sometimes a refusal to answer is an answer in itself.


>> These are not leading questions, they are your opportunity to
>> establish your credibility.
>
> It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
>
> This is all that those with discerning hearts require.
>

Do they all have "discerning hearts" at Emory University? Is that why
their hearts all sink at the mention of your name?

BTW, are you ever on the premises at Mableton Parkway? Let me guess,
you're taking the 5th on that one as well. Sometimes a refusal to answer
is an answer in itself.

--
David Silverman C.B.E.
aa #2208

Not authentic without this signature.

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 5:58:58 PM9/5/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in
news:1189026102.6...@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com to
alt.atheism:

> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > convicted friend David Solomonson (dsolo) wrote:
>> >> satan via a sockpuppet hissed in his usual lying fashion:
>> >>
>> >> >"he can not tell us that-cuz the hospital where he is employed as
a
>> >> >part-time janitor is ashamed of him."
>> >>
>> >> Why do you hate part-time janitors?
>> >
>> > Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.
>> >
>>
>> Just tell us where you work and stop jerking people about.
>
> Those who have a true need to know, already know :-)
>

Sometimes a refusal to answer is an answer in itself.

--

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 6:25:24 PM9/5/07
to
convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/2b7ec3aed38156d6?
> >> >
> >> > <snip>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Still here helping folks by posting on usenet in between seeing
> >> >> > patients :-)
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, 8 years ago until now is quite a long interval, but it is an
> >> >> interval.
> >> >
> >> > My usenet posts have not been separated by 8 year intervals :-)
> >>
> >> Sophistry and supercilliousness noted.
> >
> > Truth is simply neither.
>
> Deliberate misconstruction noted.

Lack of understanding observed.

> >> >> >> You'd make a good Jesuit, you would, Andy!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > It remains my choice to not be religious.
> >> >>
> >> >> Your repetitiveness/verbigeration indicates otherwise.
> >> >
> >> > Not for folks with normal reading comprehension.
> >>
> >> Do I need to point out the obvious?
> >
> > Without the LORD, your needs are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>
> You're good at misconstruing things. It's about all that you're good at.

Without the LORD, your opinions are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).

> >> > This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to
> >> > convict you:
> >> >
> >> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> >> >
> >> > <incoherent babbling snipped>
> >>
> >> Incoherent babbling?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> >> Oh, yes!
> >
> > Glad you agree.
>
> Deliberate misconstruction noted.

Writing is not construction.

> >> the repeated request, written in perfectly
> >> good English - my native tongue for 52 years - that you tell us
> >> exactly where you treat patients.
> >
> > QED :-)
>
> Deliberate misconstruction noted.

Smiling is not construction.

> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS compelling
> > you to unwittingly be incoherent and babbling.
>
> You are the only one who doesn't understand the question.

Where there is no question mark, there has been no question.

> >> >> We all want to know.
> >>
> >> Still the truth, despite your sophistry and cheap insults.
> >
> > Untrue.
> >
> > Not everyone wants to know.
> >
> >> Andrew, **you** personalised this debate, live with it.
> >
> > It remains my choice to not debate.
> >
> >> You're the one
> >> trying to pull rank, you're the one claiming to be not just a doctor,
> >> but a consultant.
> >
> > Not a claim but a fact.
> >
> >> Prove it, or your rank-pulling is futile, and your
> >> "helping" people is very probably contrary to the law.
> >
> > GOD's purpose for me here remains to inform and not to either prove or
> > convince.
>
> Tough. You just did.

No. HE did by using you.

> Sometimes a refusal to answer is an answer in itself.

Only for those whose hearts have been made discerning by the Holy
Spirit.

> >> Here are some helpful questions, which you should be happy to answer
> >> in a direct and unambiguous manner:
> >>
> >> What is the name and location of the practice/hospital where you have
> >> lawful permission to treat patients?
> >
> > If you had a true need to know, you would already know.
>
> And again.

Indeed :-)

> >> What inspection process is it subject to, and by whom?
> >
> > If you had a true need to know, you would already know.
>
> And again.

You are perseverating :-)

> >> When does its licence expire?
> >
> > If you had a true need to know, you would already know.
> >
> And again.

Your perseveration suggests that you may be suffering from OBS. Would
suggest you inform your doctor that you now perseverate along with
have delusions of grandeur that you write for everyone.

> >> Can you show us samples of its documentation e.g. brochures, patient
> >> information, weekly cleaning and inspection schedule,
> >> policies/procedures for the sterilization of instruments, infection
> >> control policy? If not, can you at least point us to an up-to-date
> >> inspection report for the practice you work at?
> >
> > If you had a true need to know, you would already know.
>
> And again.

See above.

> >> How many patients have you treated in the last 12 months?
> >
> > If you had a true need to know, you would already know.
>
> And again. Sometimes a refusal to answer is an answer in itself.

Obsession is always an indication of a loss of free will.

> >> These are not leading questions, they are your opportunity to
> >> establish your credibility.
> >
> > It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
> >
> > This is all that those with discerning hearts require.
>
> Do they all have "discerning hearts" at Emory University?

No.

> Is that why their hearts all sink at the mention of your name?

It is understandable for folks to dislike getting crank phone calls.

> BTW, are you ever on the premises at Mableton Parkway?

Mableton Parkway is a road and not a "premises."

> Let me guess,
> you're taking the 5th on that one as well. Sometimes a refusal to answer
> is an answer in itself.

Without the LORD, your guesses are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).

This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
you:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 6:37:18 PM9/5/07
to
convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> > convicted friend David Solomonson (dsolo) wrote:
> >> >> satan via a sockpuppet hissed in his usual lying fashion:
> >> >>
> >> >> >"he can not tell us that-cuz the hospital where he is employed as
> a
> >> >> >part-time janitor is ashamed of him."
> >> >>
> >> >> Why do you hate part-time janitors?
> >> >
> >> > Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Just tell us where you work and stop jerking people about.
> >
> > Those who have a true need to know, already know :-)
>
> Sometimes a refusal to answer is an answer in itself.

Obsession always indicates a loss of free will.

This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
you:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

Robibnikoff

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 6:42:33 PM9/5/07
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1189029158.0...@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...

> friend duke wrote:
>> convicted neighbor David Silverman "satan's Little Helper" wrote:
>> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> >> Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.
>>
>> An EXCELLANT comment.
>
> Reminds me of a verse t

Fuck you, nym-shitter
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 5, 2007, 7:30:13 PM9/5/07
to
convicted neighbor Robibnikoff wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > friend duke wrote:
> >> convicted neighbor David Silverman "satan's Little Helper" wrote:
> >> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.
> >>
> >> An EXCELLANT comment.
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8757754452e5e359?
>
> Fuck you, nym-shitter

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Proof

This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
you:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

Phil Aypee

unread,
Sep 6, 2007, 3:15:13 AM9/6/07
to
Hi,

Sanity's Little Helper wrote - boring stuff arguing with a boring stiff.

Arguing with evangelicals is stupid, even if you are one yourself.

Be argumentative if you wish - but only bores will read you!

Take care,
Phil.

Nosterill

unread,
Sep 6, 2007, 4:46:17 AM9/6/07
to
On Sep 5, 8:56 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

It seems that you are failing your god rather badly then, doesn't it?
Practically every other line in this message is a flat refusal to
inform.

> Cardiologist- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 6, 2007, 5:17:07 AM9/6/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in
news:1189031838.6...@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com to alt.atheism:

> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >> > convicted friend David Solomonson (dsolo) wrote:
>> >> >> satan via a sockpuppet hissed in his usual lying fashion:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >"he can not tell us that-cuz the hospital where he is employed
as
>> a
>> >> >> >part-time janitor is ashamed of him."
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Why do you hate part-time janitors?
>> >> >
>> >> > Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Just tell us where you work and stop jerking people about.
>> >
>> > Those who have a true need to know, already know :-)
>>
>> Sometimes a refusal to answer is an answer in itself.
>
> Obsession always indicates a loss of free will.
>

Whatever.

Sanity's Little Helper

unread,
Sep 6, 2007, 5:24:28 AM9/6/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in
news:1189031124.2...@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com to
alt.support.anxiety-panic:

<snip>
Jumping threads and Google accounts is running away.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 6, 2007, 7:05:09 AM9/6/07
to
convicted neighbor (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/620392f6fb2aadfc?
>
> Jumping threads

No such thing.

Bottom line:

You remain untruthful.

This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
you:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

> and Google accounts is running away.

As if wearing a different hat is running away.

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Hollywood

unread,
Sep 6, 2007, 7:39:12 AM9/6/07
to
On Sep 4, 5:06 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"

<and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
> convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
>
> > Andrew arrogantly wrote:

> > We all want to know.
>
> Your false belief that you write for everyone would be a delusion of
> grandeur.

I'd like to know, and I'm sure there are others who'd be curious to
know what
hospital allows you near patients outside of the waiting room for the
pharmacy
where you pick up the pills which clearly aren't working.

Robibnikoff

unread,
Sep 6, 2007, 10:39:32 AM9/6/07
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1189035013.1...@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...

> convicted neighbor Robibnikoff wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > friend duke wrote:
>> >> convicted neighbor David Silverman "satan's Little Helper" wrote:
>> >> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.
>> >>
>> >> An EXCELLANT comment.
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8757754452e5e359?
>>
>> Fuck you, nym-shitter
>
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Proof

Fuck off, again, Asshole. RE-PLONK!

JESUS WAS A COCKSUCKER!

unread,
Sep 6, 2007, 12:07:55 PM9/6/07
to

"duke" <duckg...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:r68ud35kgat9snf9t...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:47:35 +0200 (CEST), "Sanity's Little Helper"
> <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote:
>
>>> Understandably without GOD, satan has no capacity for love.
>
> An EXCELLANT comment.
>
>
> duke, American-Idiot.
> *****
> "The Mass is the most perfect form of idiocy for idiots."
> Pope Paul VI
> *****
you just did it again puke.
another post proving your stupid.


Michael Gray

unread,
Sep 6, 2007, 7:05:11 PM9/6/07
to

Well, that was boring as well as tedious.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 6, 2007, 7:19:40 PM9/6/07
to

You remain in my prayers:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

les_on_usenet

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 6:00:21 AM9/7/07
to

Well, all we ever seem to get on this newsgroup is the
same old boring stuff. ID - tedious, atheist are angry -yawn,
atheists religion -snore, quotes from the Bible - is there some
interesting paint drying anywhere? And of course assertion
after assertion after assertion. Yep this tedious nonesense
never ends and these fools have been prattling out this
same superstitious nonesense ever since mankind first emerged
200-150,000 years ago to reach new unabated heights 2000 years
ago when the utimate idiot religion emerged to take the fools crown.

Les Hellawell
Greetings from
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County

Michael Gray

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 8:01:57 AM9/7/07
to

Can I sense some repressed anger there? ;)

les_on_usenet

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 9:08:33 AM9/7/07
to
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:31:57 +0930, Michael Gray
<mike...@newsguy.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:00:21 +0100, les_on_usenet
><delete...@leswell.freeuk.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:35:11 +0930, Michael Gray
>><mike...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:14:13 -0001, phil.see...@uk.invalid (Phil
>>>Aypee) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>Sanity's Little Helper wrote - boring stuff arguing with a boring stiff.
>>>>
>>>>Arguing with evangelicals is stupid, even if you are one yourself.
>>>>
>>>>Be argumentative if you wish - but only bores will read you!
>>>>
>>>>Take care,
>>>>Phil.
>>>
>>>Well, that was boring as well as tedious.
>>
>>Well, all we ever seem to get on this newsgroup is the
>>same old boring stuff. ID - tedious, atheist are angry -yawn,
>>atheists religion -snore, quotes from the Bible - is there some
>>interesting paint drying anywhere? And of course assertion
>>after assertion after assertion. Yep this tedious nonesense
>>never ends and these fools have been prattling out this
>>same superstitious nonesense ever since mankind first emerged
>>200-150,000 years ago to reach new unabated heights 2000 years
>>ago when the utimate idiot religion emerged to take the fools crown.
>
>Can I sense some repressed anger there? ;)

Only at the stupidity of it all and the harm it has done mankind. I
like to think, believe even that mankind aught to be able to do better
than this.

Archie Leach

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 1:51:33 PM9/7/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:

>
>> Andrew, **you** personalised this debate, live with it.
>
>It remains my choice to not debate.

Wow, more Kentucky Fried Chungshit. Chungfuck certainly has a rather
unique definition of "debate".

Either that, or else he's morally rotten, intellectually corrupt, and
spiritually dishonest.

Aratzio

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 2:05:22 PM9/7/07
to
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:51:33 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Archie Leach
<arc...@no.spam> bloviated:

I thought he was a fuckhead?

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

Archie Leach

unread,
Sep 7, 2007, 3:56:41 PM9/7/07
to
Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:51:33 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Archie Leach
><arc...@no.spam> bloviated:
>
>>"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> Andrew, **you** personalised this debate, live with it.
>>>
>>>It remains my choice to not debate.
>>
>>Wow, more Kentucky Fried Chungshit. Chungfuck certainly has a rather
>>unique definition of "debate".
>>
>>Either that, or else he's morally rotten, intellectually corrupt, and
>>spiritually dishonest.
>>
>>
>I thought he was a fuckhead?

Name calling only shows that you're absolutely RIGHT in calling Chung
a "Fuckhead".

Masahiro Saito

unread,
Sep 19, 2007, 6:11:42 PM9/19/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <hear...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in message
news:1189076709.8...@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...

God Bless you!

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Sep 19, 2007, 6:19:27 PM9/19/07
to
friend Masahiro Saito wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor David Silverman (satan's Little Helper) wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/620392f6fb2aadfc?
> >>
> >> Jumping threads
> >
> > No such thing.
> >
> > Bottom line:
> >
> > You remain untruthful.
> >
> > This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
> > you:
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> >
> >> and Google accounts is running away.
> >
> > As if wearing a different hat is running away.
> >
> > Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
> >
> > http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease
>
> God Bless you!

Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS moving you
to bless me :-)

Laus Deo !

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we
can love our neighbors a little more and HIM infinitely more.

0 new messages