Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Coronary arteries and favorite locations and oddities and things

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Po...@nospam.invalid

unread,
Dec 28, 2006, 9:50:25 PM12/28/06
to
Are there any particular locations that are more susceptible to
Atherosclerosis than others? I keep hearing about the RCA, LCA, LAD,
and Circumflex. But I seldom hear of arteries in the rear of the
heart. Do they not develop disease as often back there?

Incidentally, I just learned that the Circumflex system services the
right rear of the heart in 15% of people but, most commonly (85%) the
Right Coronary Artery branches off back there. I find that
interesting. Anybody here know why some of us are different? Do the
Circumflex dominant peeps have anything else in common with each
other? <shug> just curious (I have no idea which category I belong
to).

Port

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 29, 2006, 3:18:28 AM12/29/06
to
Po...@nospam.invalid wrote:

> Are there any particular locations that are more susceptible to
> Atherosclerosis than others?

Locations where there is more turbulent blood flow.

> I keep hearing about the RCA, LCA, LAD,
> and Circumflex. But I seldom hear of arteries in the rear of the
> heart. Do they not develop disease as often back there?

The RCA and Circumflex (by way of marginals) typically supply the back
of the heart.

> Incidentally, I just learned that the Circumflex system services the
> right rear of the heart in 15% of people but, most commonly (85%) the
> Right Coronary Artery branches off back there. I find that
> interesting. Anybody here know why some of us are different?

GOD's choice.

> Do the
> Circumflex dominant peeps have anything else in common with each
> other? <shug> just curious (I have no idea which category I belong
> to).

They tend to be left-handed ( just kidding :-)

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we
can love our neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a lot more
dear neighbor whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love

Po...@nospam.invalid

unread,
Dec 29, 2006, 9:10:54 AM12/29/06
to
Port wrote:
>> Are there any particular locations that are more susceptible to
>> Atherosclerosis than others?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>Locations where there is more turbulent blood flow.

So I guess I'm wrong about Atherosclerosis being more prevalent in the
front... assuming the heart's backside arteries are just as turbulent
as the front.

>> Do the
>> Circumflex dominant peeps have anything else in common with each
>> other? <shug> just curious (I have no idea which category I belong
>> to).
>
>They tend to be left-handed ( just kidding :-)

....aha... I suspected something like that. I was thinking they may
be more liberal minded or tilt left when they walk.

Seriously though, I found it to be a bit remarkable. As if 15% of the
population had six fingers on the left hand. Or both ears on one side
of the head. I was thinking genetics (family) might play a part or it
might be limited more to race or gender. Apparently, one system works
as well as the other though, huh?

Port

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 29, 2006, 9:16:45 AM12/29/06
to
P...@nospam.invalid wrote:
> Port wrote:
> >> Are there any particular locations that are more susceptible to
> >> Atherosclerosis than others?
>
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> >Locations where there is more turbulent blood flow.
>
> So I guess I'm wrong about Atherosclerosis being more prevalent in the
> front... assuming the heart's backside arteries are just as turbulent
> as the front.

Atherosclerosis is more likely to happen to a greater degree at the
ostia (openings) and at branch points.

> >> Do the
> >> Circumflex dominant peeps have anything else in common with each
> >> other? <shug> just curious (I have no idea which category I belong
> >> to).
> >
> >They tend to be left-handed ( just kidding :-)
>
> ....aha... I suspected something like that. I was thinking they may
> be more liberal minded or tilt left when they walk.

:-)

> Seriously though, I found it to be a bit remarkable. As if 15% of the
> population had six fingers on the left hand. Or both ears on one side
> of the head. I was thinking genetics (family) might play a part or it
> might be limited more to race or gender. Apparently, one system works
> as well as the other though, huh?

It is wiser to ask for and receive GOD's blessing obviating the need to
ever find out whether one has a dominant left circumflex :-)

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we

can love our neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a lot more,
dear neighbor Port whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love

> Port

Jaguar

unread,
Dec 29, 2006, 11:15:54 AM12/29/06
to

Andrew Chung:

Is a frequent and proven liar (evidence archived forever on Google)

Has lost numerous NNTP accounts with supernews and others, has had many

Google accounts nuked, and his vanity domain heartmdphd.com is now
banned from setting up accounts. He is instead using multiple Google
sock accounts and email addresses in the format l...@thetruth.com (#
being a number)

Is unemployed after being sacked with cause from his one and only job
after just over 80 days

Fled the state of Florida, and now claims to practice in Georgia
despite
having no admission priveliges in the State's hospitals

Runs a phony foundation with a total declared income of circa $200, the

ownership and contact details of which are obfuscated on its website

Makes failed prophecies concerning earthquakes with areas and dates,
which don't happen (remember the bible quotes about false prophets)

Performed a public attempt at 'exorcising' a Malaysian sock on usenet,
then denied doing it. He has recently reversed position again and
admits
to practicing exorcism by usenet, proving himself a liar in the
process.

Promotes a dangerous diet, with a million dollar guarantee that he
demands thirty dollars to access details of. This despite being
unemployed. His soliciting and spamming for donations looks to be
similar to the Nigerian Advance Fee Fraud, where victims pay money
upfront in the hope of coming into money but find they have merely
bought into a lie. Part of his advice is to pour nail polish remover
onto food.

Declares he has a cardiology practice despite posting night and day
from
the same IP address (his home presumably) or a coffee shop internet
cafe

Makes further false prophecies that we should now be all dying in a
bird
flu pandemic. When these fail to happen, he does them all over again
and
changes the dates. Nuclear war is another Chung spciality, which
naturally doesn't happen when he says it is going to.

Worships evil hatemonger Fred Phelps and will not denounce the acts of
Westboro's congregation. He even accuses someone with the name Phelps
of
being Fred's son and refuses to accept he is completely wrong.

Uses the same patter as Pat Robertson, indicating his religious
activity
is confined to watching cable TV. No evidence Chung has ever attended a

church.

Has a tendency to cyberstalk, particularly women. His wife fled some
time ago to another state, an act which Chung tries to pass of as
"being
on vacation".

Frequently passes himself off as being qualified in areas such as
endocrinology, despite making incredibly funddamental blunders in his
'advice'. It is no wonder the Florida heart facility terminated him,
and
has publicly denounced his version of events. Again archived on Google.


Don't forget the fake fast, where he didn't lose any weight, as well as

the infamous 666 stamping fiasco.

Joe Doe

unread,
Dec 29, 2006, 10:07:04 PM12/29/06
to
In article <s9v8p25bkbhl03q0n...@4ax.com>,
Po...@nospam.invalid wrote:

> Are there any particular locations that are more susceptible to
> Atherosclerosis than others? I keep hearing about the RCA, LCA, LAD,
> and Circumflex. But I seldom hear of arteries in the rear of the
> heart. Do they not develop disease as often back there?

The current model is that damage to the endothelium allows infiltration
of LDL or some variant form of it (Lp(a) for example). LDL gets
oxidized and this triggers it to be ingested by phagocytes and they in
turn send out inflamatory signals, attract other cells, platelets etc
and provoke plaque to build up. The "foam cells" ultimately die because
they cannot really process the LDL efficiently. The process is repeated
as plaque builds up.

So the primary insult is something that can damage the endothelium.
This could be at places of turbulent blood flow as Andy suggested,
damage to the endothelium due to high blood pressure, high blood glucose
(loosens the glue between cells), smoking, infections etc. You will
recognize that many of these are known risk factors for heart disease
and that is why to a certain extent heart disease is controlled by
changing your lifestyle. Protecting the integrity of the endothelium of
your artery is of primary importance (hopefully initiated when very
young) but still better late than never.

Roland

Po...@nospam.invalid

unread,
Dec 30, 2006, 9:58:05 AM12/30/06
to
Joe Doe wrote:
>So the primary insult is something that can damage the endothelium.
>This could be at places of turbulent blood flow as Andy suggested,

Wouldn't running a catheter up & down within coronary arteries cause
as much damage as turbulent blood flow?

Each of my caths has shown disease spread to new locations and one of
my suspicions has been that the cath procedure itself is making
matters worse. My docs don't seem the least concerned about that
though. And neither have they offered a satisfactory explanation.

Port <----who has yet another cath procedure scheduled soon

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Jan 2, 2007, 9:58:30 PM1/2/07
to
Po...@nospam.invalid wrote:
> Joe Doe wrote:
> >So the primary insult is something that can damage the endothelium.
> >This could be at places of turbulent blood flow as Andy suggested,
>
> Wouldn't running a catheter up & down within coronary arteries cause
> as much damage as turbulent blood flow?

A catheter running up and down within a coronary artery would be
inadvertant.

Using a King multipurpose catheter does make this much less likely to
happen especially for the more vital left main coronary artery.

> Each of my caths has shown disease spread to new locations and one of
> my suspicions has been that the cath procedure itself is making
> matters worse. My docs don't seem the least concerned about that
> though. And neither have they offered a satisfactory explanation.

Atherosclerosis is an active and ongoing inflammatory process in folks
that continue to have risk factors for disease progression.

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we
can love our neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a lot more,
dear neighbor Port whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love

Meanwhile, HIS brethren have been blessed:

http://MabletonGA.OurLittle.net/DreadNought

... and continue to be blessed:

http://MabletonGA.OurLittle.net/Guarantee

(note: Only those who are blessed by GOD will have access to these and
other related OurLittle.net articles per a secure IP database. All
others will have to make charitable $30.00 donations to
TheWellnessFoundation.com first to gain access.)

0 new messages