What would be a good Simulator?
Xanax
I have MultiSim 2001 Personal.
I have been told be a few folk that it's not great.
I'm interested in Simulation RF circuits tank circuits etc..
Is there a program out there that can do that that is olso with in a Joe
Bloggs budget???
Xanax.
Henry
Jim Thompson
I think the consensus here is that Mike Engelhardt's LTSpice is
certainly the best action for the buck... it's free.
...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |
I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
Paul Burridge
<inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 22:40:54 -0000, "Xanax" <j...@fo.mo> wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>I have MultiSim 2001 Personal.
>>I have been told be a few folk that it's not great.
>>
>>I'm interested in Simulation RF circuits tank circuits etc..
>>Is there a program out there that can do that that is olso with in a Joe
>>Bloggs budget???
>>
>>Xanax.
>>
>
>I think the consensus here is that Mike Engelhardt's LTSpice is
>certainly the best action for the buck... it's free.
Hey! Jim Thompson finally admits to the supremacy of LT!
Oh happy day! :-)
--
"Windows [n.], A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch
to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit
microprocessor and produced by a two bit company."
Jim Thompson
<p...@osiris.notthisbit.co.uk> wrote:
>On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 15:46:21 -0700, Jim Thompson
><inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 22:40:54 -0000, "Xanax" <j...@fo.mo> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>I have MultiSim 2001 Personal.
>>>I have been told be a few folk that it's not great.
>>>
>>>I'm interested in Simulation RF circuits tank circuits etc..
>>>Is there a program out there that can do that that is olso with in a Joe
>>>Bloggs budget???
>>>
>>>Xanax.
>>>
>>
>>I think the consensus here is that Mike Engelhardt's LTSpice is
>>certainly the best action for the buck... it's free.
>
>Hey! Jim Thompson finally admits to the supremacy of LT!
>Oh happy day! :-)
No I didn't! I said "best action for the buck".
EIDDO
Kevin Aylward
> On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 15:46:21 -0700, Jim Thompson
> <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 22:40:54 -0000, "Xanax" <j...@fo.mo> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I have MultiSim 2001 Personal.
>>> I have been told be a few folk that it's not great.
>>>
>>> I'm interested in Simulation RF circuits tank circuits etc..
>>> Is there a program out there that can do that that is olso with in
>>> a Joe Bloggs budget???
>>>
>>> Xanax.
>>>
>>
>> I think the consensus here is that Mike Engelhardt's LTSpice is
>> certainly the best action for the buck... it's free.
>
> Hey! Jim Thompson finally admits to the supremacy of LT!
> Oh happy day! :-)
As usual, this is where you dont actually take in *exactly* what was
said:-)
Bang for the buck means BB = quality/cost.
A cost = 0, makes BB infinite. It does not make something the best
quality, as might be inferred by a claim of "supremacy".
In reality, for many/most projects, the free SuperSpice demo achieves
similar practical BB as LTSpice. This is because, if you use the
schematic hierarchy you can actually use 750 components (30 schematic
blocks * 25 component per block).
Kevin Aylward
salesE...@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
Terry Pinnell
See my notes and links to some 60 ECAD programs at
http://www.terrypin.dial.pipex.com/ECADList.html
quite a few of which have simulation facilities.
Terry Pinnell
Hobbyist, West Sussex, UK
Paul Burridge
<kevindotayl...@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:
>Paul Burridge wrote:
>> On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 15:46:21 -0700, Jim Thompson
>> <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 22:40:54 -0000, "Xanax" <j...@fo.mo> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> I have MultiSim 2001 Personal.
>>>> I have been told be a few folk that it's not great.
>>>>
>>>> I'm interested in Simulation RF circuits tank circuits etc..
>>>> Is there a program out there that can do that that is olso with in
>>>> a Joe Bloggs budget???
>>>>
>>>> Xanax.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think the consensus here is that Mike Engelhardt's LTSpice is
>>> certainly the best action for the buck... it's free.
>>
>> Hey! Jim Thompson finally admits to the supremacy of LT!
>> Oh happy day! :-)
>
>As usual, this is where you dont actually take in *exactly* what was
>said:-)
>
>Bang for the buck means BB = quality/cost.
Yeah, I know what ol' Jim was getting at; I was just pulling his
chain. :-)
Seriously, though, the OP was asking about RF-specific simulation, was
he not? In which case Serenade SV might be worth his while to check
out. It's fee and whilst I don't have the URL handy, I'm sure a search
under Serenade SV would bring it up.
Xanax
LTSpice isn't what I'm after. It doesn't do any UHF RF analysing. I'll check
out Serenade SV and see what it can do.
Cheers,
Xanax.
"Terry Pinnell" <terrypi...@dial.pipexTHIS.com> wrote in message
news:vogcqv4m3pijoh1hm...@4ax.com...
Henry
than LTspice.
I thought "analysis" means man-made thinking??? Otherwise we can fire all
the rf engineers... :)
- Henry
Xanax schrieb in Nachricht ...