How much does Mirka weigh?
TT
Whisper
> http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Federer+s+fun+in+the+sun+cmaTmILs7w_l.jpg?70678EX_FEDERER_B-GR_04
>
>
> 120kg?
What about the left leg?
Thomas R. Kettler
wrote:
> http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Federer+s+fun+in+the+sun+cmaTmILs7w_l.jpg?7
> 0678EX_FEDERER_B-GR_04
>
> 120kg?
Minor point: a kg is a unit of mass, not weight, as weight indicates the
attraction of an object by the earth or gravity.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight>
The SI unit for weight or force is the newton (N).
--
Remove blown from email address to reply.
wkhedr
> http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Federer+s+fun+in+the+sun+cmaTmILs7...
>
> 120kg?
She is like 33-34 years old with two babies and is a retired athlete.
She is not a model and to be honest I find her an attractive woman and
wife.
TT
Thank you for clarification, I guess. That's how the question about
someone's mass is asked in English though?
TT
> In article <UdU0o.1776$136...@uutiset.elisa.fi>, TT <n...@email.org>
> wrote:
>
>> http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Federer+s+fun+in+the+sun+cmaTmILs7w_l.jpg?7
>> 0678EX_FEDERER_B-GR_04
>>
>> 120kg?
>
> Minor point: a kg is a unit of mass, not weight, as weight indicates the
> attraction of an object by the earth or gravity.
>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight>
Ok then. Let's assume assume Mirka is not accelerating, being stationary
on earth, as in the picture, how much does she weigh?
TT
...in fact she looks like a person who would be unlikely to accelerate
or elevate much.
--
http://s4.postimage.org/DqPli-07bec5b30fb99d26898facc4e66e141e.jpg
Fan
wrote:
> In article <UdU0o.1776$136....@uutiset.elisa.fi>, TT <n...@email.org>
> wrote:
>
> >http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Federer+s+fun+in+the+sun+cmaTmILs7...
> > 0678EX_FEDERER_B-GR_04
>
> > 120kg?
>
> Minor point: a kg is a unit of mass, not weight, as weight indicates the
> attraction of an object by the earth or gravity.
>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass>
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight>
>
> The SI unit for weight or force is the newton (N).
> --
within the metric system and while you are correct, so are those who
use kg as weight.
It is a crazy messed up system and while your concept is more accepted
in the scientific community, the other way is just as good, especially
in common commerce.
I noticed at Wimbledon that Mirka looked a lot slimmer and more
attractive than she has lately. She was not fat and her hair looked
much nicer. This is saying a lot, coming from someone who is not a
Federer fan.
missy
>
> - Show quoted text -
Now Roger is almost retired , hes been keepin her more in shape with a
daily regime of push ups.. prob how he hurt his back
felangey
attractive than she has lately. She was not fat and her hair looked
much nicer. This is saying a lot, coming from someone who is not a
Federer fan.<
Wow...that is so big of you. Why would somebody judge someone they don't
know on the strength of the fact that they are not a fan of somebody else
they don't know? Lack of maturity I'll bet.
Superdave
Mirka is a gem. Roger is a very lucky guy. Mirk is no floozy or gold digging
tart but a loyal faithful wife which is what Roger wants and needs. He is no
Tiger Woods and Mirka is no Oksana Grigorieva.
Fan
Lucky us, we have you and your posts as a shining examples of
maturity :-(
Thomas R. Kettler
wrote:
You could always ask the following:
Is Mirka massive or diminutive?
pltr...@xhost.org
<tket...@blownfuse.net> wrote:
>The SI unit for weight or force is the newton (N).
No one gives a fig.
-- Larry
TT
> In article <p8V0o.1789$136...@uutiset.elisa.fi>, TT <n...@email.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Thomas R. Kettler wrote:
>>> In article <UdU0o.1776$136...@uutiset.elisa.fi>, TT <n...@email.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Federer+s+fun+in+the+sun+cmaTmILs7w_l.jp
>>>> g?7
>>>> 0678EX_FEDERER_B-GR_04
>>>>
>>>> 120kg?
>>> Minor point: a kg is a unit of mass, not weight, as weight indicates the
>>> attraction of an object by the earth or gravity.
>>>
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass>
>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight>
>>>
>>> The SI unit for weight or force is the newton (N).
>> Thank you for clarification, I guess. That's how the question about
>> someone's mass is asked in English though?
>
> You could always ask the following:
>
> Is Mirka massive or diminutive?
Compared to what, whales?
--
http://s4.postimage.org/DqPli-07bec5b30fb99d26898facc4e66e141e.jpg
Joe Ramirez
> > wrote:
>
> >> Thomas R. Kettler wrote:
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>>http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Federer+s+fun+in+the+sun+cmaTmILs7...
> >>>> g?7
> >>>> 0678EX_FEDERER_B-GR_04
>
> >>>> 120kg?
> >>> Minor point: a kg is a unit of mass, not weight, as weight indicates the
> >>> attraction of an object by the earth or gravity.
>
> >>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass>
> >>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight>
>
> >>> The SI unit for weight or force is the newton (N).
> >> Thank you for clarification, I guess. That's how the question about
> >> someone's mass is asked in English though?
>
> > You could always ask the following:
>
> > Is Mirka massive or diminutive?
>
> Compared to what, whales?
Is this stupid thread designed to discredit the notion that RST
participants have high IQs?
Superdave
>Thomas R. Kettler wrote:
>> In article <p8V0o.1789$136...@uutiset.elisa.fi>, TT <n...@email.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thomas R. Kettler wrote:
>>>> In article <UdU0o.1776$136...@uutiset.elisa.fi>, TT <n...@email.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Federer+s+fun+in+the+sun+cmaTmILs7w_l.jp
>>>>> g?7
>>>>> 0678EX_FEDERER_B-GR_04
>>>>>
>>>>> 120kg?
>>>> Minor point: a kg is a unit of mass, not weight, as weight indicates the
>>>> attraction of an object by the earth or gravity.
>>>>
>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass>
>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight>
>>>>
>>>> The SI unit for weight or force is the newton (N).
>>> Thank you for clarification, I guess. That's how the question about
>>> someone's mass is asked in English though?
>>
>> You could always ask the following:
>>
>> Is Mirka massive or diminutive?
>
>Compared to what, whales?
How about Serena !
Sakari Lund
People hide their high IQs really well in rst. I guess you must have a
really high IQ to be able to hide it so well.
Hola
> http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Federer+s+fun+in+the+sun+cmaTmILs7...
>
Just needs a little hip, thigh and belly liposuction.
Iceberg
you can take a guess what she's like, she never smiles for a start.
Also I've met her briefly once and she comes across how she looks.
missy
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:15:22 +0300, TT <n...@email.org> wrote:
> >Thomas R. Kettler wrote:
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> Thomas R. Kettler wrote:
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Federer+s+fun+in+the+sun+cmaTmILs7...
> >>>>> g?7
> >>>>> 0678EX_FEDERER_B-GR_04
>
> >>>>> 120kg?
> >>>> Minor point: a kg is a unit of mass, not weight, as weight indicates the
> >>>> attraction of an object by the earth or gravity.
>
> >>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass>
> >>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight>
>
> >>>> The SI unit for weight or force is the newton (N).
> >>> Thank you for clarification, I guess. That's how the question about
> >>> someone's mass is asked in English though?
>
> >> You could always ask the following:
>
> >> Is Mirka massive or diminutive?
>
> >Compared to what, whales?
>
> How about Serena !
Seerena ass has its own moon .
Joubert
> People hide their high IQs really well in rst. I guess you must have a
> really high IQ to be able to hide it so well.
>
Ahahahahahah
TT
Well actually Thomas was rather smart, the question was not so much
about mass, but rather universal attraction.
According to the law of universal gravitation, the attractive force (F)
between two bodies is proportional to the product of their masses (m1
and m2), and inversely proportional to the square of the distance (r)
between them:
F = G*(m1*m2}/r^2
Now, for example, let's imagine that Mirka would be stationary on Mars,
how much would she weight:
(m1)Mirka's mass on Earth = 120
(m2)Mass of Mars/Earth = 0.107
(r)Radius of Mars/Earth = 0.533
Answer: Mirka would weight only 45.2 on Mars... and yet she would be
even less attractive to me in Newtonian sense since the distance between
us would be greater. So maybe Thomas didn't have a point.
On the other, as we know that one year in Mars is little over 2 Earth
years...she would be around 17 years old on Mars. Wow!
Javier González Nicolini
Serena is so big, Obi Wan Kenobi said "That's no moon... that's
SERENA!!!"
/$1 to Seth Green
Sakari Lund
This shows how difficult it is to measure intelligence, and how
different meanings there are for intelligence. You may think that was
very intelligent. But I think what Joe meant, and I definitely mean,
is that starting a thread called "How much does Mirka weigh?" is not
very intelligent.
Joubert
> This shows how difficult it is to measure intelligence, and how
> different meanings there are for intelligence. You may think that was
> very intelligent.
That's seventh grade physics actually.
TT
Obviously you missed the point that discussing Mirka's MASS is not very
intelligent or tactful, but discussing her WEIGHT is! :-P
--
http://s4.postimage.org/DqPli-07bec5b30fb99d26898facc4e66e141e.jpg
Mark
> http://www1.pictures.zimbio.com/bg/Federer+s+fun+in+the+sun+cmaTmILs7...
>
165 lbs is my guess.
Mark
>
He more than likely hurt his back by always being on it while ball
boys sucked his dick.
bob
:-)
bob