evidence shows ped ophelia not harmful

[commander zero rides]

The pe do philia scare is a fake. It is not harmful. That is why they
refuse to allow anyone to discuss the issue openly. It would reveal
that there is much evidence that it is harmless and can be
beneficial.

check out these sources:

Gilbert Herdt on the culture of the Sambia people.

The Rind Report

"Harmful to Minors" by Judith Levine

"Love Against Hate" by Karl Meninger

It is even mentioned as common practice in the opera Don Giovanni by
Mozart.

There are more sources. Have you ever noticed that only westerners
are
arrested overseas? The locals never are.

The sex hysteria is being used as a pretext to distract the people
from the failings of the government and to make them fear the
government.

[Al Arduengo]

I will personally bust a cap in the cranium of any pedophile I can. I
have children. If you are a pedophile, please kill yourself. Do society
a favor.

--
~/.signature

[RHF]

(OT) : Off-Topic "Sick-O" Post

[msg]

RHF wrote:

> (OT) : Off-Topic "Sick-O" Post
>
What the heck does this refer to? Why didn't you preserve the original
header or include a partial quotation so we could determine the context?

Regards,

Michael

[RHF]

MSG - Here is a Link to the original 'sick' Message; since
you seem not to be able to simply follow this Thread.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/6e8d8245e2de8de4

now go vomit on a sick-o like the orignal poster ~ RHF
-or- maybe you enjoy that topic and ideas - I DON'T [.]
.

[craigm]

RHF wrote:

Actually, RHF, it is you who can't seem to understand that others do not see
threads that same as you do. Google displays threads differently than other
usenet readers. Most readers group threads based upon the subject. When you
change the subject, you create a new thread.

You view the world from your distorted perspective. Try thinking about the
other readers of the group.

[Telamon]

In article <_5dHi.18$4O3.1...@news.sisna.com>,
craigm <no...@domain.invalid> wrote:

Try thinking about the people that already have this stuff kill filed
until the OT news group idiot brings it up.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

[msg]

RHF wrote:

How can I follow a non-existent thread; I am not on 'Google Groups'.
In Usenet, the header determines the threading logic for many
newsreaders. If you create a new header, it begins a new thread.
I had no idea what you were talking about with no references to
any previous posts by message ID or to previous threads by
name.

I have no interest in the content of any perverse postings; just
expect that Usenet conventions be maintained so we're not kept
guessing.

Regards,

Michael