DRUDGE TO REPLACE LIMBAUGH SLOT IN SHORT TERM!!!
James
WOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
DRUDGE IN THE DAYTIME !!!!!!!
THIS IS BETTER THAN SEX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Roger
news:10670216...@newshost03.voicenet.com...
Do you know what sex is?
Grinder
"Roger" <rog...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ERfmb.5860$lL6....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
Sure does. Just ask his blow-up Betty.
Mike Wilcox
Is that who that whining idiot was on the show today? he sounded
like all his comments were being read off cue cards. Pathetic.
--
Mike Wilcox
Stephen Denney
I wonder if he will talk about Arnold Schwarzenegger's interaction with
black weightlifters.
- Steve Denney
NoSur...@never.net
So writes the anonymous and forever totally unknown person using lousy
grammar.
Have a nice Day!!
Cheerio,
Dennis, Proud, America-Loving NEOCON, Finest Kind Irish/English
Billary
Grinder
"Billary" <Bil...@vastrightwingconspiracy.org> wrote in message
news:kGimb.32270$RP2....@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
>
>
Your most intelligent post to date.
Mike Wilcox
Nothing anonymous about me, my name is on every post. BTW, Limbaugh's show
is finished if they keep using such high calibre guest hosts.
--
Mike Wilcox
WShoots1
SEX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >>
Either you don't how to ...., or I don't know how to listen.
Bill, K5BY
NoSur...@never.net
<appra...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Is that your arrogance or ignorance showing?
NoSur...@never.net
<appra...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
You write that as if you really, really, really know the mind of
Rush's 22,000,000 fans. Is that your arrogance or ignorance showing?
T James
>
>On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:19:22 -0400, Mike Wilcox
><appra...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>>NoSur...@never.net wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:58:58 -0400, Mike Wilcox
>>> <appra...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Roger wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> "James" <capji...@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> >> news:10670216...@newshost03.voicenet.com...
>>> >> > www.drudgereport.com
>>> >> >
>>Nothing anonymous about me, my name is on every post. BTW, Limbaugh's show
>>is finished if they keep using such high calibre guest hosts.
>
>You write that as if you really, really, really know the mind of
>Rush's 22,000,000 fans. Is that your arrogance or ignorance showing?
>
listening to Rush. Makes 'em feel alive. Liberals and Neo-Conservatives
are like that.
--
.
"Let it not be said that no one cared, that no one objected once it's
realized that our liberties and wealth are in jeopardy. "
.
-Hon. Ron Paul of Texas, 7/10/2003, "Neo-CONNED"
.
http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr071003.htm
Roger
news:3F99A0A2...@sympatico.ca...
He's stolen Rush's technique too then.
Who gave Rush the vapor free markers?
Pick whichever is funniest. Or neither.
>
>
> --
> Mike Wilcox
Roger
news:p3cjpvoa4b3g1d02o...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:58:58 -0400, Mike Wilcox
> <appra...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >Roger wrote:
> >
> >> "James" <capji...@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:10670216...@newshost03.voicenet.com...
> >> > www.drudgereport.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > WOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
> >> >
> >> > DRUDGE IN THE DAYTIME !!!!!!!
> >> >
> >> > THIS IS BETTER THAN SEX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >>
> >> Do you know what sex is?
> >
> >Is that who that whining idiot was on the show today? he sounded
> >like all his comments were being read off cue cards. Pathetic.
>
> So writes the anonymous and forever totally unknown person using lousy
> grammar.
NoSurrender calling Mike Wilcox anonymous?
Roger
news:cnjjpvo6ogda40jgl...@4ax.com...
65% of Americans believe Satan is real.
70% believe Saddam was involved in 911.
Rush is in quality company.
Roger
news:BLimb.744$Px2...@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Billary" <Bil...@vastrightwingconspiracy.org> wrote in message
> news:kGimb.32270$RP2....@twister.tampabay.rr.com...
> >
> >
>
> Your most intelligent post to date.
The funniest post all week! Thanks!
Photodano1
RHF
>
> 65% of Americans believe Satan is real.
> 70% believe Saddam was involved in 911.
>
> Rush is in quality company.
>
Roger,
Rush Will Be Back.
- - - For I Believe !
~ RHF
.
.
Michael Bryant
>Rush Will Be Back.
>- - - For I Believe !
>
But, then, you also believe that everything you don't like in politics is
caused by a one-world socialist conspiracy, right? The silliness of your
beliefs speak for themselves....
Harry Quiff
Best to have sex first before making such a comment.
David Stinson
>
> www.drudgereport.com
Drudge is a rude little twit, without one tenth the
talent of Rash Windbaugh.
Roger
news:e5e13af8.03102...@posting.google.com...
Sad. Very very sad.
>
> ~ RHF
Frank White
mwbr...@aol.comnojunk says...
You mean the one-world socialist conspiracy theory ISN'T true?!?
Well, crud, THAT'S really going to complicate things!
^_~
FW
Mike Wilcox
Try listening to the hosts and note the way they phrase their responses, also
note how few callers they are actually taking. To me they all sound like
they're reading a script of talking points and don't sound spontaneous at all.
It reminds me of the Wizard of OZ when the curtain is pulled back to expose the
little man pulling the levers.
Mike Wilcox
Mike Wilcox
Nojust common sense. His fans tune in to hear Rush Limbaugh, not a wooden Rush
impersonator. Guest hosts can seldom hold a show together for very long and
ratings will drop as a result.
Mike Wilcox
Ken [NY)
I do. It's something that is none of anybody's business, as
long as it takes place in a federal building by federal employees.
Like the Oval Office.
Cheers,
Ken (NY)
Chairman,
Department Of Redundancy Department
___________________________________
email:
http://www.geocities.com/bluesguy68/email.htm
"If you think health care is expensive now,
wait until you see what it costs when it's free."
- P.J. O'Rourke
Q: What the hardest thing about rollerblading?
A: Telling your parents you’re gay.
Ken [NY)
>> >Nothing anonymous about me, my name is on every post. BTW, Limbaugh's
>show
>> >is finished if they keep using such high calibre guest hosts.
>>
>> You write that as if you really, really, really know the mind of
>> Rush's 22,000,000 fans. Is that your arrogance or ignorance showing?
>
>65% of Americans believe Satan is real.
>70% believe Saddam was involved in 911.
October 17, 2003 No.592
Iraqi Daily: Saddam Ordered Training of Al-Qa'ida Members
The independent Iraqi weekly Al-Yawm Al-Aakher reveals details on the
training of Al-Qa'ida members operating under the orders of Saddam's
Presidential Palace two months before the September 11 attacks. The
following are excerpts from the article: [1]
Training At Nahrawan and Salman Pak
"An Iraqi officer (L) [only identified by initial] tells us that one
day a Land Cruiser belonging to the Personal Security Force (Al-Amn
Al-Khass, responsible for the protection of Saddam Hussein) arrived
and a senior officer from the Presidential Palace stepped out of it.
He was one of those officers who used to stand behind Saddam, which
means that he was one of [his] personal bodyguards. After a two-hour
meeting with a select group of officers at the Special Forces School,
we were informed that we would have dear guests, and that we should
train them very well in a high level of secrecy - not to allow anyone
to approach them or to talk to them in any way, shape, or form.
"A few days later, about 100 trainees arrived. They were a mixture of
Arabs, Arabs from the Peninsula [Saudi Arabia], Muslim Afghans, and
other Muslims from various parts of the world. They were divided into
two groups, the first one went to Al-Nahrawan and the second to Salman
Pak, and this was the group that was trained to hijack airplanes. The
training was under the direct supervision of major general (M. DH. L)
[only identified by initials] who now serves as a police commander in
one of the provinces. Upon the completion of the training most of them
left Iraq, while the others stayed in the country through the last
battle in Baghdad against the coalition forces."
Al-Qa'ida Group Headed by a Saudi Cleric
"I remember that the leader of the group was a Saudi cleric called
[Muhammad], who was a fervent and audacious individual and did not
require much training. He was highly skilled, and could fire
accurately at a target while riding a motorcycle. Additionally, he
used to deliver fiery sermons calling for Jihad and for fighting the
Americans anywhere in the world. Surprisingly, this man's picture,
alongside the commander of the Special Forces School, was televised
several times before the beginning of the war and the fall of the
former regime."
Training Supervised by the Fedayeen Command
"...The Fedayeen command [Fedayeen Saddam under Uday's command]
supervised the 100 Al-Qa'ida fighters directly, to the extent that
senior Fedayeen officers visited them constantly and inspected them
almost daily, especially during the final days when they transferred
them, late at night in two red trucks that belonged to the Ministry of
Transportation, to an undisclosed destination. I witnessed that with
my own eyes because on that day I was the duty officer."
Al-Qa'ida Members Participated in Battles Against U.S. Forces
"A few days before the beginning of the last war, we were surprised to
see the same people whom we had trained return to the Special Forces
School and with them 100 additional individuals. The high command
asked us to re-train them and to divide them into several groups to be
deployed in various areas in Iraq.
"Truth be told, most of these individuals competed to go to war and to
the front lines. [2] Therefore, under pressure they participated
immediately in extremely fierce battles that astonished the Iraqis and
the Americans."
With the 11th Division in the Area of Al-Kifl
"On April 5, 2003 orders were issued to send these individuals to the
battle front immediately. About 100 of them were sent to the 11th
company division in Nasiriya. And for the sake of history I will say
that this division's endurance was due to some formidable fighters,
the commanding officer and members of Al-Qa'ida who fought with
intensity and brutality that are seldom matched, while they were
praising Allah: Allahu Akbar… Allahu Akbar… What I mean by that are
the violent battles that took place along the rapid highway for
seventeen consecutive days and forced the Americans to withdraw and
re-enter from the industrial area of Nasiriya … As for the groups
which went to Al-Kifl, they participated in extremely brutal battles.
Not many of them retreated and they sacrificed their lives to Apache
[helicopter] fire, amid the admiration of the Iraqis and the Americans
themselves. The proof is that some of them blew themselves up in the
midst of American forces."
[1] Al-Yawm Al-Aakher (Iraq), October 16, 2003.
[2] According to the article, a number of the individuals also fought
in Afghanistan: "Most of [the people] I talked to confirmed to me that
they had come from Afghanistan and the Pakistani mountains, and that
they were the ones who fought the Americans in Mazar Al-Sharif and
Kabul. This was a true experience that they translated into the
reality of the fierce battles in Iraq."
http://www.memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD59203
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stinger
don't you, Michael!
Dumbass.
-- Stinger
"Michael Bryant" <mwbr...@aol.comnojunk> wrote in message
news:20031025072001...@mb-m07.aol.com...
Stinger
-- Stinger
"Ken [NY)" <em...@Below.Text> wrote in message
news:ke8lpv022npqm6ap6...@4ax.com...
> praising Allah: Allahu Akbar. Allahu Akbar. What I mean by that are
> the violent battles that took place along the rapid highway for
> seventeen consecutive days and forced the Americans to withdraw and
> re-enter from the industrial area of Nasiriya . As for the groups
Michael Bryant
>Because you know that it's REALLY Hillary's "Vast right-wing conspiracy,"
>don't you, Michael!
>
>Dumbass.
Well, we can see a lot by how quickly you resort to obscenity, right?
Hillary and RHF are both deluded to see everything as part of a conspiracy.
And your they-did-it,-so-why-can't-I philosophy is exactly what is dragging US
politics to such a low level.
Try again.
Stinger
I see.
You wrote a terse one-sentence comment (replete with a generic
over-generalized attack on conservatives that truly hate socialism) and I
replied in kind illustrate my point. -- But now that's not fair?
And my second point is (again) that you are a dumbass. Rather than write a
soliloquy outlining the remarkable depths of your dumbassness from the
abundant material in your earlier posts, I just went straight to the point
to spare everyone the wasted effort.
-- Stinger
"Michael Bryant" <mwbr...@aol.comnojunk> wrote in message
news:20031025154730...@mb-m13.aol.com...
Roger
Except that it's not a little man, and he's puking on his shoes.
>
> Mike Wilcox
Roger
news:ke8lpv022npqm6ap6...@4ax.com...
>
> >> >Nothing anonymous about me, my name is on every post. BTW, Limbaugh's
> >show
> >> >is finished if they keep using such high calibre guest hosts.
> >>
> >> You write that as if you really, really, really know the mind of
> >> Rush's 22,000,000 fans. Is that your arrogance or ignorance showing?
> >
> >65% of Americans believe Satan is real.
> >70% believe Saddam was involved in 911.
>
> October 17, 2003 No.592
>
> Iraqi Daily: Saddam Ordered Training of Al-Qa'ida Members
>
> The independent Iraqi weekly Al-Yawm Al-Aakher reveals details on the
> training of Al-Qa'ida members operating under the orders of Saddam's
> Presidential Palace two months before the September 11 attacks. The
> following are excerpts from the article: [1]
Quite a reliable source. A newspaper with less than 6 months of existence.
Is there a reason this hasn't been published elsewhere?
> praising Allah: Allahu Akbar. Allahu Akbar. What I mean by that are
> the violent battles that took place along the rapid highway for
> seventeen consecutive days and forced the Americans to withdraw and
> re-enter from the industrial area of Nasiriya . As for the groups
Roger
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:21:56 GMT, "Roger" <rog...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"James" <capji...@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:10670216...@newshost03.voicenet.com...
> >> www.drudgereport.com
> >>
> >>
> >> WOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
> >>
> >> DRUDGE IN THE DAYTIME !!!!!!!
> >>
> >> THIS IS BETTER THAN SEX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> >
> >Do you know what sex is?
> >
>
> I do. It's something that is none of anybody's business, as
> long as it takes place in a federal building by federal employees.
> Like the Oval Office.
One of these days you're going to have to stop blaming everything on
Clinton. It was pathetic when it started, it's nothing but sad and desperate
now.
Can you do it? Is it possible?
NoSur...@never.net
You are definitely too short for this conversation; everytime you aim
for high intellect, you merely end up flat on your face with your dick
in the dust.
NoSur...@never.net
<appra...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
Jay-sus Mikey...You'll try anything to show your ignorance of both
Rush's show and the dynamics of his audience. You know nothing of talk
radio or devoted fans. Now, go away before you hurt yourself.
NoSur...@never.net
>On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:21:56 GMT, "Roger" <rog...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"James" <capji...@nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:10670216...@newshost03.voicenet.com...
>>> www.drudgereport.com
>>>
>>>
>>> WOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> DRUDGE IN THE DAYTIME !!!!!!!
>>>
>>> THIS IS BETTER THAN SEX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>>Do you know what sex is?
>>
>
> I do. It's something that is none of anybody's business, as
>long as it takes place in a federal building by federal employees.
> Like the Oval Office.
>
> Cheers,
Now that's cold...funny, and all to true in the case of the cigar
sniffer...but still cold.
Have a nice Day!!
Cheerio,
Dennis, Proud, America-Loving NEOCON, Finest Kind Irish/English
>Ken (NY)
RHF
= = = wrote in message news:<20031025072001...@mb-m07.aol.com>...
MVB,
"Everything" is so absolute and unreal [.]
However, there is a 'committed' Political Cadre of OWLES (may be 5%)
who's Live Purpose is to establish a 'state' a 'world' that reflects
their "Ideals" and is 'naturally' Lead by them.
- For after all Who Knows Better than the OWLES how to Lead Us.
- - Who is better qualified than the OWLES to Lead Us.
- - - Who has Earned the Right To Lead Us - The Owles.
It is not a "one-world socialist conspiracy" to use your words; but a
"One World Liberal Elite Socialist" Cadre to use my words.
- The Few (OWLES)
- - Who Know The Best
- - - For The Many (The Un-Enlightened Masses)
This Cadre of OWLES 'label' Themselves "Liberals" and "Socialists"
- But They Do NOT Believe in Democratic Socialism.
- - Their 'brand' of "Socialism" requires them
- - - To Be In-Power and In-Control.
- - - - The end result to those that this Cadre would 'control'
(Enslave)
- - - - - Is that the OWLES are simply neo-fascist/neo-communists.
The Problem with the OWLES is Not Liberalism or Socialism.
- It is their Elitism that has the potential to make them dangerous.
- - For they Believe they are Right and Good.
- - - For they Believe they are Choozen to Lead.
- - - - For they Believe they Know whats Best for everyone else.
Their Elitism entitles them to Control and Guild (Enslave) Others.
Beware the OWLES !
OBTW: We (USofA) live in a 'blended' capitalist/consevative and
socialist/liberal society that is balanced and tolerant. With time
this society will change and evolve as the needs and expectations of
the American people adapt to the times. This is because the 'leaders'
are Elected to Follow the Will of the People" -vice- The 'people'
should Follow the Will of the Leaders.
~ RHF
.
.
RHF
What is SAD is that you only quote a few of the percentages
from the Fox News Article "More Believe In God Than Heaven"
GoTo=> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,99945,00.html
What Americans Believe:
* 92% in God (11 out of 12)
* 85% in Heaven (6 out of 7)
* 82% in Miracles (4 out of 5)
According to a recent FOX News Poll.
Again - For I Have Faith and I Believe... amen, Amen. AMEN ! ~ RHF
.
.
= = = "Roger" <rog...@hotmail.com>
= = = wrote in message news:<aUtmb.5956$SJ3....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com>...
HFguy
OWL we know them?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Roger
>
> What is SAD is that you only quote a few of the percentages
> from the Fox News Article "More Believe In God Than Heaven"
> GoTo=> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,99945,00.html
>
> What Americans Believe:
> * 92% in God (11 out of 12)
> * 85% in Heaven (6 out of 7)
> * 82% in Miracles (4 out of 5)
> According to a recent FOX News Poll.
My parents taught me to only say something when you can something nice. I
broke that a little, but now you want me to be mean. You must be that little
Satan on my shoulder.
Roger
news:r31mpvc5i1n7chpu5...@4ax.com...
Show me where. Is this a critique or an insult?
NoSur...@never.net
It is penetrating and scathing anaylsis of your inability to separate
your infantile emotions from your juvenile intellect.
Roger
news:ivcnpv01ehgsa06q7...@4ax.com...
Didn't think so. You don't know. You are a brainless insulter, with no
arguments of your own. You disagree with me, but you don't know why. You
have opinions but no reasons. You are, intellectually, worthless.
Ken [NY)
>> The independent Iraqi weekly Al-Yawm Al-Aakher reveals details on the
>> training of Al-Qa'ida members operating under the orders of Saddam's
>> Presidential Palace two months before the September 11 attacks. The
>> following are excerpts from the article: [1]
>
>Quite a reliable source. A newspaper with less than 6 months of existence.
It is also an Iraqi source. I would think that the Iraqi
citizens know a bit more about what was really going on in Iraq before
the war than say Newsweek.
By the way, how long must a newspaper be in existance before
they can be believed? I read lies all the time in the New York Times
and the LA Times which have been around a lot longer.
>Is there a reason this hasn't been published elsewhere?
There must be a very good reason why the mainstream media,
most of whom supported and endorsed Al Gore in 2000, don't want you to
know that Saddam Hussein was in deep with al Qaida before 9/11. The
Bush administration has been asking the same thing of our mainstream
media which seems to be only interested in announcing US body counts.
My guess is that they just don't want you to know the truth because it
interferes with their anti-Bush campaign.
Cheers,
Ken [NY)
I don't know how I could blame anybody else for Clinton's
sodomizing an employee nearly the age of his daughter.
Regards,
NoSur...@never.net
Put forth a cogent and rational agrument, and I'll discuss it with
you. Think you can do that? All you've done so far is insult Rush and
others behind their backs.
Have a nice Day!!
Cheerio,
Dennis, Proud, America-Loving NEOCON, Finest Kind Irish/English
>
>>
>> Have a nice Day!!
>>
>> Cheerio,
>>
>> Dennis, Proud, America-Loving NEOCON, Finest Kind Irish/English
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >>
Roger
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 22:35:34 GMT, "Roger" <rog...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> The independent Iraqi weekly Al-Yawm Al-Aakher reveals details on the
> >> training of Al-Qa'ida members operating under the orders of Saddam's
> >> Presidential Palace two months before the September 11 attacks. The
> >> following are excerpts from the article: [1]
> >
> >Quite a reliable source. A newspaper with less than 6 months of
existence.
>
> It is also an Iraqi source. I would think that the Iraqi
> citizens know a bit more about what was really going on in Iraq before
> the war than say Newsweek.
> By the way, how long must a newspaper be in existance before
> they can be believed? I read lies all the time in the New York Times
> and the LA Times which have been around a lot longer.
If it is run by Iraqis, it is staffed by people who have no recent
experience with running an independent newspaper. If they have recent
experience, it's on state papers.
>
> >Is there a reason this hasn't been published elsewhere?
>
> There must be a very good reason why the mainstream media,
> most of whom supported and endorsed Al Gore in 2000, don't want you to
> know that Saddam Hussein was in deep with al Qaida before 9/11. The
> Bush administration has been asking the same thing of our mainstream
> media which seems to be only interested in announcing US body counts.
> My guess is that they just don't want you to know the truth because it
> interferes with their anti-Bush campaign.
Just as reporters require more than one source for a fact for a story, I
require more than one source for a story. Unless someone else starts
reporting this, or picks up this story, I treat it as a curiosity, nothing
more.
Roger
Roger
RHF
> >
> > What is SAD is that you only quote a few of the percentages
> > from the Fox News Article "More Believe In God Than Heaven"
> > GoTo=> http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,99945,00.html
> >
> > What Americans Believe:
> > * 92% in God (11 out of 12)
> > * 85% in Heaven (6 out of 7)
> > * 82% in Miracles (4 out of 5)
> > According to a recent FOX News Poll.
>
> My parents taught me to only say something when you can something nice. I
> broke that a little, but now you want me to be mean. You must be that little
> Satan on my shoulder.
>
roger, Roger. ROGER !
To Paraphase you:
"One of these days you're going to have to stop blaming everything on
Your Parents. It was pathetic when it started, it's nothing but sad
and desperate now."
Believe Me - I am Not the 'little Satan' on your shoulder.
- - - Your Personal Demons and any Devils reside within you [.]
~ RHF
Ken [NY)
>"Ken [NY)" <em...@Below.Text> wrote in message
>news:hkknpv0ut56tpabe4...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 22:35:34 GMT, "Roger" <rog...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> The independent Iraqi weekly Al-Yawm Al-Aakher reveals details on the
>> >> training of Al-Qa'ida members operating under the orders of Saddam's
>> >> Presidential Palace two months before the September 11 attacks. The
>> >> following are excerpts from the article: [1]
>> >
>> >Quite a reliable source. A newspaper with less than 6 months of
>existence.
>>
>> It is also an Iraqi source. I would think that the Iraqi
>> citizens know a bit more about what was really going on in Iraq before
>> the war than say Newsweek.
>> By the way, how long must a newspaper be in existance before
>> they can be believed? I read lies all the time in the New York Times
>> and the LA Times which have been around a lot longer.
>
>If it is run by Iraqis, it is staffed by people who have no recent
>experience with running an independent newspaper. If they have recent
>experience, it's on state papers.
Again, I would rather believe those who were in the know at
the time.
>> >Is there a reason this hasn't been published elsewhere?
>>
>> There must be a very good reason why the mainstream media,
>> most of whom supported and endorsed Al Gore in 2000, don't want you to
>> know that Saddam Hussein was in deep with al Qaida before 9/11. The
>> Bush administration has been asking the same thing of our mainstream
>> media which seems to be only interested in announcing US body counts.
>> My guess is that they just don't want you to know the truth because it
>> interferes with their anti-Bush campaign.
>
>Just as reporters require more than one source for a fact for a story, I
>require more than one source for a story. Unless someone else starts
>reporting this, or picks up this story, I treat it as a curiosity, nothing
>more.
Fine. Ostriches stick their heads in the sand and my little
sister used to hold her hands over her ears when she didn't want to
hear something.
But doesn't it bother you that a story like this should be
hidden from you by the main stream press? Why are they hiding yet
another connection between al Qaida and Iraq? What are they afraid of?
Or were they unable to find the story? Hell, it took me about ten
seconds to find it online.
I saw this story mentioned on Fox and nowhere else on TV.
Thanks to the internet, talk radio and Fox news, the truth can always
be revealed now, unlike prior decades.
Cordially,
Ken (NY)
Chairman,
Department Of Redundancy Department
Ken [NY)
Clinton is in the news almost every day, criticizing President
Bush. I think he could handle getting it back a little from someone in
a news group.
And again, who would you blame for the semen stains on the
girl's dress? Socks the cat? If you could manage it, you would
probably blame it on Bush.
Cheers,
Roger
Why would they "hide" this? They jump all over stories like this. They live
for stories like this. But they make sure they can back it up first.
> I saw this story mentioned on Fox and nowhere else on TV.
> Thanks to the internet, talk radio and Fox news, the truth can always
> be revealed now, unlike prior decades.
It doesn't bother you that only Fox picks this up? I'd question it no matter
which other source picked it up. When only one source picks up a story, it's
questionable.
I'm not saying it it isn't true, I'm saying it's questionable.
Roger
He's not in the news, the news is putting him on. If people stopped caring
about him, the news would stop putting him on. He doesn't own any media
outlets.
> And again, who would you blame for the semen stains on the
> girl's dress? Socks the cat? If you could manage it, you would
> probably blame it on Bush.
Got anything from this century? It's over. Get over it.
Ryan, KC8PMX
the teacher that he/she forgot to give homework on Fridays, when I was a
kid.......
NoSur...@never.net
<REMOVETH...@diamondcs.net> wrote:
>Ohhh goodie..... Drudge reminds me of that annoying, whiney kid who reminded
>the teacher that he/she forgot to give homework on Fridays, when I was a
>kid.......
It is telling on you that you still disparage that kid when you could
have used the extra homework to your advantage.
Have a nice day!!
Cheerio,
Dennis, Proud America-Loving NEOCON, Finest Kind Irish/English
Ryan, KC8PMX
high/high school career with the homework I was already doing. The point
was in regards to one person spoiling it for the group and of course the
mentality/personality that goes along with it.
<NoSur...@never.net> wrote in message
news:24htpvgp9071gstkk...@4ax.com...
Ken [NY)
>> >> >> >Do you know what sex is?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I do. It's something that is none of anybody's business, as
>> >> >> long as it takes place in a federal building by federal employees.
>> >> >> Like the Oval Office.
>> >> >
>> >> >One of these days you're going to have to stop blaming everything on
>> >> >Clinton. It was pathetic when it started, it's nothing but sad and
>> >desperate
>> >> >now.
>> >> >
>> >> >Can you do it? Is it possible?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> I don't know how I could blame anybody else for Clinton's
>> >> sodomizing an employee nearly the age of his daughter.
>> >
>> >One of these days you're going to have to stop blaming everything on
>> >Clinton. It was pathetic when it started, it's nothing but sad and
>desperate
>> >now.
>>
>> Clinton is in the news almost every day, criticizing President
>> Bush. I think he could handle getting it back a little from someone in
>> a news group.
>
>He's not in the news, the news is putting him on. If people stopped caring
>about him, the news would stop putting him on. He doesn't own any media
>outlets.
Roger, Clinton schedules press conferences and appears at
Democrat fundraisers to issue his version of what should have been
done... after Dec. 2000. of course. He never gives reasons why, for
eight years, he did almost nothing to fight the terrorists that were
attacking and killing Americans.
>> And again, who would you blame for the semen stains on the
>> girl's dress? Socks the cat? If you could manage it, you would
>> probably blame it on Bush.
>
>Got anything from this century? It's over. Get over it.
Clinton remains in the news. And if Bush can be a target,
Clinton better duck because there is a lot more on him than on anybody
else. If he can't stand the heat,.... well you know the rest of
Truman's advice.
Cheers,
Ken (NY)
Chairman,
Department Of Redundancy Department
Roger
Press conferences are something people hold, not the press. They don't have
to show up.
The terrorists who bombed the Oklahoma City federal building and WTC in 1993
were all tried and convicted.
>
> >> And again, who would you blame for the semen stains on the
> >> girl's dress? Socks the cat? If you could manage it, you would
> >> probably blame it on Bush.
> >
> >Got anything from this century? It's over. Get over it.
>
> Clinton remains in the news. And if Bush can be a target,
> Clinton better duck because there is a lot more on him than on anybody
> else. If he can't stand the heat,.... well you know the rest of
> Truman's advice.
The press covers him.
What heat? He isn't President anymore.
Friendly Everyday Mad Scientist
>
> www.drudgereport.com
>
> WOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
>
> DRUDGE IN THE DAYTIME !!!!!!!
>
> THIS IS BETTER THAN SEX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You're doing something horribly wrong then. :P