We are spys
Just Plain Burr
of a giveaway if the FBI already suspects you
--
Burr
Big, Lean, Mean and Clean
I'll be lifting until they pry the
bar from my cold dead hands
Adventure before Dementia
I belong to The Tea Party, I Vote
cuh...@webtv.net
cuhulin
dave
Never.
RHF
- - cuhu...@webtv.net wrote:
- - Wouldn't you like to be a fly on the wall, once in a while?
- - cuhulin
- Never.
That's Our Dave
Swap {Splat} Blob
http://www.horrorstew.com/images/TheBlobRemakeBox.jpg
that's bye-bye ~ RHF
.
Nick
> Short-wave radios were once relatively common in homes. Today, they're a bit
> of a giveaway if the FBI already suspects you
>
difficult to make "things stick".
However if you use a PC / software to control your receiver then you
might be vulnerable to "So we find you listen to the BBC World Service
on Shortwave. Why would you want to do this as an American citizen?"
type of questioning.
Stock answer "because I want to learn true English and the BBC is
recognised as a word wide accepted source for true English broadcasting."
I'm now going to duck, run and hide before I get .... .... ....
Mike
Burr,
If they come in my house, they're likely to think they've stumbled
into KGB master control center.
Hope the tropical heat is treating you well.
Mike
(I detest the Tea Party, and I do more than just vote...)
dxAce
Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
> On Jul 2, 6:59 am, "Just Plain Burr" <pitz...@iwvisp.com> wrote:
> > Short-wave radios were once relatively common in homes. Today, they're a bit
> > of a giveaway if the FBI already suspects you
> >
> > --
> > Burr
> > Big, Lean, Mean and Clean
> > I'll be lifting until they pry the
> > bar from my cold dead hands
> > Adventure before Dementia
> >
> > I belong to The Tea Party, I Vote
>
> Burr,
>
> If they come in my house, they're likely to think they've stumbled
> into KGB master control center.
Hey, clown 'tard, you wouldn't know the KGB, much less their 'master control
center' even if they crawled up your fat ass and spent a long Siberian winter
there.
> Mike
> (I detest the Tea Party, and I do more than just vote...)
Yeah, you tend to lie your clown 'tard ass off...
dxAce
Michigan
USA
Gregg
>
> - Show quoted text -
Priceless.:-D Long Siberian winter? ;-)
cuh...@webtv.net
cuhulin
dave
> I aints no spy.
> cuhulin
>
The best agent is sometimes someone who is unaware that he is an agent.
cuh...@webtv.net
Nice kitty,,, Yeowwwww.
///Mr.Humphries, leave my kitty alone!///
cuhulin
Mike
>
> Hey, clown 'tard, you wouldn't know the KGB, much less their 'master control
> center' even if they crawled up your fat ass and spent a long Siberian winter
> there.
>
Already drinking for the Holiday, Steve? Why don't you share some
"stories"
with us about how your Navy surveillance work makes you an "expert" on
KGB
facilities?
And stop talking about my ass, you pervert! Other people are start to
talk
about your clear sexual fascinations....
Don't stop now, keep drinking, Steve.
Mike,
I got three days to have a great dialogue with Stevie and his little
buddy,
Gregg.
nurk_fred2000
***Hey dufus...Look at it this way...You've got 3 days sucking off the
taxpayer tit to get sh%t faced and toasted all in one long
weekend...Then, when you get back to class on Monday you'll be the
same old useless twit you always are...Just too baked out of your gord
to know any better...Lying about a Ph.d, priceless!
cuh...@webtv.net
Senior Ex-KGB Man Claims 400 Russian Spies in U.S.
http://www.stevequayle.com/index1.html
and The Wings of Eagles movie is on the AMC channel.
I am going to move that toe!
cuhulin
Mike
>
> ***Hey dufus...Look at it this way...You've got 3 days sucking off the
> taxpayer tit to get sh%t faced and toasted all in one long
> weekend...Then, when you get back to class on Monday you'll be the
> same old useless twit you always are...Just too baked out of your gord
> to know any better...Lying about a Ph.d, priceless
Hey, idiot, I don't teach at a public school and the private
corporation
I do teach for does random drug testing, so your wrong on both
counts as usual, Jurk_dead2000! You are Steve Lare or so
unoriginal that you're copying the rhetorical of RRS' biggest
troglodyte. My teaching evaluations have been 3.96 out of
4 for several quarters in a role and I was just recognized as
the best college lecturer in KY. What have you done in your
life, moron? Besides, of course, trolling on the internet. I
think we can all understand why Steve Lare and Gregg are
people you, literally, look up to.
You prove daily that you are truly brain dead. Now, go back
under your bridge. You stink, Troll.
Mike
Gregg
> On Jul 2, 9:09 pm, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hey, clown 'tard, you wouldn't know the KGB, much less their 'master control
> > center' even if they crawled up your fat ass and spent a long Siberian winter
> > there.
>
> Already drinking for the Holiday, Steve? Why don't you share some
> "stories"
> with us about how your Navy surveillance work makes you an "expert" on
> KGB
> facilities?
>
> And stop talking about my ass, you pervert! Other people are start to
> talk
> about your clear sexual fascinations....
>
there early this morning Mikey? I usually don't pick on grammar when
it comes to usenet, I'm a fast typer and try to fix it but when I hit
send it's sent and I could give a flying you know what. But you make
fun of everyone else misspelling and grammar <heh> so I thought I
would point it out to you.<snicker> Professor.....lol....which makes
it even worse than anyone else who isn't a "professor". ;-)
And I don't get this "drinking thing" when it comes to Ace. What he
does (if he even drinks and I don't know or believe it just because
you say it) is 100% legal. What you do on the other hand..lol...is
not. Yet you still chose/choose to do it and it's gonna get ya' again.
Bank on it. As sure as the sun will rise every morning though you may
not see it- it is there. Bank on it. And you can blabber all you want
about drug tests (there's ways around that) etc. etc. we both know
they don't no matter what you say - so please don't emabarras yourself
or play the group into thinking otherwise because the smarter ones
know better Brybaby. Have Cheetos lately?!
I'll think of you here in a little when I'm setting the hook on a big
one, and make no mistake about it, I WILL be setting the hook.:-)
Gregg
Bwahahahahah - I am literally cracking up and had to go back and
correct the wrong letters I typed....lol. Troglodyte...lol <sigh-
pause> ....lol...are you trying to impress your boyfriends with that
word? I heard that word for the first time in the 10th grade by the
eeriest and wierdest of teachers I ever had - that as students- none
of us (that I know of) could quite put a finger onto why we all felt
he was "different" - we just knew as young kids that "something wasn't
right". We (meaning all the students) later learned either eleven or
twelve years after we graduated that indeed the feeling towards him
was spot on when he made the newspapers. Troglodyte....oh quit it!!
<rolling my eyes>
Of course he was speaking of the prehistoric era and cavemen and
cavewomen - I take it you mean the other definition of a recluse?
Dude, I feel I am safe in saying that Steve.....Ace to you....isn't a
caveman or isn't a recluse, so are you going to admit that you are
lying AGAIN or embellishing AGAIN? Just remember AGAIN, just because
you say something doesn't mean it's so unless you have some proof.
So be careful if you want to turn that around (that proof statement)
on me when I speak about you, follow me....jelly bean?
I am sure we will all be awaiting with fingies crossed for your proof
or retraction of your statement. Troglodyte? That's the best you have
to offer this group (or myself) to impress us or make us reach for a
dictionary because your literary skills dwarfs us beneath you because
we weren't busted for smoking illegal drugs in a hotel room with one
of our students on a school sponsored event and later quit in
disgrace? You still do Cheetos Bry? :-D
Mike
>
> - Show quoted text -
Gregg,
I will absolutely guarantee you that I don't smoke dope. I'm tired
of your lies suggesting I do. Personally, I don't think there's
anything wrong with doing so, but I make sure my students know
that if they do, they need to stop. 95% of my students will be
starting professional careers after graduating - they need to
be prepared for substance abuse testing as a condition of
employment and random drug tests on the technological jobs
they'll be starting in.
If you send me your address, I'll be happy to send you copies
of my quarterly blood tests from my physician. These tests
have to be certified and will prove to you that you ought to
shut your mouth before I actually take a slander action
against you.
You still awaiting that "Premium RX", Gregg? How long does
it take? Is it being shipped from Mars? I have several of
my top receivers being repaired by a tech in Michigan, for
free. I bet I get my radios back before you "claim" to
receive your's.
Had my pictures taken today by a professional photo-
grapher for the award I'm receiving as the state's Most
Dramatic Lecturer. But I couldn't help thinking about you.
You deserve an award as the Most Dramatic Nit-Wit in
Radio History!
Now, don't forget to suck up to Lare, today! You need to
impress your troll sock puppets...
[Yawn...]
Mike
Gregg
Sheesh, I just notice all kinds of misspellings and grammatical
errors. At least I have a reason, I type fast and I type with emotion.
You type....errr try an type like someone educated and trying to prove
it....lol. What a hoot! :-D
Mike
>
> Of course he was speaking of the prehistoric era and cavemen and
> cavewomen - I take it you mean the other definition of a recluse?
> Dude, I feel I am safe in saying that Steve.....Ace to you....isn't a
> caveman or isn't a recluse, so are you going to admit that you are
> lying AGAIN or embellishing AGAIN? Just remember AGAIN, just because
> you say something doesn't mean it's so unless you have some proof.
>
Frankly, Gregg, I find you and Steve to be provide fairly
conclusive evidence that Neanderthals continue to walk
among us. You, and your troll buddies, give us daily
PROOF!
Mike
Gregg
Hey Fred, look at all the screwups he did in this one post!!!<snicker>
He gave me a "closet compliment" - he knows all about those. He
insinuated Steve and I are smarter than you <heh> by saying you "look
up to us" (not verbatim). Whaddaya' think about them there apples
pal? ;-P Maybe it was a subliminal slip on his part. Ha! Do you really
live under a bridge?
Mike
>
> Hey Fred, look at all the screwups he did in this one post!!!<snicker>
> He gave me a "closet compliment" - he knows all about those. He
> insinuated Steve and I are smarter than you <heh> by saying you "look
> up to us" (not verbatim). Whaddaya' think about them there apples
> pal? ;-P Maybe it was a subliminal slip on his part. Ha! Do you really
> live under a bridge
You really think that's a subliminal compliment on my part?
Wow. Given what I have clearly expressed about your intellectual
capabilities, I think anyone with a modicum (run and look it up)
of intelligence will recognize it as an insult to a troll. Saying
that they're stupider than you is hardly complimenting your
obviously low IQ. Perhaps more English and logic courses
back in high school might have been recommended for you,
Gregg.
Have a nice day, little guy!
Mike
dxAce
Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
You finally gonna call that relative that you've claimed was a lawyer?
dxAce
Michigan
USA
Mike
>
> - Show quoted text -
Well, my sister is a lawyer, but not one handling defamation
cases. She's an administrative lawyer with the state of KY, handling
state enforcement of laws against coal companies caught violating
their mining permits. You'd probably even like her, Steve,
because she's a very right-wing Republican.
But there's no shortage of lawyers, Steve. And with the new internet
harassment laws recently put into effect, I can only urge you to
keep talking, Steve.
Three days to explore the inner recesses of Steve Lare's mind.
I think this could be fun!
Mike
RHF
- The best agent is sometimes someone who
- is unaware that he is an agent.
Dave Your The Best ! :o) ~ RHF
.
RHF
- I aints no spy.
- cuhulin
No-But - Cuhulin many of your Posts here prove
that you are a One-Man Neighborhood Watch.
.
RHF
> On Jul 2, 7:52 pm, dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:
>
> > cuhu...@webtv.net wrote:
> > > I aints no spy.
> > > cuhulin
>
- - is unaware that he is an agent.
-
- Dave You Are "The Best" ! :o) ~ RHF
- .
dxAce
We need about ten seconds to explore the inner recesses of yours, 'tard boy, cause it's empty!
Best make that appointment with the lawyer, cause I plan on continuing to talk.
Your empty threats are just that, empty, empty like your fat head.
dxAce
Michigan
USA
dxAce
Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
I'd much rather see a copy of the monthly evaluation from your psychiatrist, 'tard boy!
dxAce
Michigan
USA
dxAce
Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
> On Jul 2, 9:09 pm, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hey, clown 'tard, you wouldn't know the KGB, much less their 'master control
> > center' even if they crawled up your fat ass and spent a long Siberian winter
> > there.
> >
>
> Already drinking for the Holiday, Steve? Why don't you share some
> "stories"
> with us about how your Navy surveillance work makes you an "expert" on
> KGB
> facilities?
I don't tell "stories", dufus. I leave that sort of stuff to pathologically lying
clown 'tard academics such as yourself.
dxAce
Michigan
USA
dxAce
One tip for you, clown 'tard academic: If one claims to be "harassed", one blows one's case
totally away by urging that individual that one feels "harassed" by to keep talking.
Check that out with your "sister" whom you claim is a "lawyer".
dxAce
Michigan
USA
dave
>
> You prove daily that you are truly brain dead. Now, go back
> under your bridge. You stink, Troll.
>
> Mike
Why don't you just filter him out?
dave
My The Best what?
Gregg
> Gregg,
Mike,
>
> I will absolutely guarantee you that I don't smoke dope.
You can "absolutely guarantee" me nothing pal. I can PROMISE you this
Mike, if you had the info of what I KNOW - - not only of what went
down "out there" - - but other pertininent info on you - -if it was
all reversed around you would have said something longgggg
ago.....just be careful. And I will admit this much, when I was new to
the computer you "scared me" - not in the "you are going to whoop my
ass" - because that....how do I say it? Me on my worst day and you on
your best....ain't happening. But I was new and was warned of lunatics
and spiteful people and in some cases - things got "literally"
personal on usenet from what I was told/warned at times and I knew
enough about your writing and style (through my years of studying said
things) that I wanted to know what I may be dealing with. Of course, I
found out what a nut you are from your own vitriol, not the dangerous
kind - but simply someone who wants to be even bigger than they really
are - like I guess most of us do at times in all honesty. And my
checking started before, not right before.....but close to five months
before your last fiasco with me when I decided enough was enough and
Krypsie was introduced into the crotch of your pants and vice versa.
Because I know MY character in comparison towards yours. If you knew
about me what I know about you.....you would be changing screen names
and going through an anonymous newsgroup and "dumping it" for everyone
to see.
Like I have said over five times ( I think ) - it is just your nature.
It isn't mine. But I know nothing is slander if it's the truth. That
IS the bottom LEGAL line and trust me....please if you haven't ever
listened to anyone on usenet before.....trust me....I am the wrong one
to mess with when it comes to getting info. Now if you want to employ
the ole' challenge you did to Ace a while back - I will accept that
challenge on my own timetable and "dump it" when I see fit and how I
see fit and to who I see fit. Kinda like my fake "Premium RX' ;-) This
isn't me "getting with friends to find out info" or a "49.99 Info
Check" or all the stupid kinds of background checks on the internet.
Those are childs play and show nothing to me that I can't find out on
my own in one hour to an hour an a half of my own time. Those kinds of
checks only scratch the surface and in some cases - if someone was
busted for something years back - that doesn't mean that is how they
are today and I don't hold that against them. EVERYONE (including me)
has skeletons in their closet. EVERYONE (including me) try an "show
their best face" in meeting someone for the first time. But I learned
a while back that people aren't always what they appear to be (burned-
not since though) and I find it fascinating.....and I'll even go as
far as to say (like I said with The Bankok Banger and don't get a big
head) that I find you fascinating also. I really do.
I let you do it to me for yearssss and took your pot shots at not just
me (I can handle that) but you took them at my faith and you took them
at my God and yours - - and I'm not even including the political crap
which in a way.....neither poster or postee is going to change anyones
mind. No one changes anyones mind on usenet, there may be a few - my
mind was changed on one subject matter some years back - but it
doesn't happen much in regards to anyones thought process.
> I'm tired
> of your lies suggesting I do.
Watch it. ;-) And it depends on what you mean "suggesting" means.
> Personally, I don't think there's
> anything wrong with doing so
Of course. We all know that by your actions where you had no choice
BUT to admit it. But why was it that - for years before you got busted
out at Weber St. with the male student (Danny) in your hotel room that
you railed and railed on anyone that did drugs in RRS and other
groups? Now, I don't know THAT for a fact, but I know it was said time
and time again that you spoke up against drugs till you got busted and
that's why many reveled in your bust and called you a hypocrite (I
could waste more of my time to find it- if you say otherwise though)
If I am wrong or slightly mistaken about that....I expect you to
correct me and I will apologize, because I don't like when things are
said about me <heh> that aren't true and posted by 'someone' that is
attempting to make the group feel it is someone else. ;-)
> but I make sure my students know
> that if they do, they need to stop.
Huh? Either you are FLAT OUT LYING AGAIN or one or more of your
students questioned you about the facts they know about you from Weber
St. in Utah where you were arrested on a school sponsored event and
found to be in possesion of pot and paraphenalia in a hotel room with
a male student.
I don't like to tell much of my personal history, because -
well....that is my personal history. I did seven years in college (not
in a row) and NOT ONE TIME did I ever have a teacher ......or know of
one who had a teacher (and I would have known-bank on it) that said "I
make sure my students know if they do (drugs)....they need to stop".
Why is it that in my short time of knowing you - that I reach a lot of
"firsts"? Like I said a couple of days ago, I have NEVER heard of a
teacher....and I will add....or know of someone that knows someone
that is a PROVEN teacher.....on usenet that spouts off about
awards.....or even that they are a college teacher and ESPECIALLY with
your history on usenet and the personal vendettas and outright mean
and spiteful things you say about ANYONE that does not agree with you
or questions you and you don't like it.
> 95% of my students will be
> starting professional careers after graduating - they need to
> be prepared for substance abuse testing as a condition of
> employment and random drug tests on the technological jobs
> they'll be starting in.
Huh? ROTF - why was it that my teacher/teachers ******NEVER********
said anything to anyone (that I know of) about substance abuse or
randoms? And the advantage I have over you in saying this - is that I
DO KNOW what you do for a living and you DON'T know what I do. I'm in
one of MANY fields (from my schooling) that deal with liars everyday -
it's just part of the job, from itty bitty white lies -- --too lying
by omission - - too looking you square in the eyes and lying to your
face". Nothing was ever said to anyone of us about randoms/testing
because it's freeking common sense UNLESS the one telling you is
"giving you the low down" so too speak from personal experience
because they don't want to happen to you what happened to
them....lol.
>
> If you send me your address, I'll be happy to send you copies
> of my quarterly blood tests from my physician.
Do you really think for a minute Michael, that I would send you my
address? I mean, really do you? Of course not.<rolling my eyes> This
is simply another ploy or head game to try an convince people in this
group and "others" that "may be" reading your mumbo jumbo to buy what
you're trying to sell. I know what you're capable of if push came to
shove.....just via internet - (I see what you have said to and about
Steve/Peter/Kevin and countless others over the years- worse in
vitriol than Kramer). You made fun of Peter losing use of a leg and
you made fun of someones family member commiting suicide - not face to
face though - no matter how skilled you feel you are in debating. I
don't debate. I deal with facts and there is no debate or grey area
when dealing with me when it comes to someone such as yourself. There
is NO WAY POSSIBLE *anyone* could EVER bring a defamation case against
me via usenet through my ISP or in real life face to face dealings -
because I go overboard in showing what I know and it makes it very
easy for a judge if the idiot is unrepresented and/or if he/she is
represented and their attorney takes a look in the "discovery" process
- it will stop right there unless I then want to flip things around.
>These tests
> have to be certified and will prove to you that you ought to
> shut your mouth before I actually take a slander action
> against you.
Number one buddy (and I don't mean it literally FWIW) - you better
watch that fresh mouth of yours. You aren't scaring me with that type
of talk. Know what the legal definition of slander is in both states
and in both states via internet. And not to get all technical with
you...lol....but the tests (drugs) aren't "certified" either - and
I'll go even further (not that it's that big a deal) in saying that I
don't buy that they draw blood either. It's just a urine. I mean, did
you just make a mistake in using that word (certified) or did you
think by using that word that it was going to make it that more
believable? I'll be honest AGAIN with you Michael, I don't know if you
get high. I really don't. It's not "up there" on my "thing to do
list". But I could. Ohhhhh believe me - when I say I could. :-) That
isn't a threat either, because I have no reason or inclination to find
out if you do, to be quite frank I could freeking care less. If you
didn't learn your lesson from the time you were caught till
now.....and be honest with ALL OF US IN HERE ......it's not like that
was the first time you ever got high while teaching at Weber St. was
it? I mean, lets get all our "honesty cards" out on the table, I
smoked pot before - I will be honest about it. I had to not only
submit a blood test but also a polygraph test with a follow up after
that. I think the last time I got high was when I was between nineteen
and twenty years old. I know I wasn't twenty one, I know that for a
fact. Because I grew up and came to the consensus THAT IT IS
ILLEGAL!!! But you just don't turn off at your age that "I am going to
stop because this is illegal or my livelihood". Studies actually show
that it entrenches that person EVEN MORE into it (if they get busted),
with the thinking of "no one is going to tell me what to do" - - - and
they make efforts to "work around it".....not saying you're doing that
either.....but most do. I am sure you are the ones that gave it up. I
truly hope you did.
>
> You still awaiting that "Premium RX", Gregg? How long does
> it take? Is it being shipped from Mars? I have several of
> my top receivers being repaired by a tech in Michigan, for
> free. I bet I get my radios back before you "claim" to
> receive your's.
Ha! Damn, you've brought it up more than I have. You'd think you were
getting it. I know the list of your "top receivers" and NOT ONE is
considered a "Premium RX" - - again - - that there is the facts.
Forget my receiver Michael, this is all about you. :-)
>
> Had my pictures taken today by a professional photo-
> grapher for the award I'm receiving as the state's Most
> Dramatic Lecturer.
Yeah, Kramer maybe? <snort> Michael, do you "really" think any of us
care....I mean "really"? LOL - I know I don't....lol...I see enough of
your "dramatics" and shuck and jive in here. Like I said before, you
could win ***Ky. Teacher Of The Century*** award and I wouldn't look
at you any different than I do now. That is a fact and I am sorry
(truly I am - really) if it hurts your feelings or doesn't give you
the lift or emotional jolt you were looking for when you typed that
and hit the send buttom.
> But I couldn't help thinking about you.
I have got to ask you this....lol.<sigh> Do you "really" think about
Steve and myself like you say you do in many of your posts? I'm being
serious. I mean, when you're out in your world - do you HONESTLY think
of me? I don't feel flattered if the answer is yes, it really kinda
creeps me out, not in a scary way.....but I guess in a sad way. Please
Michael, when you get all these awards that you have worked so hard
for and finally attained - please don't think of me. Just think of how
many......errr never mind. But I can PROMISE YOU that I won't think
about you again till I log on and check my lists emails and two other
sites AND THEN I will log onto google. But this is the third group I
check, there are two others that take priority over this. ***THEN*** -
I will think of you when I am reading your crap.
> You deserve an award as the Most Dramatic Nit-Wit in
> Radio History!
Blah Blah Blah - that's it? <shaking my head>
>
> Now, don't forget to suck up to Lare, today! You need to
> impress your troll sock puppets...
Like you did your Weber St. students that you got high with more than
once / more than twice/ more than three etc. etc. etc. that kind of
"sucking up....errr sucking in - oh never mind you know what I mean"?
Or do you mean "another" kind of sucking up?
>
> [Yawn...]
Open that pouty little lower lip wide open, uh huh.<snicker>
Gregg
He is and I love him for it.:-) You know, Doggie and the couch and the
van and the neighbors and the wimmins etc. etc. etc. oh - and
www.devilfinder.com
Gotta be honest Cuh, I've never clicked on that link, I can find the
devil without clicking on him, know what I mean Jelly Bean?
Gregg
Bwahahahah - and that would be a Big Fat Ole' Correctomundo. :-)
Joe from Kokomo
> Dude, I feel I am safe in saying that Steve.....Ace to you....
No, only an "ace" to himself, a self-assigned handle. But definitely a
legend in his own mind. :-)
Don't you EVER get tired of sucking up to him?
Joe from Kokomo
> And I don't get this "drinking thing" when it comes to Ace. What he
> does (if he even drinks and I don't know or believe it just because
> you say it)...
You must be new in town...
Steve's past adventures with the bottle are legendary to everyone else
here (except you, apparently).
Joe from Kokomo
> I don't like to tell much of my personal history, because -
> well....that is my personal history. I did seven years in college (not
> in a row)...
SEVEN years???
Did you ever get a degree...or is this just a back handed admission that
you IQ might not be up to snuff? :D
dxAce
Gregg wrote:
Yes, our 'rezident' clown 'tard academic, (you know, the one with the 'KGB master control center'
in his home), is totally clueless as to the law.
He really needs to get in touch with his "sister", the "lawyer".
LMFAO
dxAce
Michigan
USA
dxAce
Joe from Kokomo wrote:
What the heck, Bryant, our clown 'tard homeboy, spent a lot of time trying to
obtain a PhD, but, he could not. However, he certainly felt compelled to lie
about having one.
Ain't that right, Brybaby?
dxAce
Michigan
USA
Krypsis
> On Jul 3, 5:20 am, Mike<mwbry...@aol.com> wrote:
>> Gregg,
>
> Mike,
>
>
>>
>> I will absolutely guarantee you that I don't smoke dope.
>
> You can "absolutely guarantee" me nothing pal. I can PROMISE you this
> Mike, if you had the info of what I KNOW -
So I take it you saw it? That my dear fellow is about the only way you
could "know" with any certainty that which you profess to know. When you
hear it from others it is "hearsay"! Hearsay is not proven fact!
> - not only of what went down "out there" -
> - but other pertininent info on you - -if it was
> all reversed around you would have said something longgggg
> ago.....just be careful. And I will admit this much, when I was new to
> the computer you "scared me" - not in the "you are going to whoop my
> ass" - because that....how do I say it? Me on my worst day and you on
> your best....ain't happening. But I was new and was warned of lunatics
> and spiteful people and in some cases - things got "literally"
> personal on usenet from what I was told/warned at times and I knew
> enough about your writing and style (through my years of studying said
You?? Years of studying? Just how many years did they have you repeat
kindergarten???
Really Gregg, your writing style is that of someone quite uneducated!
> things) that I wanted to know what I may be dealing with. Of course, I
> found out what a nut you are from your own vitriol, not the dangerous
> kind - but simply someone who wants to be even bigger than they really
> are - like I guess most of us do at times in all honesty. And my
So, that makes Mike a nut and, quite obviously you as well. Hmmmm
> checking started before, not right before.....but close to five months
> before your last fiasco with me when I decided enough was enough and
> Krypsie was introduced into the crotch of your pants and vice versa.
Have you got a fetish going about the crotch of Mike's pants?? That
would explain a lot! Jilted lovers do get quite nasty!
>
> Because I know MY character in comparison towards yours. If you knew
> about me what I know about you.....you would be changing screen names
> and going through an anonymous newsgroup and "dumping it" for everyone
> to see.
The mere fact that Mike hasn't dumped his standard screen name says more
positive things about him than it does about you!
>
> Like I have said over five times ( I think ) - it is just your nature.
> It isn't mine. But I know nothing is slander if it's the truth. That
> IS the bottom LEGAL line and trust me....please if you haven't ever
> listened to anyone on usenet before.....trust me....I am the wrong one
> to mess with when it comes to getting info. Now if you want to employ
Ah, usenet threats now eh?
> the ole' challenge you did to Ace a while back - I will accept that
> challenge on my own timetable and "dump it" when I see fit and how I
> see fit and to who I see fit. Kinda like my fake "Premium RX' ;-) This
> isn't me "getting with friends to find out info" or a "49.99 Info
> Check" or all the stupid kinds of background checks on the internet.
> Those are childs play and show nothing to me that I can't find out on
> my own in one hour to an hour an a half of my own time. Those kinds of
> checks only scratch the surface and in some cases - if someone was
> busted for something years back - that doesn't mean that is how they
> are today and I don't hold that against them. EVERYONE (including me)
> has skeletons in their closet. EVERYONE (including me) try an "show
> their best face" in meeting someone for the first time. But I learned
> a while back that people aren't always what they appear to be (burned-
> not since though) and I find it fascinating.....and I'll even go as
> far as to say (like I said with The Bankok Banger and don't get a big
> head) that I find you fascinating also. I really do.
Yes, Confirmed! A jilted lover! Gregg, move on man! Mike's not the only
man you could love!
>
> I let you do it to me for yearssss and took your pot shots at not just
> me (I can handle that) but you took them at my faith and you took them
> at my God and yours -
Ah, your "belief system" has been placed under siege and that you see as
a personal attack upon yourself!
> - and I'm not even including the political crap
> which in a way.....neither poster or postee is going to change anyones
Another "belief system"
> mind. No one changes anyones mind on usenet, there may be a few - my
> mind was changed on one subject matter some years back - but it
> doesn't happen much in regards to anyones thought process.
>
>
>> I'm tired
>> of your lies suggesting I do.
>
> Watch it. ;-) And it depends on what you mean "suggesting" means.
>
>
>> Personally, I don't think there's
>> anything wrong with doing so
>
> Of course. We all know that by your actions where you had no choice
> BUT to admit it. But why was it that - for years before you got busted
> out at Weber St. with the male student (Danny) in your hotel room that
> you railed and railed on anyone that did drugs in RRS and other
> groups? Now, I don't know THAT for a fact, but I know it was said time
> and time again that you spoke up against drugs till you got busted and
It was "said time and time again"!
Did you SEE it or was it hearsay?
> that's why many reveled in your bust and called you a hypocrite (I
> could waste more of my time to find it- if you say otherwise though)
> If I am wrong or slightly mistaken about that....I expect you to
> correct me and I will apologize, because I don't like when things are
> said about me<heh> that aren't true and posted by 'someone' that is
> attempting to make the group feel it is someone else. ;-)
>
So when are you putting your new sockpuppet into action?
>
>> but I make sure my students know
>> that if they do, they need to stop.
>
> Huh? Either you are FLAT OUT LYING AGAIN or one or more of your
> students questioned you about the facts they know about you from Weber
> St. in Utah where you were arrested on a school sponsored event and
> found to be in possesion of pot and paraphenalia in a hotel room with
> a male student.
You were the arresting officer??
>
> I don't like to tell much of my personal history, because -
You don't have much of a personal history!
> well....that is my personal history. I did seven years in college (not
> in a row) and NOT ONE TIME did I ever have a teacher ......or know of
> one who had a teacher (and I would have known-bank on it) that said "I
> make sure my students know if they do (drugs)....they need to stop".
Seven years in college? Gregg, those remedial literacy classes did you
no good. I'd ask for my enrolment fees back if I were you!
>
> Why is it that in my short time of knowing you - that I reach a lot of
> "firsts"? Like I said a couple of days ago, I have NEVER heard of a
> teacher....and I will add....or know of someone that knows someone
> that is a PROVEN teacher.....on usenet that spouts off about
> awards.....or even that they are a college teacher and ESPECIALLY with
> your history on usenet and the personal vendettas and outright mean
> and spiteful things you say about ANYONE that does not agree with you
> or questions you and you don't like it.
Between you and steve, you both really have a history of personal
vendettas against anyone who does not agree with you!
>
>> 95% of my students will be
>> starting professional careers after graduating - they need to
>> be prepared for substance abuse testing as a condition of
>> employment and random drug tests on the technological jobs
>> they'll be starting in.
>
> Huh? ROTF - why was it that my teacher/teachers ******NEVER********
> said anything to anyone (that I know of) about substance abuse or
> randoms? And the advantage I have over you in saying this - is that I
Gregg, that was because they didn't expect a kindergarten dropout to be
aware of such things and deemed it unnecessary!
> DO KNOW what you do for a living and you DON'T know what I do. I'm in
What does it matter? It would be a low wage, low skill requirement job
anyway!
> one of MANY fields (from my schooling) that deal with liars everyday -
> it's just part of the job, from itty bitty white lies -- --too lying
"too lying"????
> by omission - - too looking you square in the eyes and lying to your
"too looking"???
> face". Nothing was ever said to anyone of us about randoms/testing
> because it's freeking common sense UNLESS the one telling you is
> "giving you the low down" so too speak from personal experience
> because they don't want to happen to you what happened to
> them....lol.
>
Man, this is one hell of a convoluted sentence Gregg! Did you not learn
anything about sentence structure in your remedial literacy classes?
Certainly you learnt naught of punctuation!
>
>
>>
>> If you send me your address, I'll be happy to send you copies
>> of my quarterly blood tests from my physician.
>
> Do you really think for a minute Michael, that I would send you my
> address? I mean, really do you? Of course not.<rolling my eyes> This
Because you're scared of Michael???
> is simply another ploy or head game to try an convince people in this
> group and "others" that "may be" reading your mumbo jumbo to buy what
> you're trying to sell. I know what you're capable of if push came to
> shove.....just via internet - (I see what you have said to and about
> Steve/Peter/Kevin and countless others over the years- worse in
> vitriol than Kramer). You made fun of Peter losing use of a leg and
> you made fun of someones family member commiting suicide - not face to
> face though - no matter how skilled you feel you are in debating. I
> don't debate. I deal with facts and there is no debate or grey area
> when dealing with me when it comes to someone such as yourself. There
> is NO WAY POSSIBLE *anyone* could EVER bring a defamation case against
> me via usenet through my ISP or in real life face to face dealings -
> because I go overboard in showing what I know and it makes it very
> easy for a judge if the idiot is unrepresented and/or if he/she is
> represented and their attorney takes a look in the "discovery" process
> - it will stop right there unless I then want to flip things around.
Definitely didn't do any legal studies in kinder!
>
>> These tests
>> have to be certified and will prove to you that you ought to
>> shut your mouth before I actually take a slander action
>> against you.
>
> Number one buddy (and I don't mean it literally FWIW) - you better
> watch that fresh mouth of yours. You aren't scaring me with that type
> of talk. Know what the legal definition of slander is in both states
> and in both states via internet. And not to get all technical with
> you...lol....but the tests (drugs) aren't "certified" either - and
> I'll go even further (not that it's that big a deal) in saying that I
> don't buy that they draw blood either. It's just a urine. I mean, did
> you just make a mistake in using that word (certified) or did you
Drug tests are "certified" if they are carried out by qualified and
licensed medical practitioners in an approved manner!
> think by using that word that it was going to make it that more
> believable? I'll be honest AGAIN with you Michael, I don't know if you
> get high. I really don't. It's not "up there" on my "thing to do
> list". But I could. Ohhhhh believe me - when I say I could. :-) That
> isn't a threat either, because I have no reason or inclination to find
> out if you do, to be quite frank I could freeking care less. If you
If you could "freeking care less", why then make such a big deal of the
drug issue?
> didn't learn your lesson from the time you were caught till
> now.....and be honest with ALL OF US IN HERE ......it's not like that
> was the first time you ever got high while teaching at Weber St. was
> it? I mean, lets get all our "honesty cards" out on the table, I
> smoked pot before - I will be honest about it. I had to not only
> submit a blood test but also a polygraph test with a follow up after
> that. I think the last time I got high was when I was between nineteen
> and twenty years old. I know I wasn't twenty one, I know that for a
> fact. Because I grew up and came to the consensus THAT IT IS
> ILLEGAL!!! But you just don't turn off at your age that "I am going to
Oh I get it. When you are under 21, it is legal to smoke dope in your
country. Once you turn 21, it becomes illegal. That's why you felt
compelled to stop smoking dope!
> stop because this is illegal or my livelihood". Studies actually show
> that it entrenches that person EVEN MORE into it (if they get busted),
You really don't have much of an idea of psychology, do you?
> with the thinking of "no one is going to tell me what to do" - - - and
> they make efforts to "work around it".....not saying you're doing that
> either.....but most do. I am sure you are the ones that gave it up. I
> truly hope you did.
>
If you truly hope Mike gave it up, why do you continually lambast him
about it?
>
>
>>
>> You still awaiting that "Premium RX", Gregg? How long does
>> it take? Is it being shipped from Mars? I have several of
>> my top receivers being repaired by a tech in Michigan, for
>> free. I bet I get my radios back before you "claim" to
>> receive your's.
>
> Ha! Damn, you've brought it up more than I have. You'd think you were
> getting it. I know the list of your "top receivers" and NOT ONE is
> considered a "Premium RX" - - again - - that there is the facts.
> Forget my receiver Michael, this is all about you. :-)
>
No Gregg, this response says a whole lot more about you than it says
about anyone else!
>
>>
>> Had my pictures taken today by a professional photo-
>> grapher for the award I'm receiving as the state's Most
>> Dramatic Lecturer.
>
> Yeah, Kramer maybe?<snort> Michael, do you "really" think any of us
> care....I mean "really"? LOL - I know I don't....lol...I see enough of
> your "dramatics" and shuck and jive in here. Like I said before, you
> could win ***Ky. Teacher Of The Century*** award and I wouldn't look
> at you any different than I do now. That is a fact and I am sorry
> (truly I am - really) if it hurts your feelings or doesn't give you
> the lift or emotional jolt you were looking for when you typed that
> and hit the send buttom.
>
Yes Gregg, they didn't do class pictures showing you graduating from
kindergarten. That's because you dropped out!
>
>> But I couldn't help thinking about you.
>
> I have got to ask you this....lol.<sigh> Do you "really" think about
> Steve and myself like you say you do in many of your posts? I'm being
> serious. I mean, when you're out in your world - do you HONESTLY think
> of me? I don't feel flattered if the answer is yes, it really kinda
> creeps me out, not in a scary way.....but I guess in a sad way. Please
> Michael, when you get all these awards that you have worked so hard
> for and finally attained - please don't think of me. Just think of how
> many......errr never mind. But I can PROMISE YOU that I won't think
> about you again till I log on and check my lists emails and two other
> sites AND THEN I will log onto google. But this is the third group I
> check, there are two others that take priority over this. ***THEN*** -
> I will think of you when I am reading your crap.
>
But Gregg, it wasn't that long ago that you were lamenting that Mike
didn't post any more. You missed him! Admit it!
>
>> You deserve an award as the Most Dramatic Nit-Wit in
>> Radio History!
>
> Blah Blah Blah - that's it?<shaking my head>
>
>
>>
>> Now, don't forget to suck up to Lare, today! You need to
>> impress your troll sock puppets...
>
> Like you did your Weber St. students that you got high with more than
> once / more than twice/ more than three etc. etc. etc. that kind of
> "sucking up....errr sucking in - oh never mind you know what I mean"?
> Or do you mean "another" kind of sucking up?
>
>>
>> [Yawn...]
>
> Open that pouty little lower lip wide open, uh huh.<snicker>
>
Freekin' hell!!! He is right there in YOUR DREAMS! It's far worse than
I thought! You've slipped into toal and utter obsession. No hope of
redemption for you now!
None so spiteful as a lover scorned!!!
Krypsis
Mike
I knew it wouldn't take long for your knife-wielding "Rambo"
alter-ego to emerge! Here's another thing I teach students:
conciseness. Never take five thousand words to say what
you mean. It conveys uncertainty and outright deception.
I'll try to keep this response short. It should be easy.
1. You're an idiot. You might be an idiot with bluster, but
you're an idiot.
2. You should know that they can detect THC via either urine
or blood. Both of mine are checked every two months by
my doctor for the last five years. Remember, I had a
stroke five years ago. Use your super-sleuth powers,
Greggbo. My insurance company requires certification
of the results. The offer stands. Give me a post office box
if you don't want to give out your address.
3. I'm also tired of your inferences that I'm gay. While
there is nothing wrong with being gay, I am not. None
of your awesome detection has produced any evidence
to the contrary. My daughter still lives at home. I was a
debate coach for over 20 years. That profession involves
extensive travel to tournaments on a fixed budget. All
debate coaches share rooms with their debaters while
on the road, often with four or five people packed in a
room. That's a fact that you could easily find out about.
4. I tell my students not to smoke pot (or do other drugs)
because I teach Job Interviewing skills to inner city
students who are about to be starting high-tech jobs.
Many of them don't know that most jobs in KY require
drug screening and random testing. Those are also facts.
I do admit to them that I've smoked pot, but try to share
with them the professional necessity of not doing so.
Many of them have thanked me for being being direct
and honest with them. You have alluded to my Linked In bio.
If you have read it, you should know what my students
(of both genders) say about me.
5. I have never made fun of Maus for losing his legs.
I don't why you say such horrible things. I never even knew
this until you pointed it out. I also find it very amazing that
you seem to be fixated on my past, but have no problem at all
with Strom being an avowed Nazi that has served actual
time in prison for child pornography, a crime that I accused
him of way back of in the 1990's. Even other Nazis say he's
too sexually weird for them to tolerate. But, hey, that's no
problem for you, right?
That's enough. You're a fool. But you're also psychotic.
Psychotics need to be dealt with before they have a
chance to hurt others. You don't scare me. But, please
keep on talking. Others need to see you for exactly what
you really are.
The fact that you align yourself with Steve Lare and the
trolls, by itself, tells most people all they need to know about you.
I'd still love to meet you face-to-face. Place or venue of
your choice. You've got nothing to worry about. I can hardly
walk, much less threaten you physically! So, why are you
such a cowardly, sniveling, cyber-bully? Men should have the
courage to throw their insults face-to-face.
Mike
dxAce
Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
Heck, that's nothing to brag about, had your 'daughter' attended the Sullivan
College of Technology & Design she'd now be gainfully employed like the other
'95%' of the graduates and she'd have had her own place to live!
dxAce
Michigan
USA
m II
> RHF wrote:
>> Dave Your The Best ! :o) ~ RHF
>> .
>
> My The Best what?
he's possessed...
mike
cuh...@webtv.net
too.I Spy, you Spy, we all Spy.
Ahh shud hav nown bitter dan tu mow mah yard thi mawnin, sew werly en
dee mawnin wyly it's su damp.Dat thar wet/damp dam grass dun woiked me
haf tu death!
cuhulin
Mike
>
> What the heck, Bryant, our clown 'tard homeboy, spent a lot of time trying to
> obtain a PhD, but, he could not.
No, unlike you, I wanted to get out there and start working.
It might be old-fashioned about me, but I feel that earning
my wages is the right thing to do. And, I never found the
lack of a doctorate degree to get in the way of academic
jobs.
But, of course, you can't understand that.
Mike
m II
> If you send me your address, I'll be happy to send you copies
> of my quarterly blood tests from my physician. These tests
> have to be certified and will prove to you that you ought to
> shut your mouth before I actually take a slander action
> against you.
Not to pick nits, I make the same mistake regularly. I'll get this out
while while it's still fresh in my mind ....A slander is committed in
spoken form. Libel happens when the same lie or defamation is done in
print. You would be launching a Libel action against him.
mike
dxAce
Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
OK, so you claim to have had a 'stroke' five years ago. Just how does that
explain the fact that you claimed to have had a PhD c. ten years ago?
dxAce
Michigan
USA
dxAce
Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
OK, but that still doesn't explain why you 'claimed' to have that PhD, Mr. Debate!
Other than the absolute fact that you are a pathological liar.
dxAce
Michigan
USA
Mike
>
> OK, so you claim to have had a 'stroke' five years ago. Just how does that
> explain the fact that you claimed to have had a PhD c. ten years ago?
>
I really did have a stroke five years ago that left me unable to
walk, talk, or even swallow. Took a while to come back, but since
then I have gone through extensive therapy and medical
monitoring. Ask your cousin, Burr. I explained it all to him
during my rehab, when he was asking me to return to posting
on RRS. I disagree strongly with Burr's politics, but he does
have a heart. I respect him in a way that I don't think I could
ever respect you. He's always made the effort to check on me,
whether I was posting to RRS or not.
But my stroke and my level of educational attainment have
absolutely no connection. Why should they? Even your insults
are nonsensical, Steve.
Mike
dxAce
Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
> On Jul 3, 11:39 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > OK, so you claim to have had a 'stroke' five years ago. Just how does that
> > explain the fact that you claimed to have had a PhD c. ten years ago?
> >
>
> I really did have a stroke five years ago that left me unable to
> walk, talk, or even swallow.
Well, one will have to check that statement out with not only your postings on
RRS but with your employer as well.
> Took a while to come back, but since
> then I have gone through extensive therapy and medical
> monitoring. Ask your cousin, Burr. I explained it all to him
> during my rehab, when he was asking me to return to posting
> on RRS. I disagree strongly with Burr's politics, but he does
> have a heart. I respect him in a way that I don't think I could
> ever respect you. He's always made the effort to check on me,
> whether I was posting to RRS or not.
>
> But my stroke and my level of educational attainment have
> absolutely no connection. Why should they? Even your insults
> are nonsensical, Steve.
OK, but what is nonsensical about asking you, an obvious clown 'tard academic,
just why you lied about having a PhD c. ten years ago?
dxAce
Michigan
USA
dxAce
Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
> On Jul 3, 11:39 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > OK, so you claim to have had a 'stroke' five years ago. Just how does that
> > explain the fact that you claimed to have had a PhD c. ten years ago?
> >
>
> I really did have a stroke five years ago that left me unable to
> walk, talk, or even swallow. Took a while to come back, but since
> then I have gone through extensive therapy and medical
> monitoring. Ask your cousin, Burr. I explained it all to him
> during my rehab, when he was asking me to return to posting
> on RRS. I disagree strongly with Burr's politics, but he does
> have a heart.
Cry us a river, clown 'tard.
You are so full of shit that it is indeed pathological.
dxAce
Michigan
USA
Mike
Go ahead, Steve. I'll wait while you check with Burr. I
want you to see that you, too, are full of excrement.
I mean it, Burr and I agree on little, but I still respect him
for being a human. You became some sort of alcoholic
reptile a long time ago.
Mike
dxAce
I could check with Cousin Burr until the cows come home.
But, you still haven't told us just how your so called 'stroke' figures in to
just why you lied, c. 2000, about having a PhD, clown 'tard.
Please, drink some more, smoke some more, and try to make up something new!
dxAce
Michigan
USA
Mike
>
> I don't tell "stories", dufus. I leave that sort of stuff to pathologically lying
> clown 'tard academics such as yourself.
>
Interesting "stories" told by Steve Lare:
1. I'm employed. (Disproven and finally admitted
to after caught posting logs 24 hours a day.)
2. I'm announcing that I am leaving this
newsgroup. (Didn't leave for a single day!)
3. While in the Navy, I actually helped in the
search for Pol Pot. (Later denied)
4. I just got through a long motorcycle trip.
(Later retracted after it was pointed out that it
might disqualify him from receiving disability)
5. I'm a Native American from the Miami tribe,
I don't worship God, but Native spirits, instead.
(Hogwash, you don't worship anything besides
your Drakes!)
We won't get into your supposed degrees or what
others have backchanneled me about your
departure from the Armed Forces.
You're sick, Steve. When you decide to finally
seek help, let me know. I'll do whatever I can to
help you.
Mike
dxAce
dxAce wrote:
> Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
>
> > On Jul 3, 12:01 pm, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
> > > Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
> > >
> > > > I really did have a stroke five years ago that left me unable to
> > > > walk, talk, or even swallow. Took a while to come back, but since
> > > > then I have gone through extensive therapy and medical
> > > > monitoring. Ask your cousin, Burr. I explained it all to him
> > > > during my rehab, when he was asking me to return to posting
> > > > on RRS. I disagree strongly with Burr's politics, but he does
> > > > have a heart.
> > >
> > > Cry us a river, clown 'tard.
> > >
> > > You are so full of shit that it is indeed pathological.
> > >
> >
> > Go ahead, Steve. I'll wait while you check with Burr. I
> > want you to see that you, too, are full of excrement.
> > I mean it, Burr and I agree on little, but I still respect him
> > for being a human. You became some sort of alcoholic
> > reptile a long time ago.
>
> I could check with Cousin Burr until the cows come home.
>
> But, you still haven't told us just how your so called 'stroke' figures in to
> just why you lied, c. 2000, about having a PhD, clown 'tard.
You still haven't told us just why your 'daughter' is still living with you.
Don't they have a program at the 'Sullivan College' that might help her become
gainfully employed so that she might get out on her own, homeboy?
dxAce
Michigan
USA
dxAce
Michael W. "I'm a college professor with a PhD" Bryant wrote:
> On Jul 3, 8:22 am, dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't tell "stories", dufus. I leave that sort of stuff to pathologically lying
> > clown 'tard academics such as yourself.
> >
>
> Interesting "stories" told by Steve Lare:
>
> 1. I'm employed. (Disproven and finally admitted
> to after caught posting logs 24 hours a day.)
I've not been employed since 2003, check it out, clown 'tard.
> 2. I'm announcing that I am leaving this
> newsgroup. (Didn't leave for a single day!)
Heck, I actually left due to my ISP dropping newsgroup service.
> 3. While in the Navy, I actually helped in the
> search for Pol Pot. (Later denied)
Crap, EVERYONE was looking for Pol Pot!
> 4. I just got through a long motorcycle trip.
> (Later retracted after it was pointed out that it
> might disqualify him from receiving disability)
I think you are referring to another individual with the same name, as I've never owned
a motorcycle. That individual lives in Florida.
> 5. I'm a Native American from the Miami tribe,
> I don't worship God, but Native spirits, instead.
> (Hogwash, you don't worship anything besides
> your Drakes!)
Yes, I am a proud decendent of the Miami.
> We won't get into your supposed degrees or what
> others have backchanneled me about your
> departure from the Armed Forces.
My 'departure' from the Armed Forces?
Hey, clown 'tard doobie smoking dufis, I was honorably discharged.
My 'supposed' degree(s)? I certainly invite anyone out there to contact Grand Valley
State University to inquire about whether or not I received a degree.
> You're sick, Steve. When you decide to finally
> seek help, let me know. I'll do whatever I can to
> help you.
I'd really prefer to not have 'help' from some clown 'tard academic who lied about
having a PhD.
dxAce
Michigan
USA
Joe from Kokomo
> The fact that you align yourself with Steve Lare and the
> trolls, by itself, tells most people all they need to know about you.
That DOES speak volumes about Gregg, doesn't it?
dave
The innocent have nothing to hide.
cuh...@webtv.net
Stand Up and Fight Wallace Beery
Margaret O'Brien once said when she was a little girl at the movie
studios, Wallace Beery used to steal her lunch.
He used to get in some real bar room knock down fights too.Sometimes he
would ''borrow'' movie studio props and rent them out to other movie
studios.One time, some MGM people went to his home and they turned over
a boat.On the bottom was a sign painted on there.It said, Property Of
MGM Studios.
cuhulin
Gregg
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
When are you going to understand Robin? I DO NOT read your
posts....lol...as soon as I see it is you in response to me I
automatically scroll to the bottom and either spank your bottom or
simply don't respond. I am just telling you this because if you REALLY
REALLY feel that ole' Gregg is actually reading your post.<sigh> it
ain't happening. You present no challenge whatsoever (I gave you your
shot), you are like two days ago garbage when it comes to your stink.
I don't want to smell it and I don't want to see it. So keep typing
away and hitting the send button you moron because I know YOU READ
EVERYTHING I type in EVERY group I post in.<heh> Whats that really
say? Ha! And again, don't bother answering unless you're trying to
impress your boyfriends. Ha Ha- supposed 70 + yr. old playing on
usenet, only in Australia.<shaking my head>
Krypsis
> On Jul 3, 10:44 am, Krypsis<kryp...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>> On 3/07/2010 11:13 PM, Gregg wrote:
<snip>
>
> When are you going to understand Robin? I DO NOT read your
> posts....lol...as soon as I see it is you in response to me I
Gregg, you do read my posts. You are a troll! You get your jollies from
the havoc you wreak in newsgroups. It's an imperative that you read and
reread the fruits of your labours. It's what you live for. Shortwave
radio is a secondary matter with you.
> automatically scroll to the bottom and either spank your bottom or
You're way too kinky Gregg!
> simply don't respond. I am just telling you this because if you REALLY
> REALLY feel that ole' Gregg is actually reading your post.<sigh> it
I'll give you a clue Gregg! I don't give a damn whether YOU read my
posts! Others do and, by now, have worked out what a troll you really
are. I must admit, you haven't made it too difficult!
> ain't happening. You present no challenge whatsoever (I gave you your
> shot), you are like two days ago garbage when it comes to your stink.
Sticks and stones!
> I don't want to smell it and I don't want to see it. So keep typing
You may not want to but you cannot resist!
> away and hitting the send button you moron because I know YOU READ
> EVERYTHING I type in EVERY group I post in.<heh> Whats that really
Not every group Gregg! No need! You crosspost the same posts to multiple
newsgroups so there's no need to read multiple iterations of the same post.
> say? Ha! And again, don't bother answering unless you're trying to
> impress your boyfriends.
Gregg, it's you who have boyfriends! You and your troll buddies. In
fact, you're obsessed by "boyfriends". You can't get your mind away from
the concept! You must have recently "come out"!
> Ha Ha- supposed 70 + yr. old playing on
> usenet, only in Australia.<shaking my head>
I hadn't realised that the USA had an age limit on usenet. We don't
appear to have such a thing here in Australia!
From what I can determine, most people of middle age or greater tend to
usenet as a means of discourse. People of more tender years tend to
facebook like forums and web chatrooms. That's why I'm surprised to see
you here in usenet!
Krypsis
m II
> The innocent have nothing to hide.
I'm going to try this. It may work better than Wine, I don't know.
http://dlc.sun.com/virtualbox/vboxdownload.html
mike
Mike
> When are you going to understand Robin? I DO NOT read your
> posts....lol...as soon as I see it is you in response to me I
> automatically scroll to the bottom and either spank your bottom or
> simply don't respond. I am just telling you this because if you REALLY
> REALLY feel that ole' Gregg is actually reading your post.<sigh> it
> ain't happening. You present no challenge whatsoever (I gave you your
> shot), you are like two days ago garbage when it comes to your stink.
> I don't want to smell it and I don't want to see it. So keep typing
> away and hitting the send button you moron because I know YOU READ
> EVERYTHING I type in EVERY group I post in.<heh> Whats that really
> say? Ha! And again, don't bother answering unless you're trying to
> impress your boyfriends. Ha Ha- supposed 70 + yr. old playing on
> usenet, only in Australia.<shaking my head>
Be careful about shaking that head so much. It seems to be barely
attached. No shock here that you dont (/can't) read posts. No,
not surprising, at all.
Mike
Gregg
Huh? Rambo? Really? Count how many words you have typed in this
post...lol...I have read posts of yours where I am literally just left
speechless and shaking my head. And to think you're using the ole'
noggin again...lol... to people that aren't that bright and make them
think the more someone types it conveys uncertainty or deception. You
are suchhhhhh a bullshitter. There are NO credible studies done in
that area that prove what you just said -- - like it was the truth.
There are in face to face studies but not in via communications by the
internet or even post a notes for that matter.You are a fraud and you
are lying again!! It's funny that you used to love me and I was your
pal (like Batman) when I was either not saying anything about you or
disagreeing with ones that spoke harshly about you. Why is that? I
mean, I know the answer but I want to see the crap you spew in
answering that simple question and it IS simple. :-)
>
> I'll try to keep this response short. It should be easy.
No it isn't....lol.... but it is easy.
>
> 1. You're an idiot. You might be an idiot with bluster, but
> you're an idiot.
**rolling my eyes** - and that is all you have to offer Brybaby? Clean
the orange Cheetos stains off your fingers and try again.
Hint...lol...I'm using an ole' "debate strategy". ;-)
>
> 2. You should know that they can detect THC via either urine
> or blood.
AGAIN. You are lying. I will just leave it at that unless you don't
know what I know - - which I feel is why you either #1 Said what you
said or #2 In case "someone" is reading this - you can play like
Dumbo. I bet you told your "students"......errrr you're "friends" more
than what you just said here....lol. You may not like me pal because I
can call you on your bullshit - but I am a trained "bullshit sniffer"
and you qualify in that segment.
> Both of mine are checked every two months by
> my doctor for the last five years.
Huh? For what? Pot? ***BOTH*** your blood AND your urine as you just
stated above? Oh quit it...lol...tell it to someone else that
qualifies as a "window licker". If what you just said is true (which
it isn't) then it isn't a "random" as you said before.....come on
Brybaby - shuck and jive - move to the left and move to the right -
I'm a paid Hound Dog Bullshitter.<sniff sniff>
> Remember, I had a
> stroke five years ago.
No, I don't remember and I don't care. Try that technique on someone
else or when you "warm up" for a debate and shout it into your tape
recorder.<shaking my head>
> Use your super-sleuth powers,
> Greggbo. My insurance company requires certification
> of the results.
AGAIN!!! You are full of shit. Learn to use the "simple" correct
words, they won't give the "dramatic" effect that you are fishing for
and the emotional tugs - - - but you will be respected more<heh> by
the reader.
> The offer stands. Give me a post office box
> if you don't want to give out your address.
LOLOL - I'm not spending one nickel for a PO Box...lol. Buddy, I know
ALL ABOUT PO Boxes. There are things I know that I can promise you -
you don't. Or your phone number or your cell number or your license
plate and at least four other things I won't share here.
>
> 3. I'm also tired of your inferences that I'm gay.
And you do know the definition of said word inference in via
communications by the internet or even post a notes for that
matter.You are a fraud and you are lying again!! It's funny that you
used to love me and I was your pal (like Batman) when I was either not
saying anything about you or disagreeing with ones that spoke harshly
about you. Why is that? I mean, I know the answer but I want to see
the crap you spew in answering that simple question and it IS
simple. :-)
> While
> there is nothing wrong with being gay, I am not.
I have NEVER once said you liked to swallow another man's cum or have
your butt penetrated by another man's penis. Like you said, there
nothing wrong with that. ;-) Oh quit it you big fat ding dong headed
liar. Yes, there is SOMETHING very wrong with it in the word OF GOD.
I'm not going to get all biblical about it, but the Lord said
(HIMSELF) that not only is it not right. But IT IS AN ABOMINATION!!!!
Does you simple computer Bible text/defintion check **** find out what
that word itself means in that EXACT context in (in the Hebrew) what
he stated and get back with me. Not that there is anything wrong with
that....spoken like the typical liberal....and I hate tagging specific
political affiliates because in the grand scheme of things - everyone
is lying to everyone else (just like the Bible said would happen) and
this country is going down to hell in a big ole' handbasket.
> None
> of your awesome detection has produced any evidence
> to the contrary.
I love google, just for the fact that is shows the bullshitters like
you......even ten/fifteen years from now. Or someone will "bump one of
your threads" though you are rotting in the grave and have already
answered to your Lord and Savior. Your words and posts of
vindictiveness will be your usenet legacy. Me on the other hand, has
tried to be as nice as I can possibly be to anyone unless my repeated
requests go without <snapping my fingers> - can't think of the word
and won't be a phoney and type it in later.....but you know what I
mean. ;-) Then and only then - do I speak up. I'll let someone, both
in face to face dealings and via usenet mess with me. I'm all for
having a good time and making friends or letting someone think they
have the drop on me, but long ago you mistook my kindness as my
weakness and you couldn't have been farther from the the truth.
Evidence? Really? Are we gonna dance Mike? Give me the word here on
usenet. I will be "above board" and I will never say a thing here
about it in RRS. That just means - just what it means. Think it
through slowly, really think about it and try an swallow a tad of
whatever pride you have left down your gullet and try an not make this
too personal. It isn't going to hurt me, I can promise you that. I can
just dissapear from here or either ignore you and do the radio thing
and "dump it" and when I say that.....I mean just that. You will go
running to your fake attorney sister (I will find out about that
also ;-) And you will scream and bitch - but it will be through enough
anonymous servers in correlation with each other you wouldn't know if
your "garbage man" (catch that) posted it or a student in your own
class.<heh> This (I PRAYYYYY you believe me) - is the wrong person at
the wrong time you want to play reindeer games with. Really Michael. I
am being as nice as I can and trying to give you a way to save face.
Send me an email, and I will dissapear from RRS if you do for an
amount of time.. I pwomise.<heh>
> My daughter still lives at home.
I don't care, but thanks for sharing I guess? <rolling my eyes>
Another part of the bullshit you have infested this group with? Now
you are going to include the daughter, I know psychology speaking what
that means.<snicker> **NOTHING** could/would ever surprise me about
you....lol. I could NEVER find out anything about you and in my mind
say ""Damn, I can't believe that". That says alot - believe me it
does. A daughter, but no wife living presently with you?<trap laid> A
daughter ALWAYS (in over 83% of studied cases) wants to be with their
Mommy. <deeply thinking and accessing read material>
>I was a
> debate coach for over 20 years.
Blah Blah Blah - nothing there of interest. And I threw a wiffleball
for thirty two. So?
>That profession involves
> extensive travel to tournaments on a fixed budget. All
> debate coaches share rooms with their debaters while
> on the road, often with four or five people packed in a
> room. That's a fact that you could easily find out about.
AND YOU CHOSE THAT profession!!!!! I would have NEVER chosen that. I
am just a saved sinner and life is hard enough and I keep "prayed up"
- and I wouldn't put myself in that spot. You put yourself in a spot
that not "just doesn't look good" - but decided "Hey- I am just like
you kids". That is why teachers or pastors or people in power keep the
doors open with any type of sex nowadays....lol. ANY look of
impropriety is just that, if you KNEW HOW IT WOULD LOOK BUT CHOSE to
do it your way. Shuck and jive don't work here.
>
> 4. I tell my students not to smoke pot (or do other drugs)
> because I teach Job Interviewing skills to inner city
> students who are about to be starting high-tech jobs.
> Many of them don't know that most jobs in KY require
> drug screening and random testing. Those are also facts.
And AGAIN - I say "why"? No one ever said anything to any of my
classmates about that. Someone I have KNOWN PERSONALLY for eleven
years is part of that (KY job) and he was never told. He now (at least
till nine months ago- I can make a phone call and check) was a part of
the BATF in Louisville. It's a rather new "occupied area for them."
When you go down 71s and get off at the 2nd loop of GS - you continue
to go straight and you pass the big Ford Plant on your left side. I
know you know where I mean. ;-) On the right hand side of the HW you
will see (I think) three crosses for three dead boys that (of course)
died there.....and the next exit is a big loop and you have to be
careful and slow down - even on a sunny day....you come to a stop
sign.
You take a left and the small neighborhood is on your right and then
you go over a set of RR tracks - right after that you take a left into
the "business park". The first driveway on your right is to the
loading area of the BATF on the right side. You can't get more high
tech than what he did even BEFORE he went there.<snicker> We NEVER had
someone gives us the "low down" on drug tests..lol. But yet, you did
your students.<shaking my head>
> I do admit to them that I've smoked pot, but try to share
> with them the professional necessity of not doing so.
Yeah, whatever. Is that short of enough for you? ;-P
> Many of them have thanked me for being being direct
> and honest with them.
Uh huh. I will leave it at that. Just watch yourself. ;-)
> You have alluded to my Linked In bio.
> If you have read it, you should know what my students
> (of both genders) say about me.
I don't know (on that Linkd site) and I don't care. I didn't "join"
because I don't have to- to find out info**BUT** I DO KNOW what some
of your "former students" think of yourself. Do you wanna play? People
(in general) like to talk.....especially when they know they're
getting older (and they have their own families and values) that "they
feel they were played". Many have developed their own belief systems
without a master'de'bator paving their
minds driveway so too speak. Do you want me to say names (from back
then) - that I could only know unless I only knew...lol. Or would you
go personally and professionally after them also? I bet you would. It
is just your nature. Two of the names ( that I know of) are now
changed....because they are now changed. ;-) I truly think it would be
in your best interest
*****The Rest of This Is Cooked So We don't Have To Read Anymore Of
Your Crap******
RHF
> On Jul 3, 7:27 am, RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 2, 6:18 pm, cuhu...@webtv.net wrote:
> > - I aints no spy.
> > - cuhulin
>
> > No-But - Cuhulin many of your Posts here prove
> > that you are a One-Man Neighborhood Watch.
> > .
>
> He is and I love him for it.:-) You know, Doggie and the couch and the
> van and the neighbors and the wimmins etc. etc. etc. oh - andwww.devilfinder.com
>
- Gotta be honest Cuh,
- I've never clicked on that link,
- I can find the devil without clicking on him,
- know what I mean Jelly Bean?
? YKWIMJB ?
http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/You+Know+What+I+Mean,+Jelly+Bean%3F
You Know What I Mean - Jelly Bean ?
and now you know . . . ~ RHF
.
RHF
> RHF wrote:
> > On Jul 2, 7:52 pm, dave<d...@dave.dave> wrote:
> >> cuhu...@webtv.net wrote:
> >>> I aints no spy.
> >>> cuhulin
>
- - - The best agent is sometimes someone who
- - - is unaware that he is an agent.
- - Dave Your The Best ! :o) ~ RHF
- My The Best what?
*correction*
Dave You Are "The Best" ! :o) ~ RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5b05bb9a5a1f1d1d
-wrt- The best _____* is sometimes someone who
is unaware that he is an _____*.
* Fill-in the _Blanks_ for yourself.
.
Gregg
You better watch it fresh mouth, truly you should. I can PROMISE- you
will scream like a school girl and play the other side of the tracks.
Bwahahahhaha- NO ONE HAS EVER "backchanneled" you......as you so
eloquently stated.....when it comes towards Ace. Hasn't happened and
you are lying. :-) What have the others - back channeled you in
reference.......said? We are waiting with our breath held in
reverance<rolling my eyes>
RHF
> Mike wrote:
>
> > You prove daily that you are truly brain dead. Now, go back
> > under your bridge. You stink, Troll.
>
> > Mike
- Why don't you just filter him out?
Dave - In a Game of Cat-and-Mouse . . .
Both Often Need Each Other :
Otherwise There Is NO Game.
it's mostly about being-in 'the game' ~ RHF
.
Gregg
Bwahahahahahhahahahahhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaa - you are an *****ADMITTED
and CONVICTED******** not just a puffer of the weed but also supplier
of the weed to your college debate students at Weber St.<rolling my
eyes> Only in Amerika and now at Sullivan College of Technology &
Design in Louisville,Kentucky. <rolling my eyes>
Gregg
You only respect him because you feel he has the brains of a salad
bowl (nothing personal Burr - I don't believe it). You Bryant DO NOT
RESPECT ANYONE on usenet unless you feel there is an advantage to you.
I do not believe you. Steve does not believe you. And numerous other
in RRS do not believe you. You provide NOTHING to this group.. :-(
Gregg
>
> - Show quoted text -
Exactly.<rolling my eyes> But lets not get too far away from the
truth. ;-)
Gregg
> You Know What I Mean - Jelly Bean ?
>
> and now you know . . . ~ RHF
> .
Only in RRS - thanks to RHF - welcome back pal. Seriously.:-)
dave
I do several shows a year at the old MGM lot in Culver City (now Sony
Pictures Entertainment). They haven't cleaned some parts since Wallace
Beery stumbled down the narrow breezeways. They do Jeopardy from there.
Mike
GREGG. RRS, Cincinnati, USA, at 0911 UTC in some sort of
Pidgin English, July 4. Long, rambling discourse barked in
Standard N. Korean-style delivery. Clear proof of some sort of
mental imbalance. Fading in and out. Mentions of Cheetos,
Biblical Abominations, BATF, fake sisters, former students, etc..
Transcript above being sent to authorities for QSL. Splatter
from dxAce posts noted. Strange near-by // noted, possibly
sign of inebriated technician? (Dell Studio 17 Laptop, Mike
Bryant, Louisville, KY)
dave
I think I may be able to get a copy of 7 Professional at employee
pricing. $40 is a fair price for DirectX 10, which I need to run a DSP
panoramic display. I have absolutely no need for anything else in POS
Windows.
Mike
>
> You only respect him because you feel he has the brains of a salad
> bowl (nothing personal Burr - I don't believe it). You Bryant DO NOT
> RESPECT ANYONE on usenet unless you feel there is an advantage to you.
> I do not believe you. Steve does not believe you. And numerous other
> in RRS do not believe you. You provide NOTHING to this group..
I think Burr knows that I don't think he has the "brains
of a salad bowl". I do, however, find you to be "fruit
loops"-crazy! Since I see you speaking for "others
in RRS," I have to ask: Are you now hearing voices
in your head?
Get kelp. It might help.
Mike
dxAce
Was it 'the voices in your head' that compelled you to lie about that PhD,
clown 'tard?
dxAce
Michigan
USA
cuh...@webtv.net
cuhulin
dave
I wish I could be there. I am always here, however.
cuh...@webtv.net
http://www.worldnetdaily.com
And Owl ''global warming'' Gourdhead is 'messin around' with them
wimmins.
cuhulin
Gregg
> GREGG. RRS, Cincinnati, USA, at 0911 UTC in some sort of
> Pidgin English, July 4. Long, rambling discourse barked in
> Standard N. Korean-style delivery. Clear proof of some sort of
> mental imbalance. Fading in and out. Mentions of Cheetos,
> Biblical Abominations, BATF, fake sisters, former students, etc..
> Transcript above being sent to authorities for QSL. Splatter
> from dxAce posts noted. Strange near-by // noted, possibly
> sign of inebriated technician? (Dell Studio 17 Laptop, Mike
> Bryant, Louisville, KY)
And you didn't pick up on any of it. Can't say I am surprised. You
were given three clues and they went right over your head. No more
clues/ cipher - I tried. Back to radio, imagine that.
RHF
> On Jul 4, 6:23 am, Gregg <gk...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > You only respect him because you feel he has the brains of a salad
> > bowl (nothing personal Burr - I don't believe it). You Bryant DO NOT
> > RESPECT ANYONE on usenet unless you feel there is an advantage to you.
> > I do not believe you. Steve does not believe you. And numerous other
> > in RRS do not believe you. You provide NOTHING to this group..
>
- of a salad bowl". I do, however, find you to be "fruit
- loops"-crazy! Since I see you speaking for "others
- in RRS," I have to ask: Are you now hearing voices
- in your head?
-
- Get kelp. It might help.
-
- Mike
MWB - It's often stated as
Crazy for CoCo Puffs ! :-) ~RHF
http://www.toplessrobot.com/sonny%20coco.jpg
.
I see Islands of CoCo Puffs floating in . . .
a sea of tranquil sanity - ohm-wo-men
http://hrsbstaff.ednet.ns.ca/kcurran/images/coco%20puffs.jpg
.
RHF
- - cuhu...@webtv.net wrote:
- - But,
- - you have to be there to be square.
- - Knowhattamean, Vern?
- - cuhulin
- I wish I could be there.
- I am always here, however.
Dave sometimes {often-times}
HERE Is A Good Place To Be !
-or- not to be - any questions ~ RHF
.
dave
It's Mt. Washington, you ditz. The worst weather on Earth. Makes
Antarctica seem civilized.
dave
>
> MWB - It's often stated as
> Crazy for CoCo Puffs ! :-) ~RHF
> http://www.toplessrobot.com/sonny%20coco.jpg
> .
Koo-koo for Cocoa Puffs, ya dipshit.
RHF
> cuhu...@webtv.net wrote:
> > July Snow in New Hampshire.
> >http://www.worldnetdaily.com
>
> > And Owl ''global warming'' Gourdhead is 'messin around' with them
> > wimmins.
> > cuhulin
- It's Mt. Washington, you ditz.
Mount Washington (New Hampshire)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Washington_%28New_Hampshire%29
- The worst weather on Earth.
- Makes Antarctica seem civilized.
Dave ? ditz ?
here i thunk you was a no-coder
ditz ditz dah dumb ~ RHF
.
cuh...@webtv.net
Mount Kilimanjaro.Mount Cotapaxi.Mount Kenya.
cuhulin
cuh...@webtv.net
You don't want to embarass the chicken! ~ Paul Gallo.
cuhulin
dave
Do you listen to WWL 870?
cuh...@webtv.net
cuh...@webtv.net
http://www.rense.com/general91/soon.htm
So is Islam.
Ahh tink Ahh et to mush supper.Mah stomach fills bloated.Ahh am going
ter drank ah glass uv watery with ah big spoon full er two uv bakin
soda.tHat weel fix it up Good.
cuhulin