SPOTLESS SUNS: Yesterday, NASA announced that the sun has plunged

[helm...@wowway.com]

Space Weather News for April 2, 2009
http://spaceweather.com

SPOTLESS SUNS: Yesterday, NASA announced that the sun has plunged
into the deepest solar minimum in nearly a century. Sunspots have all
but vanished and consequently the sun has become very quiet. In 2008,
the sun had no spots 73% of the time, a 95-year low. In 2009, sunspots
are even more scarce, with the "spotless rate" jumping to 87%. We are
currently experiencing a stretch of 25 continuous days uninterrupted
by sunspots--and there's no end in sight.

This is a big event, but it is not unprecedented. Similarly deep solar
minima were common in the late-19th and early-20th centuries, and each
time the sun recovered with a fairly robust solar maximum. That's
probably what will happen in the present case, although no one can say
for sure. This is the first deep solar minimum of the Space Age, and
the first one we have been able to observe using modern technology.
Is it like others of the past? Or does this solar minimum have its
own unique characteristics that we will discover for the first time as
the cycle unfolds? These questions are at the cutting edge of solar
physics.

You can monitor the progress of solar minimum with a new "Spotless
Days Counter" on spaceweather.com. Instead of counting sunspots,
we're counting no sunspots. Daily updated totals tell you how many
spotless days there have been in a row, in this year, and in the
entire solar cycle. Comparisons to historical benchmarks put it all
in perspective. Visit http://spaceweather.com for data.

[dave]

http://www.solarcycle24.com/

[helm...@wowway.com]

Thanks, didn't have that link.

[veesubotee]

For the benefit of myself and other casual SWL's, etc., will this be a
positive or negative impact on reception?

HankG

<helm...@wowway.com> wrote in message
news:dlsct41hsqjdvqq72...@4ax.com...

[kb9...@yahoooo.com]

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 15:06:56 -0400, "veesubotee" <hg...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>For the benefit of myself and other casual SWL's, etc., will this be a
>positive or negative impact on reception?
>
>HankG

BAD in genera might improvethe reception of a few staions near to you
or with realy good paths to you

less noise most likely but fewer signals you want to hear
if you were in midwest of the USA might dscribe the number of signals
you a likely to hear

clear enoughl

"one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress"
adams

woger you are a Congress all in your own head

<a href="http://www.3ix.org/sys/aff.php?aff=7439" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.3ix.org/images/194_101_1.gif" alt="Reliable $1 Web Hosting by 3iX" width="194" height="101" border="0"></a>

altopia is never used by KB9RQZ
nor is Kons...@hotmail.com ever
btw i can be found at
17366 N River Rd
Chassel Mi

but the cowards asking lack the gut to act

[Telamon]

In article <grdjsi$p9m$1...@nntp.motzarella.org>,
"veesubotee" <hg...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> For the benefit of myself and other casual SWL's, etc., will this be a
> positive or negative impact on reception?

Weaker daytime reception on the mid to high bands but better nigh time
reception on the lower bands at night. Conditions will be more stable
and predictable with no radio blackouts.

The only enhanced reception you will probably get is around dawn and
sunset.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California