Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: VOTE! Usenet Kook of the Year 2004

52 views
Skip to first unread message

bisecti...@yahoo.ca

unread,
Jan 9, 2005, 2:59:17 PM1/9/05
to

Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
> Here follows the one true ballot for the 2004 Usenet Kook of the Year
> awards. Anybody may vote, but your votes may be disqualified, mocked,
> burnt, shredded and/or recycled for use as toilet paper at the Vote
> Wrangler's discretion if:
>
> * you are a previous winner of Kook of the Month or the Bobo Award
> * you attempt to vote twice
> * you vote anonymously or with an unidentifiable sockpuppet
> * you vote for or against yourself
> * you vote in a thread other than this one
> * you vote in a newsgroup other than AUK without crossposting to
AUK
> * you vote in a follow-up to an incomplete or altered version of
> the ballot
> * you have officially been declared non-existent
>
> Crossposting the complete, unaltered ballot is permitted. You have
> until 12:00 noon GMT on 15 Jan 2005 to cast your votes. Vote wisely;
> next time the candidate might be you.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
> ROOKIE KOOK OF THE YEAR
> (Vote for one candidate.)
>
> Alexa Cameron
> Charles D Bohne
> George Hammond
> Joseph Bartlo
> Matthew "Mad Hatter" Moulton
> Pamela K Russell
> Rick Sobie
> Russell B Waters
> Scott A Gilbert
> Stephen P Vanier
> Trollzilla
> Uni/ArtistMike
>
>
> KOOK OF THE YEAR
> (Vote for one candidate.)
>
> Aaron R Kulkis
> Adam Weishaupt IX
> Albert Silverman
> Alexa Cameron
> Andrew Walcott Beckwith
> Ari "Lotus" Lindemann
> Barbara Schwarz
> Bert Hoff
> Bob Allisat
> Bradley L Jesness
> Bruce Daniel Kettler
> Bruce M Lloyd
> Celeste
> Charles D Bohne
> Chive Mynde
> Chuck Lysaght
> Clannish Warlords of Soc.Culture.Scottish
> Colin James III
> Dale "Average Joe" Kelly
> Dave "BigNetBuy"
> Dave "Joe1orbit"
> David Tholen
> Dean "±" Humphries
> Diana L "Curio Jones" Napolis
> Dmitri Vulis
> Doctress Neutopia
> Don "Kool" MacDonald
> Dore Williamson
> Douglas Grant
> Earl Gordon Curley
> Edmond Heinz Wollmann
> Edvin Augusts
> Emmett Earl Gulley
> Erik "Erik Mouse" McDarby
> George Hammond
> Gordon Roy "Ray Gordon" Parker
> Helena Kobrin
> Hugh Jeffcoat
> Humanitas
> James Ogle
> Jason "Flagship1" Bisbing
> Jason Kodish
> Jay "Jai Maharaj" Stevens
> Jean-Paul Turcaud
> Jeffery Douglas "McJeffy" Hunt
> Jerry M "Art Wholeflaffer" Kolnick
> Jim Collier
> Joan L Brewer
> Joe Baptista
> Joe Bruno
> John Lauzon
> John Martin Grubor
> John P "Sollog" Ennis
> John Turmel
> Joseph Bartlo
> Karl Denninger
> Ken Sandberg
> Kenneth R Pangborn
> Koos Nolst Trenite
> Lester Chow
> Lisa Agnes Gardner
> Ludwig "Archimedes Plutonium" Poehlmann
> Lynne "HoofPrints" Lyons
> Mark Line
> MarsRules
> Martin J Hannigan
> Matt Giwer
> Matthew "Mad Hatter" Moulton
> Michael Sean "EQ" Worley
> Mike Vandeman
> Neal
> Pamela K Russell
> Pete Stapleton
> Peter Nathan Haas
> Pierre Savoie
> Pietro Sommavilla
> PZ Myers
> Raymond Ronald Karczewski
> Richard "Eliyehowah" Schiller
> Richard S Bullis
> Rick Sobie
> Robert E McElwaine
> Romath
> Russell B Waters
> Scott A Gilbert
> Scott Bradbury
> Soc.Men
> Stanley Broskey
> Stephen Boursy
> Stephen P Vanier
> Steve Chaney
> Steven Ray Winter
> Terry Ortman
> Thomas K Odell
> Tim Brown
> Tim Thorne
> Tony Sidaway
> TOR
> Trollzilla
> Twonky
> Uni/ArtistMike
> Usenet Y2K Paranoids
> Vegas Luna
> Viv Eshwar
> Walter Kent Prescott
>
>
> COWARD OF THE YEAR
> (Vote for one candidate.)
>
> Alexa Cameron
> Charles D Bohne
> Chuck Lysaght
> John Lucas
> Joseph Bartlo
> Pietro Sommavilla
> Ray Murphy
> Russell B Waters
> Uni/ArtistMike
>
>
> --
> alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQs:
> http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
>
> [To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]

Message has been deleted

bisecti...@yahoo.ca

unread,
Jan 9, 2005, 3:23:36 PM1/9/05
to
Message has been deleted

bisecti...@yahoo.ca

unread,
Jan 9, 2005, 3:39:37 PM1/9/05
to
th0...@antispam.ham wrote:
> What does this have to do with OS/2, classical music, basketball or
football,
> bisectional?

Nothing, but it is completely on topic for AUK. Have you seen any of
Hammond's posts? I think he's mostly in the psychology newsgroups.

> What does this have to do with OS/2, classical music, basketball or
football,
> bisectional?
>

Who added football to the distribution?

> What does this have to do with OS/2, classical music, basketball or
football,
> bisectional?

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Peter J Ross

unread,
Jan 9, 2005, 7:54:08 PM1/9/05
to
On Sunday 09 January, bisecti...@yahoo.ca wrote in
alt.usenet.kooks:

> Have you seen any of Hammond's posts? I think he's mostly in the
> psychology newsgroups.

^^^^^^^^^^
Physics newsgroups, mostly.

George has a website too:

<http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com/>


PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Peter J Ross

unread,
Jan 10, 2005, 12:34:39 AM1/10/05
to
On Monday 10 January, Nightingale wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:

> Peter J Ross wrote in message ...

>> Like many of the other KotM winners on the ballot, our
>>Mark Line has long vanished, but it's traditional to post the complete
>>list of past winners, even if some of the candidates are dead (Earl
>>Curley) or have spent the whole year in prison without posting rights
>>(Emmett Gulley).

> Do any of the old-timers win?

It depends entirely on the actions of you, the voters. :-)

The kook who's currently in the lead for KotY didn't win KotM till
last year but had a long Usenet history before that.

>>How did the sports groups get into the crosspost? Does Tholen thole in
>>them too? Of course, anybody who has a detectable history of Usenet
>>posting is welcome to vote in the ballot, subject to the restrictions
>>on votes from net.kooks and net.fuckwits previously announced.

> I don't know who chose this distribution, but I think if it was a Tholen fan
> that sci.astro would have been included.

It's a mystery to me. I'm hereby trimming the ng line, just to prove
that I'm not *always* an evil xposting troll.

Btw, if you're reading this, Albert: Where's your music?

PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:

Nightingale

unread,
Jan 10, 2005, 12:40:41 AM1/10/05
to

Peter J Ross wrote:

> On Monday 10 January, Nightingale wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>
>
>>Peter J Ross wrote in message ...
>
>
>>>Like many of the other KotM winners on the ballot, our
>>>Mark Line has long vanished, but it's traditional to post the complete
>>>list of past winners, even if some of the candidates are dead (Earl
>>>Curley) or have spent the whole year in prison without posting rights
>>>(Emmett Gulley).
>
>
>>Do any of the old-timers win?
>
>
> It depends entirely on the actions of you, the voters. :-)

I'm not voting - I don't even recognize most of the names.

>
> The kook who's currently in the lead for KotY didn't win KotM till
> last year but had a long Usenet history before that.
>

Who is in the lead?

>
>>>How did the sports groups get into the crosspost? Does Tholen thole in
>>>them too? Of course, anybody who has a detectable history of Usenet
>>>posting is welcome to vote in the ballot, subject to the restrictions
>>>on votes from net.kooks and net.fuckwits previously announced.
>
>
>>I don't know who chose this distribution, but I think if it was a Tholen fan
>>that sci.astro would have been included.
>
>
> It's a mystery to me. I'm hereby trimming the ng line, just to prove
> that I'm not *always* an evil xposting troll.
>
> Btw, if you're reading this, Albert: Where's your music?
>
> PJR :-)

I've added his newsgroup.


--
Io la Musica son, ch'ai dolci accenti
So far tranquillo ogni turbato core,
Et or di nobil ira et or d'amore
Poss'infiammar le più gelate menti.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

tho...@antispam.ham

unread,
Jan 10, 2005, 5:37:12 PM1/10/05
to
Ross writes:

158> It's because he didn't win Kook of the Month until 2004. The rookies
158> are the 2004 winners; all other winners since 1994 - such as Tholen
158> and Silverman - are in the complete Kook of the Year list.

158> George is a complete loon, but also a nice guy as far as I can tell
158> from a few polite exchanges of email. You may still be able to find
158> him in sci.physics.relativity and talk.origins, but his home group is
158> now alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated (of which he is the
158> sole, extremely clueless, moderator).

158> He was posting kookery in rec.org.mensa in 1994, and was the first
158> ever Kook of the Month winner. The Mark Line you know is probably
158> soembody else. Like many of the other KotM winners on the ballot, our
158> Mark Line has long vanished, but it's traditional to post the complete
158> list of past winners, even if some of the candidates are dead (Earl
158> Curley) or have spent the whole year in prison without posting rights
158> (Emmett Gulley).

158> How did the sports groups get into the crosspost? Does Tholen thole in
158> them too? Of course, anybody who has a detectable history of Usenet
158> posting is welcome to vote in the ballot, subject to the restrictions
158> on votes from net.kooks and net.fuckwits previously announced.

159> Nothing at all.

159> Nothing at all.

159> Why do you care, Davey-wavey?

159> PJ "Jub vf Qnirl-Jnirl, Ebff? Ner lbh fhsrevat sebz nggevohgvba
159> ceboyrzf?" R :-)

160> [snippage]

160> Zber vzcbegnagyl, jub gur uryy nz V???!

161> It depends entirely on the actions of you, the voters. :-)

161> The kook who's currently in the lead for KotY didn't win KotM till
161> last year but had a long Usenet history before that.

161> It's a mystery to me. I'm hereby trimming the ng line, just to prove
161> that I'm not *always* an evil xposting troll.

161> Btw, if you're reading this, Albert: Where's your music?

162> It was similar enough to the real thing to fool me. It therefore must
162> have fooled Ross too, since we're well known for being the same
162> person.

Acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.

===========================================================================

th0...@antispam.ham writes:

3> So then why did you post it to other newsgroups, bisectional?

3> What you think is irrelevant, bisectional.

3> Classic evasion.

3> Note: no response.

4> What does this have to do with classical music, OS/2, Fortran, or sports,
4> Nightingale?

4> What does this have to do with classical music, OS/2, Fortran, or sports,
4> Nightingale?

5> On what basis do you claim to speak for Nightingale?

5> On what basis do you claim to speak for Nightingale?

5> Suffering from attribution problems, Peter?

5> Irrelevant.

6> So why are you making off-topic posts, Nightingale?

6> So why are you making off-topic posts, Nightingale?

7> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

7> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

8> Incorrect. You choose the distribution whenever you post, Nightingale.

8> Incorrect. You choose the distribution whenever you post, Nightingale.

9> What text are you attributing to me, Curtis?

9> What does this have to do with classical music, OS/2, Fortran, or sports,
9> Curtis?

9> What alleged try are you referring to, Curtis?

9> Famous last words.

What does any of that have to do with classical music, th0len?

===========================================================================

Nightingale writes:

1809> OK, thanks for explaining.

1809> Complete loon about covers it. It looks like he's moved around a bit. I
1809> saw his "proof of god" in a psycology or personality group - I don't
1809> remember which group now, it was quite a few years ago - and never tried to
1809> converse with him about anything.

1809> It could be the same person - the Mark I knew was brilliant, although he
1809> could be a bit strange sometimes, and I think he was a mensa member. I
1809> thought he was OK, but some people found him hard to deal with - he got
1809> booted of at least one email list that I know of. He worked in project
1809> management, and was interested in (and good at) a lot of things, especially
1809> computer-related and languages. He used to live in Washington & then moved
1809> to Texas to be with somebody he met through the email list (last I heard,
1809> they are still together).

1809> Do any of the old-timers win?

1809> I don't know who chose this distribution, but I think if it was a Tholen fan
1809> that sci.astro would have been included.

1810> Nothing.

1810> Nothing.

1811> That was not Dave.

1812> I didn't choose the newsgroup distribution, th0len.

1812> I didn't choose the newsgroup distribution, th0len.

1813> On your part.

1813> On your part.

1814> I'm not voting - I don't even recognize most of the names.

1814> Who is in the lead?

1814> I've added his newsgroup.

What does any of that have to do with classical music, Nightingale?

===========================================================================

The Ron Jeremy of Rogers Park writes:

1> Tr0len pops up automatically in rec.sport.basketball.college whenever
1> anybody starts explaining the truth either about Kansas (usually
1> overhyped, longstanding tradition of being overrated, etc.) or Roy
1> Williams (cry, Roy, cry some more!)

1> copyright ARCHIE LEACH

What does that have to do with classical music, Jeremy?

===========================================================================

alias # today total last year
-------------- ------- ----- ---------
bruce 307 0
cypherpunk 256 578
bisectional 243 0
nightingale 6 203 1613
grantco 120 229
greycloud 91 0
zwar 86 349
chatterly 85 0
dizzy 84 522
kohl 84 2192
fields 73 678
patterson 72 135
ross 5 71 10
aratzio 60 0
wehrung 50 262
elizabot 41 0
drpostman 38 54
karttunen 38 97
daniels 36 165
deco 30 0
haslam 30 675
hertz 27 0
lockhart 25 60
drysdale 24 0
freud 24 44
cohen 23 0
bloggs 22 200
diogenes 20 0
"nightingale" 20 0
sun sue 20 0
th@len 20 0
ah 19 0
chrisv 17 0
yyyiiinnnggg 16 0
edwin 15 0
hgj 15 0
deus 14 0
kolle 14 264
phoenix 14 18
relic 14 0
parsnip 13 0
jaakko 12 99
beck 11 239
flonkenstein 11 0
bostonblackie 10 0
penso 10 172
kadaitcha 9 0
ranger 9 0
th0len 7 9 0
flaviaR 8 0
logical 8 0
john 7 0
bornfeld 6 14
charlie @ sea 6 0
prai jei 6 11
rickenbacker 6 0
snit 5 0
speech 5 0
alex 4 0
concerned 4 0
donna 4 0
extreme 4 0
hucker 4 2
qasim 4 0
tweet 4 7
andrews 3 1
antispim.him 3 0
bookman 3 4
casa 3 0
g&p 3 0
henry 3 1
invalid 3 0
jazz guy 3 3
jim 3 0
marty 3 0
mrs 3 0
sutton 3 1
†ho|en 2 0
• 2 0
ada9 2 0
adam 2 13
balaam 2 0
barca 2 0
barton 2 0
ugly bob 2 0
braves fan 2 0
charlie 2 0
dodel 2 0
george 2 0
h 2 0
harrington 2 64
hernandez 2 0
highwood 2 12
js 2 0
kennedy 2 3
marshall 2 0
molybdenum 2 0
monkey 2 1
moonbeam 2 2
n 2 0
schultz 2 5
toughlin 2 0
wiser 2 3
. 1 0
afoklala 1 0
akhen 1 0
ansermetniac 1 0
antagonismo 1 90
antagonist 1 0
blonko 1 0
bob 1 1
briggs 1 20
burtner 1 0
cargle 1 0
catroo 1 108
commentator 1 0
corinne 1 0
creevey 1 69
daveb 1 0
davidb 1 0
durante 1 0
emperor 1 0
ende 1 0
firewalker 1 0
fischer 1 0
gactimus 1 0
gamble 1 13
girouard 1 2
god 1 0
gorden 1 0
granzeau 1 0
hills 1 0
homie 1 1
ilechko 1 0
jeremy 1 1 0
kelly 1 0
koehlmann 1 0
lawrence 1 1
learned 1 0
liath 1 0
lysaght 1 0
martin 1 0
mirah 1 0
mitzel 1 0
muething 1 5
nelson 1 0
notroll 1 0
o'brien 1 0
o'donoghue 1 0
osterwald 1 0
ot 1 0
pinups 1 0
ploni 1 4
poetman 1 0
porky 1 16
pragmatist 1 0
refutebot 1 0
rice 1 0
rick 1 0
roberts 1 8
steiner 1 0
stratford 1 1
straussvogel 1 0
sutton 1 1
tessier 1 0
"tholen" 1 0
tuan 1 0
voege 1 0
vonroach 1 0
weinkam 1 0
whitney 1 0
-------------- ------- ----- ---------
171 19 2796 10033

Ross

unread,
Jan 10, 2005, 6:46:25 PM1/10/05
to
Wee Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
this in news:ssDEd.57303$nP1...@twister.socal.rr.com:

Still suffering from attribution problems, I see, Davie?

I notice that you have cowardly failed to answer my questions from the
previous thread. So are you going to run away like a hypocrite or are you
going to show some character and answer the question?

[remainder not snecked for the sake of other froups, where Davie is too
cowardly to post]

>========================================================================
>===

Dammit, Davie, that total does not reflect the posts in the thread from
which you ran away.

--
Go not to Usenet for counsel, for they will say both yes and no.

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 10, 2005, 8:10:14 PM1/10/05
to
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:46:25 -0600, Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> got
double secret probation because:

Look at Art Deco, Dr. Postman and myself. Nothing to speak of. If the
coward is going to lits us, at least he could to is get it right.

tho...@antispam.ham

unread,
Jan 11, 2005, 4:50:37 PM1/11/05
to
Ross writes:

163> Wee Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
163> this in news:ssDEd.57303$nP1...@twister.socal.rr.com:

163> Still suffering from attribution problems, I see, Davie?

163> I notice that you have cowardly failed to answer my questions from the
163> previous thread. So are you going to run away like a hypocrite or are you
163> going to show some character and answer the question?

163> [remainder not snecked for the sake of other froups, where Davie is too
163> cowardly to post]

163> Dammit, Davie, that total does not reflect the posts in the thread from
163> which you ran away.

Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.

===========================================================================

Aratzio writes:

61> Look at Art Deco, Dr. Postman and myself. Nothing to speak of. If the
61> coward is going to lits us, at least he could to is get it right.

What does that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?

===========================================================================

alias # today total last year
-------------- ------- ----- ---------
bruce 307 0
cypherpunk 256 578
bisectional 243 0

nightingale 203 1613


grantco 120 229
greycloud 91 0
zwar 86 349
chatterly 85 0
dizzy 84 522
kohl 84 2192
fields 73 678
patterson 72 135

ross 1 72 10
aratzio 1 61 0

th0len 9 0

. 1 0

jeremy 1 0

171 2 2798 10033

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 11, 2005, 6:59:39 PM1/11/05
to
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:

> Ross writes:
>
> 163> Wee Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and
> scribbled
> 163> this in news:ssDEd.57303$nP1...@twister.socal.rr.com:
>
> 163> Still suffering from attribution problems, I see, Davie?
>
> 163> I notice that you have cowardly failed to answer my questions from the
> 163> previous thread. So are you going to run away like a hypocrite or are
> you
> 163> going to show some character and answer the question?
>
> 163> [remainder not snecked for the sake of other froups, where Davie is too
> 163> cowardly to post]
>
> 163> Dammit, Davie, that total does not reflect the posts in the thread from
> 163> which you ran away.
>
> Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.

Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Pee Wee
Tholenator(tm) the Coward?? How ironic.


>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Aratzio writes:
>
> 61> Look at Art Deco, Dr. Postman and myself. Nothing to speak of. If the
> 61> coward is going to lits us, at least he could to is get it right.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?

What does this have to do with classical music, Pee Wee Tholenator(tm)
the Coward?


>
> ===========================================================================
>
> alias # today total last year
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> bruce 307 0
> cypherpunk 256 578
> bisectional 243 0
> nightingale 203 1613
> grantco 120 229
> greycloud 91 0
> zwar 86 349
> chatterly 85 0
> dizzy 84 522
> kohl 84 2192
> fields 73 678
> patterson 72 135
> ross 1 72 10
> aratzio 1 61 0
> wehrung 50 262
> elizabot 41 0
> drpostman 38 54
> karttunen 38 97
> daniels 36 165
> deco 30 0

I command you to increase my number.

Do your students know you make an idiot of yourself on usenet,
Tholenator(tm)?

--
"Ions are attracted to IRON"
"That's what Earth's core is made mostly of -- IRON"
"GEEZUS are the HAARP Techno Cowboys THAT stupid?!?!?!?!"
"Earth's ionosphere is now a super ion charged ionosphere."
-- Alexa Cameron demonstrates her 200+ alien-implanted IQ

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 11, 2005, 7:05:05 PM1/11/05
to
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:50:37 GMT, tho...@antispam.ham got double
secret probation because:

>Ross writes:


>
>163> Wee Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
>163> this in news:ssDEd.57303$nP1...@twister.socal.rr.com:
>
>163> Still suffering from attribution problems, I see, Davie?
>
>163> I notice that you have cowardly failed to answer my questions from the
>163> previous thread. So are you going to run away like a hypocrite or are you
>163> going to show some character and answer the question?
>
>163> [remainder not snecked for the sake of other froups, where Davie is too
>163> cowardly to post]
>
>163> Dammit, Davie, that total does not reflect the posts in the thread from
>163> which you ran away.
>
>Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.
>
>===========================================================================
>
>Aratzio writes:
>
>61> Look at Art Deco, Dr. Postman and myself. Nothing to speak of. If the
>61> coward is going to lits us, at least he could to is get it right.
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?
>

Nothing but the fact you were lying in your previous lits o haet. Do
you always lie in your lits or was this a special occasion?

>===========================================================================
>
>alias # today total last year
>-------------- ------- ----- ---------
>bruce 307 0
>cypherpunk 256 578
>bisectional 243 0
>nightingale 203 1613
>grantco 120 229
>greycloud 91 0
>zwar 86 349
>chatterly 85 0
>dizzy 84 522
>kohl 84 2192
>fields 73 678
>patterson 72 135
>ross 1 72 10
>aratzio 1 61 0

What about the 27 posts last week, liar? Did you forget all them as
just a bad dream?

Ross

unread,
Jan 11, 2005, 8:00:07 PM1/11/05
to
Wee Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
this in news:NSXEd.57486$nP1....@twister.socal.rr.com:

> Ross writes:
>
> 163> Wee Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and
> scribbled 163> this in news:ssDEd.57303$nP1...@twister.socal.rr.com:
>
> 163> Still suffering from attribution problems, I see, Davie?
>
> 163> I notice that you have cowardly failed to answer my questions
> from the 163> previous thread. So are you going to run away like a
> hypocrite or are you 163> going to show some character and answer the
> question?
>
> 163> [remainder not snecked for the sake of other froups, where Davie
> is too 163> cowardly to post]
>
> 163> Dammit, Davie, that total does not reflect the posts in the
> thread from 163> which you ran away.
>
> Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.

You're still being the hypocritical coward, Davie. No surprise, really.

>
>========================================================================
>===

>
> Aratzio writes:
>
> 61> Look at Art Deco, Dr. Postman and myself. Nothing to speak of. If
> the 61> coward is going to lits us, at least he could to is get it
> right.
>
> What does that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?
>
>========================================================================
>===
>
> alias # today total last year
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> bruce 307 0
> cypherpunk 256 578
> bisectional 243 0
> nightingale 203 1613
> grantco 120 229
> greycloud 91 0
> zwar 86 349
> chatterly 85 0
> dizzy 84 522
> kohl 84 2192
> fields 73 678
> patterson 72 135
> ross 1 72 10

C'mon, Davie, you missed a whole bunch of posts.

--
Go not to Usenet for counsel, for they will say both yes and no.

Message has been deleted

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 12:29:43 AM1/12/05
to
Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> wrote:

He spent all day obsessively hacking out "digests" to AFA-B, and
snecking AUK.

Ross

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 12:51:40 AM1/12/05
to
Art Deco pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this
in news:110120052229433653%art_...@127.0.0.1:

> Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> wrote:
>
>> Wee Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and
>> scribbled this in news:NSXEd.57486$nP1....@twister.socal.rr.com:
>>
>> > Ross writes:
>> >
>> > 163> Wee Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box
>> > and scribbled 163> this in
>> > news:ssDEd.57303$nP1...@twister.socal.rr.com:
>> >
>> > 163> Still suffering from attribution problems, I see, Davie?
>> >
>> > 163> I notice that you have cowardly failed to answer my questions
>> > from the 163> previous thread. So are you going to run away like a
>> > hypocrite or are you 163> going to show some character and answer
>> > the question?
>> >
>> > 163> [remainder not snecked for the sake of other froups, where
>> > Davie is too 163> cowardly to post]
>> >
>> > 163> Dammit, Davie, that total does not reflect the posts in the
>> > thread from 163> which you ran away.
>> >
>> > Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How
>> > ironic.
>>
>> You're still being the hypocritical coward, Davie. No surprise,
>> really.
>>
>> >
>> >=====================================================================

>> >=== ===

>> >
>> > Aratzio writes:
>> >
>> > 61> Look at Art Deco, Dr. Postman and myself. Nothing to speak of.
>> > If the 61> coward is going to lits us, at least he could to is get
>> > it right.
>> >
>> > What does that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?
>> >
>> >=====================================================================

>> >=== ===

>> >
>> > alias # today total last year
>> > -------------- ------- ----- ---------
>> > bruce 307 0
>> > cypherpunk 256 578
>> > bisectional 243 0
>> > nightingale 203 1613
>> > grantco 120 229
>> > greycloud 91 0
>> > zwar 86 349
>> > chatterly 85 0
>> > dizzy 84 522
>> > kohl 84 2192
>> > fields 73 678
>> > patterson 72 135
>> > ross 1 72 10
>>
>> C'mon, Davie, you missed a whole bunch of posts.
>
> He spent all day obsessively hacking out "digests" to AFA-B, and
> snecking AUK.

Bob-dammed kook....

He pretends to be so fastidious in his digest compiling, yet his work is
very sloppy.

R.

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 1:07:12 AM1/12/05
to
Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> wrote:

With this kind of shoddy performance, it is hard to believe he has the
methodical abilities needed to discover comets.

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 9:33:47 AM1/12/05
to
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:29:43 -0700, Art Deco <art_...@127.0.0.1>
transparently proposed:

Where does he find time to *discover* asteroids that will *DESTROY THE
EARTH*?

Ross

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 9:41:54 AM1/12/05
to
Aratzio pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
news:t8dau09gig80bt5li...@4ax.com:

> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 22:29:43 -0700, Art Deco <art_...@127.0.0.1>
> transparently proposed:
>
>>Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Wee Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and
>>> scribbled this in news:NSXEd.57486$nP1....@twister.socal.rr.com:

[...]

>>> >====================================================================
>>> >==== ===

>>> >
>>> > alias # today total last year
>>> > -------------- ------- ----- ---------
>>> > bruce 307 0
>>> > cypherpunk 256 578
>>> > bisectional 243 0
>>> > nightingale 203 1613
>>> > grantco 120 229
>>> > greycloud 91 0
>>> > zwar 86 349
>>> > chatterly 85 0
>>> > dizzy 84 522
>>> > kohl 84 2192
>>> > fields 73 678
>>> > patterson 72 135
>>> > ross 1 72 10
>>>
>>> C'mon, Davie, you missed a whole bunch of posts.
>>
>>He spent all day obsessively hacking out "digests" to AFA-B, and
>>snecking AUK.
>
> Where does he find time to *discover* asteroids that will *DESTROY THE
> EARTH*?

I wonder if Davie has met Alexa, yet.

R.

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 11:16:55 AM1/12/05
to
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:41:54 -0600, Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com>
transparently proposed:

Has to have, she has been known to x-post her screed to sci.astro.
Both have been around long enough too.

Message has been deleted

tho...@antispam.ham

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 4:31:57 PM1/12/05
to
Aratzio writes:

62> What does you ignorance of usenet have to do with me?

62> So why are all these posts missing from your lits o' haet? Cowardice?

63> Nothing but the fact you were lying in your previous lits o haet. Do
63> you always lie in your lits or was this a special occasion?

63> What about the 27 posts last week, liar? Did you forget all them as
63> just a bad dream?

64> Hi Peter, you are officially Tholed.

65> His cowardice and post editing are well-known.

66> Where does he find time to *discover* asteroids that will *DESTROY THE
66> EARTH*?

67> Has to have, she has been known to x-post her screed to sci.astro.
67> Both have been around long enough too.

68> Juvpu vf jul V k-cbfg gb ezp
68> OJNUNUNUNUNUNUNUN

What does any of that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?

===========================================================================

Art Deco writes:

31> Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Pee Wee
31> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?? How ironic.

31> What does this have to do with classical music, Pee Wee Tholenator(tm)
31> the Coward?

31> I command you to increase my number.

31> Do your students know you make an idiot of yourself on usenet,
31> Tholenator(tm)?

32> Gur ZCP gung ernyyl pbhagf vf erp.zhfvp.pynffvpny, gurfr fpv.nfgeb
32> "qvtrfgf" ynpx cebcre yvgf.

33> He spent all day obsessively hacking out "digests" to AFA-B, and
33> snecking AUK.

34> With this kind of shoddy performance, it is hard to believe he has the
34> methodical abilities needed to discover comets.

What does any of that have to do with classical music, Deco?

===========================================================================

Ross writes:

164> You're still being the hypocritical coward, Davie. No surprise, really.

164> C'mon, Davie, you missed a whole bunch of posts.

165> Art Deco pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this
165> in news:110120052229433653%art_...@127.0.0.1:

165> Bob-dammed kook....

165> He pretends to be so fastidious in his digest compiling, yet his work is
165> very sloppy.

166> Aratzio pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
166> news:t8dau09gig80bt5li...@4ax.com:

166> I wonder if Davie has met Alexa, yet.

Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.

===========================================================================

th0...@antispam.ham writes:

10>

Well, at least somebody had the presence of mind to cancel the article.

===========================================================================

alias # today total last year
-------------- ------- ----- ---------
bruce 307 0
cypherpunk 256 578
bisectional 243 0
nightingale 203 1613
grantco 120 229
greycloud 91 0
zwar 86 349
chatterly 85 0
dizzy 84 522
kohl 84 2192

ross 2 75 10


fields 73 678
patterson 72 135

aratzio 7 68 0


wehrung 50 262
elizabot 41 0
drpostman 38 54
karttunen 38 97
daniels 36 165

deco 4 34 0

th0len 1 10 0


kadaitcha 9 0
ranger 9 0

. 1 0

171 15 2813 10033

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 5:19:22 PM1/12/05
to
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:31:57 GMT, tho...@antispam.ham got double
secret probation because:

>Aratzio writes:

Nice when you are the top of the list.

That's better Davie.

What does this impotent list have to do with Classical Music,
Tholenizer?

Ross

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 5:33:47 PM1/12/05
to
Lil' Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
this in news:hHgFd.59413$nP1....@twister.socal.rr.com:

[snip other people's digests]

>
> Ross writes:
>
> 164> You're still being the hypocritical coward, Davie. No surprise,
> really.
>
> 164> C'mon, Davie, you missed a whole bunch of posts.
>
> 165> Art Deco pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
> this 165> in news:110120052229433653%art_...@127.0.0.1:
>
> 165> Bob-dammed kook....
>
> 165> He pretends to be so fastidious in his digest compiling, yet his
> work is 165> very sloppy.
>
> 166> Aratzio pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
> this in 166> news:t8dau09gig80bt5li...@4ax.com:
>
> 166> I wonder if Davie has met Alexa, yet.
>
> Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.

Still suffering from attribution problems, I see. How hypocritical of you,
Davie, to snip my question of you.


>
>========================================================================
>===

>
> th0...@antispam.ham writes:
>
> 10>
>
> Well, at least somebody had the presence of mind to cancel the
> article.
>
>========================================================================
>===
>
> alias # today total last year
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> bruce 307 0
> cypherpunk 256 578
> bisectional 243 0
> nightingale 203 1613
> grantco 120 229
> greycloud 91 0
> zwar 86 349
> chatterly 85 0
> dizzy 84 522
> kohl 84 2192
> ross 2 75 10

Dammit, Davie, you missed a whole boat load of posts from last week. Where
is your dedication to your job?

--

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 8:52:46 PM1/12/05
to
Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:31:57 GMT, tho...@antispam.ham got double
> secret probation because:
>
> >Aratzio writes:
>
> Nice when you are the top of the list.

Well done, sir!

Tholenator(tm) the net.kkkop and hypocrite is the sole judge of
everything on- or off-topic on usenet. I think there was a memo.

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 8:50:38 PM1/12/05
to
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:

> Aratzio writes:
>
> 62> What does you ignorance of usenet have to do with me?
>
> 62> So why are all these posts missing from your lits o' haet? Cowardice?
>
> 63> Nothing but the fact you were lying in your previous lits o haet. Do
> 63> you always lie in your lits or was this a special occasion?
>
> 63> What about the 27 posts last week, liar? Did you forget all them as
> 63> just a bad dream?
>
> 64> Hi Peter, you are officially Tholed.
>
> 65> His cowardice and post editing are well-known.
>
> 66> Where does he find time to *discover* asteroids that will *DESTROY THE
> 66> EARTH*?
>
> 67> Has to have, she has been known to x-post her screed to sci.astro.
> 67> Both have been around long enough too.
>
> 68> Juvpu vf jul V k-cbfg gb ezp
> 68> OJNUNUNUNUNUNUNUN
>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?

Why are you a hypocrite, Tholenator(tm)?


>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Art Deco writes:
>
> 31> Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Pee Wee
> 31> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?? How ironic.

Note: no response.


>
> 31> What does this have to do with classical music, Pee Wee Tholenator(tm)
> 31> the Coward?

Note: no response.


>
> 31> I command you to increase my number.
>
> 31> Do your students know you make an idiot of yourself on usenet,
> 31> Tholenator(tm)?

Note: no response.


>
> 32> Gur ZCP gung ernyyl pbhagf vf erp.zhfvp.pynffvpny, gurfr fpv.nfgeb
> 32> "qvtrfgf" ynpx cebcre yvgf.

Note: no response.


>
> 33> He spent all day obsessively hacking out "digests" to AFA-B, and
> 33> snecking AUK.

Note: no response.


>
> 34> With this kind of shoddy performance, it is hard to believe he has the
> 34> methodical abilities needed to discover comets.

Note: no response.


>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Deco?

What does this have to do with classical music, Pee Wee Tholenator(tm)
the Lamer?


>
> ===========================================================================
>
> Ross writes:
>
> 164> You're still being the hypocritical coward, Davie. No surprise, really.
>
> 164> C'mon, Davie, you missed a whole bunch of posts.
>
> 165> Art Deco pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this
> 165> in news:110120052229433653%art_...@127.0.0.1:
>
> 165> Bob-dammed kook....
>
> 165> He pretends to be so fastidious in his digest compiling, yet his work is
> 165> very sloppy.
>
> 166> Aratzio pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
> 166> news:t8dau09gig80bt5li...@4ax.com:
>
> 166> I wonder if Davie has met Alexa, yet.
>
> Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.

Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Pee Wee
Tholenator(tm)? How ironic.

Excellent, "haslam" is in my rear-view mirror!

How much time did you waste putting this "digest" together,
Tholenator(tm)?

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 8:55:01 PM1/12/05
to
Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> wrote:

> Lil' Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
> this in news:hHgFd.59413$nP1....@twister.socal.rr.com:
>
> [snip other people's digests]
>
> >
> > Ross writes:
> >
> > 164> You're still being the hypocritical coward, Davie. No surprise,
> > really.
> >
> > 164> C'mon, Davie, you missed a whole bunch of posts.
> >
> > 165> Art Deco pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
> > this 165> in news:110120052229433653%art_...@127.0.0.1:
> >
> > 165> Bob-dammed kook....
> >
> > 165> He pretends to be so fastidious in his digest compiling, yet his
> > work is 165> very sloppy.
> >
> > 166> Aratzio pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
> > this in 166> news:t8dau09gig80bt5li...@4ax.com:
> >
> > 166> I wonder if Davie has met Alexa, yet.
> >
> > Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.
>
> Still suffering from attribution problems, I see. How hypocritical of you,
> Davie, to snip my question of you.

Welcome to TholenWorld.


>
>
> >
> >========================================================================
> >===
> >
> > th0...@antispam.ham writes:
> >
> > 10>
> >
> > Well, at least somebody had the presence of mind to cancel the
> > article.
> >
> >========================================================================
> >===
> >
> > alias # today total last year
> > -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> > bruce 307 0
> > cypherpunk 256 578
> > bisectional 243 0
> > nightingale 203 1613
> > grantco 120 229
> > greycloud 91 0
> > zwar 86 349
> > chatterly 85 0
> > dizzy 84 522
> > kohl 84 2192
> > ross 2 75 10
>
> Dammit, Davie, you missed a whole boat load of posts from last week. Where
> is your dedication to your job?

Tholenator(tm) the OCDboi is incompetent. He has Mt. Pocono disease.

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 12:14:41 AM1/13/05
to
Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

Oh yes, Perplexa is well-known in sci.astro. She goes there when her
trolls in alt.politics.* dry up. Her longest-lived sock, "*", was
primarily targeted there.

tho...@antispam.ham

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 3:57:54 PM1/13/05
to
Aratzio writes:

69> What does this impotence have to do with Israel, TholenDork?

70> What does your impotence have to do with fucknozzles, TholerPop?

71> Nice when you are the top of the list.

71> That's better Davie.

71> What does this impotent list have to do with Classical Music,
71> Tholenizer?

72> Ironically, neither did you.

73> Who is Ross, Davie?

74> Who is Davie, Peter, are you suffering from Rosstribution problems,
74> again?

75> You erroneously presupposed I gave a RATZass.

75> Non Rossequitur.

What does any of that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?

===========================================================================

Ross writes:

167> Is Davie suffering from attribution problems again?

168> Note: no RATZponse.

168> Classic erroneous pRATZsupposition.

169> Lil' Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled
169> this in news:hHgFd.59413$nP1....@twister.socal.rr.com:

169> [snip other people's digests]

169> Still suffering from attribution problems, I see. How hypocritical of you,
169> Davie, to snip my question of you.

169> Dammit, Davie, you missed a whole boat load of posts from last week. Where
169> is your dedication to your job?

170> Peter J Ross pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this
170> in news:slrncuba2p...@nntp.petitmorte.net:

170> Is it your turn to be me today or is my turn to be you?

170> Bob-dammit, but this arrangement is confusing to me. How can we expected
170> to keep things straight if Davie doesn't?

Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.

===========================================================================

Art Deco writes:

35> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
35> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

36> Cowardly snecked newsgroups restored:

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.

36> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
36> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

36> How much time did you waste today keeping track of your "digests",
36> OCDboi?

37> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
37> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

38> Prepare to be Tholed and digested, Aratzio.

39> Why are you a hypocrite, Tholenator(tm)?

39> Note: no response.

39> Note: no response.

39> Note: no response.

39> Note: no response.

39> Note: no response.

39> Note: no response.

39> What does this have to do with classical music, Pee Wee Tholenator(tm)
39> the Lamer?

39> Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Pee Wee
39> Tholenator(tm)? How ironic.

39> Excellent, "haslam" is in my rear-view mirror!

39> How much time did you waste putting this "digest" together,
39> Tholenator(tm)?

40> Well done, sir!

40> Tholenator(tm) the net.kkkop and hypocrite is the sole judge of
40> everything on- or off-topic on usenet. I think there was a memo.

41> Welcome to TholenWorld.

41> Tholenator(tm) the OCDboi is incompetent. He has Mt. Pocono disease.

42> He can't; he's a coward.

43> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
43> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

44> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
44> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

45> You posted in ne.weather, Tholenator(tm).

45> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
45> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

46> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
46> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

47> At least Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) doesn't think I'm Ross. The lamer got
47> one thing right.

48> He is likely running out of enough hours in the day to even keep the
48> digests in their current sorry shape. Don't hold your breath.

49> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
49> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

49> Ironically, you haven't answered this question.

What does any of that have to do with classical music, Deco?

===========================================================================

alias # today total last year


-------------- ------- ----- ---------
bruce 307 0
cypherpunk 256 578
bisectional 243 0
nightingale 203 1613
grantco 120 229
greycloud 91 0
zwar 86 349
chatterly 85 0
dizzy 84 522
kohl 84 2192

ross 4 79 10
aratzio 7 75 0


fields 73 678
patterson 72 135

wehrung 50 262
deco 15 49 0


elizabot 41 0
drpostman 38 54
karttunen 38 97
daniels 36 165

th0len 10 0

. 1 0

171 26 2839 10033

Ross

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 5:05:53 PM1/13/05
to
pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
news:mhBFd.59675$nP1....@twister.socal.rr.com:

> Aratzio writes:
>
> 69> What does this impotence have to do with Israel, TholenDork?
>
> 70> What does your impotence have to do with fucknozzles, TholerPop?
>
> 71> Nice when you are the top of the list.
>
> 71> That's better Davie.
>
> 71> What does this impotent list have to do with Classical Music,
> 71> Tholenizer?
>
> 72> Ironically, neither did you.
>
> 73> Who is Ross, Davie?
>
> 74> Who is Davie, Peter, are you suffering from Rosstribution
> problems, 74> again?
>
> 75> You erroneously presupposed I gave a RATZass.
>
> 75> Non Rossequitur.
>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?
>
>========================================================================
>===
>
> Ross writes:
>
> 167> Is Davie suffering from attribution problems again?
>
> 168> Note: no RATZponse.
>
> 168> Classic erroneous pRATZsupposition.

Still suffering attribution problems, I see. No surprise, really.

>
> 169> Lil' Davie Tholen pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and
> scribbled 169> this in
> news:hHgFd.59413$nP1....@twister.socal.rr.com:
>
> 169> [snip other people's digests]
>
> 169> Still suffering from attribution problems, I see. How
> hypocritical of you, 169> Davie, to snip my question of you.
>
> 169> Dammit, Davie, you missed a whole boat load of posts from last
> week. Where 169> is your dedication to your job?
>
> 170> Peter J Ross pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and
> scribbled this 170> in news:slrncuba2p...@nntp.petitmorte.net:
>
> 170> Is it your turn to be me today or is my turn to be you?
>
> 170> Bob-dammit, but this arrangement is confusing to me. How can we
> expected 170> to keep things straight if Davie doesn't?
>
> Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.

Still trying to control others on Usenet, eh Davie? You might want to
develop some integrity for yourself before you try to impose anything on
others.

>
>========================================================================
>===

Bob-Dammit, 'Ratz is moving up!

--
'You're erroneously presupposing that I'm in "RL", Ross.'

- Dave Tholen, Existentialist Philosopher,
Usenet Kook of the Month for March of 1998
in news:3E2871C8...@ix.netcom.com.

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 5:59:39 PM1/13/05
to
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:05:53 -0600, Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> got
double secret probation because:

> pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in

That are the plan! Must catch the BOT!

Peter J Ross

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 6:47:22 PM1/13/05
to
On Monday 10 January, Nightingale wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:

> Peter J Ross wrote:

>> On Monday 10 January, Nightingale wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:
>>
>>>Peter J Ross wrote in message ...
>>
>>>>Like many of the other KotM winners on the ballot, our
>>>>Mark Line has long vanished, but it's traditional to post the complete
>>>>list of past winners, even if some of the candidates are dead (Earl
>>>>Curley) or have spent the whole year in prison without posting rights
>>>>(Emmett Gulley).
>>
>>>Do any of the old-timers win?
>>
>> It depends entirely on the actions of you, the voters. :-)

> I'm not voting - I don't even recognize most of the names.

So it looks as if poor Davie may be stuck on two votes. I blame the
voters' erroneous presuppositions.

>> The kook who's currently in the lead for KotY didn't win KotM till
>> last year but had a long Usenet history before that.

> Who is in the lead?

If I told you they'd have to kill me.

>>>>How did the sports groups get into the crosspost? Does Tholen thole in
>>>>them too? Of course, anybody who has a detectable history of Usenet
>>>>posting is welcome to vote in the ballot, subject to the restrictions
>>>>on votes from net.kooks and net.fuckwits previously announced.
>>
>>>I don't know who chose this distribution, but I think if it was a Tholen fan
>>>that sci.astro would have been included.
>>
>> It's a mystery to me. I'm hereby trimming the ng line, just to prove
>> that I'm not *always* an evil xposting troll.
>>
>> Btw, if you're reading this, Albert: Where's your music?
>>
>> PJR :-)

> I've added his newsgroup.

No, *I've* added his newsgroup.

Btw, Albert, I've written exactly 0 notes of music so far this year.

That's quite similar to your lifetime output, isn't it?

PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]

Nightingale

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 7:45:37 PM1/13/05
to
Peter J Ross wrote:
>>>>Do any of the old-timers win?
>>>
>>>It depends entirely on the actions of you, the voters. :-)
>
>
>>I'm not voting - I don't even recognize most of the names.
>
>
> So it looks as if poor Davie may be stuck on two votes.

Good. (I wouldn't have voted for him anyway - of the names I recognize,
Hammond is most deserving.)

>>>
>>>Btw, if you're reading this, Albert: Where's your music?
>>>
>>>PJR :-)
>
>
>>I've added his newsgroup.
>
>
> No, *I've* added his newsgroup.
>

Wow! His own fan group. My server doesn't carry it - anything
interesting ever happen there.

> Btw, Albert, I've written exactly 0 notes of music so far this year.
>
> That's quite similar to your lifetime output, isn't it?
>

You're such a sweetie :-)

--
Blessed Cecilia, appear in visions
To all musicians, appear and inspire:
Translated Daughter, come down and startle
Composing mortals with immortal fire.

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 7:49:09 PM1/13/05
to
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:

Cowardly snecked newsgroups restored:

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 36> Cowardly snecked newsgroups restored:

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop.
>
> 36> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 36> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 36> How much time did you waste today keeping track of your "digests",
> 36> OCDboi?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 37> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 37> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 38> Prepare to be Tholed and digested, Aratzio.
>
> 39> Why are you a hypocrite, Tholenator(tm)?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 39> Note: no response.
>
> 39> Note: no response.
>
> 39> Note: no response.
>
> 39> Note: no response.
>
> 39> Note: no response.
>
> 39> Note: no response.
>
> 39> What does this have to do with classical music, Pee Wee Tholenator(tm)
> 39> the Lamer?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 39> Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Pee Wee
> 39> Tholenator(tm)? How ironic.

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 39> Excellent, "haslam" is in my rear-view mirror!
>
> 39> How much time did you waste putting this "digest" together,
> 39> Tholenator(tm)?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 40> Well done, sir!
>
> 40> Tholenator(tm) the net.kkkop and hypocrite is the sole judge of
> 40> everything on- or off-topic on usenet. I think there was a memo.
>
> 41> Welcome to TholenWorld.
>
> 41> Tholenator(tm) the OCDboi is incompetent. He has Mt. Pocono disease.
>
> 42> He can't; he's a coward.
>
> 43> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 43> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 44> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 44> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 45> You posted in ne.weather, Tholenator(tm).

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 45> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 45> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 46> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 46> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 47> At least Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) doesn't think I'm Ross. The lamer got
> 47> one thing right.
>
> 48> He is likely running out of enough hours in the day to even keep the
> 48> digests in their current sorry shape. Don't hold your breath.
>
> 49> What does this "digest" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 49> Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKop?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> 49> Ironically, you haven't answered this question.

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.


>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Deco?

What does this "digest" have to do with classical music, Pee Wee
Tholenator(tm) the Coward?


>
> ===========================================================================
>
> alias # today total last year
> -------------- ------- ----- ---------
> bruce 307 0
> cypherpunk 256 578
> bisectional 243 0
> nightingale 203 1613
> grantco 120 229
> greycloud 91 0
> zwar 86 349
> chatterly 85 0
> dizzy 84 522
> kohl 84 2192
> ross 4 79 10
> aratzio 7 75 0
> fields 73 678
> patterson 72 135
> wehrung 50 262
> deco 15 49 0

Yes! #16 for me!

How much time did you waste today keeping track of your "digests",
OCDboi?

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 7:50:34 PM1/13/05
to
Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

ALL HAEL THE MIGHTY MPC!!!1!

--

Peter J Ross

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 8:05:06 PM1/13/05
to
On Friday 14 January, Nightingale wrote in alt.usenet.kooks:

> Peter J Ross wrote:
>>>>>Do any of the old-timers win?
>>>>
>>>>It depends entirely on the actions of you, the voters. :-)
>>
>>>I'm not voting - I don't even recognize most of the names.
>>
>> So it looks as if poor Davie may be stuck on two votes.

> Good. (I wouldn't have voted for him anyway - of the names I recognize,
> Hammond is most deserving.)

I prefer kooks who have weird ideas to ones who merely treat Usenet as
a lavatory. My original intention was to vote for George, but since I
have the privilege of voting last I'll probably use my vote to resolve
ties instead.

>>>>Btw, if you're reading this, Albert: Where's your music?
>>

>>>I've added his newsgroup.
>>
>> No, *I've* added his newsgroup.

> Wow! His own fan group. My server doesn't carry it - anything
> interesting ever happen there.

I've never subscribed. Since nothing interesting ever happens in
Albert's own posts, it seems unlikely.

>> Btw, Albert, I've written exactly 0 notes of music so far this year.
>>
>> That's quite similar to your lifetime output, isn't it?

> You're such a sweetie :-)

I once newgrouped an alt.fan.* group for somebody I'd never heard of.
Everybody agrees that there are no limits to my kindness and
sympathetic understanding!

Nightingale

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 8:31:08 PM1/13/05
to
Peter J Ross wrote:
>>>Btw, Albert, I've written exactly 0 notes of music so far this year.
>>>
>>>That's quite similar to your lifetime output, isn't it?
>
>
>>You're such a sweetie :-)
>
>
> I once newgrouped an alt.fan.* group for somebody I'd never heard of.
> Everybody agrees that there are no limits to my kindness and
> sympathetic understanding!
>
> PJR :-)

I'll remember that if I ever need an alt.fan group for somebody :-)

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 9:57:04 PM1/13/05
to
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:50:34 -0700, Art Deco <art_...@127.0.0.1> got
double secret probation because:

Hi Art, hows your tholen tholenizing this fine tholer of a thole?

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 10:09:57 PM1/13/05
to
Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

I'm climbin' to the top of the charts!

--

Brendan R. Wehrung

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 10:44:31 PM1/13/05
to

(tho...@antispam.ham) writes:
> kohl 84 2192
> ross 4 79 10
> aratzio 7 75 0
> fields 73 678
> patterson 72 135
> wehrung 50 262
> deco 15 49 0
> elizabot 41 0

Anybody notice only Tholen's stalkers care about him these days?
Now, it they'd delete rec.music.classical from their spam list...

--


Matthew Fields

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 10:18:20 PM1/13/05
to
In article <slrncue24a...@nntp.petitmorte.net>,

Oh, what the heck, Let me change my KOTY vote to David Tholen, while
leaving my money on Albert Silverman for Coward Of The Year.


--
Matthew H. Fields http://personal.www.umich.edu/~fields
Music: Splendor in Sound
To be great, do things better and better. Don't wait for talent: no such thing.
Brights have a naturalistic world-view. http://www.the-brights.net/

Nicolai P. Zwar

unread,
Jan 14, 2005, 2:39:57 AM1/14/05
to

The digests just aren't what they used to be anymore. Anyway, it's easy
to filter out the digests if one does not care to read them anymore, but
in a way, they belong to rec.music.classical out of tradition. Can't
just undo years of tradition.

--
Nicolai Zwar
http://www.nicolaizwar.com
"Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants,
cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys." (Yahweh, apparently throwing one
of his tantrums.)

tho...@antispam.ham

unread,
Jan 14, 2005, 5:02:38 PM1/14/05
to
Brendan R. Wehrung writes:

496> Anybody notice only Tholen's stalkers care about him these days?

Classic contradiction, given how you just demonstrated that you care,
Wehrung.

469> Now, it they'd delete rec.music.classical from their spam list...

Classic hypocrisy, coming from someone who didn't delete
rec.music.classical from his spam list.

===========================================================================

Nicolai P. Zwar writes:

434> The digests just aren't what they used to be anymore.

Yeah, your contributions are way day, Zwar.

434> Anyway, it's easy
434> to filter out the digests if one does not care to read them anymore,

Too bad your filter doesn't prevent off-topic material from getting
posted to the newsgroup, Zwar.

434> but
434> in a way, they belong to rec.music.classical out of tradition. Can't
434> just undo years of tradition.

"I don't feel the need to rationalize my own odd behavior.
I just accept it my own odd behavior as odd behavior."
--Nicolai P. Zwar

"I'm just being an eccentric oddball, Dave."
--Nicolai P. Zwar

===========================================================================

Matthew H. Fields writes:

919> Oh, what the heck, Let me change my KOTY vote to David Tholen, while
919> leaving my money on Albert Silverman for Coward Of The Year.

Classic antagonism as expected from someone who doesn't care whether
he disrupts a newsgroup or not.

===========================================================================

Nightingale writes:

1815> Good. (I wouldn't have voted for him anyway - of the names I recognize,
1815> Hammond is most deserving.)

1815> Wow! His own fan group. My server doesn't carry it - anything
1815> interesting ever happen there.

1815> You're such a sweetie :-)

What does any of that have to do with classical music, Nightingale?

===========================================================================

Art Deco writes:

50> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
50> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

51> The power of his OCD compels him to rid usenet of all antagonists.

52> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
52> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

53> Nothing; Tholenator(tm) is a hypocrite.

54> Prepare to be Tholed and digested.

55> Cowardly snecked newsgroups restored:

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

55> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
55> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

56> I predict that Tholenator(tm) will demonstrate conclusively that he has
56> cabbage for testicles.

57> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
57> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

58> Without his "antagonists," Davie Tholenator(tm) would be completely
58> ignored on usenet.

59> Cowardly snecked newsgroups restored:

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

59> What does this "digest" have to do with classical music, Pee Wee
59> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

59> Yes! #16 for me!

59> How much time did you waste today keeping track of your "digests",
59> OCDboi?

60> ALL HAEL THE MIGHTY MPC!!!1!

61> I'm climbin' to the top of the charts!

62> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
62> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

63> Tholenator(tm) uses usenet as an outlet for his OCD.

64> Tholenator(tm) is a coward, yet strangely unafraid of making himself
64> into a hypocrite on usenet.

65> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
65> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

66> Tholenator(tm) must poast.

67> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
67> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

67> Ironically, you still haven't answered this question.

68> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
68> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

69> My sources [tins] tell me that he answers questions from students with
69> questions also.

70> Hey, I just found out that I am Kali tonight!

70> The parallels with St. Foamy are *spooky*.

What does any of that have to do with classical music, Deco?

===========================================================================

Ross writes:

171> pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
171> news:mhBFd.59675$nP1....@twister.socal.rr.com:

171> Still suffering attribution problems, I see. No surprise, really.

171> Still trying to control others on Usenet, eh Davie? You might want to
171> develop some integrity for yourself before you try to impose anything on
171> others.

171> Bob-Dammit, 'Ratz is moving up!

172> Art Deco pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this
172> in news:130120051802410669%art_...@127.0.0.1:

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> No surprise, really.

172> Nothing.

172> No surprise, really.

173> I hope it's your turn. I've been neglecting to be Gary Burnore's sock
173> recently and therefore need to catch up.

173> His laziness has spoiled Usenet completely for me.

174> So it looks as if poor Davie may be stuck on two votes. I blame the
174> voters' erroneous presuppositions.

174> If I told you they'd have to kill me.

174> No, *I've* added his newsgroup.

174> Btw, Albert, I've written exactly 0 notes of music so far this year.

174> That's quite similar to your lifetime output, isn't it?

175> I prefer kooks who have weird ideas to ones who merely treat Usenet as
175> a lavatory. My original intention was to vote for George, but since I
175> have the privilege of voting last I'll probably use my vote to resolve
175> ties instead.

175> I've never subscribed. Since nothing interesting ever happens in
175> Albert's own posts, it seems unlikely.

175> I once newgrouped an alt.fan.* group for somebody I'd never heard of.
175> Everybody agrees that there are no limits to my kindness and
175> sympathetic understanding!

Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Ross? How ironic.

===========================================================================

Aratzio writes:

76> That are the plan! Must catch the BOT!

77> *YAWN*

78> ME ME ME ME ME ME ME I AM A STAR ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME

79> If Tholen Litses this sentence, then Tholen has cabbage for testicles.

80> Hi Art, hows your tholen tholenizing this fine tholer of a thole?

81> ART ART ART ART YOU ARE A STAR ART ART ART ART ART

82> Ironical taint tit.

82> If Tholen Lits this setence, Tholen admits he is a moron.

83> They make him see BOB!

What does any of that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?

===========================================================================

mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges writes:

1> i was sorta wondering why the seven sisters or stellar nurseries
1> or ursa minor didnt have anything to do with astronomy

1> by the pillars of heaven methinsk his knee jerks

1> arf meow arf

1> cthulu loves you
1> he loves the little children
1> with ketchup please

What does that have to do with classical music, anges?

===========================================================================

alias # today total last year
-------------- ------- ----- ---------
bruce 307 0
cypherpunk 256 578
bisectional 243 0

nightingale 1 204 1613


grantco 120 229
greycloud 91 0

zwar 1 87 349


chatterly 85 0
dizzy 84 522
kohl 84 2192

ross 5 84 10
aratzio 8 83 0
fields 1 74 678
patterson 72 135
deco 21 70 0
wehrung 1 51 262

. 1 0


afoklala 1 0
akhen 1 0

anges 1 1 0

172 39 2878 10033

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 14, 2005, 7:37:37 PM1/14/05
to
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:

Looks like Tholenator(tm) gave up digesting sci.astro:

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 51> The power of his OCD compels him to rid usenet of all antagonists.

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 52> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 52> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.


>
> 53> Nothing; Tholenator(tm) is a hypocrite.
>
> 54> Prepare to be Tholed and digested.
>
> 55> Cowardly snecked newsgroups restored:
>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 55> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 56> I predict that Tholenator(tm) will demonstrate conclusively that he has
> 56> cabbage for testicles.

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 57> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 57> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 58> Without his "antagonists," Davie Tholenator(tm) would be completely
> 58> ignored on usenet.
>
> 59> Cowardly snecked newsgroups restored:

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> What does this "digest" have to do with classical music, Pee Wee
> 59> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.


> 59> Yes! #16 for me!
>
> 59> How much time did you waste today keeping track of your "digests",
> 59> OCDboi?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 60> ALL HAEL THE MIGHTY MPC!!!1!
>
> 61> I'm climbin' to the top of the charts!
>
> 62> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 62> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 63> Tholenator(tm) uses usenet as an outlet for his OCD.
>
> 64> Tholenator(tm) is a coward, yet strangely unafraid of making himself
> 64> into a hypocrite on usenet.
>
> 65> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 65> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 66> Tholenator(tm) must poast.
>
> 67> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 67> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 67> Ironically, you still haven't answered this question.

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 68> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 68> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 69> My sources [tins] tell me that he answers questions from students with
> 69> questions also.
>
> 70> Hey, I just found out that I am Kali tonight!
>
> 70> The parallels with St. Foamy are *spooky*.
>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Deco?

What do your "digests" have to do with classical music, Pee Wee
Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKopper?

Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Tholenator(tm)? How

Number #15!

Apparently I am no longer "suffering from attribution problems."

Life is good.

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 14, 2005, 7:37:11 PM1/14/05
to
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:

Looks like Tholenator(tm) gave up digesting sci.astro:

> Brendan R. Wehrung writes:

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 51> The power of his OCD compels him to rid usenet of all antagonists.

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 52> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 52> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.


>
> 53> Nothing; Tholenator(tm) is a hypocrite.
>
> 54> Prepare to be Tholed and digested.
>
> 55> Cowardly snecked newsgroups restored:
>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.

No surprise, really.


>
> 55> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 55> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 56> I predict that Tholenator(tm) will demonstrate conclusively that he has
> 56> cabbage for testicles.

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 57> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 57> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 58> Without his "antagonists," Davie Tholenator(tm) would be completely
> 58> ignored on usenet.
>
> 59> Cowardly snecked newsgroups restored:

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Coward.

No surprise, really.


>
> 59> What does this "digest" have to do with classical music, Pee Wee
> 59> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.


> 59> Yes! #16 for me!
>
> 59> How much time did you waste today keeping track of your "digests",
> 59> OCDboi?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 60> ALL HAEL THE MIGHTY MPC!!!1!
>
> 61> I'm climbin' to the top of the charts!
>
> 62> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 62> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 63> Tholenator(tm) uses usenet as an outlet for his OCD.
>
> 64> Tholenator(tm) is a coward, yet strangely unafraid of making himself
> 64> into a hypocrite on usenet.
>
> 65> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 65> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 66> Tholenator(tm) must poast.
>
> 67> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 67> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 67> Ironically, you still haven't answered this question.

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 68> What do your "digests" have to do with astronomy, Pee Wee
> 68> Tholenator(tm) the Coward?

Note: no response from Pee Wee Tholenator(tm) the Hypocrite.
>

> 69> My sources [tins] tell me that he answers questions from students with
> 69> questions also.
>
> 70> Hey, I just found out that I am Kali tonight!
>
> 70> The parallels with St. Foamy are *spooky*.
>
> What does any of that have to do with classical music, Deco?

What do your "digests" have to do with classical music, Pee Wee
Tholenator(tm) the Net.KKKopper?

Still acting like an eight-year-old on Usenet, eh Tholenator(tm)? How

Number #15!

Apparently I am no longer "suffering from attribution problems."

Life is good.

--

Message has been deleted

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 14, 2005, 9:17:17 PM1/14/05
to
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:37:11 -0700, Art Deco <art_...@127.0.0.1> got
double secret probation because:

><tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:


>
>Looks like Tholenator(tm) gave up digesting sci.astro:

Damn, does that mean we achieved victory over teh TholenBot?

I shall today.

>>
>> 77> *YAWN*
>>
>> 78> ME ME ME ME ME ME ME I AM A STAR ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME
>>
>> 79> If Tholen Litses this sentence, then Tholen has cabbage for testicles.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA
Tholen has Cabbage Testicles.

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 14, 2005, 9:19:51 PM1/14/05
to
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:02:38 GMT, tho...@antispam.ham got double
secret probation because:

<snip a bunch of othere people>

>===========================================================================
>
>Aratzio writes:
>
>76> That are the plan! Must catch the BOT!
>
>77> *YAWN*
>
>78> ME ME ME ME ME ME ME I AM A STAR ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME
>
>79> If Tholen Litses this sentence, then Tholen has cabbage for testicles.
>
>80> Hi Art, hows your tholen tholenizing this fine tholer of a thole?
>
>81> ART ART ART ART YOU ARE A STAR ART ART ART ART ART
>
>82> Ironical taint tit.
>
>82> If Tholen Lits this setence, Tholen admits he is a moron.

Davie, you admit, you are a moron!!!!

>
>83> They make him see BOB!
>
>What does any of that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?

Who cares, Davie, I will catch the bot.

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 14, 2005, 9:21:18 PM1/14/05
to
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:37:37 -0700, Art Deco <art_...@127.0.0.1> got
double secret probation because:

><tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:

Hi Davie, mighty nice evening out, I am listening to music, how about
you?

Message has been deleted

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 15, 2005, 12:05:49 PM1/15/05
to
Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:37:11 -0700, Art Deco <art_...@127.0.0.1> got
> double secret probation because:
>
> ><tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:
> >
> >Looks like Tholenator(tm) gave up digesting sci.astro:
>
> Damn, does that mean we achieved victory over teh TholenBot?

For teh moment, but like bad music, he always comes back.

Boost!

>
> >>
> >> 77> *YAWN*
> >>
> >> 78> ME ME ME ME ME ME ME I AM A STAR ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME
> >>
> >> 79> If Tholen Litses this sentence, then Tholen has cabbage for testicles.
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHA
> Tholen has Cabbage Testicles.

QED.

--

"Ions are attracted to IRON"

"The dense ions in the ionosphere are simulating a
much higher gravitational pull to earth."

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 15, 2005, 12:09:14 PM1/15/05
to
Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

He must be busy writing new macros for Teh Mighty Digestor.

BTW, the doublepoast was completely accidental. The newsreader crashed
at exactly the right moment -- it had finished posting, but hadn't
cleared the output queue yet. When I relaunched it, it posted again.

--
"Ions are attracted to IRON"

"The dense ions in the ionosphere are simulating a
much higher gravitational pull to earth."

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 15, 2005, 12:10:38 PM1/15/05
to
Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:02:38 GMT, tho...@antispam.ham got double
> secret probation because:
>
> <snip a bunch of othere people>
>
> >===========================================================================
> >
> >Aratzio writes:
> >
> >76> That are the plan! Must catch the BOT!
> >
> >77> *YAWN*
> >
> >78> ME ME ME ME ME ME ME I AM A STAR ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME
> >
> >79> If Tholen Litses this sentence, then Tholen has cabbage for testicles.
> >
> >80> Hi Art, hows your tholen tholenizing this fine tholer of a thole?
> >
> >81> ART ART ART ART YOU ARE A STAR ART ART ART ART ART
> >
> >82> Ironical taint tit.
> >
> >82> If Tholen Lits this setence, Tholen admits he is a moron.
>
> Davie, you admit, you are a moron!!!!

Whee, there you have it!


>
> >
> >83> They make him see BOB!
> >
> >What does any of that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?
>
> Who cares, Davie, I will catch the bot.

Boost boost boost boost boost boost boost boost boost boost!

--
"Ions are attracted to IRON"

"The dense ions in the ionosphere are simulating a
much higher gravitational pull to earth."

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 15, 2005, 3:40:18 PM1/15/05
to
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:05:49 -0700, Art Deco <art_...@127.0.0.1> got
double secret probation because:

Who is Davie, Aratzio?

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 15, 2005, 3:41:21 PM1/15/05
to

On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:09:14 -0700, Art Deco <art_...@127.0.0.1> got
double secret probation because:

Sure it did. MPC is everything to you.

I am listening to music again.

Aratzio

unread,
Jan 15, 2005, 3:42:38 PM1/15/05
to
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 10:10:38 -0700, Art Deco <art_...@127.0.0.1> got
double secret probation because:

>Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:02:38 GMT, tho...@antispam.ham got double
>> secret probation because:
>>
>> <snip a bunch of othere people>
>>
>> >===========================================================================
>> >
>> >Aratzio writes:
>> >
>> >76> That are the plan! Must catch the BOT!
>> >
>> >77> *YAWN*
>> >
>> >78> ME ME ME ME ME ME ME I AM A STAR ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME
>> >
>> >79> If Tholen Litses this sentence, then Tholen has cabbage for testicles.

Well he has cabbage testicles too.

>> >
>> >80> Hi Art, hows your tholen tholenizing this fine tholer of a thole?
>> >
>> >81> ART ART ART ART YOU ARE A STAR ART ART ART ART ART
>> >
>> >82> Ironical taint tit.
>> >
>> >82> If Tholen Lits this setence, Tholen admits he is a moron.
>>
>> Davie, you admit, you are a moron!!!!
>
>Whee, there you have it!

Clear proof, Davie Tholen is a cabbage testicled moron.

>>
>> >
>> >83> They make him see BOB!
>> >
>> >What does any of that have to do with classical music, Aratzio?
>>
>> Who cares, Davie, I will catch the bot.
>
>Boost boost boost boost boost boost boost boost boost boost!

Do you listen to music, Art.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages