disguised weapon VS direct intervention

[Snoop]

I play disguised weapon at the beginnig of a combat to draw a .44, then my
opponent play direct intervention... He can choose if he cancels the
disguised weapon OR the weapon.. . and if he cancel the weapon, i can choose
another (a submachinegun for example)..but if i have no other weapon, my
disgused weapon is lost... If he cancel my disguised weapon, i can draw a
card then play a second disguised weapon if i have one in my hand...but i
have no second disguised weapon, i keep the initial .44.
Correct ?

Snoop

[LSJ]

"Snoop" <bu...@multimania.com> wrote:
> I play disguised weapon at the beginnig of a combat to draw a .44, then my
> opponent play direct intervention... He can choose if he cancels the
> disguised weapon OR the weapon.. . and if he cancel the weapon, i can choose

He can cancel the weapon OR the Disguised Weapon, yes.
The former parallels the ability to play Sudden Reversal when Bindusara
uses his special ability to "play" a master card [RTR 08-JUL-1996].

> another (a submachinegun for example)..but if i have no other weapon, my
> disgused weapon is lost... If he cancel my disguised weapon, i can draw a

You cannot choose another - the effect is lost if the weapon is cancelled.
Both the weapon and the Disguised Weapon end up in the ash heap.

> card then play a second disguised weapon if i have one in my hand...but i
> have no second disguised weapon, i keep the initial .44.
> Correct ?

Correct. If the Disguised Weapon is cancelled, the effect (equipping a weapon
from your hand) doesn't occur, so you keep the weapon in your hand.

--
LSJ (vte...@wizards.com) VTES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and DCI (tournament) rules:
http://www.wizards.com/VTES/VTES_Rules.html

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own