Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

electric motor bearings?

14 views
Skip to first unread message

Grant Erwin

unread,
Apr 10, 2007, 7:58:46 PM4/10/07
to
I'm rebuilding a 7.5 hp electric motor. Its shaft end bearing had a metal
seal away from the shaft end and was open on the other side. The other
bearing also had one metal seal and was open on one side. The motor has
zerk fittings for greasing.

I'm going to use this motor for an RPC idler motor only. I'd like it to
run as quietly as possible. In calling bearing houses, two different
clerks told me that electric motors often have two metal seals i.e. ZZ.

Should I use ZZ, 2RS, one side metal, or open? Why?

Thanks,

GWE

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Ignoramus22866

unread,
Apr 10, 2007, 8:03:34 PM4/10/07
to
My opinion is that the bearings' contribution to noise will ne
minimal. Motor fan and windings hum will contribute more. I would go
with ZZ just so that I am not bothered with oiling, dust etc.

i

Tom Gardner

unread,
Apr 10, 2007, 8:19:52 PM4/10/07
to

"Grant Erwin" <gr...@NOSPAMkirkland.net> wrote in message
news:461c179d$0$12034$8826...@free.teranews.com...

> I'm rebuilding a 7.5 hp electric motor. Its shaft end bearing had a metal
> seal away from the shaft end and was open on the other side. The other
> bearing also had one metal seal and was open on one side. The motor has
> zerk fittings for greasing.
>
> I'm going to use this motor for an RPC idler motor only. I'd like it to
> run as quietly as possible. In calling bearing houses, two different
> clerks told me that electric motors often have two metal seals i.e. ZZ.
>
> Should I use ZZ, 2RS, one side metal, or open? Why?
>
> Thanks,
>
> GWE
>
> --

Get the double shields, you don't want or need sealed brearings.

John

unread,
Apr 10, 2007, 10:26:18 PM4/10/07
to

It depends on how you are going to use the motor, what type of
enviorment it is going to be in. For your application a sealed bearing
will work fine unless you are running it in a very dusty envoirment.
Then an open bearing with a zerk fitting to flush the bearing grease and
inject new grease is desired. There should be a pipe plug that you
remove opposite the zerk fitting so the old grease comes out rather than
pushing its way out along the shaft and creating a mess.

John

John

unread,
Apr 10, 2007, 10:27:07 PM4/10/07
to

Use a 2RS sealed pregreased bearing.

John

Nick Mueller

unread,
Apr 11, 2007, 4:21:52 AM4/11/07
to
Grant Erwin wrote:

> Should I use ZZ, 2RS, one side metal, or open? Why?

Z is better for dirty environments.
I guess you want a Z, because there must be some way to get the grease in.
ZZ and 2RS are greased out of the factory, so you could use them and ignore
the zerk fitting. If you only get a ZZ and need a Z, you can pry one
sealing out with a screwdriver.

Nick
--
***********************************
*** The lowcost DRO ***
***********************************
<http://www.yadro.de>

REMOVE Tom

unread,
Apr 11, 2007, 9:51:28 AM4/11/07
to
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:58:46 -0700, Grant Erwin
<gr...@NOSPAMkirkland.net> wrote:

>I'm rebuilding a 7.5 hp electric motor. Its shaft end bearing had a metal
>seal away from the shaft end and was open on the other side. The other
>bearing also had one metal seal and was open on one side. The motor has
>zerk fittings for greasing.
>
>I'm going to use this motor for an RPC idler motor only. I'd like it to
>run as quietly as possible. In calling bearing houses, two different
>clerks told me that electric motors often have two metal seals i.e. ZZ.
>
>Should I use ZZ, 2RS, one side metal, or open? Why?
>

If you have a metal seal it is most likely a shield. If you buy a
sealed or shielded bearing it is greased for life - the grease should
outlive the metal and relube is not required. Over 98% of bearings
never reach their design life and most fail due to over lubrication so
I would suggest that if you have a normal environment go with ZZ since
they are cheaper than sealed. If you are in a fairly dirty
environment, I would suggest going with NTN bearings with LLB non
contact seals. I would not suggest going with 2RS as these are contact
seals and create friction (drag and heat) and probably aren't
necessary. If you want to go with a single shield and relube, I would
suggest you reverse the bearing - put the shield on the lube side so
it will act as a meter. It will actually do a better job of keeping
the grease out of the windings than the way it was originally
installed.

*

unread,
Apr 11, 2007, 1:04:06 PM4/11/07
to

Ignoramus22866 <ignoram...@NOSPAM.22866.invalid> wrote in article
<-Kmdndqkd79LuIHb...@giganews.com>...


> My opinion is that the bearings' contribution to noise will ne
> minimal. Motor fan and windings hum will contribute more. I would go
> with ZZ just so that I am not bothered with oiling, dust etc.
>
>

You would think so, but my experience proved otherwise.

I bought one of those ubiquitous $200 bandsaws from a local
salvage-oriented retailer.

Even though it was brand new, it had, obviously, been underwater at some
point.....perhaps in the ship's hold?

When you hit the switch, the noise it made was a cross between a klaxon and
a siren. My neighbors all knew when I was cutting metal.

As a part of my "Neighborhood Relations Policy", I would close the shop
doors if I had to cut something with that saw while working in the evening.

Since the machine worked fine, I tolerated the noise - hoping that the shop
phone would not ring while I was using it....since I couldn't hear the
phone ring, nor could I talk on it while the saw was running.

One day, I got fed up. I opened the motor up, took the bearings out,
cleaned them up, and packed them with a good quality (military surplus)
wheel bearing grease. They quieted substantially.

I took the bearing numbers, went to my local NAPA Auto Parts store, and
found the exact replacements (alternator bearings) in-stock......sitting on
the shelf......for less than $10.00 each.

I replaced them and the saw quieted so much, my neighbor from across the
street asked if I had bought a new saw.

Again, that was my own, personal, somewhat surprising experience.....YMMV!


Ignoramus13850

unread,
Apr 11, 2007, 1:09:00 PM4/11/07
to
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:04:06 -0500, * <nos...@this.addy.com> wrote:
>
>
> Ignoramus22866 <ignoram...@NOSPAM.22866.invalid> wrote in article
><-Kmdndqkd79LuIHb...@giganews.com>...
>> My opinion is that the bearings' contribution to noise will ne
>> minimal. Motor fan and windings hum will contribute more. I would go
>> with ZZ just so that I am not bothered with oiling, dust etc.
>>
>>
>
> You would think so, but my experience proved otherwise.
>
> I bought one of those ubiquitous $200 bandsaws from a local
> salvage-oriented retailer.
>
> Even though it was brand new, it had, obviously, been underwater at some
> point.....perhaps in the ship's hold?
>
> When you hit the switch, the noise it made was a cross between a klaxon and
> a siren. My neighbors all knew when I was cutting metal.

The key here is "it had, obviously, been underwater at some point".

> As a part of my "Neighborhood Relations Policy", I would close the shop
> doors if I had to cut something with that saw while working in the evening.
>
> Since the machine worked fine, I tolerated the noise - hoping that the shop
> phone would not ring while I was using it....since I couldn't hear the
> phone ring, nor could I talk on it while the saw was running.
>
> One day, I got fed up. I opened the motor up, took the bearings out,
> cleaned them up, and packed them with a good quality (military surplus)
> wheel bearing grease. They quieted substantially.
>
> I took the bearing numbers, went to my local NAPA Auto Parts store, and
> found the exact replacements (alternator bearings) in-stock......sitting on
> the shelf......for less than $10.00 each.
>
> I replaced them and the saw quieted so much, my neighbor from across the
> street asked if I had bought a new saw.
>
> Again, that was my own, personal, somewhat surprising experience.....YMMV!
>
>

Yes, you put in new bearings, and the noise went down. That's what
Grant wants to do as well, put in new bearings. I just do not think
that the type of bearings will make much difference, noise wise.

i

Ned Simmons

unread,
Apr 11, 2007, 3:23:27 PM4/11/07
to
In article <WsydnZE-ZYGxi4Db...@giganews.com>, ignoramus13850
@NOSPAM.13850.invalid says...

>
> Yes, you put in new bearings, and the noise went down. That's what
> Grant wants to do as well, put in new bearings. I just do not think
> that the type of bearings will make much difference, noise wise.
>

"Electric motor quality" bearings are bearings that have either been
manufactured or selected for quiet running.

http://www.dynaroll.com/catalog/pag027.htm
http://www.vncbearing.com/tdata.html

Ned Simmons

Camperken

unread,
Apr 12, 2007, 1:18:31 AM4/12/07
to
Grant
Last month I did the same bearing replacement on a 7 1/2 HP motor for
my phase converter. As others have said, the difference in seals/
shields is minimal in this application.

I found bearings on ebay at 1/3 the cost from the bearing houses.

John Normile


On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:58:46 -0700, Grant Erwin
<gr...@NOSPAMkirkland.net> wrote:

Richard J Kinch

unread,
Apr 14, 2007, 12:36:35 AM4/14/07
to
Grant Erwin writes:

> Should I use ZZ, 2RS, one side metal, or open? Why?

Dunno about that, but ...

Here's some old notes of mine on bearing nomenclature:

NTN (ntnamerica.com) (and others) bearing numbering system:
(See http://www.us.nsk.com/page.asp?ID=255 for more code interchange
info)
Z = shielded one side, ZZ = both sides; ZS/ZZS = removeable, V/VV non-
contact
steel shields, D/DD contact steel, TS/TTS Teflon.
L = sealed one side, LL = both sides. LB = non-contact sealed one side,
LLB = both sides. LU = contact sealed one side, LLU = both sides.
Suffix N = snap ring groove in outer surface of outer ring, NR = same
with ring supplied. FL/FR = flanged outer ring, R = standard, RW/FRW =
extended/flanged inner ring.
K = 1/12 bore taper on ID.
Ball retainer cages: J = pressed steel aka "ribbon" (assumed if
omitted),
T2 = nylon, T12 = "plastic", G1 = machined, W = crown,
brass cage for cylindrical roller bearings or L1 = other bearings,
F3 = machined leaded steel, F5 = machined Cr-Mo steel, T1 = machined
phenolic.
D = OD, d = ID or bore, B = width, r = bore chamfer.
SRDG = single row deep groove radial bearing, numbers 6xxx.
SRDG cartridge (wider for more grease) = 63xxx.
SRDG max capacity (extra balls via filling slot) = BLxxx.
SRDG heat-treated high-strength long-life = TMBxxx.
Felt seal = 8xxx, Wide-cup felt seal = WC8xxx.
Angular contact = 7xxx, suffix G = flush ground for duplex pairing to
elminate
end play, suffix (?) C = 15 deg contact, D = 45 deg contact, none =
standard
30 deg contact. Duplex pairing: back-to-back (higher rigidity) = DB
suffix,
face-to-face (more misalignment tolerance) = DF suffix, tandem (added
thrust
in one direction) = DT suffix. Preload designations for precision
pairs
(using slight gaps in ring dimensions): N = normal, L = light, M =
medium,
H = heavy.
Double-row angular contact = 3xxx (extra balls via filling slot) or
5xxx (normal balls).
Double-row self-aligning angular contact (spherical inside of outer
ring)
= 1xxx or 2xxx.
Single direction thrust ball bearings = 51xxx, double direction = 52xxx.
Double direction angular contact thrust ball bearings = 562xxx.
Steel hardness in bearings typically 60 to 64 Rockwell C.
Radial internal clearance = C2 (best), standard (C or no suffix), C3,
C4, C5 (worst).
Last three digits of number XYY:
YY=ID: 00=10mm 01=12mm 02=15mm 03=17mm
X=OD: code for size depends on ID.
For ID 9mm or less, 3rd digit is ID in mm.

Bearing tolerance classification equivalents:

ABEC ISO DIN

ABEC 1 Normal P0
ABEC 3 Class 6 P6
ABEC 5 Class 5 P5
ABEC 7 Class 4 P4
ABEC 9 Class 2 P2

Lew Hartswick

unread,
Apr 14, 2007, 12:42:46 PM4/14/07
to
Richard J Kinch wrote:
( lot of good info)
When I save this it writes as a .eml extension.
Is there some way to convert this to a .txt file ?
Anybody???
Thanx
...lew...

clareatsnyder.on.ca

unread,
Apr 14, 2007, 1:26:25 PM4/14/07
to

Copy and paste to word processor - works every time.

Larry Jaques

unread,
Apr 14, 2007, 2:42:49 PM4/14/07
to
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:42:46 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm, Lew
Hartswick <lhart...@earthlink.net> quickly quoth:

>Richard J Kinch wrote:
>( lot of good info)
>When I save this it writes as a .eml extension.
>Is there some way to convert this to a .txt file ?

Ctrl-A, Ctrl-C to grab all the text,
Start/All Programs/Accessories/Notepad to open Notepad,
Ctrl-V to drop the saved text.
In the Notepad menu: File/Save As, name it whatever.txt.
Done.

--
The ancient and curious thing called religion, as it shows itself in the
modern world, is often so overladen with excrescences and irrelevancies
that its fundamental nature tends to be obscured.
--H.L. Mencken in "Treatise on the Gods"

Martin H. Eastburn

unread,
Apr 14, 2007, 4:18:58 PM4/14/07
to
Rename. .eml to txt did you try that ?

I do some saving but often through a text editor. But directly has been done.

Martin H. Eastburn
@ home at Lions' Lair with our computer lionslair at consolidated dot net
TSRA, Life; NRA LOH & Endowment Member, Golden Eagle, Patriot"s Medal.
NRA Second Amendment Task Force Charter Founder
IHMSA and NRA Metallic Silhouette maker & member.
http://lufkinced.com/

Larry Jaques wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:42:46 GMT, with neither quill nor qualm, Lew
> Hartswick <lhart...@earthlink.net> quickly quoth:
>
>
>>Richard J Kinch wrote:
>>( lot of good info)
>>When I save this it writes as a .eml extension.
>>Is there some way to convert this to a .txt file ?
>
>
> Ctrl-A, Ctrl-C to grab all the text,
> Start/All Programs/Accessories/Notepad to open Notepad,
> Ctrl-V to drop the saved text.
> In the Notepad menu: File/Save As, name it whatever.txt.
> Done.
>

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Lew Hartswick

unread,
Apr 14, 2007, 10:15:47 PM4/14/07
to
Martin H. Eastburn wrote:
> Rename. .eml to txt did you try that ?
>
Yea . Tried it but it puts a lot of extraenious junk in.

I'll try the copy and paste bit.
Thanks.
...lew...

0 new messages