New WiFi Adapter
Wayne.B
impressed with the early test results. It is a high power USB adapter
with provision for an external antenna, and not particularly
expensive:
http://wlanparts.com/product/NUB-362EXT
I'm using it with an 8.5 db omnidirectional antenna mounted about 25
feet above the water and fed with 30 feet of low loss coax.
The drivers installed very quickly and cleanly, and the client
software allows scanning and selection for all available access
points.
It is very significantly better than my previous best, which was a USB
Rangemax adapter mounted about 20 feet above the water.
Thanks to Glenn Ashmore who pointed out this unit in a previous post.
Wayne.B
<onetw...@four.com> wrote:
>8.5 db vertical? Way cool.
>
>What are you using as a ground plane?
The whole thing is encased in fiberglass so the exact construction is
difficult to determine. There is an aluminum decoupling sleeve at the
bottom where the co-ax exits, and that is also the mounting point for
the U-bolts. I'm guessing, but suspect that inside the fiberglass are
some stacked co-linear elements, perhaps center fed but I don't know.
The frequencies are at about 2400 MHz so you can fit a lot of 1/4 wave
segments in a small space.
You can buy them at CompUSA stores:
Looks like they are now claiming 9 db gain.
Hi...@patowamak.net
inside and you run a cable outside with the antenna on the end? Or is
the whole unit mounted outside? If the former, any indications on
signal loss per cable length?
Is there a way to feed this into a router? Would like to be able to use
my Vonage phone service and also feed other computers in my boat.
Skip Gundlach
Just a very short note, as I'm about to go 600 miles up the road to
pick up the last two bins and my wife, to return to the boat,
permanently...
This is exactly the scenario I've been working on for over a year. I
can't take the time right now to elaborate, but I believe it can be
done - I just don't know exactly how at this moment.
I had a very brief period of success before my IP conflict dragon's
brother (I killed the original) came out and ate my connection.
Pop over to alt.internet.wireless for the ongoing discussions of my
travails, and you can also follow me on SSCA.org's forum.
As it is I am using a USB adapter on an active cable extension, and
it's mounted under the dodger, but that's only useful in static
conditions. I use it for Skype, Vonage (my softphone in the laptop,
this note, email and researching on the web for all the stuff I have
still to buy before we can leave.
NOT wireless - USB cable - and not feeding a vonage adapter box or
other computers - but it can be done...
L8R
Skip
Morgan 461 #2
SV Flying Pig KI4MPC
See our galleries at http://justpickone.org/skip/gallery/
"Believe me, my young friend, there is *nothing*-absolutely
nothing-half so much worth doing as simply messing,
messing-about-in-boats; messing about in boats-or *with* boats.
In or out of 'em, it doesn't matter. Nothing seems really to matter,
that's the charm of it.
Whether you get away, or whether you don't; whether you arrive at your
destination or whether you reach somewhere else, or whether you never
get anywhere at all, you're always busy, and you never do anything in
particular; and when you've done it there's always something else to
do, and you can do it if you like, but you'd much better not."
Wayne.B
Yes, the USB adapter is inside the main cabin feeding a 30 ft run of
low loss coax cable through an adapter (SMC to type N connector if I
recall correctly).
The antenna looks like this:
I don't know the loss figures on the cable but shorter is always
better at these frequencies. What I can tell you is that overall
system performance is a great deal better than anything else I've
tried previously. CompUSA also sells a Hawking remote
amplifier/preamp which could be installed near the antenna if mounted
in a watertight enclosure.
I don't know of any way to feed a router unless you can figure out how
to get ICS (Internet Connection Sharing) to work using a USB primary
network connection. If that is important to you, I'd recommend
looking at a remote external WiFi adapter with an ethernet interface.
The folks that I bought my USB adapter from also have a wide variety
of other components that you might find applicable:
Glenn Ashmore
thick and should only be used for short pigtails. LMR200 is about 1/4"
thick and looks a lot like RG-59 and is good up to 10 or 15'. LMR400 is
1/2" thick and looks like RG 213 but lower loss.
To give you an idea of the relative losses, that 30' run in LMR100 would
loose 11.7db or about 93% of the signal. In LMR200 it would loose 5 db or
about 58% and in LMR-400 it would loose 2db or about 37%.
There is an online calculator at:
http://www.timesmicrowave.com/cgi-bin/calculate.pl
One advantage of the EUB-362 is that you can run the USB cable up to 15'
(with a powered hub up to 30')with no loss and use a shorter coax to the
antenna.
Extra antenna height doesn't get you much because the absolute range over
water of a 200mw wifi signal on a 9db omni antenna is about 2 miles. With
the antenna at 10' the horizon is twice that far. Anything much higher than
the Bimini frame makes no real improvement. In some cases it could actually
work against you. Many marinas use sectorized antennas with narrow vertical
patterns and aim them down towards the end of the outer docks to get maximum
signal within the marina and minimize the spread to boats outside. If you
are anchored off the marina the antenna can be to high to be in the sweet
part of the beam.
An example in reverse is at Trellis Bay, Tortola. The BVIWifi antenna is on
the roof of the Trellis Bay Cyber Cafe. The pattern is 10 degrees vertical
and 180 horizontal and is aimed out into the anchorage. On the beach 50' in
front of the antenna a laptop will not see the signal but 30' further out on
the dinghy dock it comes in strong.
--
Glenn Ashmore
I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack
there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com
Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com
"Wayne.B" <waynebatr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lah1c2toqa9u7vbi8...@4ax.com...
Wayne.B
wrote:
>The popular low loss wifi coax is the LMR series. LMR100 is about 1/8"
>thick and should only be used for short pigtails. LMR200 is about 1/4"
>thick and looks a lot like RG-59 and is good up to 10 or 15'. LMR400 is
>1/2" thick and looks like RG 213 but lower loss.
>
>To give you an idea of the relative losses, that 30' run in LMR100 would
>loose 11.7db or about 93% of the signal. In LMR200 it would loose 5 db or
>about 58% and in LMR-400 it would loose 2db or about 37%.
Thanks Glenn, looks like I have the LMR400.
Are you saying that path loss at 2400 MHz precludes distances over 2
miles regardless of antenna gain or height?
Norm
and an antenna. Wish I had seen this thread before. Anyway the seller
has this site that takes a Linksys wireless router and makes it into a
fully automated Wireless Internet Service finder and router.
I don't know much about this stuff, but here is the link
Comments?
Norm
S/V Barbara Ann Swift 40
Green Cove Springs Marinia, FL
Glenn Ashmore
"Wayne.B" <waynebatr...@hotmail.com> wrote
.
>
> Thanks Glenn, looks like I have the LMR400.
>
> Are you saying that path loss at 2400 MHz precludes distances over 2
> miles regardless of antenna gain or height?
>
You can get considerably further with a super high gain antenna but on a
sailboat there is a practical limit. Antennas achieve "gain" by restricting
the radiation to a desired pattern. With a beam you can get a lot of gain
but restricted to a narrow cone which on a boat moving around at anchor it
would be useless. Omni directional get higher gain by flattening the
doughnut. A 5db omni has about a 60 degree vertical spread. an 11db might
have less than 10 degrees of vertical spread. Once you get past about 11db
the pattern is so flat that the slightest rocking will make the signal fade.
8.5 to 9db is about optimal on a sailboat.
If both antennas are at 10' the line of site distance is about 8.5 statute
miles. Assuming the receiving antenna is not laying on the ground the
height over about 10' or 15' is not going to make a lot of difference
because at the low power of wifi the signal is not going to make it that
far.
You add and subtract DB to find the effective radiated power so a 200mw
transmitter is 23db. Subtract 2 db for loss in the LMR400 and add back 8.5
for the antenna and you are at 29.5db radiated in the desired pattern.
The receive sensitivity on the UEB-362 is about -92db which is about as good
as it gets. Add a net of 6.5 for the antenna and cable and you are
at -98.5. You also need 5 or 6 db to separate out the signal from the
noise. The total maximum field loss you can have and still maintain a link
will be 29.5 + 98.5 - 6db margin = 122db. In absolutely perfect line of
site conditions a field loss of 122db is about 7 miles but that is rarely
possible. Just 2 or 3 db difference in performance or field loss will cut
that dramatically. As a practical matter you will be lucky to get a
reliable connection most of the time at much more than half that distance.
Wayne.B
wrote:
>As a practical matter you will be lucky to get a
>reliable connection most of the time at much more than half that distance.
Thanks, interesting analysis.
Goofball_star_dot_etal
Bruce in Alaska
"Glenn Ashmore" <gash...@cox.net> wrote:
very nice articulation of "Radio Path Engineering for Dummies 101"
Bruce in alaska
--
add a <2> before @