Have others noticed these "draggy" bearings?
Do they in fact "break in"?
Is there anything that can be done?
Is this a ploy to get us to upgrade to ceramic bearings, and would
they actually make this better?
Paul
do you want seals that seal, or just look good? because if you want the
former, you have a sacrifice to make. but you'll be relieved to learn
that at higher speeds, the drag decreases, so it's only when you're
being a slug that it makes any difference.
as for the freehub body, remove it and lube once in a while. qspc
recommends synthetic motor oil, and i've used it too. seems to work.
but an unlubed delrin bearing can't slow you down unless you're coasting.
'Sealed' bearings have a rubber 'seal' and these will always be more
draggy than cup and ball bearings(like the ultegra and Centaur if
2006) which are sealed better with labyrinth seals. The only way to
make them 'better' is to remove the seals, bad idea, BTW. Cheaper to
make hubs this way since no cup needs to be made for the nug for the
bearings to live in. Not sure why these, with such a draggy, 2 pawl
rear hub, is so expensive.
Ceramic bearings empty your wallet and little else in spite of the
shill you hear on adverts and certain web sites.
> Ceramic bearings empty your wallet and little else in spite of the
> shill you hear on adverts and certain web sites.
In a letter to FIETS magazine, after these questioned the effectiveness of
ceramic bearings, a guy made the very enthousiastic comment that he "only"
paid 475 Euro's for ceramic bearings in his Ksyriums and RD. Speaking about
the effectiveness of marketing. O yeah: of course he noticed significant
less resistance, in spite of a lab test by TOUR that showed a result that
could hardly be measured.
Derk
Lots of silly things in bikes these days but some, like compact
frames, oversized handlebars, internal headsets do have a few
advantages. Small rider fit, safer light handlebars, easier to weld/
afix big tubes=safer frames, etc. BUT ceramic does little/nuthin.