After looking at a pair of them, it appears that there are differences
in the precise layout, angles and shapes of the ramps and pins, and
possibly some tweaks in the tooth shaping, to optimise the shifting.
Given that all of these features were added lonmg after the der system
had become common, having them less than optimally implemented will
cause nothing more than a slight delay in upshifts to the big ring, if
even that. Yes, it's nice to use them correctly; if you need to ride
*today*, use what's at hand and don't worry about it.
--
Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
Some gardening required to reply via email.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.
Dear David,
See this short thread, where Sheldon Brown, Peter Chisholm, and Mike
Jacoubowsky broke Shimano's heart back in 1999:
http://tinyurl.com/e84ye
or
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.bicycles.tech/browse_frm/thread/64b8f42973085a33/1ff986509cb09252?q=%22shimano+a%22&rnum=1#1ff986509cb09252
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
shimano has does some sort of study to determine where to put the pick
up pins and ramps and insist that they must be matched..but in actual
practice, it doesn't matter at all...remember once upon a time, on
roads far, far away, big rings didn't have all the 'gook' on them to
help the no-technique-cyclist shift onto the big ring.