3.1 Released (and 0.1 rdfextras)
Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes
As some of you already noticed, I released a version 3.1 - we had
fixed many small annoying bugs since 3.0 and it was time. The release
is of course not perfect, there were bugs still open, and two more
appeared after I made the SVN tag and sent this email :) (#160 and
#161)
However, at least all tests still pass :)
I also made a release of rdfextras 0.1 - it's still very messy, many
tests still fail, but at least some things work!
Cheers,
- Gunnar
Niklas Lindström
nice to see this progress!
Any plans to release a 3.1.1 anytime soonish? As the reporter of #161
(and fixer, if the patch doesn't seem too clumsy) I'm a bit bummed
that a released RDFLib doesn't have clean N3 serialization -- I use
that a lot (admittedly it doesn't fail, but it no longer shows off N3
in its proper beauty).
(Alas, I mostly use just that, since I regularly work in java-land --
though groovy and RDF-related stuff makes that ok ;) ..)
Best regards,
Niklas
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rdflib-dev" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rdfli...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rdflib-dev+...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rdflib-dev?hl=en.
>
>
Gunnar Aastrand Grimnes
I did briefly wonder if I should move the 3.1 tag and add this patch
to the release, but then there was no reason to not get #160 in too,
and then it would never be released.
We should really try to push a new release slightly more often than
once a year :)
I committed a test for your issue, I will look at and commit the patch
later today (maybe)
For me, a speedy 3.1.1 would be fine!
- Gunnar
2011/3/21 Niklas Lindström <linds...@gmail.com>:
