MSWin32 (Visual C++ 8.0) Test Results (r12442)
Ron Blaschke
details for the tests that failed. The C<t/pmc/env.t> and
<t/pmc/complex.t> are not unexpected on Windows.
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/doc/pod.t 3 768 1166 3 0.26% 24 738 820
t/op/calling.t 1 256 92 1 1.09% 91
t/pmc/complex.t 1 256 53 1 1.89% 33
t/pmc/env.t 2 512 12 2 16.67% 9-10
t/pmc/objects.t 1 256 73 1 1.37% 73
(22 subtests UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 17 tests and 361 subtests skipped.
Failed 5/233 test scripts, 97.85% okay. 8/5860 subtests failed, 99.86% okay.
t/op/calling.........................NOK 91# Failed test
(t/op/calling.t at line 2327)
# got: '
# 22
# 33
# '
# expected: '11
# 22
# 33
# '
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 92.
t/op/calling.........................dubious
Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
DIED. FAILED test 91
Failed 1/92 tests, 98.91% okay (less 1 skipped test: 90 okay,
97.83%)
t/pmc/complex........................NOK 33# Failed test
(t/pmc/complex.t at line 1024)
# got: '
# ln(0+0i)
# got -1.#INF00+0.000000i
# not -inf+0.000000i
# done
# '
# expected: 'done
# '
t/pmc/complex........................ok 53/53# Looks like you failed 1
test of 53.
t/pmc/complex........................dubious
Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
DIED. FAILED test 33
Failed 1/53 tests, 98.11% okay (less 3 skipped tests: 49 okay,
92.45%)
t/pmc/env............................NOK 9# Failed test (t/pmc/env.t
at line 168)
# got: '0
# '
# expected: '3
# '
t/pmc/env............................NOK 10# Failed test
(t/pmc/env.t at line 191)
# got: '0.000000
# '
# expected: '3.000000
# '
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 12.
t/pmc/env............................dubious
Test returned status 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
DIED. FAILED tests 9-10
Failed 2/12 tests, 83.33% okay (less 1 skipped test: 9 okay,
75.00%)
t/pmc/objects........................NOK 73# Failed test
(t/pmc/objects.t at line 2122)
# got: 'error:imcc:The opcode 'isa_i_p_kc' (isa<3>) was not
found. Check the type and number of the arguments
# in file 'D:\src\parrot\t\pmc\objects_73.pir' line 6
# '
# expected: '0
# '
# '.\parrot.exe --gc-debug "D:\src\parrot\t\pmc\objects_73.pir"' failed
with exit code 18
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 73.
t/pmc/objects........................dubious
Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
DIED. FAILED test 73
Failed 1/73 tests, 98.63% okay (less 2 skipped tests: 70 okay,
95.89%)
t/compilers/pge/p5regexp/p5rx........ok
290/800 skipped: bugs | errors | trailing modifiers, 22/800
unexpectedly succeeded
t/doc/pod............................NOK 24# Failed test
(t/doc/pod.t at line 62)
# D:/src/parrot/compilers/pge/PGE/P6Regex.pir (1236): You forgot a
'=back' before '=head1'
t/doc/pod............................ok 628/1166
# Failed test (t/doc/pod.t at line 62)
# D:/src/parrot/compilers/pge/PGE/Regex.pir (28): Unknown directive: =over4
# D:/src/parrot/compilers/pge/PGE/Regex.pir (30): '=item' outside of any
'=over'
t/doc/pod............................ok 783/1166
# Failed test (t/doc/pod.t at line 62)
# D:/src/parrot/compilers/pge/PGE/Exp.pir (39): '=item' outside of any
'=over'
t/doc/pod............................ok 1138/1166# Looks like you failed
3 tests of 1166.
t/doc/pod............................dubious
Test returned status 3 (wstat 768, 0x300)
DIED. FAILED tests 24, 738, 820
Failed 3/1166 tests, 99.74% okay
Jerry Gay
> Here's another round of test results on my box. I've also added the
> details for the tests that failed. The C<t/pmc/env.t> and
> <t/pmc/complex.t> are not unexpected on Windows.
>
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> t/doc/pod.t 3 768 1166 3 0.26% 24 738 820
fixed, r12443.
> t/op/calling.t 1 256 92 1 1.09% 91
> t/pmc/complex.t 1 256 53 1 1.89% 33
> t/pmc/env.t 2 512 12 2 16.67% 9-10
> t/pmc/objects.t 1 256 73 1 1.37% 73
these are all expected, at the moment.
> (22 subtests UNEXPECTEDLY SUCCEEDED), 17 tests and 361 subtests skipped.
pmichaud++ # more passing p5regex tests
i'll update p5rx.t to un-todo these.
thanks for reporting.
~jerry
Andy Dougherty
> On 4/27/06, Ron Blaschke <mailin...@rblasch.org> wrote:
> > Here's another round of test results on my box. I've also added the
> > details for the tests that failed. The C<t/pmc/env.t> and
> > <t/pmc/complex.t> are not unexpected on Windows.
> >
>
> > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > t/doc/pod.t 3 768 1166 3 0.26% 24 738 820
> fixed, r12443.
>
> > t/op/calling.t 1 256 92 1 1.09% 91
> > t/pmc/complex.t 1 256 53 1 1.89% 33
> > t/pmc/env.t 2 512 12 2 16.67% 9-10
> > t/pmc/objects.t 1 256 73 1 1.37% 73
> these are all expected, at the moment.
They are? Is the list of "expected failuers" anywhere obvious? I don't
see it anywhere obvious either in the source or in the recent
perl6-internals archives. Perhaps I've missed it somewhere.
--
Andy Dougherty doug...@lafayette.edu
Jerry Gay
list mail,) and they appear regularly on the smoke server
(http://smoke.parrotcode.org/smoke).
calling is failing due to a test checked in by patrick (:flat and
named params, iirc,) and objects is failing due to an
as-yet-unimplemented opcode (part of PDD21 changes, iirc.) both of
these should be resolved when leo (or any other C coder with tuits) up
to fixing them.
i'm having trouble finding tickets for these others, but that may be
because my network connection is horribly inconsistent at the moment,
and not because they don't exist.
~jerry
Jerry Gay
Chromatic
> calling is failing due to a test checked in by patrick (:flat and
> named params, iirc,) and objects is failing due to an
> as-yet-unimplemented opcode (part of PDD21 changes, iirc.) both of
> these should be resolved when leo (or any other C coder with tuits) up
> to fixing them.
These at least sound like TODOs. Oh mythical lurkers with some free time who
want to contribute, there are a few of us who don't have time to code today
but who do have time to apply good patches....
-- c