Indeed, it does look nice. I think a few of us attempted to install
but never got it running due to its many external sources and lack of
time. Ben Lipkowitz says the instructions are decent, I can't recall.
> An account to download the software can be obtained by sending a
> request to sup...@nanorex.com
You just have to go register at http://nanoengineer-1.com and and then
click download, no need in taking the long way about things :-)
> There was a nice list of software in recent posts by Heath and Bryan.
> Do any of those packages have the engineering CAD style available in
> NE-1?
Having not used Nanoengineer, I'm not sure exactly what it's interface
is like. However, SKDB ( http://adl.serveftp.org/dokuwiki/skdb ) uses
Open CASCADE ( see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_CASCADE and
http://adl.serveftp.org/dokuwiki/occ ) and PythonOCC ( see
http://pythonocc.org/ and http://adl.serveftp.org/dokuwiki/pythonocc
). I've actually been working on creating a .deb file for the program
this past week, ask me how far along I've come in a month.. And also
in SKDB is heeks_coords.py which extracts coordinates from HeeksCAD
files.
http://code.google.com/p/heekscad/
Debian packages for it: http://yamato.hyte.de/packages/heeks/
If you are on Windows and don't mind the .NET junk, NaroCAD looks
decent: http://narocad.com/
--
Heath Matlock
+1 256 274 4225
Yes, a few years ago. Still not open sourced, is it?
> http://nanoengineer-1.com/content/
>
> An account to download the software can be obtained by sending a
> request to sup...@nanorex.com
>
> There was a nice list of software in recent posts by Heath and Bryan.
> Do any of those packages have the engineering CAD style available in
> NE-1?
>
> There was also a question about atomic positions. NE-1 uses .mmp
Not a question, at least not about NE-1.
> (molecular machine part) files. basically x,y,z data, atom type, and
> bond information. NE-1 can also make a .pdb file.
The problem with this is that you typically have CAD, which is bulk,
and molecular editors, which are atomically accurate but don't scale
to even mesoscale. So you need a hybrid approach, where you can describe
parts at atomic detail, iterations of such (e.g. tilings a la crystal
lattice) and ways of using bulk, but with bond-precision attachement
tools. And you have to think about the facility which will make use
of such descriptions. This still hasn't been done yet.
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
The problem with this is that you typically have CAD, which is bulk,
and molecular editors, which are atomically accurate but don't scale
to even mesoscale. So you need a hybrid approach, where you can describe
parts at atomic detail, iterations of such (e.g. tilings a la crystal
lattice) and ways of using bulk, but with bond-precision attachement
tools. And you have to think about the facility which will make use
of such descriptions. This still hasn't been done yet.
My problem at this point is that the simulator does not work (in linux). The guy who wrote it says the new gcc may have broken it and lists some options. None of which my programming skills are up to (yet),
http://ngineers.ning.com/profiles/blogs/nanohive1-install
If anyone could take a look at this and at least give me a pointer, I would appreciate it. Note that it runs fine on Win XP (& Mac), the last time I had access to that system, I made these training videos. I have not been able to use it for simulations since.
http://www.youtube.com/user/technologicleenelson#p/a/u/1/wvcwY5pSXZs
http://www.youtube.com/user/technologicleenelson#p/a/u/0/nqfXzTrwI3c
Netbeans IDE has python support and I have run NE-1 from inside Netbeans - I found it a very useful way to look at the code.