So, how do folks here feel about Google's announcement of shuttering Google Reader on July 1, 2013? I for one am pretty bummed - GR has been a very convenient way for me to keep up on information at my pace.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NewsRob User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to newsrob+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to new...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/newsrob?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NewsRob User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to newsrob+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to new...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/newsrob?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Very sad
Sucks. It's the app I use more than any other.
Alternatives?
http://blog.feedly.com/2013/03/14/google-reader/
Here's the best alternative that I've found thus far. They seem to be willing to take on a lot by promising seamless transition with their newly announced Normandy API. Willing to work with 3rd parties as well. Hopefully NR can adapt for this.
--
There are other alternatives like @hivemined and theoldreader.com (which is overwhelmed at the moment) so hopefully some clarity will emerge on a dominant platform, and maybe we can get some mobile app lovin' - perhaps even from Newsrob. Should be interesting....
To me, so far the best alternative appears to be newsblur - which has mobile client and desktop site...
--
I agree. You can't view feeds through a browser without plugins (prohibited at my place of work). The mobile app isn't efficient for reading large volumes, and doesn't appear to support offline content.
Newsblur looks better but the offline problem still stands.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "NewsRob User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/newsrob/GPiJU7Ibh9M/unsubscribe?hl=en.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to newsrob+u...@googlegroups.com.
http://blog.feedly.com/2013/03/14/google-reader/Here's the best alternative that I've found thus far. They seem to be willing to take on a lot by promising seamless transition with their newly announced Normandy API. Willing to work with 3rd parties as well. Hopefully NR can adapt for this.
Well, I think "minimal" is questionable. Firstly, does feedly even intend to make their Normandy api available for non feedly clients? And if so, migrating may be non trivial, depending on how decoupled the Newsrob code is from the APIs.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NewsRob User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to newsrob+u...@googlegroups.com.
I already sent them a mail. We'll see.
If the API is compatible it would mean I need to only change the API end points, i.e. the URLs. Then there would still be the testing to do. Still depending on the test results that could be kind of minimal.
It would also mean that all end points need to be available that NewsRob uses, including authentication. Otherwise the adaption probably wouldn't be that minimal.
Written on a mobile device
"Note 2: if you are a third party developer using the Google Reader API and would like to integrate with Normandy, please send an email to re...@feedly.com. We would love to keep the Google Reader ecosystem alive."
As mentioned above I already sent them a mail a couple of hours ago.
But I think it'll take some time for them to come up with the details. I am sure they have other concerns at the moment. Google's decision sent a lot of attention and new users their way.
Written on a mobile device
Thanks for emailing them, Mariano - as others have said NewsRob is fantastic, does the job that many others fail to do efficiently. If there's anyway we can just keep using it via a different API I'd be very much up for that, here's hoping their reply is positive and the workload from your perspective wouldn't be too onerous.
Cheers
Alan
Sure, but I can't "apt-get install feedly-server", right?
I can't tell on this phone since surfing there keeps on trying to launch a damn app.
It might be a decent de facto API standard though, you're right.
>> there's the minor trouble of self-hosting and getting an API right.
feed.ly does.
Now this. As previously mentioned, I don't care for magazine layouts (the Flipboard app, while beautiful, for me isn't functional) but NR with its quick 'mark read until here' or 'swipe to mark unread/swipe again to star' is superb. As a daily user, I'd be gutted to lose it, so I really hope we can keep the UI with a different back end. Fast, thoughtful, simple and functional.
Anyway, an interesting thread. One I'll check back on. Wonder if there's an RSS feed for it...
Newsblur shows promise. According to his get satisfaction site he's going to implement offline caching once the impact from GR shutting down calms down.
I spent the larger part of yesterday to find an alternative. None works as well as NewsRob... Sad....
You'd need to set up an account with feedly, but then would use Newsrob on your phone. I can't use Feedly on my work computer as we're blocked from installing extensions, and feedly doesn't work as just a page.
For me the big win about GR was the combination of mobile and desktop app, with the state syncing between both. So feedly wouldn't cut it because even if I could use it at work, I can't stand the UI.
Newsblur seems excellent from a UI perspective, and very much like an improved GR. If either of the existing mobile apps supported offline I'd be happy, but if Newsrob could support its api that'd be awesome too. Plus he has a sensible paid model ($1/month) so it's likely to be around for a while.
--
Sam Clay, who develops newsblur, bumped it to $2 temporarily to slow down new registrations while he upgrades his server infrastructure to deal with the enormous influx after the Google announcement. He tweeted that it'll drop down again once he's got things under control (it's already a ton faster).
The app and the site are both open source and there are two apps already. There's no reason why there can't be 3 or more (think how many GR clients there are....).
Oh, and check newsblur out if you haven't. It's like reader, but in the 20th century. ;-)
On Mar 17, 2013 2:44 PM, "Mariano Kamp" <marian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was surprised to see Google shut down Reader. It was clear over the last years that it didn't get much love anymore, but I thought that Google had deep enough pockets to keep on humoring this particular audience. Alas this is not the case.
The Reader userbase has a lot of "influencer" users. They're not as visible as bloggers or Twitterers, but focusing on the 1 or 100 in the 1:100:10,000 can be misleading.
My lingering question is whether this is a "strategic" decision for Google rather than strictly financial.
> It made me think about my relationship with Google. When I started working on NewsRob at the end of 2008 I was a Google fanboy and was under the impression that they could do no wrong. Meanwhile I still have the highest respect for Google, but see them in a more realistic light.
One unexpected place their sharp turn has taken them is increased recruiting costs. Some of the people they'd like to have working for them are not purely responsive to cash (they can be comfortable a lot of places) and hard-to-quantify halo effects already in play for influencers are unusually clear if you talk to these people.
But I don't have a 767 in my garage, so I don't have the extrinsic credibility on assessing relative value and cost.
The response curve is pretty discontinuous though. Apple banning apps written in Flash (but not similar ones in Lua) was a last straw for me: they made up a bunch of technical BS to explain why they were not acting in my interest. Adobe had accumulated vast empires of bad karma, but iOS went into the same "so many bastards, so little time" pile.
Anyway, Newsrob (despite its lack of page up/down keys...) is a huge percentage of my screen time, far more than Google Reader itself. I agree that the IE effect was in play, but until sharing was nuked, I had little to complain about. Gonna be interesting. An old cliche is that there are no good USENET readers because all the people who really understand the problem space are too busy reading news to actually implement anything.... :-)
Sorry, busy at my day job, so it will take until the weekend for me to be able to say something more detailed.The short version is this:This is news to me. I need time to reflect on it.This may be the end of NewsRob, but not the end of RSS. Google didn't do such a good job with GR over the last years, but took all the air out of the RSS space, so maybe now something better will grow.I also have had no time to think about how I personally would want to deal with keeping up with updates in the future. Google+/Facebook/Twitter didn't work efficiently for me in the past.Maybe it is not the end of NewsRob. As Jesse mentioned Feedly may offer an alternative backend, maybe others will step up too. I will look into that.The three month period is a joke, but still it means that there is no need to make a decision today.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 7:23 AM, <jesse...@gmail.com> wrote:
http://blog.feedly.com/2013/03/14/google-reader/
Here's the best alternative that I've found thus far. They seem to be willing to take on a lot by promising seamless transition with their newly announced Normandy API. Willing to work with 3rd parties as well. Hopefully NR can adapt for this.
--
How would a self-hosted platform make any sense for Mariano to build support for? The number of people who'd self-host would be tiny.
As mentioned above I already sent them a mail a couple of hours ago.
But I think it'll take some time for them to come up with the details. I am sure they have other concerns at the moment. Google's decision sent a lot of attention and new users their way.
Written on a mobile device
On Mar 14, 2013 5:58 PM, "Peter Riocreux" <peter.r...@cakes.org.uk> wrote:There is reason to hope they will let 3p apps access it, on <http://blog.feedly.com/2013/03/14/google-reader/> they say:
"Note 2: if you are a third party developer using the Google Reader API and would like to integrate with Normandy, please send an email to re...@feedly.com. We would love to keep the Google Reader ecosystem alive."
On 14 March 2013 15:58, Mariano Kamp <marian...@gmail.com> wrote:
I already sent them a mail. We'll see.
If the API is compatible it would mean I need to only change the API end points, i.e. the URLs. Then there would still be the testing to do. Still depending on the test results that could be kind of minimal.
It would also mean that all end points need to be available that NewsRob uses, including authentication. Otherwise the adaption probably wouldn't be that minimal.
Written on a mobile device
On Mar 14, 2013 4:27 PM, "Mark Otway" <ma...@otway.com> wrote:Well, I think "minimal" is questionable. Firstly, does feedly even intend to make their Normandy api available for non feedly clients? And if so, migrating may be non trivial, depending on how decoupled the Newsrob code is from the APIs.
On 14 Mar 2013 15:14, "Oliver Kötter" <oliver....@gmail.com> wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 14. März 2013 07:23:22 UTC+1 schrieb jesse...@gmail.com:http://blog.feedly.com/2013/03/14/google-reader/Here's the best alternative that I've found thus far. They seem to be willing to take on a lot by promising seamless transition with their newly announced Normandy API. Willing to work with 3rd parties as well. Hopefully NR can adapt for this.
I also would like the Normandy API from feedly implemented. This should be compatible to the Google API already implemented into NewsRob, so I guess this would please many of use while Mariano has minimal work to do.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NewsRob User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to newsrob+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to new...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/newsrob?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NewsRob User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to newsrob+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to new...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/newsrob?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NewsRob User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to newsrob+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to new...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/newsrob?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
So, how do folks here feel about Google's announcement of shuttering Google Reader on July 1, 2013? I for one am pretty bummed - GR has been a very convenient way for me to keep up on information at my pace.
I recently read on the fougrapi mailing list that there will another party besides feedly to work on a compatible service. I am offline at the moment, so will post a link late.
Btw. I also find Nick's post interesting (and sobering): http://nick.typepad.com/blog/2013/03/my-plan-for-feeddemon.html
Written on a mobile device
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NewsRob User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to newsrob+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to new...@googlegroups.com.
I will be happy to test it for you :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NewsRob User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to newsrob+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to new...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/newsrob?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Mariano-
Fyi, I'm getting a bunch of freezing and I'm having to force close with the new version. I'll try to do a debug to catch it later tomorrow for you. It seems to be happening when first entering the app or when I refresh the content and once on starring an item in the feed list.
I'm in a Verizon Galaxy Nexus with 4.2.2. if anyone else is curious.
Cori
The latter parameter is implemented from NewsRob 4.8.9-5 on. Not available in the Android Market. Instead you can grab it here: newsrob489 5.apk | newsrobapp
tt-rss looks to have a great/simple web interface, someone just needs
to create a google reader API plugin that maps to what Newsrob
expects.
Had to revert to -4 . Kept freezing after the first sync on exact syncing and I had to force close.
Consuming (and syncing) RSS feeds is a huge part of my daily life. So far I don't see any way to replace the GR/NR combo and I'm really afraid for the future.. I'd be glad to pay and I'd be glad to clean up your code.. I'm sure there are many many others!
Mariano, the code may be ugly but guess what? It works! And there are a ton of users (me included) who love and depend on this app. I really think you should just spend an hour and put the whole thing up on github and let the open source community fork it and play with it and clean it up. Add a donation page and let your baby go out into the world and grow.
Consuming (and syncing) RSS feeds is a huge part of my daily life. So far I don't see any way to replace the GR/NR combo and I'm really afraid for the future.. I'd be glad to pay and I'd be glad to clean up your code.. I'm sure there are many many others!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NewsRob User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to newsrob+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to new...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/newsrob?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
My ideal scenario would be for the offline, Tasker and instapaper features of Newsrob to be integrated into Newsblur.....
Yeah. We need somebody to take Newsrob's offline feature-set and drop it into the Newsblur (opensource) client. RSS nirvana awaits.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NewsRob User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to newsrob+u...@googlegroups.com.
Here's another crazy idea: how about a Kickstarter (or similar crowdfunding platform) for a limited development sprint with specific goals? Maybe in the $5k-$10k range. I don't actually think that people would be willing to invest this much to keep NR going, but let's make them (us) prove it.
I would be interested in putting that development time in for a good deal. That is, if you're willing to share your code with at least one more person, or maybe just some modules of it – while keeping full ownership of any new code, of course. Basically, the idea is that you'd get an externally funded developer on the project.
--
So what's the intended back end that you guys would target? Please don't pick Feedly. Anything else I don't mind, but where I work we are quite locked down (financial institution) which means we can't install 3td party browser extensions. So feedly is dead to me until they can provide a Web viewer.
Of course perhaps the best solution would be to abstract out the API, and have plugins for different back ends, so Newsrob could work with Feedly, Newsblur or anything else (and people could write their own plugins for 3rd party services). That would be an awesome model (although admittedly more complex up front). :-)