About Elisabeth Cardis (Interphone study) Conflict of Interest in the past and now?
http://www.nirs.org/mononline/appendixinbeirletter1.htm
Imbalance and Conflict-of-Interest
in BEIR VII Phase 2 Committee Membership
............
ELISABETH
CARDIS. Dr. Cardis is the lead author of one of the studies most
frequently cited by the nuclear industry as supposed support for its
claim that low-dose radiation risks are overstated. The pooled study
has been widely criticized for combining non-comparable data sets and
a number of other methodological problems, including diluting
positive findings for particular cancers from one facility with data
from facilities with different cancers due to different radiation
exposure pathways. However, none of the critics of the Cardis et al.
study have been permitted on the panel, while two of her co-authors
(Gilbert and Howe) are on it. The IARC study combined data from 7
nuclear facilities in three countries despite the paper by Kneale and
Stewart which showed that even Hanford and Oak Ridge data are not
compatible. (Kneale & Stewart, "Factors affecting
recognition of cancer risks of nuclear workers", Occup
& Environ Med 1995,52, 515-523.) Cardis and two
co-authors of the study are on the panel, but Kneale and Stewart are
not. Furthermore, no scientists who studies have reached contrary
conclusions have permitted on the panel. It is hard to see how a
panel can be considered balanced when three authors of a single study
widely pointed to by the nuclear industry will be judging the
implications and validity of their own work as well as that of
scientists who have reached contrary conclusions, while the critics
of the Cardis et al. study and the experts whose research found
strong radiation effects are
excluded.
________________________________________________________________________
From:
pedro belmonte espejo
Date: Friday, March 20, 2009 1:27
pm
Subject: two new questions to Elisabeth Cardis
Dear
Dr. Elisabeth Cardis:
I am very
grateful to you for the e-mail responding to my question about the
Interphone study. Thank you very much. Please, let me ask you two new
questions:
What do you mean by a short period of time for delivery of the manuscript of the international analyses for publication? (a month, a year?).
You are a member of the so-called Spanish Comité Cientifico Asesor sobre Radiofrecuencias (Scientific Advisory Committee on Radiofrequencies) http://www.ccars.es/composicion.htm , a group that refuses that public exposure to RF and microwave has not biological effects. Some of its members have been experts of the mobile operators trials emission antenna.
Do you not think that being a member of this group can not be a true bias or conflict of interest in its work of coordination in the Interpone study?
Best regards
Pedro
Belmonte
ELF Committee
ECOLOGISTAS EN ACCIÓN
From Mast Sanity/Mast Network
[ http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Elisabeth+Cardis
http://omega.twoday.net/search?q=Interphone ]