CNN kicked to the curb
Compact Adolescent
Compact Adolescent
whofan
>
> http://www.breitbart.tv/go-home-dc-crowd-drowns-out-cnn-reporter-during-live-report/
>
That is GREAT!!!! Love the "GLEN BECK" "GLEN BECK" chants!!!!!
Hey Obama: YOU LIE!!!!!
Freestyle
> Compact Adolescent wrote:
>
> >http://www.breitbart.tv/go-home-dc-crowd-drowns-out-cnn-reporter-duri...
>
> That is GREAT!!!! Love the "GLEN BECK" "GLEN BECK" chants!!!!!
>
> Hey Obama: YOU LIE!!!!!
whofan
The *only* question remaining is....will Bill O'Reilly be able to
maintain his ratings lead over the amazing Glen Beck????
It is really stunning to watch Glen Beck go from relative obscurity to
an overnight sensation since joining Fox News!!!!!!
The BEST part of all is he's got the loony left acting absolutely
*INSANE* with rage!!!!
And just like the demmies could never defeat GW Bush in an election, the
loony left will NEVER be able to best Glen Beck!!!!! For he *OWNS* the
liberals, and was able to bring down one of Obama's czars - Van Jones
single handedly!!!!!
Ya just gotta LUVIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Compact Adolescent
"Freestyle" <bris...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8dcaf0a1-eca8-4fbe...@t13g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMJG6lvnz3Y
Freestyle
> "Freestyle" <brist...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8dcaf0a1-eca8-4fbe...@t13g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Sep 12, 10:39 pm, whofan <dgbre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Compact Adolescent wrote:
>
> >> >http://www.breitbart.tv/go-home-dc-crowd-drowns-out-cnn-reporter-duri...
>
> >> That is GREAT!!!! Love the "GLEN BECK" "GLEN BECK" chants!!!!!
>
> >> Hey Obama: YOU LIE!!!!!
>
>
> >http://s217.photobucket.com/albums/cc83/TomCat1948or2/Blog%202009/Act...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMJG6lvnz3Y
You should keep the video camera away from your mom.
She's not very photogenic.
Compact Adolescent
"Freestyle" <bris...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0f49c374-42da-4523...@j4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
That's your wife.
Too_Many_Tools
>
> - Show quoted text -
That's not his mom...that Teeny Weenie himself.
Is that a teabag hanging from his mouth?
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> "Freestyle" <brist...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:0f49c374-42da-4523...@j4g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 13, 12:39 am, "Compact Adolescent" <not_...@bright.duh> wrote:
> >> "Freestyle" <brist...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:8dcaf0a1-eca8-4fbe...@t13g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Sep 12, 10:39 pm, whofan <dgbre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Compact Adolescent wrote:
>
> >> >> >http://www.breitbart.tv/go-home-dc-crowd-drowns-out-cnn-reporter-duri...
>
> >> >> That is GREAT!!!! Love the "GLEN BECK" "GLEN BECK" chants!!!!!
>
> >> >> Hey Obama: YOU LIE!!!!!
>
> >> >http://s217.photobucket.com/albums/cc83/TomCat1948or2/Blog%202009/Act...
>
> >> >http://s217.photobucket.com/albums/cc83/TomCat1948or2/Blog%202009/Act...
>
> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMJG6lvnz3Y
>
> > You should keep the video camera away from your mom.
> > She's not very photogenic.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
How would you know?
I mean with her clothes on.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> Freestyle wrote:
> > On Sep 12, 10:39 pm, whofan <dgbre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Compact Adolescent wrote:
>
> >>>http://www.breitbart.tv/go-home-dc-crowd-drowns-out-cnn-reporter-duri...
> >> That is GREAT!!!! Love the "GLEN BECK" "GLEN BECK" chants!!!!!
>
> >> Hey Obama: YOU LIE!!!!!
>
>
> >http://s217.photobucket.com/albums/cc83/TomCat1948or2/Blog%202009/Act...
>
> The *only* question remaining is....will Bill O'Reilly be able to
> maintain his ratings lead over the amazing Glen Beck????
>
> It is really stunning to watch Glen Beck go from relative obscurity to
> an overnight sensation since joining Fox News!!!!!!
>
> The BEST part of all is he's got the loony left acting absolutely
> *INSANE* with rage!!!!
>
> And just like the demmies could never defeat GW Bush in an election, the
> loony left will NEVER be able to best Glen Beck!!!!! For he *OWNS* the
> liberals, and was able to bring down one of Obama's czars - Van Jones
> single handedly!!!!!
>
> Ya just gotta LUVIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe Beck should run for President?
Beck/Palin for 2012.
Laugh...laugh...laugh...
TMT
whofan
Come on Free....a "your mama" joke????? For crissakes :^D
Sorry, that video represented the typical Obama voter. I was expecting
to hear her state it was all a joke...but it looks like the pathetic
liberal in the video was serious.
Gunner Asch
<not...@bright.duh> wrote:
>http://www.breitbart.tv/go-home-dc-crowd-drowns-out-cnn-reporter-during-live-report/
http://www.breitbart.tv/how-big-was-the-crowd-time-lapse-video-shows-magnitude-of-the-rally/
Gunner
The current Democratic party has lost its ideological basis for
existence.
- It is NOT fiscally responsible.
- It is NOT ethically honorable.
- It has started wars based on lies.
- It does not support the well-being of americans - only billionaires.
- It has suppresed constitutional guaranteed liberties.
- It has foisted a liar as president upon America.
- It has violated US national sovereignty in trade treaties.
- It has refused to enforce the national borders.
...It no longer has valid reasons to exist.
Lorad474
Buerste
"Too_Many_Tools" <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0864c347-7e01-4a68...@o9g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
Beck/Palin for 2012.
Laugh...laugh...laugh...
TMT
************************
It doesn't matter who the Republicans run in 2012, they will win by a
landslide.
Curly Surmudgeon
How much $$$ are you willing to wager on that prediction?
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Republican Family Values == Fuck anything that moves
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Omega
> http://www.breitbart.tv/go-home-dc-crowd-drowns-out-cnn-reporter-duri...
I thought that you were talking about how CNN screwed the pooch over
the Coast Guard training exercise.
CNN Jumps the Gun on Coast Guard Story
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/11/AR2009091103842.html?hpid=topnews
No Bammer
It would be a hell of a lot better than what we have now.
Buerste
"Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.09...@live.com...
More than you got, I have a job...no cheese-checks!
Compact Adolescent
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:90lqa5hcqq4riiqmq...@4ax.com...
> Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
>
>>The current Democratic party has lost its ideological basis for
>>existence.
>>- It is NOT fiscally responsible.
>>- It is NOT ethically honorable.
>>- It has started wars based on lies.
>>- It does not support the well-being of americans - only billionaires.
>>- It has suppresed constitutional guaranteed liberties.
>>- It has foisted a liar as president upon America.
>>- It has violated US national sovereignty in trade treaties.
>>- It has refused to enforce the national borders.
>
> Bush was a Democrat? I didn't know.
Loony lib alert!
HH&C
> "Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> wrote in message
>
> news:pan.2009.09...@live.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:54:44 -0400, "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com> wrote:
>
> >> "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > Republican Family Values == Fuck anything that moves
>
> More than you got, I have a job...no cheese-checks!
Wonder how Smudge's short sell/house flipping scams are doing?
HH&C
> Gunner Asch <gun...@NOSPAMlightspeed.net> wrote:
> >The current Democratic party has lost its ideological basis for
> >existence.
> >- It is NOT fiscally responsible.
> >- It is NOT ethically honorable.
> >- It has started wars based on lies.
> >- It does not support the well-being of americans - only billionaires.
> >- It has suppresed constitutional guaranteed liberties.
> >- It has foisted a liar as president upon America.
> >- It has violated US national sovereignty in trade treaties.
> >- It has refused to enforce the national borders.
>
Let me help you out there, Winston. GW Bush is a Republican.
Curly Surmudgeon
Let's document this, sign a legally binding contract and put the cash in
escrow. Winner take all.
What is your definition of "landslide"? And a Republican must win the
Presidency to boot. Not a Democratic "landslide" or a third party
"landslide" but a clear "landslide" for a Republican winning the White
House in 2012.
Typically a "landslide is 378 (70%) electoral votes.
To recap, let's agree on terms then see how much cash you're willing to
wager.
Omega
wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:06:29 -0400, "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com> wrote:
> > "Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> wrote in message
> >news:pan.2009.09...@live.com...
> >> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:54:44 -0400, "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> > More than you got, I have a job...no cheese-checks!
>
> Let's document this, sign a legally binding contract and put the cash in
> escrow. Winner take all.
>
> What is your definition of "landslide"? And a Republican must win the
> Presidency to boot. Not a Democratic "landslide" or a third party
> "landslide" but a clear "landslide" for a Republican winning the White
> House in 2012.
>
> Typically a "landslide is 378 (70%) electoral votes.
>
> To recap, let's agree on terms then see how much cash you're willing to
> wager.
>
> --
> Regards, Curly
No, a landslide is 60% of the popular vote. LBJ had that. Even
Reagan had a huge popular vote.
Compact Adolescent
> Republican Family Values == Fuck my crazymother
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody is interested in your pesos.
Compact Adolescent
"HH&C" <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:67e2a9dc-f1e5-4b94...@s15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
Yes, Winton does need help :-)
Buerste
I never knew a "landslide" was ever quantified. However, for a straight
"WIN" I can wager $25k. Contact your lawyer, the money will be put into an
interest bearing account and the winner will take only the principle and his
portion of the interest. That's the usual procedure.
Jim Stewart
>
> http://www.breitbart.tv/go-home-dc-crowd-drowns-out-cnn-reporter-during-live-report/
Nothing an Electrovoice 635A microphone wouldn't
have fixed. No way an ENG crew should have deployed
without one in the truck.
Curly Surmudgeon
"Landslide" is a subjective term however it is the term which you used:
"It doesn't matter who the Republicans run in 2012, they will win by
> a landslide."
I am taking you up on that claim so by all means let us quantify your
terms.
> However, for a straight "WIN" I can wager $25k.
Let's make this worthwhile, add a zero. Or two.
> Contact your lawyer,
> the money will be put into an interest bearing account and the winner
> will take only the principle and his portion of the interest. That's
> the usual procedure.
I neither need nor want a lyingscumbag lawyer. Contact my banker,
William Voros, at the Magyar Nemzeti Bank. Bill speaks pretty good
English and excellent German. He will give you the routing numbers once
we have a signed, notarized, agreement.
Now, back to your claim of a Republican "landslide" in 2012. The usual
threshold is a 2/3rds win of electoral votes, 2*540/3 rounding up.
Curly Surmudgeon
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/landslide
land⋅slide
/ˈlændˌslaɪd/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [land-slahyd] Show IPA noun,
verb, -slid, -slid or -slid⋅den, -slid⋅ing.
Use landslide in a Sentence
See web results for landslide
See images of landslide
–noun
1. the downward falling or sliding of a mass of soil, detritus, or
rock on or from a steep slope.
2. the mass itself.
3. an election in which a particular victorious candidate or party
receives an overwhelming mass or majority of votes: the 1936 landslide
for Roosevelt.
4. any overwhelming victory: She won the contest by a landslide.
–verb (used without object)
5. to come down in or as in a landslide.
6. to win an election by an overwhelming majority.
As you see, the term is subjective. I want to find out just how certain
Buerste is of his claim. First we need to define the threshold of
"landslide." (clue: it is far from a simple majority) Then how much of
the riches he claims to have that he will risk.
I am normally not a betting man as I require excellent odds and payback.
The claim that Republicans will win 2012 in a landslide is so
preposterous that the odds are sufficient to overcome my reticence.
Let the dance begin...
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Republican Family Values == Fuck anything that moves
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buerste
"Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote in message
<snip>
> Let's make this worthwhile, add a zero. Or two.
>
>> Contact your lawyer,
>> the money will be put into an interest bearing account and the winner
>> will take only the principle and his portion of the interest. That's
>> the usual procedure.
>
> I neither need nor want a lyingscumbag lawyer. Contact my banker,
> William Voros, at the Magyar Nemzeti Bank. Bill speaks pretty good
> English and excellent German. He will give you the routing numbers once
> we have a signed, notarized, agreement.
>
> Now, back to your claim of a Republican "landslide" in 2012. The usual
> threshold is a 2/3rds win of electoral votes, 2*540/3 rounding up.
>
> --
> Regards, Curly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Republican Family Values == Fuck anything that moves
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe you can access that much cash or afford to wager it. I
doubt you can raise 1% of that. However, I'll call your bluff. Send me
proof, a SS# or a D&B# will do for a quick check by the company that does my
rating work for my company. In return, I'll send my D&B. (I'm worth
millions yet I don't have access to 1/4mil, so I know you're full of it)
Otherwise, apologize for wasting my time and making yourself look foolish.
Nice trying to avoid lawyers, like anybody would trust you without an
irrevocable contract...not for $25!
Curly Surmudgeon
The dance begins.
Whether I can raise that amount or not isn't relevant. Yet. Nor has my
net worth been mentioned online. Nor will it be. Nor do I brag on
usenet about my net worth. Money has no relationship to the value of a
claim.
Let us first reach consensus on what is a "landslide." Then execute a
contract. I'll even allow you to recover your funds if not matched in
some reasonable time period.
But you aren't going to escape by misdirection. Your claim was"
"It doesn't matter who the Republicans run in 2012, they will win by a
landslide."
Let's see if you are willing to back up your ludicrous claims.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Jesus Would Vote Republican
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buerste
Since you're so confident you should offer odds.
Curly Surmudgeon
> Since you're so confident you should offer odds.
Still unwilling to backup your claims?
Keep dancing.
Strabo
Yeah. Put all the bets in a can and tell me where it is and I'll hold it
for you.
Strabo
I detect a whiff of BS!
Buerste
"Strabo" <str...@flashlight.net> wrote in message
news:iETrm.180010$O23....@newsfe11.iad...
You detect Curly backpedaling like a banshee.
HH&C
wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:50:23 -0400, "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com> wrote:
> > "Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> wrote in message
> >news:pan.2009.09...@live.com...> >>> "Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:pan.2009.09...@live.com...
> >>>> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:54:44 -0400, "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com>
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Too_Many_Tools" <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> >>> More than you got, I have a job...no cheese-checks!
>
> >> Let's document this, sign a legally binding contract and put the cash
> >> in escrow. Winner take all.
>
> >> What is your definition of "landslide"? And a Republican must win the
> >> Presidency to boot. Not a Democratic "landslide" or a third party
> >> "landslide" but a clear "landslide" for a Republican winning the White
> >> House in 2012.
>
> >> Typically a "landslide is 378 (70%) electoral votes.
>
> >> To recap, let's agree on terms then see how much cash you're willing to
> >> wager.
>
> >> --
> >> Regards, Curly
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> > I never knew a "landslide" was ever quantified.
>
> "Landslide" is a subjective term however it is the term which you used:
>
> "It doesn't matter who the Republicans run in 2012, they will win by
>
> > a landslide."
>
> I am taking you up on that claim so by all means let us quantify your
> terms.
>
> > However, for a straight "WIN" I can wager $25k.
>
> Let's make this worthwhile, add a zero. Or two.
>
> > Contact your lawyer,
> > the money will be put into an interest bearing account and the winner
> > will take only the principle and his portion of the interest. That's
> > the usual procedure.
>
> I neither need nor want a lyingscumbag lawyer. Contact my banker,
> William Voros, at the Magyar Nemzeti Bank. Bill speaks pretty good
> English and excellent German. He will give you the routing numbers once
> we have a signed, notarized, agreement.
You don't use the nugan hand bank? Thought you were on a list?
> Now, back to your claim of a Republican "landslide" in 2012. The usual
> threshold is a 2/3rds win of electoral votes, 2*540/3 rounding up.
>
> --
> Regards, Curly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Republican Family Values == Take Your Kid To A TEA Party
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HH&C
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:53:52 -0400, "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com> wrote:
> > "Curly Surmudgeon" <CurlySurmudg...@live.com> wrote in message
>
> > <snip>
> >> Let's make this worthwhile, add a zero. Or two.
>
> >>> Contact your lawyer,
> >>> the money will be put into an interest bearing account and the winner
> >>> will take only the principle and his portion of the interest. That's
> >>> the usual procedure.
>
> >> I neither need nor want a lyingscumbag lawyer. Contact my banker,
> >> William Voros, at the Magyar Nemzeti Bank. Bill speaks pretty good
> >> English and excellent German. He will give you the routing numbers
> >> once we have a signed, notarized, agreement.
>
> >> Now, back to your claim of a Republican "landslide" in 2012. The usual
> >> threshold is a 2/3rds win of electoral votes, 2*540/3 rounding up.
>
> >> --
> >> Regards, Curly
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> > I don't believe you can access that much cash or afford to wager it. I
> > doubt you can raise 1% of that. However, I'll call your bluff. Send me
> > proof, a SS# or a D&B# will do for a quick check by the company that
> > does my rating work for my company. In return, I'll send my D&B. (I'm
> > worth millions yet I don't have access to 1/4mil, so I know you're full
> > of it) Otherwise, apologize for wasting my time and making yourself look
> > foolish.
>
> > Nice trying to avoid lawyers, like anybody would trust you without an
> > irrevocable contract...not for $25!
>
> The dance begins.
>
> Whether I can raise that amount or not isn't relevant. Yet. Nor has my
> net worth been mentioned online. Nor will it be. Nor do I brag on
> usenet about my net worth. Money has no relationship to the value of a
> claim.
You bought a ratty place in Argentina so you could pay $8.00 for a
dental cleaning.
> Let us first reach consensus on what is a "landslide." Then execute a
> contract. I'll even allow you to recover your funds if not matched in
> some reasonable time period.
>
> But you aren't going to escape by misdirection. Your claim was"
>
> "It doesn't matter who the Republicans run in 2012, they will win by a
> landslide."
>
> Let's see if you are willing to back up your ludicrous claims.
>
> --
> Regards, Curly
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Like Jesus Would Vote Republican
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
HH&C
>
> >> <snip>
> >>> Let's make this worthwhile, add a zero. Or two.
>
> >>>> Contact your lawyer,
> >>>> the money will be put into an interest bearing account and the winner
> >>>> will take only the principle and his portion of the interest. That's
> >>>> the usual procedure.
> >>> I neither need nor want a lyingscumbag lawyer. Contact my banker,
> >>> William Voros, at the Magyar Nemzeti Bank. Bill speaks pretty good
> >>> English and excellent German. He will give you the routing numbers
> >>> once we have a signed, notarized, agreement.
>
> >>> Now, back to your claim of a Republican "landslide" in 2012. The usual
> >>> threshold is a 2/3rds win of electoral votes, 2*540/3 rounding up.
>
> >>> --
> >>> Regards, Curly
>
> >>> Republican Family Values == Fuck anything that moves
>
> >> I don't believe you can access that much cash or afford to wager it. I
> >> doubt you can raise 1% of that. However, I'll call your bluff. Send me
> >> proof, a SS# or a D&B# will do for a quick check by the company that
> >> does my rating work for my company. In return, I'll send my D&B. (I'm
> >> worth millions yet I don't have access to 1/4mil, so I know you're full
> >> of it) Otherwise, apologize for wasting my time and making yourself look
> >> foolish.
>
> >> Nice trying to avoid lawyers, like anybody would trust you without an
> >> irrevocable contract...not for $25!
>
> > The dance begins.
>
> > Whether I can raise that amount or not isn't relevant. Yet. Nor has my
> > net worth been mentioned online. Nor will it be. Nor do I brag on
> > usenet about my net worth. Money has no relationship to the value of a
> > claim.
>
> > Let us first reach consensus on what is a "landslide." Then execute a
> > contract. I'll even allow you to recover your funds if not matched in
> > some reasonable time period.
>
> > But you aren't going to escape by misdirection. Your claim was"
>
> > "It doesn't matter who the Republicans run in 2012, they will win by a
> > landslide."
>
> > Let's see if you are willing to back up your ludicrous claims.
>
> I detect a whiff of BS!
That would be Smudge.
Curly Surmudgeon
You're dancing. And avoiding any substantiation of your claim that
Republicans will win in a "landslide" in 2012. Republicans have been
widely discredited for just such utterances.
I've given you my definition and you've already backpedaled to a
"straight win." This is the common pattern of Republicans, make
outlandish claims (often knowingly false) then, when challenged,
backpedal, move the goal post, reverse reality, hurl invective, misdirect
and finally call the challenger some derogative.
Republicans are _not_ going to win the presidency in any form of a
"landslide" in 2012.
Buerste
As long as the Democrats lose...a safe bet!
HH&C
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:04:13 -0700 (PDT), "HH&C"
> And Gunner gave that list to prove the Ds had lost their basis for
> existence. Go figure. Huh?-
So you've got your own list, huh?
Curly Surmudgeon
Lowering the bar for your claim even further...
Keep dancing.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lincoln Would Be Ashamed of Today's Republicans
------------------------------------------------------------------------------