Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

How do you measure a programmer's performance?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

L

unread,
Oct 3, 1995, 3:00:00 AM10/3/95
to
What criteria can be used to measure the performance of corporate IS
personnel?

What is a productive programmer?


Ken Lee

unread,
Oct 4, 1995, 3:00:00 AM10/4/95
to
In article <95100414...@greatesc.com>, marty....@greatesc.com (Marty

Tabnik) writes:
|> What is a productive programmer?
|>
|> I've been looking since '75.
|> In a recent discussion on the Y2K mailing list, we all agreed
|> There are NO OBJECTIVE STANDARDS.
|>
|> (If you find any, let us all know, huh? <G>)

On a day-to-day basis, I agree that there is no good metric.
On a year-to-year basis, however, there is a very good metric:
productive programmers ship high quality products on time and on
budget.

Yes, programming is generally a team effort, so the above metric
is more easily applied to teams. Still, the members of the team
will know who is pulling their weight and who isn't.

--
Ken Lee, ken...@rahul.net, http://www.rahul.net/kenton/

Marty Tabnik

unread,
Oct 4, 1995, 3:00:00 AM10/4/95
to

L> Message-ID: <44ra30$o...@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com>

L> What criteria can be used to measure the performance of corporate
L> IS personnel? What is a productive programmer?

I've been looking since '75.
In a recent discussion on the Y2K mailing list, we all agreed
There are NO OBJECTIVE STANDARDS.

(If you find any, let us all know, huh? <G>)

---
* SLMR 2.1a * I'm sorry but all my money is tied up in cash.

Dimitri I. Rakitine

unread,
Oct 5, 1995, 3:00:00 AM10/5/95
to
Ken Lee (ken...@rahul.net) wrote:
: In article <95100414...@greatesc.com>, marty....@greatesc.com (Marty
: Tabnik) writes:
: |> What is a productive programmer?

: |>
: |> I've been looking since '75.
: |> In a recent discussion on the Y2K mailing list, we all agreed
: |> There are NO OBJECTIVE STANDARDS.
: |>
: |> (If you find any, let us all know, huh? <G>)

: On a day-to-day basis, I agree that there is no good metric.


: On a year-to-year basis, however, there is a very good metric:
: productive programmers ship high quality products on time and on
: budget.

: Yes, programming is generally a team effort, so the above metric
: is more easily applied to teams. Still, the members of the team
: will know who is pulling their weight and who isn't.

So, does that mean that you should be smart enough to bail out
if something goes wrong ? ;-)

Dimitri


Marty Tabnik

unread,
Oct 6, 1995, 3:00:00 AM10/6/95
to

KL> Message-ID: <44v3vo$9...@murrow.corp.sgi.com>
KL> References: <44ra30$o...@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> <9510041430243570@greatesc.c

KL> In article <95100414...@greatesc.com>, marty....@greatesc.com (Mart
KL> Tabnik) writes:
KL> |> What is a productive programmer?
KL> |>
KL> |> I've been looking since '75.
KL> |> In a recent discussion on the Y2K mailing list, we all agreed
KL> |> There are NO OBJECTIVE STANDARDS.
KL> |>
KL> |> (If you find any, let us all know, huh? <G>)

KL> On a day-to-day basis, I agree that there is no good metric.
KL> On a year-to-year basis, however, there is a very good metric:
KL> productive programmers ship high quality products on time and on
KL> budget.

That is neither an objective nor a quantifiable metric. {sigh}


KL> Yes, programming is generally a team effort, so the above metric
KL> is more easily applied to teams.

Most of the best programmers I've know have been soloists.
[Although a team is good for the occasional walk-thru.]


KL> Still, the members of the team will know who is
KL> pulling their weight and who isn't.

Alas, politics enters here.
Besides, this "metric" is also subjective.
---
* SLMR 2.1a * CLINTON.SYS corrupted.... run NEWT.EXE to fix? y

Monika Weikel

unread,
Oct 6, 1995, 3:00:00 AM10/6/95
to
If a programmer write a peice of code that makes me angry, he is a bad
programmer.
If a programmer does the impossible in record time, he is a good programmer.

Harold Stevens

unread,
Oct 7, 1995, 3:00:00 AM10/7/95
to

Are you for real, or did a joker with Sanitation shanghai your toy
while you were out to lunch? As a programmer myself, thank God you
don't review my work or perhaps a visit in your "Health-Care Tech.
Group". You don't have anything to do with nuclear power plants or
Shuttle launches, I sincerely hope. Please, tell me this is just a
troll from the Dilbert Zone.

Regards, Weird

Tom Higgins

unread,
Oct 7, 1995, 3:00:00 AM10/7/95
to
In article 2...@mksrv1.dseg.ti.com, ste...@adamcsc.ti.com (Harold Stevens) writes:
->In article <6180...@MVB.SAIC.COM>, Wei...@Fwva.Saic.Com (Monika Weikel) writes:
->|> If a programmer write a peice of code that makes me angry, he is a bad
->|> programmer.
->|> If a programmer does the impossible in record time, he is a good programmer.
->
->Are you for real, or did a joker with Sanitation shanghai your toy
->while you were out to lunch? As a programmer myself, thank God you
->don't review my work or perhaps a visit in your "Health-Care Tech.
->Group". You don't have anything to do with nuclear power plants or
->Shuttle launches, I sincerely hope. Please, tell me this is just a
->troll from the Dilbert Zone.
->
-> Regards, Weird
Harold, I afraid you have been at the terminal to long and you have
become humor impared. I have been a programmer/software engineer
since 1962 and saw the humor, so it isn't because your older or been
at the job to long.

---
!
! "Good things come to those who wait"
! Benjamin Franklin
! "Crap comes right away"
! TV shopping channel
!

Harold Stevens

unread,
Oct 9, 1995, 3:00:00 AM10/9/95
to
In article <456d3l$s...@tpd.dsccc.com>, thig...@imtn.dsccc.com (Tom Higgins) writes:

[Snip...]

|> Harold, I afraid you have been at the terminal to long and you have
|> become humor impared.

[Snip...]

God I hope so. Gotta laugh or shriek at something like this.

[Snip...]

Regards, Weird

0 new messages