Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

High CPU usage without any program running

39 views
Skip to first unread message

Navile

unread,
Apr 9, 2005, 4:39:03 AM4/9/05
to
I have an Athlon 64 3200+ CPU with 512 Mb RAM. Recently due to lot of spyware
problem I had to reload Windows (XP with SP2). Since that time I have
noticed that the CPU usage has increased substantially. Even if no program is
running the CPU usage does not go below 60 to 70%. Previously if there was no
program running the CPU usage would be generally close to 0%. The memory
usage seems normal. I have Spyware Doctor that runs regularly with latest
updates and I have VET anit virus that also gets updated regularly. Both
these programs do not identify any infection. Even when I disabled the
monitoring function in Spyware Doctor and VET, the CPU usage remains at 60 to
70%.

The problem with high CPU usage is that if there are many programs running
then the computer slows down. This never used to happen before.

I have reviewed the BIOS and CMOS setup but can't find anything there.

There is no RAID etc. running. The Process list shows System Idle process at
99%, but still the CPU usage is high.

Thanks in advance to anyone with a suggestion.

--Navile

Staiger

unread,
Apr 9, 2005, 9:31:54 AM4/9/05
to
Navile wrote:
> The Process list shows System Idle process at
> 99%, but still the CPU usage is high.

Now I'm confused. How are you measuring CPU usage other than using the
Task Manager?

Staiger

Bert Kinney

unread,
Apr 9, 2005, 7:55:26 PM4/9/05
to
Hi Navile,

I am not sure if this utility will run on a 64 bit processor, but it
is does it will show what it using up the cpu processes. Scroll to the
bottom of the page.
Process Explorer
http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/procexp.shtml

--
Regards,
Bert Kinney MS-MVP Shell/User
http://dts-l.org/

Navile

unread,
Apr 10, 2005, 3:41:02 AM4/10/05
to
I am using the Task Manager. But in Task Manager under Performance it shows
in the graph that CPU usage is 60 to 70%, but under Processes tab against
'System Idle Process' it shows 99%, which I understand as that the CPU should
be idle 99%.

--Navile

Navile

unread,
Apr 10, 2005, 4:05:02 AM4/10/05
to
Thanks for the tip, I will try it.

--Navile

Navile

unread,
Apr 10, 2005, 4:37:01 AM4/10/05
to
I used the Process Explorer. It showed that 'Hardware Interrupts' are
consuming the constant 60 to 70% of CPU time. I do not know how to further
identify which Hardware is doing what and how to fix it.

Can someone help please.

thanks in advance.

--Navile

Bert Kinney

unread,
Apr 10, 2005, 10:06:50 AM4/10/05
to
Hi,

You could start by removing any hardware attached to the system via
USB connection, and checking Process Explorer.

--
Regards,
Bert Kinney MS-MVP Shell/User
http://dts-l.org/


Navile wrote:
> I used the Process Explorer. It showed that 'Hardware
> Interrupts' are consuming the constant 60 to 70% of CPU
> time. I do not know how to further identify which
> Hardware is doing what and how to fix it.
>
> Can someone help please.

> "Navile" wrote:

Navile

unread,
Apr 12, 2005, 7:10:03 AM4/12/05
to
Dear Bert

I really appreciate you helping me patiently and thank you for that. I tried
to unplug all my USB devices, but that does not make any difference in the
CPU usage. I looked up the Properties of this Hardware Interrupt process in
the Process Explorer. Every item in the Property dialogue box, under every
Tab is either empty or says n/a. I tried to Suspend or Kill the process, but
it gives me an Error saying the parameter was incorrect.

Is there anything I could do or see in the Device Manager. Or is there any
way I can find the address of this Interrupt and then do something about it?

If nothing works, is the only way to clean the disk and reload everything (I
recently had to do that, and don't really want to do that again), or is there
anyway that I can only uninstall all hardware and install, without having to
touch the windows.

Any suggestions welcome.

Thanks again

--Navile

Bert Kinney

unread,
Apr 12, 2005, 3:14:27 PM4/12/05
to
Hi Navile,

The next step would be to start disabling each sub under "Universal
Serial Bus Controllers" one at a time, keeping an eye on Process
Explorer. If this has no effect on the CPU usage, reboot and check
again.

Pop

unread,
Apr 13, 2005, 8:40:32 AM4/13/05
to
Given: System worked, got infected, windows "reloaded", procesor usage
problem.
Question: What does "reloaded" mean? Format/install or just a reinstall?
Either is possible.
Comment: It'll save a lot of time to do a good backup and format/install of
XP at this point. WHEN YOU REINSTALL THE APPS FROM ORIGINAL CDs, do so one
at a time, restarting and checking each time for the problem. Unless you
Restore an infected file or app, the problem won't come back.
Cause: I suspect a file corruption that the "reload" didn't catch. Windows
creates a lot of its own files, and those are NOT reloaded unless you delete
them (as in format) and replace them.
If you already did a format/install, something was corrupted. At any
rate, doing it again is likely the fastest and most effieicnet way to fix
it.
OTOH, if you're the curious type, as am I, you're generally on the right
track, but I'd start with Device Manager and Add/Remove Software, doing
things one at a time. In Device Manager, remove and reboot to reinsall each
item, one at a time.

HTH,
Pop

--
Let someone else do it
I'm retired!
"Navile" <Nav...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6769D847-1CEC-4CA3...@microsoft.com...

Navile

unread,
Apr 16, 2005, 10:51:08 PM4/16/05
to
Your suggestion worked, Thanks very much. Although it was not one of the USB
controllers, it was "OHCI Compliant IEEE 1394 Host Controller" There is
another IEEE 1394 Host Controller, and that is OK, but this one was creating
the problem. I Disabled it. When I Uninstalled it, it came back again, but
with Disabling it is OK.

Thanks to all others who tried to help.

--Navile

Bert Kinney

unread,
Apr 17, 2005, 8:38:54 AM4/17/05
to
You're welcome Navile, and thanks for the feedback.
0 new messages