Can't get IE to display some website correctly
tshad
It seems to not be applying the css.
www.jquery.com looks fine at my office but at home it is just a bunch of
words with not styling at all.
I saw this in IE6 and then upgraded to IE7 and still have the same problem.
IE in both places are the same versions.
What could cause this to happen?
Other websites look fine.
Thanks,
Tom
![PA Bear [MS MVP]'s profile photo](http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a-/ALV-UjXsf05hH-R8XChS3fXPPzfoO8FYYxAKhT86KfPnIELr3QJ9tQ=s40-c)
PA Bear [MS MVP]
cf.
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jquery.com%2F&profile=css21&usermedium=all&warning=1&lang=en
--
IE-specific newsgroup:
news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Client - since 2002
www.banthecheck.com
tshad
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23rYrR$3XKHA...@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Guess again!
>
Not sure what you mean by that.
As far as IE-specific.
It doesn't seem to be specific to IE as Firefox on my system has the same
result.
Tom
Daave
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23rYrR$3XKHA...@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Guess again!
>>
> Not sure what you mean by that.
He probably meant that the hypothesis that CSS is not validated is
incorrect.
Still there are apparently 27 errors, which could explain why some
browsers are having problems with that page.
> As far as IE-specific.
>
> It doesn't seem to be specific to IE as Firefox on my system has the
> same result.
Very possibly the case because of the 27 errors.
PA Bear [MS MVP]
> Your pointing me to the website didn't help me at all. It just mentioned
> that there may have been lots of errors on the page.
There *are* /lots/ of CSS errors on the page: You need to correct them for I
to display the page correctly.
References/More Help:
Cascading Style Sheets (CSS)
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/ie/aa740476.aspx
Expression Web SuperPreview for Internet Explorer (free, stand-alone visual
debugging tool for IE6, IE7, and IE8)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=8e6ac106-525d-45d0-84db-dccff3fae677
Expression Web SuperPreview Release Notes
http://www.microsoft.com/expression/products/Web_SuperPreviewReleaseNotes.aspx
If you need further assistance, post here:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/category/iedevelopment/
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Client - since 2002
www.banthecheck.com
tshad wrote:
> Scuse me.
>
> Your post pointed me to that web site, which is why I posted it here.
>
>> IE-specific newsgroup:
>> news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general
>
>
> Your pointing me to the website didn't help me at all. It just mentioned
> that there may have been lots of errors on the page.
>
> The fact that it found a bunch of errors on the site doesn't explain why
> the
> page works on 2 of my desktops at work and not on my laptop or my desktop
> at
> home - even after I upgrade to the latest of both IE and FireFox.
>
>> Asked/Answered in WinXP General hours ago:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/browse_frm/thread/2c195dc02090e3b4/
>>
>> If you must make identical posts to multiple newsgroups, please
>> cross-post
>> one (1) message to all of them. Thank you.
>> Multiposting vs Crossposting:
>> http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>>
>> tshad wrote:
>>> I am having a problem running a website on my laptop. I have this
>>> problem
>>> on both IE and FireFox - both the newest versions.
Michel Doucet
caressé son clavier pour nous dire dans le message suivant:
> There *are* /lots/ of CSS errors on the page: You need to correct them
> for I to display the page correctly.
CSS errors ?
"The document located at <http://jquery.com/> was successfully checked
as XHTML 1.0 Strict. This means that the resource in question identified
itself as "XHTML 1.0 Strict" and that we successfully performed a formal
validation using an SGML, HTML5 and/or XML Parser(s) (depending on the
markup language used)."
This website works very well with ff on Linux
--
Utiliser le butineur, le courriéleur, le lecteur de nouvelles
et le SE avec lesquels vous vous sentez le plus sécurisé ... ;)
Posted via www.individual.net
http://mdoucet.wordpress.com/
tshad
"Daave" <da...@example.com> wrote in message
news:O7szDD9X...@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> tshad wrote:
>> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23rYrR$3XKHA...@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Guess again!
>>>
>> Not sure what you mean by that.
>
> He probably meant that the hypothesis that CSS is not validated is
> incorrect.
>
> Still there are apparently 27 errors, which could explain why some
> browsers are having problems with that page.
Except that these 27 errors would be the same on the machines at work with
the same browser that work fine.
Tom
tshad
> [crosspost to WinXP General]
>
>> Your pointing me to the website didn't help me at all. It just mentioned
>> that there may have been lots of errors on the page.
>
> There *are* /lots/ of CSS errors on the page: You need to correct them for
> I to display the page correctly.
This isn't my page??
I can't correct them.
Also, these same errors would be there at work as well but the pages work
fine there.
Why would they work at work and not on my laptop with the SAME browser?
Thanks,
Tom
Paul
>
> This isn't my page??
>
> I can't correct them.
>
> Also, these same errors would be there at work as well but the pages work
> fine there.
>
> Why would they work at work and not on my laptop with the SAME browser?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom
You can use Wireshark, to collect a trace of all packets sent
and received by your attempt to render that page. Once you
stop the capture, you can save the trace for later. The trace
file (perhaps a .pcap) can then be reloaded later for analysis.
You may spot differences in what the client and server
do in each case. It could be a difference in a client
security setting, a difference in the client identification
information sent to the server, or some other difference
between the two setups.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireshark
Collect traces from both machines and then compare them.
Paul
Averelll
> Bonjour/soir, le Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:17:25 -0500, *PA Bear [MS MVP]* a
> caressé son clavier pour nous dire dans le message suivant:
>
>> There *are* /lots/ of CSS errors on the page: You need to correct them
>> for I to display the page correctly.
>
> CSS errors ?
> "The document located at <http://jquery.com/> was successfully checked
> as XHTML 1.0 Strict. This means that the resource in question identified
> itself as "XHTML 1.0 Strict" and that we successfully performed a formal
> validation using an SGML, HTML5 and/or XML Parser(s) (depending on the
> markup language used)."
>
> This website works very well with ff on Linux
>
troll international aux oreilles d'âne ?
Robert Aldwinckle
"Paul" <nos...@needed.com> wrote in message news:hd6865$tef$1...@aioe.org...
> You can use Wireshark, to collect a trace of all packets sent
> and received by your attempt to render that page.
Or, easier, provided the site tolerates a proxy, Fiddler2.
> Collect traces from both machines and then compare them.
Ditto. And Fiddler's capture allows the sessions to be replayed,
so potentially you could replay a session from a problem computer
on a non-problem computer.
---
Michel Doucet
clavier pour nous dire dans le message suivant:
>>> There *are* /lots/ of CSS errors on the page: You need to correct them
>>> for I to display the page correctly.
>>
>> CSS errors ?
>> "The document located at <http://jquery.com/> was successfully checked
>> as XHTML 1.0 Strict. This means that the resource in question
>> identified itself as "XHTML 1.0 Strict" and that we successfully
>> performed a formal validation using an SGML, HTML5 and/or XML Parser(s)
>> (depending on the markup language used)."
>>
>> This website works very well with ff on Linux
>>
> Vous n'avez pas honte de vous tripoter la nouille en public monsieur le
> troll international aux oreilles d'âne ?
Some *technical* advices to solve this problem which is an IE issue ?
Averelll
> Bonjour/soir, le Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:56:51 +0100, *Averelll* a caressé son
> clavier pour nous dire dans le message suivant:
>
>>>> There *are* /lots/ of CSS errors on the page: You need to correct them
>>>> for I to display the page correctly.
>>> CSS errors ?
>>> "The document located at <http://jquery.com/> was successfully checked
>>> as XHTML 1.0 Strict. This means that the resource in question
>>> identified itself as "XHTML 1.0 Strict" and that we successfully
>>> performed a formal validation using an SGML, HTML5 and/or XML Parser(s)
>>> (depending on the markup language used)."
>>>
>>> This website works very well with ff on Linux
>>>
>> Vous n'avez pas honte de vous tripoter la nouille en public monsieur le
>> troll international aux oreilles d'âne ?
>
> Some *technical* advices to solve this problem which is an IE issue ?
>
>
impudique est un réponse technique monsieur le troll incurable.
Michel Doucet
Coud you be so polite to answer in the language of this newsgroup ? ...
so the readers will be able to see what idiot you are !
Averelll
> Bonjour/soir, le Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:03:57 +0100, *Averelll* a caressé son
> clavier pour nous dire dans le message suivant:
>
>> Michel Doucet a écrit :
>>> Bonjour/soir, le Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:56:51 +0100, *Averelll* a caressé
>>> son clavier pour nous dire dans le message suivant:
>>>
>>>>>> There *are* /lots/ of CSS errors on the page: You need to correct
>>>>>> them for I to display the page correctly.
>>>>> CSS errors ?
>>>>> "The document located at <http://jquery.com/> was successfully
>>>>> checked as XHTML 1.0 Strict. This means that the resource in question
>>>>> identified itself as "XHTML 1.0 Strict" and that we successfully
>>>>> performed a formal validation using an SGML, HTML5 and/or XML
>>>>> Parser(s) (depending on the markup language used)."
>>>>>
>>>>> This website works very well with ff on Linux
>>>>>
>>>> Vous n'avez pas honte de vous tripoter la nouille en public monsieur
>>>> le troll international aux oreilles d'âne ?
>>> Some *technical* advices to solve this problem which is an IE issue ?
>>>
>>>
>> Depuis des années vous croyez encore que votre tripotage de nouille
>> impudique est un réponse technique monsieur le troll incurable.
>
> Coud you be so polite to answer in the language of this newsgroup ? ...
> so the readers will be able to see what idiot you are !
>
polluez ?
Daave
> "Daave" <da...@example.com> wrote in message
> news:O7szDD9X...@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Still there are apparently 27 errors, which could explain why some
>> browsers are having problems with that page.
>
> Except that these 27 errors would be the same on the machines at work
> with the same browser that work fine.
Browsers rarely display Web pages identically. Some are more forgiving
than others with respect to errors.
If the browsers are the same, then settings, updates/patches, and/or
plug-ins/add-ons would be a factor.
Daave
> Bonjour/soir, le Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:03:57 +0100, *Averelll* a
>
>> Michel Doucet a �crit :
>>> Bonjour/soir, le Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:56:51 +0100, *Averelll* a
>>>
>>>>>> There *are* /lots/ of CSS errors on the page: You need to correct
>>>>>> them for I to display the page correctly.
>>>>> CSS errors ?
>>>>> "The document located at <http://jquery.com/> was successfully
>>>>> checked as XHTML 1.0 Strict. This means that the resource in
>>>>> question identified itself as "XHTML 1.0 Strict" and that we
>>>>> successfully performed a formal validation using an SGML, HTML5
>>>>> and/or XML Parser(s) (depending on the markup language used)."
>>>>>
>>>>> This website works very well with ff on Linux
>>>>>
>>>> Vous n'avez pas honte de vous tripoter la nouille en public
>>>
>>> Some *technical* advices to solve this problem which is an IE issue
>>> ?
>>>
>>>
>> impudique est un r�ponse technique monsieur le troll incurable.
>
> Coud you be so polite to answer in the language of this newsgroup ?
> ... so the readers will be able to see what idiot you are !
ROFL
Looks like you have your own personal troll, Michael, ;-)
Michel Doucet
clavier pour nous dire dans le message suivant:
>>> Depuis des années vous croyez encore que votre tripotage de nouille
>>> impudique est un réponse technique monsieur le troll incurable.
>>
>> Coud you be so polite to answer in the language of this newsgroup ? ...
>> so the readers will be able to see what idiot you are !
>
> ROFL
>
> Looks like you have your own personal troll, Michael, ;-)
Yeah I know "he" is like a morpion which sticks to the testicles (french
proverb) ;)
PA Bear [MS MVP]
tshad
I don't have anything special in them.
Also, on the machine it works on, it takes about 1 or 2 seconds to display.
On the machines it doesn't apply the styles on, it takes about 30 seconds.
Tom
Dan
"tshad" <t...@dslextreme.com> wrote in message
news:ewBsZTFY...@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u4W8wpB...@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> [crosspost to WinXP General]
>>
>>> Your pointing me to the website didn't help me at all. It just
>>> mentioned
>>> that there may have been lots of errors on the page.
>>
>> There *are* /lots/ of CSS errors on the page: You need to correct them
>> for I to display the page correctly.
>
> This isn't my page??
>
> I can't correct them.
>
> Also, these same errors would be there at work as well but the pages work
> fine there.
>
> Why would they work at work and not on my laptop with the SAME browser?
>
Have you got something on your laptop blocking access to
http://static.jquery.com ? The CSS files for jquery.com are loaded from
static.jquery.com, and if that site is blocked then the laptop won't load
the CSS files and it look awful.
--
Dan
Dan
"Michel Doucet" <mi...@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:7ln7okF...@mid.individual.net...
> Bonjour/soir, le Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:17:25 -0500, *PA Bear [MS MVP]* a
> caressé son clavier pour nous dire dans le message suivant:
>
>> There *are* /lots/ of CSS errors on the page: You need to correct them
>> for I to display the page correctly.
>
> CSS errors ?
> "The document located at <http://jquery.com/> was successfully checked
> as XHTML 1.0 Strict. This means that the resource in question identified
> itself as "XHTML 1.0 Strict" and that we successfully performed a formal
> validation using an SGML, HTML5 and/or XML Parser(s) (depending on the
> markup language used)."
>
> This website works very well with ff on Linux
So you only validated the XHTML then, not the CSS.
27 errors and 183 warnings in the CSS according to the W3C CSS validation
service.
Looks like most of the errors are workarounds for browser handling
(specifically Mozilla extensions, which are for Firefox).
--
Dan