In theory-> CAL = Client Access License. If it's a *CLIENT* accesing the
server... it cannot mean the server accesing the server. Just don't send me
the lawers this way. :-)
My $0.02,
--
-Javier
<< SBS ROCKS !!! >>
"Brian Hannigan" <anon...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:EDF67284-0CA7-492F...@microsoft.com...
"Javier Gomez" <javier...@remove.this.bit.engineer.com> wrote in message
news:eqCVdONn...@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
SBS *does* restrict the number of connections to the server... I'm just
talking about the actual server session.
--
-Javier
<< SBS ROCKS !!! >>
"user" <us...@user.com> wrote in message
news:%23S00CSd...@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
From: "John Menter [MS]" <jme...@online.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: Licensing again, as I still don't see it working...
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 17:25:57 -0800
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
=======================================
RWW over the internet is going to either be used by an account that needs a
user CAL associated with it, or the machine that is accessing the RWW will
need a device CAL. The moment that a user account is distinguished over the
internet, that is when the CAL is needed.
You can have up to two users or devices administering the server software
without needing CALs. So, basically if the administrator account only
administers the server then a CAL is not needed. But if the administrator
account is used as a regular work account then it will need a CAL. You can
rename the administrator account and that renamed account has the same
restrictions.
You can reassign a CAL from one account to another as long as it is
permanent. This should handle the corruption problem.
These are my personal understandings of the EULA (I am not an official
licensing representative). For things that do not make sense or things you
want to confirm, I would imagine that the best thing to do is call MS and
speak to a licensing official.
=======================================
Ray Fong
Microsoft SBS Product Support
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
>From: "Javier Gomez" <javier...@remove.this.bit.engineer.com>
>References: <EDF67284-0CA7-492F...@microsoft.com>
<eqCVdONn...@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
<#S00CSdn...@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
>Subject: Re: User CAL's & the Administrator account
>Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 23:57:01 -0500
>Lines: 62
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
>Message-ID: <eMjWXkdn...@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
>Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs
>NNTP-Posting-Host: pcp01500812pcs.univde01.de.comcast.net 68.82.181.78
>Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
>Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:10231
>X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs