Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

A specific windows update - won't install

0 views
Skip to first unread message

bestbapu

unread,
Apr 28, 2007, 2:22:03 PM4/28/07
to
I have an active notification that windows wants to install a single update.
Every time I try the installer runs but 5 minutes later I'm notified that the
same update is ready to install. I've rebooted several times.

How can I make the install happen. I seem to remember a way to update the
local history (in some text file) to stop this from happening.

Help!!??!!

Dave Patrick

unread,
Apr 28, 2007, 2:52:06 PM4/28/07
to
Try asking them here. x-posted to: public.windowsupdate

http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx?dg=microsoft.public.windowsupdate&cat=en_US_56d1dd45-de9e-4fc5-9bc1-2d1d0de6daee&lang=en&cr=US

--

Regards,

Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
http://www.microsoft.com/protect

clyde...@discussions.microsoft.com

unread,
Apr 28, 2007, 3:26:02 PM4/28/07
to
I have the same problem man!I have installed that thing more then 2000 times
but every time it says that there are new updates to install.
I can't find help anywhere!

bestbapu

unread,
Apr 28, 2007, 4:54:03 PM4/28/07
to
Clyde,

This solved my specific problem for:
"Security Update for Microsoft Data Access Components (KB8322483)"

I did this:
Download MDAC 2.8 from Microsoft's website and install it. This newer
version will stop the continuous update prompt.

Ed.

To Old To . . .

unread,
May 8, 2007, 11:13:00 PM5/8/07
to
Sometime it gets a hitch in it get along.

What I do when this happens, is I see what update that it is trying to
install, i.e. kbxxxxxxx, then I go to Microsoft downloads and look for tht
particular update and install it. This generally fixes it. Not sure what the
difference is, but I have done this on many computers and it works.

Hope this helps you.

Herbert Eppel

unread,
May 9, 2007, 12:47:01 AM5/9/07
to
On 09.05.2007 04:13 UK Time, To Old To . . . wrote:
> Sometime it gets a hitch in it get along.
>
> What I do when this happens, is I see what update that it is trying to
> install, i.e. kbxxxxxxx, then I go to Microsoft downloads and look for tht
> particular update and install it. This generally fixes it. Not sure what the
> difference is, but I have done this on many computers and it works.

I currently have this problem with
Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1 (KB867801)

When I try and follow your suggestion, i.e. download and install it from
<http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=06F49985-F19F-4B50-A75F-7636D8BEE576&displaylang=en>,
I'm told "This update requires Internet Explorer 6.0 Service Pack to
be installed.

However, I already have IE6 SP1 installed!

Now what?

--
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk

To Old To . . .

unread,
May 9, 2007, 12:59:01 AM5/9/07
to
Look in help and about and see if it shows the sp1 installed. It is possible
that sp1 didn't install correctly, or that your system restored to a state
that it needs to be re-installed. If that is the case, that is why it isn't
installing.

Herbert Eppel

unread,
May 9, 2007, 1:14:18 AM5/9/07
to
On 09.05.2007 05:59 UK Time, To Old To . . . wrote:
> Look in help and about and see if it shows the sp1 installed. It is possible
> that sp1 didn't install correctly, or that your system restored to a state
> that it needs to be re-installed. If that is the case, that is why it isn't
> installing.

Thanks - yes, it's installed alright as I said, and I'm pretty sure it
isn't corrupted, but who knows? :-)

Here's a screenshot: <http://www.HerbEppel.de/Screenshots/IE6.png>

Should I try and reinstall IE6 SP1 anyway?

--
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk

To Old To . . .

unread,
May 9, 2007, 1:30:00 AM5/9/07
to
Yes, it won't hurt anything. You are getting the error that it thinks it
isn't installed. Re-installing it should fix the error.
What I would do first though is
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/822798/en-us
follow step 9, also stop BITS Service

Basically delete the Windows\SoftwareDistribution folder

Then re-do the install.

Ant

unread,
May 9, 2007, 1:33:46 AM5/9/07
to

Same here, man! Someone else as well. See
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18303288 thread. :( Note the
update is from 2004. It's very old. I think MS screwed up!
--
"... Let's go pour these (peas from a can) onto an anthill I've found."
--Strong Bad (Witness the Cheatar! episode)
/\___/\
/ /\ /\ \ Phillip (Ant) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
| |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links (AQFL): http://aqfl.net
\ _ / Remove ANT from e-mail address: phi...@earthlink.netANT
( ) or ANT...@zimage.com
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on his home computer.

Herbert Eppel

unread,
May 9, 2007, 1:58:35 AM5/9/07
to
On 09.05.2007 06:30 UK Time, To Old To . . . wrote:
> Yes, it won't hurt anything. You are getting the error that it thinks it
> isn't installed. Re-installing it should fix the error.
> What I would do first though is
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/822798/en-us
> follow step 9, also stop BITS Service
>
> Basically delete the Windows\SoftwareDistribution folder
>
> Then re-do the install.

Thanks. It all sounds rather involved.

By the way, I can't find "Step 9" - did you mean "Method 9"?

In any case, it looks as if MS screwed up with this one, as suggested by
Ant, don't you think?

--
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk

Herbert Eppel

unread,
May 9, 2007, 2:08:27 AM5/9/07
to
On 09.05.2007 06:33 UK Time, Ant wrote:

> Same here, man! Someone else as well. See
> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18303288 thread. :( Note the
> update is from 2004. It's very old. I think MS screwed up!

I think you might be right.

How do you intend to rectify the situation? By following "To Old To"'s
advice?

--
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk

Ant

unread,
May 9, 2007, 2:38:53 AM5/9/07
to
On 5/8/2007 11:08 PM PT, Herbert Eppel wrote:

> On 09.05.2007 06:33 UK Time, Ant wrote:
>
>> Same here, man! Someone else as well. See
>> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18303288 thread. :( Note the
>> update is from 2004. It's very old. I think MS screwed up!
>
> I think you might be right.
>
> How do you intend to rectify the situation? By following "To Old To"'s
> advice?

I think we will have to wait for MS to fix it or give us a workaround.
For now, we ignore it. :)
--
"Busy as ants hurrying orcs were digging, digging lines of deep trenches
in a huge ring, just out of bowshot from the walls;" --The Return of the
King (book)

Herbert Eppel

unread,
May 9, 2007, 2:47:02 AM5/9/07
to
On 09.05.2007 07:38 UK Time, Ant wrote:
> On 5/8/2007 11:08 PM PT, Herbert Eppel wrote:
>
>> On 09.05.2007 06:33 UK Time, Ant wrote:
>>
>>> Same here, man! Someone else as well. See
>>> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,18303288 thread. :( Note the
>>> update is from 2004. It's very old. I think MS screwed up!
>>
>> I think you might be right.
>>
>> How do you intend to rectify the situation? By following "To Old To"'s
>> advice?
>
> I think we will have to wait for MS to fix it or give us a workaround.
> For now, we ignore it. :)

Good plan, although the Windows Update icon in the system tray is kind
of difficult to ignore.

I think for the time being I'll include in my (extensive) PS Tray
Factory 'hide list' - incidentally, I can thoroughly recommend this
software for hiding stubborn system tray icons - see
http://www.pssoftlab.com/

--
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk

Ant

unread,
May 9, 2007, 3:48:09 AM5/9/07
to

Herbert Eppel

unread,
May 9, 2007, 4:00:33 AM5/9/07
to
0 new messages