I don't see how anyone could have any objections to that sort of upgrade!
I don't think we should have a dedicated computer to run the 3D
printers, especially one that sizeable. We are constrained by space
and power as much as it is, so if it's worth having, we should replace
Lovelace with this.
But, it's a rackmount machine? How loud is it? How much power does it
draw in comparison to Lovelace?
--
Russ Garrett
ru...@garrett.co.uk
We have a dedicated machine for the laser cutter because primarily
because it has to run Windows XP. Similar case for the Stratasys,
currently.
The Makerbot software runs fine on Linux, so I don't see why it needs
to be separated from what is currently Lovelace.
Also: you understand my practical points but you have no response to them?
> In relation to this I also believe that both the makerbot and
> stratisys are better placed in the workshop/ dirty room, especially
> because of noise but also because of the mess they tend to make from
> waste material/ burning plastic smell.
I don't think the noise or smell are particularly objectionable. I
think both machines (plus any computers which drive them) will suffer
from being in the dirty shop. Especially the Makerbot, which is
temperamental enough as it is.
--
Russ Garrett
ru...@garrett.co.uk
Though I understand your issue with some of the practical aspects of
this Russ, I have for some time been advocating a dedicated machine,
we have one for the laser cutter and I see nothing but benefits for
having one for the 3D printers as long as it can be accomidated for
space wise.
Ah, now we're talking. Getting the laser cutter computer out of the
workshop is a good idea.
> In fact couldnt we setup a "fabbing corner" in the workshop for the
> cutter/failbot/stratasys?
Again, I'm concerned about the dust affecting the 3D printers, and
dust pervades everywhere in the workshop.
>>The main challenge is stretching a USB cable and display back to a
>> server somewhere.
>
> Run it over cat5, you can even buy converters if no one can be arsed
> to solder one
This is a good idea, but we will need a proper extender, and they are
not that cheap. That said, the power saving could pay for the cost of
extenders over a couple of months.
--
Russ Garrett
ru...@garrett.co.uk
On 12 July 2011 09:39, tom <bollo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In fact couldnt we setup a "fabbing corner" in the workshop for the> cutter/failbot/stratasys?Again, I'm concerned about the dust affecting the 3D printers, and
dust pervades everywhere in the workshop.
The title of this thread is 'Dedicated computer for 3D printers'.
Would sharing a server between the fab machines solve whatever problem
it is that the dedicated computer is meant to solve ? (I recall
something about locking).
Is a fast computer with big fans etc. an improvement over 3 smaller
computers, not all of which need to be switched on ?
If the shared machine needs multiple displays & keyboards to handle 3
simultaneous users, can they be adequately managed and linked to the
correct VMs/applications or will it be a maintenance nightmare ?