(1) A word that repeat several times in the input session;
(2) Several words that belong to a same topic (topic words).
Or it could be a fact involving the computer-selected native language
word's concept.
The computer can display a small portion of the whole material and
leave a link to the whole material at the end.
Rather than insert educational information after two words (suppose
these two words are not adjacent) respectively in a sentence to be
read, we would probably better insert these two pieces of educational
information TOGETHER AT THE END OF THE ORIGINAL SENTENCE.
What's more, words that "have a trend of rapid surge" should also be
considered because their "rate of increase" is significant.
On Apr 29, 2:51 am, Yao Ziyuan <yaoziy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> can be done by annotating some or all words in native language
> documents with corresponding foreign language equivalents via a Web
> browser plugin.
- Main elements of a sentence, such as the subject, the verb, the
object, are more likely to recur.
- Elements introduced by 'a' or 'an' or 'some' or other indefinite
articles are likely to recur.
- Elements heavily modified by adjectives/adverbs/clauses/non-finite
verbs are likely to recur.
- Elements with certain "hint words" in their contexts are likely to
recur.
- Elements heavily modified by adjectives/adverbs/clauses/non-finite
verbs.
- Elements that repeat.
- Elements (keywords) occurring in the article's first paragraph (the
abstract) or each paragraph's first sentence.
In this case, the modifiers are also interesting.
On May 6, 2:25 pm, Yao Ziyuan <yaoziy...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 2:25 pm, Yao Ziyuan <yaoziy...@gmail.com> wrote:
On May 6, 2:25 pm, Yao Ziyuan <yaoziy...@gmail.com> wrote:
The rule of association promoting memorization can be exercised by
considering words that are literally, phonetically or semantically
similar/related to what the learner has already learned.
Secondly, relation words (verbs and adjectives/adverbs) mentioned for
the first time are also likely to recur, but not as probably.
See how many collocations and encyclopedic connections this word can
make with its context words.
On May 6, 2:19 pm, Yao Ziyuan <yaoziy...@gmail.com> wrote:
<catbooted> i got another interesting idea to measure the likelihood for
a word to recur.
* vishwin60|brb is now known as vishwin60
* Mr_Gustafson has joined #wikipedia
<catbooted> that is to see how many collocations (phrases) and
encyclopedic connections this word can make with its context words.
* Gwern has quit IRC (Remote closed the connection)
* After|away is now known as After-Midnight
<catbooted> if existing text contains: a wolf, a bunch of cabbage and a
goat...
<Nihiltres> sounds like an interesting statistical project.
<catbooted> guess what, the goat is more likely to recur
<catbooted> because the goat has two connections to context words "wolf"
and "cabbage"
<Dquestions> Hi Billy Jean
<catbooted> the other two words each only have one connection to other words
* Gwern has joined #wikipedia
<Mr_Gustafson> My clone wears a brown shirt, and I seduce him when
theres no-one around / mano-e-mano / on a bed of nails / bring it on
like a storm, till I knock the wind out of his sails / And we don't make
eye -- con -- tact, when we have run-in's in town / just a barely polite
nod, and nervous stares towards the ground
<catbooted> so the goat is twice more likely to recur
* ProjektTHOR has quit IRC (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
* Majorly has quit IRC (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
<Crazytales2> Mr_Gustafson: te vas faire enculer ?
<Mr_Gustafson> NP - TV On The Radio - "I Was A Lover"
* Majorly has joined #wikipedia
* zombieninja666 is stupid and can't figure out how what catbooted is
saying works
<zombieninja666> a wolf, a bunch of cabbage and a goat were walking down
the road. The wolf ate the cabbage.
<catbooted> ...
<zombieninja666> That made no sense.
<zombieninja666> (What I did)
* columbo has quit IRC (Connection timed out)
<zombieninja666> Also I am aware you didn't say it was definite.
<zombieninja666> Just, twice more likely.
<zombieninja666> But...
* zombieninja666 is stupid
<Nihiltres> oo it works...
<Nihiltres>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nihiltres/Userboxes/Super_contrib_meta
<Nihiltres> dare you to check out the source
* zombieninja666 screams
If a pronoun occurs and the computer confidently knows what it's
referring to, it can also be a place after where the English
equivalent for its referent can be inserted.
If some word A occurs and is annotated, and some text later you want
to re-annotate A but there isn't a recurrence of A here, but there is
a word B nearby and from the previous context you know a relation
between A and B. Then you can annotate B with the relation between B
and A and then A and its English equivalent.
The best way to start a new topic is to relate the new topic to an
existing topic which already receives popular attention, rather than
putting it forward in isolation.