Lisphp

As much as I enjoyed using Lisphp, I'm unfortunately going to have to go back to PHP because

I created a pull request for let*: https://github.com/lisphp/lisphp/pull/21 Jonathan On Wednesday,

Oh, actually if I use array_replace_recursive (defined as "arr"), I can do this: (arr foo (

I have doubled the size of the Lisphp literature by writing three blog posts: Lisphp at Ning -

Please check my 'cond*'(but 'else' syntax is not include) and show another solution

thank you. I checked github/dahlia.... but not working... I try github/lunant... It works. I'll

I updated the README file to mention its requirements. You can pronounce Lisphp as you want. Frankly

Be default, Lisphp uses an applicative order for functions. But you can emulate a normal order with

Thanks for your bug report. This is a REPL's value representation problem. There's an ad hoc

Sorry, I mistyped: s/propert/proper/. On Jul 7, 4:32 pm, Hong MinHee <dah...@lunant.net> wrote:

I made the group, the place for discussion about Lisphp. So, let's talk about Lisphp! Thanks,