May be, with recent discussions on format, this could be interesting:
http://www.sdml.info/projects/srcml/
Cheers,
Offray
> May be, with recent discussions on format, this could be interesting:
>
> http://www.sdml.info/projects/srcml/
A few years ago I asked the Python community whether there would be
any interest in an xml-ized Python source format. At that time, there
was not.
Naturally, I have some sympathy with the srcml, but my guess is that
it is not likely to catch on as a source format.
Edward
> A few years ago I asked the Python community whether there would be
> any interest in an xml-ized Python source format. At that time, there
> was not.
>
> Naturally, I have some sympathy with the srcml, but my guess is that
> it is not likely to catch on as a source format.
srcml seems like something more relevant to your "pylint" research.
> srcml seems like something more relevant to your "pylint" research.
In what way?
Edward
It's about annotating source code with semantic meaning. You can
handle srcML like AST tree I guess.
Not that it would make things easier than just dealing with AST.