JSR 347 discussions

Contact owners and managers

1–30 of 56

Welcome to JSR-347: Data Grids for the Java Platform!

This mailing list is the primary forum for discussions on the JSR 347 specification, on which the expert group (EG) members and interested third-parties can participate in the development of the standard. It also allows the community to follow the progress and development of Data Grids for the Java Platform.

Our homepage is https://github.com/datagrids/spec/wiki and you can find out more about how the EG works there.

Current Status

Currently the EG for the JSR forming. We plan to keep the EG formation phase open until the middle of July 2011. At this point we will start with an agenda of items to discuss, APIs to brainstorm over, and the like.

If you know of any other interested parties who would add value to this JSR by being a part of the EG, please do not hesitate to nominate them or encourage them to nominate themselves.

0 selected

5/4/15

Data Placement (Data Center)

Improve data placement among the different back-ends, with the goal of minimizing communications and

unread,

Data Placement (Data Center)

Improve data placement among the different back-ends, with the goal of minimizing communications and

5/4/15

Tristan Tarrant

1/22/15

JSR-347 has been withdrawn

Dear EG, effective from Jan 6th, 2015, JSR-347 Data Grids for the Java Platform has been withdrawn

unread,

JSR-347 has been withdrawn

Dear EG, effective from Jan 6th, 2015, JSR-347 Data Grids for the Java Platform has been withdrawn

1/22/15

Mircea Markus, … Manik Surtani11

12/10/14

JSR-347 leadership

Thanks for the credit, Ben. I'm happy to participate in the group as an expert, but leading the

unread,

JSR-347 leadership

Thanks for the credit, Ben. I'm happy to participate in the group as an expert, but leading the

12/10/14

Mircea Markus, Alex Snaps3

11/1/14

Ping? On Thursday, October 23, 2014, Alex Snaps <alex....@gmail.com> wrote: Hey Mircea, How

unread,

Ping? On Thursday, October 23, 2014, Alex Snaps <alex....@gmail.com> wrote: Hey Mircea, How

11/1/14

9/30/14

Hi, Anyone of you at JavaOne? Would be great to meet for chat/beer/etc. There's also a JSR-347

unread,

Hi, Anyone of you at JavaOne? Would be great to meet for chat/beer/etc. There's also a JSR-347

9/30/14

Mircea Markus, Alex Snaps4

4/15/14

Eventually Consistent API

Warning: Am kinda playing the devil's advocate below... On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Mircea

unread,

Eventually Consistent API

Warning: Am kinda playing the devil's advocate below... On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Mircea

4/15/14

4/11/14

meeting tomorrow?

Let's not have the meeting today then. On Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:23:59 PM UTC+1, Mircea

unread,

meeting tomorrow?

Let's not have the meeting today then. On Thursday, April 10, 2014 6:23:59 PM UTC+1, Mircea

4/11/14

Alex Snaps, … Rick Hightower16

4/8/14

Recurring meeting?

I missed the last one. Visiting kid who went away to college. (Kid still thinks they know it all.

unread,

Recurring meeting?

I missed the last one. Visiting kid who went away to college. (Kid still thinks they know it all.

4/8/14

Alex Snaps, … Mircea Markus4

4/8/14

I'll submit something on JSR347 later on this week. Manik there already ;) On Tuesday, April 8,

unread,

I'll submit something on JSR347 later on this week. Manik there already ;) On Tuesday, April 8,

4/8/14

3/31/14

Meeting minutes (March 2014)

Hi, Thanks everybody for making it to the meeting, below are the minutes I took: http://goo.gl/rWVtOQ

unread,

Meeting minutes (March 2014)

Hi, Thanks everybody for making it to the meeting, below are the minutes I took: http://goo.gl/rWVtOQ

3/31/14

Joseph Ottinger, … Rick Hightower7

3/28/14

Major concern over 347's raison d'etre

107 flashbacks... I remember the conversations around why they did not implement Map (ConcurrentMap).

unread,

Major concern over 347's raison d'etre

107 flashbacks... I remember the conversations around why they did not implement Map (ConcurrentMap).

3/28/14

Joseph Ottinger

3/28/14

Formal proposal for features changes

In light of thinking about jsr107 earlier... I would like to offer that we retract JSR107 compliance

unread,

Formal proposal for features changes

In light of thinking about jsr107 earlier... I would like to offer that we retract JSR107 compliance

3/28/14

3/28/14

#jsr347 on freenode...

... is seriously lonely btw. Since we have such much fun communicating with each other today, I

unread,

#jsr347 on freenode...

... is seriously lonely btw. Since we have such much fun communicating with each other today, I

3/28/14

Rich Midwinter, … Mircea Markus6

3/28/14

On Thursday, April 18, 2013 3:51:10 PM UTC+1, Zacarias wrote: I think group API should attack data

unread,

On Thursday, April 18, 2013 3:51:10 PM UTC+1, Zacarias wrote: I think group API should attack data

3/28/14

Rick Hightower, … Ben.Cotton31

3/27/14

Feature list on github... very early comments

Musing Openly: Another thing we might want to talk about is the notion of JGRID's adaptability to

unread,

Feature list on github... very early comments

Musing Openly: Another thing we might want to talk about is the notion of JGRID's adaptability to

3/27/14

Joseph Ottinger, Mircea Markus3

3/26/14

Mercury has been committed.

It's just the name I was giving to possible implementation approaches. I was naming them after

unread,

Mercury has been committed.

It's just the name I was giving to possible implementation approaches. I was naming them after

3/26/14

Cotton, Ben, … Alex Snaps7

3/26/14

JSR-347 (JGRID) Kick-off meeting

Awesome! Thanks... On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Mircea Markus <mircea...@gmail.com>

unread,

JSR-347 (JGRID) Kick-off meeting

Awesome! Thanks... On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Mircea Markus <mircea...@gmail.com>

3/26/14

Alex Snaps, … Rick Hightower10

3/19/14

JSR 107 is now...

+1 On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Jim Bethancourt <jimbeth...@gmail.com> wrote: Once

unread,

JSR 107 is now...

+1 On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Jim Bethancourt <jimbeth...@gmail.com> wrote: Once

3/19/14

Cotton, Ben, … Alex Snaps5

3/6/14

Software AG seated on 347

107 is out for voting on final approval ballot with the JCP EC until March 17th On Thu, Mar 6, 2014

unread,

Software AG seated on 347

107 is out for voting on final approval ballot with the JCP EC until March 17th On Thu, Mar 6, 2014

3/6/14

2/24/14

igniting 347 activity

Mircea, et. al., is it fair to say that 347 is "unofficially" waiting for either/both of 1.

unread,

igniting 347 activity

Mircea, et. al., is it fair to say that 347 is "unofficially" waiting for either/both of 1.

2/24/14

ben.c...@alumni.rutgers.edu, Mircea Markus2

2/24/14

Peter Lawrey JSR-347 EG membership request

Thanks Ben! +1. On Sunday, February 23, 2014 7:06:52 PM UTC, ben.c...@alumni.rutgers.edu wrote: Hi

unread,

Peter Lawrey JSR-347 EG membership request

Thanks Ben! +1. On Sunday, February 23, 2014 7:06:52 PM UTC, ben.c...@alumni.rutgers.edu wrote: Hi

2/24/14

Zacarias, Talip Ozturk3

4/19/13

Guys.. please accept my sincere apologies. I thought the email is sent to the hazelcast mailing group

unread,

Guys.. please accept my sincere apologies. I thought the email is sent to the hazelcast mailing group

4/19/13

Manik Surtani, Ben.Cotton=MorganStanley.com4

4/18/13

Feature Leads, part II

Hi Manik and EG, I have been building (off-line) detailed content that can very soon (ie couple of

unread,

Feature Leads, part II

Hi Manik and EG, I have been building (off-line) detailed content that can very soon (ie couple of

4/18/13

Manik Surtani, … ben.c...@morganstanley.com10

2/1/13

High level features and "feature leads"

@Ben - remember, everyone in the EG will contribute to each feature as well, so you still could take

unread,

High level features and "feature leads"

@Ben - remember, everyone in the EG will contribute to each feature as well, so you still could take

2/1/13

1/31/13

When JSR347 is complete what products will comply with it?

Hi again, I'd like to ask a question is: When JSR347 is complete what products will comply with

unread,

When JSR347 is complete what products will comply with it?

Hi again, I'd like to ask a question is: When JSR347 is complete what products will comply with

1/31/13

1/30/13

The State of the JSR Blog Post

Hi everybody, I'd just like to introduce myself. My names Ged Byrne and I'm a member of the

unread,

The State of the JSR Blog Post

Hi everybody, I'd just like to introduce myself. My names Ged Byrne and I'm a member of the

1/30/13

Manik Surtani, Ben.Cotton=MorganStanley.com2

1/30/13

Officially joining this expert group

Thanks. Application to join now in process. On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:27:24 PM UTC-5, Manik

unread,

Officially joining this expert group

Thanks. Application to join now in process. On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:27:24 PM UTC-5, Manik

1/30/13

Manik Surtani, … Joseph Ottinger4

1/30/13

Re: Timeline for developing RI and TCK?

And mercury certainly serves as a basis for experimentation. The idea was to name things after

unread,

Re: Timeline for developing RI and TCK?

And mercury certainly serves as a basis for experimentation. The idea was to name things after

1/30/13

Jim Bethancourt, … Brian Martin6

1/29/13

Transport mechanisms

I agree that the communications protocol should be an implementation choice. On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at

unread,

Transport mechanisms

I agree that the communications protocol should be an implementation choice. On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at

1/29/13

Jim Bethancourt, … Joseph Ottinger4

1/29/13

Asynchronous API thoughts & questions

I'm thinking it wouldn't affect method signatures, at least not in the DataGrid API. I'm

unread,

Asynchronous API thoughts & questions

I'm thinking it wouldn't affect method signatures, at least not in the DataGrid API. I'm

1/29/13

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu