RAD-54

[kspak...@web.de]

Hi IPF Developers,

I'm curios to know if there any plans to add support for IHE
transaction RAD-54 soon ?

Thx Karsten

[Dmytro Rud]

Hi Karsten,

this transaction corresponds to XDS.a ITI-15 with additional
constraints regarding message context, so you can try to use the IPF's
xds-iti15 component. I will check whether the IPF's simplified XDS
data model and validators can be reused in the context of RAD
transactions as well.

Note also that both ITI-15 and RAD-54 transactions are deprecated.
Their counterparts in XDS.b and XDS-I.b profiles are ITI-41 and
RAD-68, respectively. I would prefer to invest efforts in these new
transactions instead of the deprecated ones.

Kind Regards,
Dmytro

2011/8/5 kspak...@web.de <kspak...@web.de>:

[kspak...@web.de]

Hi Dmytro,

thx for fast response. Sure you are right.
Would be great if IPF could support RAD-68.

BR Karsten

On 5 Aug., 09:39, Dmytro Rud <dmytro....@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> this transaction corresponds to XDS.a ITI-15 with additional
> constraints regarding message context, so you can try to use the IPF's
> xds-iti15 component.  I will check whether the IPF's simplified XDS
> data model and validators can be reused in the context of RAD
> transactions as well.
>
> Note also that both ITI-15 and RAD-54 transactions are deprecated.
> Their counterparts in XDS.b and XDS-I.b profiles are ITI-41 and
> RAD-68, respectively.  I would prefer to invest efforts in these new
> transactions instead of the deprecated ones.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Dmytro
>

> 2011/8/5 kspakow...@web.de <kspakow...@web.de>: