Just one minor correction here. Its Tinospora without an "i" after
'r'.
Tinospora Miers Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 2, 7(37): 38. 1851
Regards
Pankaj
On Nov 8, 8:45 pm, Gurcharan Singh <
singh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Rashida ji for uploading long awaited plant, and thanks Vijayasankar
> ji for validating it
>
> --
> Dr. Gurcharan Singh
> Retired Associate Professor
> SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
> Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
> Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Pankaj Kumar <
sahanipan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks a lot Vijay for the details.
> > Regards
> > Pankaj
>
> > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Vijayasankar <
vijay.botan...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Yes, Rashida ji's plant is T. sinensis. Almost the entire plant is
> > pubescent
> > > (often softly hirsute on stems), a distint feature to easily distinguish
> > > from T. cordifolia, which is glabrous throughout.
> > > Regards
>
> > > Vijayasankar
>
> > > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Gurcharan Singh <
singh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >> Thanks Rashida ji
> > >> It would be a good addition once Shrikant ji and Vijayasankar ji confirm
> > >> it as T. sinensis.
> > >> eFlora of Pakistan and eFlora of China have really confused me.
>
> > >> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Dinesh Valke <
dinesh.va...@gmail.com>