problem installing ICA-AtoM virtual appliance

50 views
Skip to first unread message

wenkeadam

unread,
Mar 6, 2011, 12:07:54 AM3/6/11
to ICA-AtoM Users
I followed the instructions at http://ica-atom.org/docs/index.php?title=ICA-AtoM_virtual_appliance,
and the Sun Virtual Box installed correctly.

But when I unzipped the ica-atom.vmserver-r8856.tgz file I found the
following files inside the ubuntu-vmserver folder:
ica-atom-r8856.vmx and tmppxUih6.vmdk

But in the instructions it says the files should be ubuntu.vmx and
disk0.vmdk

Anyway, I tried to configure the new machine with tmppxUih6.vmdk, but
the process failed during bootup, saying there was a fatal error.

Am I using the wrong tgz file?

Jesús García Crespo

unread,
Mar 7, 2011, 4:30:30 AM3/7/11
to ica-ato...@googlegroups.com, wenkeadam
Hi,

On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:07 AM, wenkeadam <wenk...@gmail.com> wrote:
But when I unzipped the ica-atom.vmserver-r8856.tgz file I found the
following files inside the ubuntu-vmserver folder:
ica-atom-r8856.vmx and tmppxUih6.vmdk

But in the instructions it says the files should be ubuntu.vmx and
disk0.vmdk

I fixed that, thank you.
 
Anyway, I tried to configure the new machine with tmppxUih6.vmdk, but
the process failed during bootup, saying there was a fatal error.

That is weird. I have just tried in in VirtualBox 4.0.4 and it works perfectly. Have you verified the MD5 hash? Maybe, there was a problem during the transfer and the file is broken. The hash is 807b6aad3ffc04d2d03ff73fb20c61e7. You can try to download the virtual appliance again or compare its hashes with md5sum tool to check that your download is correct.

Regards,

--
Jesús García Crespo,
Software Engineer, Artefactual Systems Inc.
http://www.artefactual.com | +1.604.527.2056

ale.chiaretti

unread,
Mar 10, 2011, 4:26:09 PM3/10/11
to ICA-AtoM Users
Hi,
I think I have a similar problem.
I downolwded ica-atom.vmserver-r8856.tgz and I verified the hash. The
2 files are ica-atom-r8856.vmx and tmppxUih6.vmdk.
I configure the new machine (in VirtualBox 4.0.4) with tmppxUih6.vmdk,
but the bootup never ends.
I waited 40 minutes and the write "Starting up ..." never changes.
I tried the same in 2 pc: one with WinXP, one with WinVista.

Suggestions?
Thank in advanced.

Alessandro Chiaretti


On Mar 7, 10:30 am, Jesús García Crespo <je...@artefactual.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 6:07 AM, wenkeadam <wenkea...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > But when I unzipped the ica-atom.vmserver-r8856.tgz file I found the
> > following files inside the ubuntu-vmserver folder:
> > ica-atom-r8856.vmx and tmppxUih6.vmdk
>
> > But in the instructions it says the files should be ubuntu.vmx and
> > disk0.vmdk
>
> I fixed that, thank you.
>
> > Anyway, I tried to configure the new machine with tmppxUih6.vmdk, but
> > the process failed during bootup, saying there was a fatal error.
>
> That is weird. I have just tried in in VirtualBox 4.0.4 and it works
> perfectly. Have you verified the MD5 hash? Maybe, there was a problem during
> the transfer and the file is broken. The hash
> is 807b6aad3ffc04d2d03ff73fb20c61e7. You can try to download the virtual
> appliance again or compare its hashes with
> md5sum<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Md5sum> tool

Rob Astin

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 8:30:13 AM4/13/11
to ICA-AtoM Users
Hello everyone,

I've also stumbled over the same hurdle trying to install the virtual
appliance on Windows 7. The virtual machine stalls with 'starting
up...' and does not provide any indication of what the problem might
be.

Any suggestions?

Thank you,

Rob

Robert Astin

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 11:54:10 AM4/13/11
to ica-ato...@googlegroups.com
It seems that rolling back to an earlier version of Virtual Box does the trick (3.2 in this case).  No idea why it wouldn't work with 4.0.4.

Rob

Jesús García Crespo

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 1:01:30 PM4/13/11
to ica-ato...@googlegroups.com, Robert Astin, Austin
Hi Robert,

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Robert Astin <roba...@gmail.com> wrote:
It seems that rolling back to an earlier version of Virtual Box does the trick (3.2 in this case).  No idea why it wouldn't work with 4.0.4.

Thank you for your report. I've filed a new issue (1975). 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages